wrigs
New Member
Posts • 497
Likes • 417
July 2017
|
Highly suspect... , by wrigs on Sept 9, 2017 19:52:15 GMT 1, Claiming to be a Banksy no COA, anyone more in the know than me familiar with signatures?
Think I can guess the answer.
Claiming to be a Banksy no COA, anyone more in the know than me familiar with signatures? Think I can guess the answer. |
|
aml
New Member
Posts • 258
Likes • 280
August 2017
|
Highly suspect... , by aml on Sept 9, 2017 20:39:34 GMT 1, No COA = No buy
No COA = No buy
|
|
Pattycakes
Junior Member
Posts • 1,379
Likes • 422
June 2007
|
Highly suspect... , by Pattycakes on Sept 9, 2017 20:56:37 GMT 1, Well it's fake so just forget about it
Well it's fake so just forget about it
|
|
andyroo0312
Junior Member
Posts • 2,174
Likes • 1,675
July 2011
|
Highly suspect... , by andyroo0312 on Sept 10, 2017 3:09:13 GMT 1, Yep I am saying fake unless B was smashed. What was the image.?
Yep I am saying fake unless B was smashed. What was the image.?
|
|
wrigs
New Member
Posts • 497
Likes • 417
July 2017
|
Highly suspect... , by wrigs on Sept 10, 2017 9:35:45 GMT 1, Claiming to be an image of Underground Terror tactics (As I say way way under what it's value would be). Being sold via an auction house, I assume they take no responsibility in the authenticity of the items they sell?
Claiming to be an image of Underground Terror tactics (As I say way way under what it's value would be). Being sold via an auction house, I assume they take no responsibility in the authenticity of the items they sell?
|
|
carbonfiend
New Member
Posts • 26
Likes • 44
October 2013
|
Highly suspect... , by carbonfiend on Sept 18, 2017 12:14:14 GMT 1, Interesting side note to this & FWIW I bought an un - signed Napalm way back when from POW it's numbered as unsigned but when it arrived it had a signature on it. For yrs I thought nothing of it but when the value of prints & the need for COA's arose I took it to PC & they examined it & verified it as a genuine signiture & I have the COA of it as a signed print.
Which interestingly means there aren't 150 signed copies of Napalm but 151 ?
Interesting side note to this & FWIW I bought an un - signed Napalm way back when from POW it's numbered as unsigned but when it arrived it had a signature on it. For yrs I thought nothing of it but when the value of prints & the need for COA's arose I took it to PC & they examined it & verified it as a genuine signiture & I have the COA of it as a signed print.
Which interestingly means there aren't 150 signed copies of Napalm but 151 ?
|
|
|
|
Highly suspect... , by Coach on Sept 18, 2017 12:54:45 GMT 1, Interesting side note to this & FWIW I bought an un - signed Napalm way back when from POW it's numbered as unsigned but when it arrived it had a signature on it. For yrs I thought nothing of it but when the value of prints & the need for COA's arose I took it to PC & they examined it & verified it as a genuine signiture & I have the COA of it as a signed print. Which interestingly means there aren't 150 signed copies of Napalm but 151 ?
Lucky bugger!
What a nice anecdote. Congratulations.
Interesting side note to this & FWIW I bought an un - signed Napalm way back when from POW it's numbered as unsigned but when it arrived it had a signature on it. For yrs I thought nothing of it but when the value of prints & the need for COA's arose I took it to PC & they examined it & verified it as a genuine signiture & I have the COA of it as a signed print. Which interestingly means there aren't 150 signed copies of Napalm but 151 ? Lucky bugger! What a nice anecdote. Congratulations. |
|
