|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by onemandown72 on May 22, 2008 17:02:56 GMT 1, Will be queueing for a cup of tea in a cafe down in Broadstairs
Will be queueing for a cup of tea in a cafe down in Broadstairs
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 17:06:27 GMT 1, trying to keep the hype down maybe. not saying peoples opinions aren't true but if thsi print has work from many great artists including banksy, nick walker and sickboy why wouldnt people want to own such a rare piece. anything released by banks and nw gets sold out. From what i know Banksy has not contributed to the print.
he will have contributed. he wouldnt let a gallery print one of his images on any random image. he would want to see it first and on top they wouldnt be allowed to print his image without his permission. he would have seen it.
trying to keep the hype down maybe. not saying peoples opinions aren't true but if thsi print has work from many great artists including banksy, nick walker and sickboy why wouldnt people want to own such a rare piece. anything released by banks and nw gets sold out. From what i know Banksy has not contributed to the print. he will have contributed. he wouldnt let a gallery print one of his images on any random image. he would want to see it first and on top they wouldnt be allowed to print his image without his permission. he would have seen it.
|
|
|
spirit
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,956
Likes โข 516
August 2007
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by spirit on May 22, 2008 17:16:52 GMT 1, From what i know Banksy has not contributed to the print. he will have contributed. he wouldnt let a gallery print one of his images on any random image. he would want to see it first and on top they wouldnt be allowed to print his image without his permission. he would have seen it.
hmm - not sure seeing/approving it is the same thing as contributing to it.
From what i know Banksy has not contributed to the print. he will have contributed. he wouldnt let a gallery print one of his images on any random image. he would want to see it first and on top they wouldnt be allowed to print his image without his permission. he would have seen it. hmm - not sure seeing/approving it is the same thing as contributing to it.
|
|
|
whats that to do with the print ?
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by Guest on May 22, 2008 18:06:19 GMT 1, Banksy is a Laz artist
Banksy is a Laz artist
|
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 18:08:11 GMT 1, where did they post that ?
where did they post that ?
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by Guest on May 22, 2008 18:12:52 GMT 1, where did they post that ?
read the thread.
Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts
where did they post that ? read the thread. Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 18:13:16 GMT 1, where did they post that ?
It was originally posted on WK
where did they post that ? It was originally posted on WK
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by dogant on May 22, 2008 18:30:15 GMT 1, Outside the ultralounge now - less than 20 in the Q
Outside the ultralounge now - less than 20 in the Q
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 18:40:33 GMT 1, where did they post that ? read the thread. Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts
doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it.
where did they post that ? read the thread. Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it.
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 18:41:07 GMT 1, Outside the ultralounge now - less than 20 in the Q
for the preview ?? what time does it start ??
Outside the ultralounge now - less than 20 in the Q for the preview ?? what time does it start ??
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 18:52:42 GMT 1, read the thread. Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it.
I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this
From the Laz statement: "None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form"
Seems to indicate he didn't contribute
read the thread. Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it. I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this From the Laz statement: " None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form" Seems to indicate he didn't contribute
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 18:58:38 GMT 1, i didnt read it, i just read your statement 'Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts' which is totally different from that comment. It doesnt matter... maybe nick walker hand finishing and signing
i didnt read it, i just read your statement 'Banksy did not know this print was being sold by Dreweatts' which is totally different from that comment. It doesnt matter... maybe nick walker hand finishing and signing
|
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by orangematt on May 22, 2008 18:59:51 GMT 1, doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it. I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this From the Laz statement: " None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form" Seems to indicate he didn't contribute
This is the situation as far as i know -
He did contribute to the extent that permission was given to include his image - that was the first one printed by screen one so holds special significance - he did not do any hand finishing or signing ( that i know of anyway !! ) - and the earlier comments were to do with the fact that he did not know these were going to be sold at Selfridges .(edit : also i suppose he may not have known that they were to be sold with Dreweatt - but certainly knew that they were being printed by Screenone to be sold ! )
doesnt mean he didnt contribute. i still want it. I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this From the Laz statement: " None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form" Seems to indicate he didn't contribute This is the situation as far as i know - He did contribute to the extent that permission was given to include his image - that was the first one printed by screen one so holds special significance - he did not do any hand finishing or signing ( that i know of anyway !! ) - and the earlier comments were to do with the fact that he did not know these were going to be sold at Selfridges .(edit : also i suppose he may not have known that they were to be sold with Dreweatt - but certainly knew that they were being printed by Screenone to be sold ! )
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 19:01:03 GMT 1, also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!!
also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!!
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 19:01:14 GMT 1, I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this From the Laz statement: " None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form" Seems to indicate he didn't contribute This is the situation as far as i know - He did contribute to the extent that permission was given to include his image - that was the first one printed by screen one so holds special significance - he did not do any hand finishing or signing ( that i know of anyway !! ) - and the earlier comments were to do with the fact that he did not know these were going to be sold at Selfridges .
A very misleading statement by Laz then I feel!!
I wonder about you some times, firstly the soup can poster thing, now this From the Laz statement: " None of our artists have contributed to them in any way shape or form" Seems to indicate he didn't contribute This is the situation as far as i know - He did contribute to the extent that permission was given to include his image - that was the first one printed by screen one so holds special significance - he did not do any hand finishing or signing ( that i know of anyway !! ) - and the earlier comments were to do with the fact that he did not know these were going to be sold at Selfridges . A very misleading statement by Laz then I feel!!
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 19:02:04 GMT 1, also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!!
Is it not in conjunction with Dreweatts though?
also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!! Is it not in conjunction with Dreweatts though?
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 19:12:29 GMT 1, also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!! Is it not in conjunction with Dreweatts though?
not really. they are just making a print release, they are nothing to do with dreweatts at the end of the day, dreweatts arnt involved with the print....they havnt advertised the print therefore its not to do with them !
Let them hang needs to clarify this!!
also why would let them hang lie? they wouldnt want to make up somehting liek that otherwise it would make them look like untrustworthy w@nkers!
no one has made this whole thing clear. LAZ did not mention anything about the print only the auction itself...everyone knew none of the laz artists contributed their own work.
also just relized that the print is being released by let them hang. not dreawetts. so its a totally different situation ? ?? !!! Is it not in conjunction with Dreweatts though? not really. they are just making a print release, they are nothing to do with dreweatts at the end of the day, dreweatts arnt involved with the print....they havnt advertised the print therefore its not to do with them ! Let them hang needs to clarify this!! also why would let them hang lie? they wouldnt want to make up somehting liek that otherwise it would make them look like untrustworthy w@nkers! no one has made this whole thing clear. LAZ did not mention anything about the print only the auction itself...everyone knew none of the laz artists contributed their own work.
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by orangematt on May 22, 2008 19:13:36 GMT 1, ummm.. this is a confusing situation really isnt it ...
for sure he knew that the print was being done - definitely knew it was going to be sold as an edition - certainly had to give permission for his rude copper to be included - may not have known or enquired about anything to do with the selling side of things in regards to who would physically sell them ( if anyone other than LetThemHAng was involved in that side of thiongs) and where they would be sold !
As far as i know LetThemHang is the seller , distributor... it is being sold while Dreweatt have their auction pieces on show at Selfridges, at Selfridges .. and then as an online release through the LTH website ..
I know no more details about any of the business arrangements...
So , i guess Laz statment about no involvement could be seen as correct , but there is involvement in this print ..!!
ummm.. this is a confusing situation really isnt it ...
for sure he knew that the print was being done - definitely knew it was going to be sold as an edition - certainly had to give permission for his rude copper to be included - may not have known or enquired about anything to do with the selling side of things in regards to who would physically sell them ( if anyone other than LetThemHAng was involved in that side of thiongs) and where they would be sold !
As far as i know LetThemHang is the seller , distributor... it is being sold while Dreweatt have their auction pieces on show at Selfridges, at Selfridges .. and then as an online release through the LTH website ..
I know no more details about any of the business arrangements...
So , i guess Laz statment about no involvement could be seen as correct , but there is involvement in this print ..!!
|
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 19:21:50 GMT 1, yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts
yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts
|
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by Guest on May 22, 2008 19:23:21 GMT 1, The entire edition is 200, 100 of which will be hand-finished for Dreweatts, the other 100 being available from the site in June.
The entire edition is 200, 100 of which will be hand-finished for Dreweatts, the other 100 being available from the site in June.
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 19:26:10 GMT 1, it is being sold there but its nothing to do with them. the prints were produced by let them hang.
it is being sold there but its nothing to do with them. the prints were produced by let them hang.
|
|
jellya
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,738
Likes โข 335
November 2006
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by jellya on May 22, 2008 19:29:18 GMT 1, yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts Gawd PLEASE READ THE LTH ANNOUNCEMENT..
CAREFULLY.
You're tying yourself in knots man.
yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts Gawd PLEASE READ THE LTH ANNOUNCEMENT.. CAREFULLY. You're tying yourself in knots man.
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 19:39:54 GMT 1, yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts Gawd PLEASE READ THE LTH ANNOUNCEMENT.. CAREFULLY. You're tying yourself in knots man.
Indeed, but sometimes people only hear and see what they want to hear and see...
yer but its nothing to do with dreweatts Gawd PLEASE READ THE LTH ANNOUNCEMENT.. CAREFULLY. You're tying yourself in knots man. Indeed, but sometimes people only hear and see what they want to hear and see...
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 22, 2008 19:58:40 GMT 1, im just saying what i can work out.
im just saying what i can work out.
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by manchestermike on May 22, 2008 20:03:37 GMT 1, im just saying what i can work out.
Let Them Hang is producing a print for Dreweatts.
In my mind that's "in conjunction"
im just saying what i can work out. Let Them Hang is producing a print for Dreweatts. In my mind that's "in conjunction"
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by mammal2 on May 22, 2008 21:33:53 GMT 1, Was going to buy it, then saw it in the flesh and thought meh. I normally snap shit up. not for me, but may people will like it! SPQR tag on it too!
Was going to buy it, then saw it in the flesh and thought meh. I normally snap shit up. not for me, but may people will like it! SPQR tag on it too!
|
|
|
Are you going to be queuing on saturday ?, by grantb on May 23, 2008 10:43:49 GMT 1, im gonna go up early today have a look at the print then decide.
im gonna go up early today have a look at the print then decide.
|
|