|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Armagideon Times on Jul 9, 2020 10:11:25 GMT 1,
Looking for £3500
Prices do not include shipping or PayPal fees. located in the UK, East Yorkshire and those able to collect will be prioritised. I could even meet up or deliver if not too far, I can take more photos of the piece, so if you are interested please ask.
limited edition of 5
COA in hand
kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased
stay safe and enjoy
Looking for £3500 Prices do not include shipping or PayPal fees. located in the UK, East Yorkshire and those able to collect will be prioritised. I could even meet up or deliver if not too far, I can take more photos of the piece, so if you are interested please ask. limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy |
|
sean1397
New Member
🗨️ 800
👍🏻 306
May 2019
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by sean1397 on Jul 9, 2020 11:24:05 GMT 1, Hi
What are the dimensions of the Martin piece?
Also is it an edition of 5 or 5aps?
Thanks
Sean
Hi
What are the dimensions of the Martin piece?
Also is it an edition of 5 or 5aps?
Thanks
Sean
|
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by trastevere on Jul 9, 2020 11:25:14 GMT 1, PMed you.
PMed you.
|
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Armagideon Times on Jul 9, 2020 12:04:18 GMT 1, ill pull out the piece the today/tonight, and measure it for you, i believe its 41x 61cm
its an edition of 5 Artist proofs,
ill pull out the piece the today/tonight, and measure it for you, i believe its 41x 61cm
its an edition of 5 Artist proofs,
|
|
toutie04
New Member
🗨️ 14
👍🏻 3
June 2020
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by toutie04 on Jul 9, 2020 12:06:42 GMT 1, ill pull out the piece the today/tonight, and measure it for you, i believe its 41x 61cm its an edition of 5 Artist proofs,
Hello I am interested in this piece. Let me know what you are thinking for a price.
ill pull out the piece the today/tonight, and measure it for you, i believe its 41x 61cm its an edition of 5 Artist proofs, Hello I am interested in this piece. Let me know what you are thinking for a price. |
|
toutie04
New Member
🗨️ 14
👍🏻 3
June 2020
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by toutie04 on Jul 9, 2020 12:07:32 GMT 1, Hello I am interested in this piece, let me know what you are thinking for a price.
Hello I am interested in this piece, let me know what you are thinking for a price.
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Deleted on Jul 10, 2020 12:16:33 GMT 1, nice old piece
nice old piece
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,773
June 2009
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by met on Jul 10, 2020 14:05:27 GMT 1,  another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy
In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me).
The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre.
While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue* that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs.
But let's imagine I actually did believe Whatson had talent.
If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering.
another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. |
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
🗨️ 6,197
👍🏻 9,458
October 2015
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Dive Jedi on Jul 10, 2020 14:59:42 GMT 1, another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering.
But the lady is a person on her own....
Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending.
another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. |
|
duggyfresh
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,368
👍🏻 1,043
February 2013
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by duggyfresh on Jul 10, 2020 15:04:14 GMT 1, another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering.
Your answer could just be "because I like it" or that would be mine ha.
another old school piece, looking for interest and thoughts on pricing for this artist proof limited edition of 5 COA in hand kept in smoke and pet free home since purchased stay safe and enjoy In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. Your answer could just be "because I like it" or that would be mine ha. |
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Extra Ball on Jul 10, 2020 15:07:44 GMT 1, In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. Your answer could just be "because I like it" or that would be mine ha.
In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. Your answer could just be "because I like it" or that would be mine ha. you haven't had her husband as president for 5 years my friend |
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,773
June 2009
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by met on Jul 11, 2020 15:25:48 GMT 1, In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending.
It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted.
But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband.
Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple.
And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following:
When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity.
A more extreme case to better illustrate:
If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly.
The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending.
In my search for common ground, we can agree on "old" (despite 2013 feeling like yesterday to me). The point on which we happen to disagree is artistic calibre. While I'm reassured about the fact my opinion of some artists has evolved over time, that opinion has been consistently low when it comes to Martin Whatson. And even by his standards, I would still argue * that The Cover Up is poorly executed — whether we're talking about the originals or the different print editions and artist proofs. But let's imagine I actually did believe What son had talent. If somebody were to then ask, "Why is there a naked picture of Sarkozy's wife on your wall?", it's a question I'd have difficulty answering. You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending. |
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
🗨️ 6,197
👍🏻 9,458
October 2015
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Dive Jedi on Jul 11, 2020 15:57:38 GMT 1, You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending.
Also I have a hard time believing the average Joe and Jane would be visiting your house.
But if that's how you would describe your visitors, that's fine by me.
So for the same reason - being a fashion enthusiast - you wouldn't hang a signed photograph by Dave Stewart of Carla Bruni on your wall, in fear of remarks by your visitors ?
You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending. It's a bit weak, met. Also I have a hard time believing the average Joe and Jane would be visiting your house. But if that's how you would describe your visitors, that's fine by me. So for the same reason - being a fashion enthusiast - you wouldn't hang a signed photograph by Dave Stewart of Carla Bruni on your wall, in fear of remarks by your visitors ? |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by tab1 on Jul 11, 2020 17:53:34 GMT 1, You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Karen are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Karen were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending.
You are of course entitled to your opinion of Martin. But the lady is a person on her own.... Calling someone "the husband of" is rather condescending. It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Karen are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Karen were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending. |
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by Deleted on Jul 11, 2020 20:48:12 GMT 1, I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is.
I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is. Me too. It’s mind boggling |
|
FkNewYork
New Member
🗨️ 516
👍🏻 188
January 2018
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by FkNewYork on Jul 12, 2020 12:01:36 GMT 1, I enjoy martin artwork , but this one is not one of then in my opinion,
I enjoy martin artwork , but this one is not one of then in my opinion,
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,773
June 2009
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by met on Jul 12, 2020 13:32:24 GMT 1, It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending. It's a bit weak, met. Also I have a hard time believing the average Joe and Jane would be visiting your house. But if that's how you would describe your visitors, that's fine by me. So for the same reason - being a fashion enthusiast - you wouldn't hang a signed photograph by Dave Stewart of Carla Bruni on your wall, in fear of remarks by your visitors ?
Whether it's moving the goalposts or these are just follow-ups, I'm okay in principle to continue. But before doing so, it would be useful to learn where we are now regarding your original comment:
You had suggested my "Sarkozy's wife" reference was rather condescending. I then confirmed those words were chosen to highlight a separate issue, and that Carla Bruni wasn't the target of any condescension by me.
Are we good on that specific first point?
[I ask because the reply, "It's a bit weak", felt vague. It wasn't clear for me if my assurance to you had been accepted at face value. Or if instead you believed I was being untruthful (and that I had in fact actually meant to be condescending towards Bruni).]
It's understandable how that part of my comment could be misinterpreted. But if we can agree on the importance of intent, then rest assured there was no suggestion by me that Carla Bruni isn't her own person. I'm a fashion photography enthusiast who's kept an eye on her career(s) since her early days of modelling. Long before she got married. Long before I started paying any attention her husband. Despite my being wary and often critical of society's all-too-common tendency of assuming guilt by association, the nature of the relationship between two individuals (along with their identities) does hold relevance. In this respect, loose acquaintances or business contacts would not be comparable, for example, to a married couple. And so the reference I made to "Sarkozy's wife" was deliberate. What it hopefully serves to emphasise is the following: When somebody is the spouse of a current or former world leader, that status is significant. It will typically be at the forefront of the public's mind. Moreover, it will typically be accompanied by a great deal of baggage — often to the point of eclipsing the spouse's own singularity. A more extreme case to better illustrate:If shown a photograph of Melania Trump, be it recent or from 30 years ago, average Joe and Jane are more likely to see the current US President's wife than an autonomous individual. And if Joe or Jane were to then hang that photo on their wall at home, many other people would (rightly or wrongly, and because of the weighty association) judge or question them accordingly. The open acknowledgement of this reality is not something I would describe as condescending. It's a bit weak, met. Also I have a hard time believing the average Joe and Jane would be visiting your house. But if that's how you would describe your visitors, that's fine by me. So for the same reason - being a fashion enthusiast - you wouldn't hang a signed photograph by Dave Stewart of Carla Bruni on your wall, in fear of remarks by your visitors ? Whether it's moving the goalposts or these are just follow-ups, I'm okay in principle to continue. But before doing so, it would be useful to learn where we are now regarding your original comment: You had suggested my "Sarkozy's wife" reference was rather condescending. I then confirmed those words were chosen to highlight a separate issue, and that Carla Bruni wasn't the target of any condescension by me. Are we good on that specific first point? [I ask because the reply, "It's a bit weak", felt vague. It wasn't clear for me if my assurance to you had been accepted at face value. Or if instead you believed I was being untruthful (and that I had in fact actually meant to be condescending towards Bruni).] |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by tab1 on Jul 12, 2020 13:57:33 GMT 1, I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is.
It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often .
I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is. It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often . |
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by acaipride on Jul 12, 2020 14:50:10 GMT 1, I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is. It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often .
still a panda, non super flipp price
I'm always amazed by how bad his stuff is. It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often . still a panda, non super flipp price |
|
FkNewYork
New Member
🗨️ 516
👍🏻 188
January 2018
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by FkNewYork on Jul 12, 2020 15:59:46 GMT 1, It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often . stillIn Search Ofa panda, non super flipp price
It is hit and miss , some works are good and some are poor , some people buy on the belief that they are easy to flip and are enticed by the vault sales pricings but usually when private sales Are made inline The works do not sell often . stillIn Search Ofa panda, non super flipp price They are for sale in norway website for 1500 |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by tab1 on Jul 13, 2020 6:13:45 GMT 1, I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view
My opinion of his Top five best works are
Chinook hearts
Eternal reflection
One small stEp
High up
Enpointe
Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst
I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view
My opinion of his Top five best works are
Chinook hearts
Eternal reflection
One small stEp
High up
Enpointe
Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst
|
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by zacksz 123123 on Jul 13, 2020 11:33:04 GMT 1, I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view My opinion of his Top five best works are Chinook hearts Eternal reflection One small stEp High up Enpointe Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst
Strong disagree.
Chinook one of the sloppiest stencils. (Would be like people thinking bomb hugger was executed well and on banksys top 5)
Eternal reflection / one small step are both just stock photo images.
Equilibrium - takes the cake for best dancer. Even passe looks better than en pointe (actual female)
High up - just a landscaped print that’s not hand finished. Several other landscapes and boats that also just put this print with the rest.
I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view My opinion of his Top five best works are Chinook hearts Eternal reflection One small stEp High up Enpointe Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst Strong disagree. Chinook one of the sloppiest stencils. (Would be like people thinking bomb hugger was executed well and on banksys top 5) Eternal reflection / one small step are both just stock photo images. Equilibrium - takes the cake for best dancer. Even passe looks better than en pointe (actual female) High up - just a landscaped print that’s not hand finished. Several other landscapes and boats that also just put this print with the rest. |
|
|
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by tab1 on Jul 13, 2020 14:15:15 GMT 1, I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view My opinion of his Top five best works are Chinook hearts Eternal reflection One small stEp High up Enpointe Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst Strong disagree. Chinook one of the sloppiest stencils. (Would be like people thinking bomb hugger was executed well and on banksys top 5) Eternal reflection / one small step are both just stock photo images. Equilibrium - takes the cake for best dancer. Even passe looks better than en pointe (actual female) High up - just a landscaped print that’s not hand finished. Several other landscapes and boats that also just put this print with the rest.
If you look at the history and sales timings and the demand it created at the time these images in roughly the order created the demand that is seen here today
Chinook hearts was unsold edition of 100 prints from 1-3 years Previous , someone posted The chinook hearts on the £50 thread and it sold out with in 1-2 days , high up editions followed that did not sell out for years previously then eternal reflection followed direct from whatson £125 each then years later gp did variants / aps etc £500-£700 then gp months or years later released pp /aps £900 then the constant releases with gp whipped up a frenzy at the time .
So for the artists development of career and collectors these are the desirable pieces
All the different dancers were copyright infringements so can not really attribute to the artist
I think there was a thread ages ago with his best and worst art to have a comparative view My opinion of his Top five best works are Chinook hearts Eternal reflection One small stEp High up Enpointe Some one else can make a list of the 5 worst Strong disagree. Chinook one of the sloppiest stencils. (Would be like people thinking bomb hugger was executed well and on banksys top 5) Eternal reflection / one small step are both just stock photo images. Equilibrium - takes the cake for best dancer. Even passe looks better than en pointe (actual female) High up - just a landscaped print that’s not hand finished. Several other landscapes and boats that also just put this print with the rest. If you look at the history and sales timings and the demand it created at the time these images in roughly the order created the demand that is seen here today Chinook hearts was unsold edition of 100 prints from 1-3 years Previous , someone posted The chinook hearts on the £50 thread and it sold out with in 1-2 days , high up editions followed that did not sell out for years previously then eternal reflection followed direct from whatson £125 each then years later gp did variants / aps etc £500-£700 then gp months or years later released pp /aps £900 then the constant releases with gp whipped up a frenzy at the time . So for the artists development of career and collectors these are the desirable pieces All the different dancers were copyright infringements so can not really attribute to the artist |
|
sean1397
New Member
🗨️ 800
👍🏻 306
May 2019
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by sean1397 on Jul 14, 2020 11:43:33 GMT 1, Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like
Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it
To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it.
Sean
Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like
Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it
To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it.
Sean
|
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by acaipride on Jul 14, 2020 11:55:13 GMT 1, Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean
maybe..gp should just charge aftermarket skyrocket prices on his next drop. say 1600 for the unsellable 1500-1700 aftermarket pandas
Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean maybe..gp should just charge aftermarket skyrocket prices on his next drop. say 1600 for the unsellable 1500-1700 aftermarket pandas |
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,773
June 2009
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by met on Jul 14, 2020 17:37:56 GMT 1, Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean
Allow me to challenge you on a point:
When assessing the artwork criticisms in this thread, do you really attribute all of these to "jealousy"?
Surely there exists other possible explanations that are more credible.
Can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not a jealous person. And even if you meant to say "envy", the latter has never been a motivator for any of my posts.
Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean Allow me to challenge you on a point: When assessing the artwork criticisms in this thread, do you really attribute all of these to "jealousy"? Surely there exists other possible explanations that are more credible. Can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not a jealous person. And even if you meant to say "envy", the latter has never been a motivator for any of my posts. |
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by kylekeizer on Jul 14, 2020 22:09:13 GMT 1, Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean
You’re a fucking loser.
Never heard so much jealousy. if you don’t like Martins work and the skyrocketing prices don’t buy it To the poster what are you asking. Blind forum offers aren’t my thing but if you have a price I May pay it. Sean You’re a fucking loser. |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by tab1 on Jul 15, 2020 21:44:28 GMT 1, Skyrocketing 👍🌟
Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work
He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings
Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy?
Why would one be jealous?
Skyrocketing 👍🌟
Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work
He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings
Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy?
Why would one be jealous?
|
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by zacksz 123123 on Jul 17, 2020 12:01:17 GMT 1, Skyrocketing 👍🌟 Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy? Why would one be jealous?
Hard to take Sean seriously when he continues to buy up all of Martin whatson work still in 2020 assuming large profits on a form that was originally a banksy form.
I think he just forgets what real skyrocketing figures look like as we all remember the cost of banksy signed pieces and originals.
Skyrocketing 👍🌟 Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy? Why would one be jealous? Hard to take Sean seriously when he continues to buy up all of Martin whatson work still in 2020 assuming large profits on a form that was originally a banksy form. I think he just forgets what real skyrocketing figures look like as we all remember the cost of banksy signed pieces and originals. |
|
|
|
Martin Whatson, The Cover Up Print , by kylekeizer on Jul 17, 2020 12:43:00 GMT 1, Skyrocketing 👍🌟 Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy? Why would one be jealous? Hard to take Sean seriously when he is a huge, self obsessed asshat.
Fixed that for ya, buddy
Skyrocketing 👍🌟 Martins work is viewed subjectively , the artist does not explain his works and It is up to The viewers to make sense of the work He is one artist where his work can have many different meanings Constructive criticism displayed , have not read or viewed any posts on this thread that shows jealousy? Why would one be jealous? Hard to take Sean seriously when he is a huge, self obsessed asshat. Fixed that for ya, buddy |
|
