Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 12:55:36 GMT 1, Its ok, he says 'knock yourself out',he likes it. There we have it. Straight from the horse.
And it's mouth
Its ok, he says 'knock yourself out',he likes it. There we have it. Straight from the horse. And it's mouth |
|
jayTown
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,738
๐๐ป 1,213
February 2013
|
Just saw this on High Snobiety! F*ck me fair play. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 14:09:08 GMT 1, I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has.
Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck.
Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love.
Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is.
I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can.
I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has.
Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck.
Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love.
Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is.
I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 14:19:49 GMT 1, Banksy also said "Good artists copy", "great artists steal".
Banksy has copied and Sincura stole, which inspired Gonefellows.
Banksy also said "Good artists copy", "great artists steal".
Banksy has copied and Sincura stole, which inspired Gonefellows.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 14:20:00 GMT 1, Great to see the good work of mr Gonefellow has gone viral!! I shall be on hand with antibiotics 
For real though, Great work!
I'm sure Banksy is giving his team a kick in the arse that they did not think of that first. Expect a shady character to stop by in the middle of the night and use the code word: Glitter.
Great to see the good work of mr Gonefellow has gone viral!! I shall be on hand with antibiotics For real though, Great work! I'm sure Banksy is giving his team a kick in the arse that they did not think of that first. Expect a shady character to stop by in the middle of the night and use the code word: Glitter. |
|
Momo
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,034
๐๐ป 601
March 2014
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Momo on May 2, 2014 14:51:14 GMT 1, hahahaha
hahahaha
|
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 15:43:44 GMT 1, I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck.
Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can. 
COFFEE!!!!!.
I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck.
Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can. LOL P, well,there was this show called BOTI. COFFEE!!!!!. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 15:47:27 GMT 1, [/quote]LOL P, well,there was this show called BOTI.
COFFEE!!!!!.
[/quote]
There was?!?! Do tell.
Edit: forgot my winkie smiley
[/quote]LOL P, well,there was this show called BOTI. COFFEE!!!!!. [/quote] There was?!?! Do tell. Edit: forgot my winkie smiley |
|
kel
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,111
๐๐ป 511
October 2008
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by kel on May 2, 2014 15:56:12 GMT 1, Very Good Gonefellow. As mentioned on here you should look at producing a print of it. I am fairly confident you could shift 50 with no problem on this thread alone.
Very Good Gonefellow. As mentioned on here you should look at producing a print of it. I am fairly confident you could shift 50 with no problem on this thread alone.
|
|
Momo
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,034
๐๐ป 601
March 2014
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Momo on May 2, 2014 16:01:37 GMT 1, Ok well lets convince with numbers of those interested (peer pressure haha)
#1 Momo
Ok well lets convince with numbers of those interested (peer pressure haha)
#1 Momo
|
|
overend
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 593
๐๐ป 398
October 2013
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by overend on May 2, 2014 16:06:17 GMT 1, I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck. Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can.
Is this serious or have I missed one of the syndicates' in jokes? Banksy ripping off himself?
I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck. Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can. Is this serious or have I missed one of the syndicates' in jokes? Banksy ripping off himself? |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 16:49:15 GMT 1, I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck. Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can. Is this serious or have I missed one of the syndicates' in jokes? Banksy ripping off himself?
Actually I had been off the radar for ages and haven't even seen any of the stuff from New York. Pretty funny mistake I guess.
I have just searched BOTI New York images and 'voila'. In that case Gonefellows is a very naughty boy and should be punished.
Actually I like all like your take GF and think its a great gesture offering the image for everyone to print.
It is all starting to make sense now. Ignore all my posts before today. Its year 'Zero' for Slammer.
I am too lazy to read all of this thread to find out. So excuse me if this has been mentioned and it probably has. Banksy has just done a straight drawing of loads of cuddly toys in a cattle truck. Copying it from the person who originally came up with the idea, by driving a real truck full of toys around in a cattle truck. Thats the theft here. Not what Gonefellows has done. Similar I suppose to Banksys take on 'Winston Churchill', which I love. Gonefellows art is original IMO. If he wanted to print it and make some money from everyone that likes it I can't see where the problem is. I think is a great gesture offering the image for all to print. I would get your copies, while you can. Is this serious or have I missed one of the syndicates' in jokes? Banksy ripping off himself? I want so badly to be in the 'Syndicate'. If only. Actually I had been off the radar for ages and haven't even seen any of the stuff from New York. Pretty funny mistake I guess. I have just searched BOTI New York images and 'voila'. In that case Gonefellows is a very naughty boy and should be punished. Actually I like all like your take GF and think its a great gesture offering the image for everyone to print. It is all starting to make sense now. Ignore all my posts before today. Its year 'Zero' for Slammer. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 16:52:47 GMT 1, LOL.
You didnt miss much P.
LOL.
You didnt miss much P.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 20:25:10 GMT 1, Do NOT take this as legal advice (or view it as practice of law), but I'm pretty sure you CAN sell that print without violating copyright due to the way you've re-appropriated the images to turn it into social commentary. Essentially the same as parody; if you're conveying a new, unique message that uses source material b/c it depends on it for the point of social commentary, then you are usually outside of liability. If you do end up making one, I'd gladly take one off your hands. @ds111, parody is your only chance here to get away with this (conveying a new message, blah, blah)... Parody falls under "fair use". Sadly, previous court cases ruled that if parody was made or produced solely to make a profit, or in such quantity that it competes with original artist, it is not a "fair use". But then, that decision was revoked and claim was that even commercial parody that compete with original art is still "fair use" - www.artslaw.org/parody.htm So indeed, parody continues to be a fair use exception to copyright infringement, but this is for the US law (no idea for UK law) and if Banksy decide to summon at court of law, it all depends to the judge/court comprehension... And since you got already some press articles, etc.
Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself.
And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons.
Do NOT take this as legal advice (or view it as practice of law), but I'm pretty sure you CAN sell that print without violating copyright due to the way you've re-appropriated the images to turn it into social commentary. Essentially the same as parody; if you're conveying a new, unique message that uses source material b/c it depends on it for the point of social commentary, then you are usually outside of liability. If you do end up making one, I'd gladly take one off your hands. @ds111, parody is your only chance here to get away with this (conveying a new message, blah, blah)... Parody falls under "fair use". Sadly, previous court cases ruled that if parody was made or produced solely to make a profit, or in such quantity that it competes with original artist, it is not a "fair use". But then, that decision was revoked and claim was that even commercial parody that compete with original art is still "fair use" - www.artslaw.org/parody.htm So indeed, parody continues to be a fair use exception to copyright infringement, but this is for the US law (no idea for UK law) and if Banksy decide to summon at court of law, it all depends to the judge/court comprehension... And since you got already some press articles, etc. Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself. And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons. |
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 2, 2014 20:44:56 GMT 1, Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it.
Thats carte Blanche in my book.
Dont quote that in a book.
Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it.
Thats carte Blanche in my book.
Dont quote that in a book.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,946
๐๐ป 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Hairbland on May 2, 2014 22:04:11 GMT 1, Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it. Thats carte Blanche in my book. Dont quote that in a book.
How could he not? It's great commentary. And based on the legal wins by Richard Prince I'd say fair use,
I'd take a print, maybe a limited forum member edition.
Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it. Thats carte Blanche in my book. Dont quote that in a book. How could he not? It's great commentary. And based on the legal wins by Richard Prince I'd say fair use, I'd take a print, maybe a limited forum member edition. |
|
matp
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 501
๐๐ป 499
March 2013
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by matp on May 2, 2014 22:07:21 GMT 1, Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it. Thats carte Blanche in my book. Dont quote that in a book. How could he not? It's great commentary. And based on the legal wins by Richard Prince I'd say fair use, I'd take a print, maybe a limited forum member edition.
Someones wife told my neighbour that Banksy loves it. Thats carte Blanche in my book. Dont quote that in a book. How could he not? It's great commentary. And based on the legal wins by Richard Prince I'd say fair use, I'd take a print, maybe a limited forum member edition. Agreed!! |
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,946
๐๐ป 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Hairbland on May 2, 2014 22:08:32 GMT 1, All good and fun... But i want one of gonefellow 's prints Im going to go against the grain here and say its up to Mr. Fellow to do what he wants regardless of requests for prints etc., and personally I would rather he did something when he feels like it and keeps it witty and fresh as he so obviously has the talent to do, be that an original / Parody / Homage / prints or whatever. Its up to Mr. Fellow.
"Mr. Fellow" is so English sounding, like a Beatles song.
It's up to Mr Fellow, he needs some new socks...
All good and fun... But i want one of gonefellow 's prints Im going to go against the grain here and say its up to Mr. Fellow to do what he wants regardless of requests for prints etc., and personally I would rather he did something when he feels like it and keeps it witty and fresh as he so obviously has the talent to do, be that an original / Parody / Homage / prints or whatever. Its up to Mr. Fellow. "Mr. Fellow" is so English sounding, like a Beatles song. It's up to Mr Fellow, he needs some new socks... |
|
Momo
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,034
๐๐ป 601
March 2014
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Momo on May 3, 2014 0:17:00 GMT 1, I can trade socks if he wants!!!?
I can trade socks if he wants!!!?
|
|
matp
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 501
๐๐ป 499
March 2013
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by matp on May 3, 2014 0:20:27 GMT 1, I'll knit him a pair!! Don't know how to knit, but I'm willing to learn!!
I'll knit him a pair!! Don't know how to knit, but I'm willing to learn!!
|
|
matp
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 501
๐๐ป 499
March 2013
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by matp on May 3, 2014 0:21:12 GMT 1, Warm as toast they'll be!
Warm as toast they'll be!
|
|
matp
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 501
๐๐ป 499
March 2013
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by matp on May 3, 2014 0:22:11 GMT 1, Shit, its nearly summer, socks won't be needed...
Shit, its nearly summer, socks won't be needed...
|
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 3, 2014 12:17:36 GMT 1, @ds111, parody is your only chance here to get away with this (conveying a new message, blah, blah)... Parody falls under "fair use". Sadly, previous court cases ruled that if parody was made or produced solely to make a profit, or in such quantity that it competes with original artist, it is not a "fair use". But then, that decision was revoked and claim was that even commercial parody that compete with original art is still "fair use" - www.artslaw.org/parody.htm So indeed, parody continues to be a fair use exception to copyright infringement, but this is for the US law (no idea for UK law) and if Banksy decide to summon at court of law, it all depends to the judge/court comprehension... And since you got already some press articles, etc. Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself. And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons. There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
@ds111, parody is your only chance here to get away with this (conveying a new message, blah, blah)... Parody falls under "fair use". Sadly, previous court cases ruled that if parody was made or produced solely to make a profit, or in such quantity that it competes with original artist, it is not a "fair use". But then, that decision was revoked and claim was that even commercial parody that compete with original art is still "fair use" - www.artslaw.org/parody.htm So indeed, parody continues to be a fair use exception to copyright infringement, but this is for the US law (no idea for UK law) and if Banksy decide to summon at court of law, it all depends to the judge/court comprehension... And since you got already some press articles, etc. Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself. And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons. There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
|
|
opalis141
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 182
๐๐ป 113
April 2014
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by opalis141 on May 3, 2014 17:07:11 GMT 1, Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself. And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons. There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
Haha so... pretty much what I said? You kind of circularly argued against yourself. And odds that Banksy would dislike this rather than love it are very small. Odds that he dislikes it enough to file a lawsuit are borderline impossible, in my opinion. Especially if we're only talking a double-digit number of prints for a double-digit price, clearly made due/in response to demand from an isolated group of persons. There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
I would look to the most recent ruling if you are U.S.-based which is the Richard Price case. the case dealt with work that Price created wherein he took another artist's photographs and transformed them through the use of blue paint splotches on the images. The appeal and subsequent ruling stated that artwork that uses others' images only needs to be transformative, not necessarily a commentary on the original subject matter to constitute fair use. This Art in America article is a pretty accessible take on the matter: www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/richard-prince-wins-major-victory-in-landmark-copyright-suit/ |
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,946
๐๐ป 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Hairbland on May 4, 2014 10:38:53 GMT 1, There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
I would look to the most recent ruling if you are U.S.-based which is the Richard Price case. the case dealt with work that Price created wherein he took another artist's photographs and transformed them through the use of blue paint splotches on the images. The appeal and subsequent ruling stated that artwork that uses others' images only needs to be transformative, not necessarily a commentary on the original subject matter to constitute fair use. This Art in America article is a pretty accessible take on the matter: www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/richard-prince-wins-major-victory-in-landmark-copyright-suit/
Richard Prince has made a stunning career of appropriation, from the Marlboro Man series to the Rasta series, which he termed "Re-photography".
Re-photography uses appropriation as its own focus: artists pull from the works of others and the worlds they depict to create their own work. Appropriation art became popular in the late 1970s. Other appropriation artists such as Sherrie Levine, Louise Lawler, Vikky Alexander, Cindy Sherman, Barbara Kruger and Mike Bidlo also became prominent in the East Village in the 1980s.
There was some info online that by using someone elses photograph of a painting etc or someone elses image as in JPG etc that they created.
It's classed as theft unless you actually take the photo and create the JPG yourself.
There is also a thing about referencing the original source of an mage,
For example the truck cab and chassis in Gonefellows picture being taken from the truck cab and chassis in the Banksy original.
So if these new versions or prints are sold, does Banksy have a claim on any money as a percentage?
Also if they are re sold by Flippers or others in the future what would be the situation.
Banksy doesn't need the money and the Gonefellow version does not detract and is not detrimental to Banksy's image.
If Banksy has given permission, then in the future some re sellers could advertise this print as a colab between Banksy and Gonefellow.
(don't tell BNE)
I would look to the most recent ruling if you are U.S.-based which is the Richard Price case. the case dealt with work that Price created wherein he took another artist's photographs and transformed them through the use of blue paint splotches on the images. The appeal and subsequent ruling stated that artwork that uses others' images only needs to be transformative, not necessarily a commentary on the original subject matter to constitute fair use. This Art in America article is a pretty accessible take on the matter: www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/richard-prince-wins-major-victory-in-landmark-copyright-suit/Agreed. As the word "Art" is part of this forum's name, it is a good idea to know a bit about it rather than to just pontificate. Otherwise one is just wanking away. Richard Prince has made a stunning career of appropriation, from the Marlboro Man series to the Rasta series, which he termed "Re-photography". Re-photography uses appropriation as its own focus: artists pull from the works of others and the worlds they depict to create their own work. Appropriation art became popular in the late 1970s. Other appropriation artists such as Sherrie Levine, Louise Lawler, Vikky Alexander, Cindy Sherman, Barbara Kruger and Mike Bidlo also became prominent in the East Village in the 1980s. |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by maddoghoek100 on May 6, 2014 0:15:38 GMT 1, celebrating cinco de mayo with some tacos and my new "banksy" serving tray
celebrating cinco de mayo with some tacos and my new "banksy" serving tray |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 6, 2014 0:24:05 GMT 1, celebrating cinco de mayo with some tacos and my new "banksy" serving tray
celebrating cinco de mayo with some tacos and my new "banksy" serving tray vegetarian tacos I hope? |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on May 6, 2014 12:34:44 GMT 1, I love the look of that serving tray ( and the tacos!) but I've just gone for a straightforward canvas.
I love the look of that serving tray ( and the tacos!) but I've just gone for a straightforward canvas. |
|
soam24
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,007
๐๐ป 379
December 2012
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by soam24 on May 6, 2014 13:51:42 GMT 1, ^ awesome!
^ awesome!
|
|
thisisanton
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,053
๐๐ป 1,008
November 2012
|
Banksy.co.uk โข Official Banksy Website , by thisisanton on May 6, 2014 15:40:37 GMT 1, Did anyone manage to save a copy of Banksy's new signature? I'd like to add that when I print out my copy.
Did anyone manage to save a copy of Banksy's new signature? I'd like to add that when I print out my copy.
|
|
