not to worry Bob, last survey done indicated that there are not many of us lazy fckers who access the site using mobile phones....

fcksake, my great great uncle Alexander wont be happy.

they are Classed in the band of necrophiliacs and kiddy fiddlers! Wow! What exactly did they do?
Edit :read the whole thread now !

Diagnosed and registered as an addict and bipolar or using as another cover story for sympathy as found out ?

What do you expect them to do with NHS IDs other than use them to ensure they only provide the prints to NHS workers rather than flippers?

If another artist increased their signed prints to make more money for NHS and gave 500 free prints to staff they'd be praised.

I get people on here don't like these two but I'm surprised at members being so keen to add a negative spin to what otherwise seems to be a postive release and will benefit the NHS and 500 happy staff.

We know mate

Imagine I were a common thief who, unbeknownst to most people, breaks into your family home and plunders your most treasured possessions. Your life’s work, for example. Everything you spent so much time creating, honing, perfecting.

After passing off the haul as my own, I then make a song and dance about handing over a conveniently non-specific part of it (the “profits”) to a charitable cause — while keeping the rest for myself to cover undisclosed costs, general overhead and administrative expenses.

Staying true to my well-established modus operandi, I also don't bother to credit you or even acknowledge your forced contribution in this donation process.

__________


Now, in the above instance, would you be praising me for my generosity?

If no, how come? “Surely it’s better to do this and hopefully add to the charity fund than not?" After all, thousands are dying out there.

If yes, then with "Aw, shucks” modesty, I’d have to say it was really no trouble at all.

You see, my philanthropy is boundless; I am always happy to give away things which aren’t actually mine. That's the kind of altruism that comes very naturally to me. With other people's property, I can be generous to a fault.

And it’s even better when these donations are accompanied by good PR. The charity aspect certainly provides a helpful shield against detractors who criticise my persistent thieving. As my mate Charlie would say, "Duh, winning!"

Thieves? Can’t remember who pointed this out...?

urbanartassociation.com/thread/54282?page=1

In reality this is nothing new. Warhol, Lichtenstein, Hirst even Banksy have all “borrowed” other artists work, styles or ideas and passed it off as their own. I can give you dozens of examples.

Despite being a professional contemporary artist, last year I had to acknowledge my lack of both talent and original ideas.

The Connor Brothers Recipe (previously referred to) has thus been a godsend for a creative fraud like myself. It is simple. It is easy. And it saves huge amounts of time and effort.



Below are two of my own artworks created using this process:



Title: We Can Be Heroes
Year: 2020
Medium: JPEG file
Plate-signed, dated and numbered by the artist
Dimensions: 732 x 512 pixels
Edition: 300
Price: £120.00







Title: She Won’t Forsake Me (Cheers, Peddy and Lichtenstein)
Year: 2020
Medium: JPEG file
Plate-signed, dated and numbered by the artist
Dimensions: 626 x 512 pixels
Edition: 300
Price: £120.00



Interested buyers can send me a private message for my PayPal details.

100% of all profits from the sale of these editions will be donated to charity*.


*After deductions of my undisclosed design, production and distribution costs; overheads; admin expenses; employee salaries; reasonably-priced meals; snacks; and ancillary disbursements that my accountant kindly marks down in the books as 'fruit and flowers’.

Willing to pay double for an AP .

It’s not hard to use google or the search function to find out that these have no integrity. That be due to their artwork or past businesses. Don’t fall for it. Rearrange the following - turd a polish can’t you