greedy21
New Member
π¨οΈ 148
ππ» 115
January 2015
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by greedy21 on Mar 29, 2017 17:21:34 GMT 1, FR07 just posted on his instagram page.
www.instagram.com/danielarsham/
|
|
Rochebm
New Member
π¨οΈ 310
ππ» 314
May 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Rochebm on Mar 29, 2017 20:06:14 GMT 1, http://instagr.am/p/BSOmwxZDeZd
Daniel Arsham β’ Cassette Player β’ 07 Future RelicDaniel Arsham β’ Cassette Player β’ 07 Future Relic
|
|
Dungle
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,008
ππ» 5,174
June 2011
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Dungle on Mar 29, 2017 20:48:32 GMT 1, Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones.
Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones.
|
|
samfrost
New Member
π¨οΈ 787
ππ» 530
June 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by samfrost on Mar 29, 2017 20:55:34 GMT 1, Rather disappointing IMO. Hopefully separate but the last one was also underwhelming.
Rather disappointing IMO. Hopefully separate but the last one was also underwhelming.
|
|
tech
New Member
π¨οΈ 247
ππ» 253
February 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by tech on Mar 29, 2017 22:13:01 GMT 1, Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones.
Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones. Same here. I do like it but feel that it probably is joined together but if you have the cassette tape it will display nice with that. He didn't seem to promote this one as much this time around...i'd guess around $350 for this one so I won't be to burnt if I can't get it and will track it down on the aftermarket. |
|
Spenie
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,283
ππ» 2,215
November 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Spenie on Mar 29, 2017 22:16:57 GMT 1, I couldn't afford the postage.
I couldn't afford the postage.
|
|
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 23:46:01 GMT 1, What was postage to UK for the other relics?
What was postage to UK for the other relics? Lets just say it's cheaper to develop an actual time machine. |
|
|
|
tech
New Member
π¨οΈ 247
ππ» 253
February 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by tech on Mar 30, 2017 0:59:48 GMT 1, Wow...that's made my mind up for me. Thanks! (Β£253 in case anyone was wondering)
Wow...that's made my mind up for me. Thanks! (Β£253 in case anyone was wondering) How did you find out the price? |
|
greedy21
New Member
π¨οΈ 148
ππ» 115
January 2015
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by greedy21 on Mar 30, 2017 1:59:34 GMT 1, How did you find out the price?Β That's what it was last time - not necessarily going to be the same for this release but sure it won't be far off if not.
medichead is referring to shipping cost not cost of the product. That was also the cost of shipping through an eBay sale. He will be selling directly from his site this time around so I expect a lower shipping cost to the UK. I could be wrong.
How did you find out the price?Β That's what it was last time - not necessarily going to be the same for this release but sure it won't be far off if not. medichead is referring to shipping cost not cost of the product. That was also the cost of shipping through an eBay sale. He will be selling directly from his site this time around so I expect a lower shipping cost to the UK. I could be wrong. |
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,946
ππ» 2,740
November 2010
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Hairbland on Mar 30, 2017 3:19:30 GMT 1, Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones.
I recall the Walkman headphones being a bit more iconic than these.
Are they joined together?! I kinda wish it was just the Walkman without headphones. I recall the Walkman headphones being a bit more iconic than these. |
|
tech
New Member
π¨οΈ 247
ππ» 253
February 2014
|
|
|
tech
New Member
π¨οΈ 247
ππ» 253
February 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by tech on Mar 30, 2017 3:40:34 GMT 1, That's what it was last time - not necessarily going to be the same for this release but sure it won't be far off if not. medichead is referring to shipping cost not cost of the product. That was also the cost of shipping through an eBay sale. He will be selling directly from his site this time around so I expect a lower shipping cost to the UK. I could be wrong.
That's what it was last time - not necessarily going to be the same for this release but sure it won't be far off if not. medichead is referring to shipping cost not cost of the product. That was also the cost of shipping through an eBay sale. He will be selling directly from his site this time around so I expect a lower shipping cost to the UK. I could be wrong. Ok sorry I misread that but it might not be far off from the price of the actual relic. I know it was terrible for folks overseas last time with the shipping but he is responding to people in the comments saying they have fixed that issue so we'll see. |
|
Inknart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 3,490
ππ» 3,288
April 2015
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Inknart on Mar 30, 2017 3:49:14 GMT 1, I really thought these were great in the beginning, but as of recently just think they're kind of lame and really lacking something. I do enjoy his larger sculptures, particularly the ones that resemble a person covered up with waves (not sure if they have a name), maybe he should downsize some of those into 12-16" pieces.
I really thought these were great in the beginning, but as of recently just think they're kind of lame and really lacking something. I do enjoy his larger sculptures, particularly the ones that resemble a person covered up with waves (not sure if they have a name), maybe he should downsize some of those into 12-16" pieces.
|
|
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by nobokov on Mar 30, 2017 8:03:12 GMT 1, Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics?
An ipad should be the final relic.
Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics?
An ipad should be the final relic.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,946
ππ» 2,740
November 2010
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Hairbland on Mar 30, 2017 14:41:11 GMT 1, Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics? An ipad should be the final relic.
A human should be the final relic.
Damn you apes!
Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics? An ipad should be the final relic. A human should be the final relic. Damn you apes! |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by nobokov on Mar 30, 2017 14:44:34 GMT 1, Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics? An ipad should be the final relic. A human should be the final relic. Damn you apes!
Dammmmn you all to hellllllllll!!!!
Why are these considered Future Relics? Aren't they already present-day relics? An ipad should be the final relic. A human should be the final relic. Damn you apes! Dammmmn you all to hellllllllll!!!! |
|
msobel3
New Member
π¨οΈ 184
ππ» 115
November 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by msobel3 on Mar 30, 2017 17:15:00 GMT 1, nobokov they are called future relics because in the FUTURE they will be RELICS of our time.
Arshams whole premise is this idea of being in the future and future archaeology. He is pretending that this item is uncovered in the year 2079. If you look on the boxes it says Excavated and some year well into the future.
nobokov they are called future relics because in the FUTURE they will be RELICS of our time. Arshams whole premise is this idea of being in the future and future archaeology. He is pretending that this item is uncovered in the year 2079. If you look on the boxes it says Excavated and some year well into the future.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by nobokov on Mar 30, 2017 18:08:50 GMT 1, nobokov they are called future relics because in the FUTURE they will be RELICS of our time. Arshams whole premise is this idea of being in the future and future archaeology. He is pretending that this item is uncovered in the year 2079. If you look on the boxes it says Excavated and some year well into the future.
I definitely get his intent. I just think they're lazy, uninspired choices for relics, which don't provide any artistic insight or commentary. It's obvious to choose items which are already obsolete and can be found in a similar state at a local garbage dump. I feel that choosing current items as relics would be more interesting and would spark more dialogue.
Relic 08 will be a telegraph.
nobokov they are called future relics because in the FUTURE they will be RELICS of our time. Arshams whole premise is this idea of being in the future and future archaeology. He is pretending that this item is uncovered in the year 2079. If you look on the boxes it says Excavated and some year well into the future. I definitely get his intent. I just think they're lazy, uninspired choices for relics, which don't provide any artistic insight or commentary. It's obvious to choose items which are already obsolete and can be found in a similar state at a local garbage dump. I feel that choosing current items as relics would be more interesting and would spark more dialogue. Relic 08 will be a telegraph. |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Deleted on Mar 30, 2017 21:36:35 GMT 1, Can the next one be a google glass relic?
Can the next one be a google glass relic?
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 5,891
ππ» 5,527
September 2013
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Poster Bob on Mar 30, 2017 22:10:30 GMT 1, The next one will be something Michael Stipe already did. This guy is a hack.
Can the next one be a google glass relic?
The next one will be something Michael Stipe already did. This guy is a hack. Can the next one be a google glass relic? |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by nobokov on Mar 30, 2017 22:23:25 GMT 1, I see where you're coming from, but from an artistic/aesthetics perspective it would be pretty dull having an ipad or iphone cast in plaster.
Perhaps the insides would still be beautiful in 2085 as Steve Jobs intended.
Since these relics don't seem to follow the decay patterns of the actual materials, maybe a miniature Iceberg would be an aesthetically pleasing relic - each one unique in shape.
I see where you're coming from, but from an artistic/aesthetics perspective it would be pretty dull having an ipad or iphone cast in plaster. Perhaps the insides would still be beautiful in 2085 as Steve Jobs intended. Since these relics don't seem to follow the decay patterns of the actual materials, maybe a miniature Iceberg would be an aesthetically pleasing relic - each one unique in shape. |
|
|
|
sl
New Member
π¨οΈ 460
ππ» 241
September 2016
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by sl on Mar 30, 2017 22:36:26 GMT 1, These are gimmicky at best.
I think these ar-a-sham
π
These are gimmicky at best.
I think these ar-a-sham
π
|
|
msobel3
New Member
π¨οΈ 184
ππ» 115
November 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by msobel3 on Mar 31, 2017 17:04:37 GMT 1, is anyone having any success trying to purchase?
is anyone having any success trying to purchase? |
|
lucky7
New Member
π¨οΈ 423
ππ» 178
June 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by lucky7 on Mar 31, 2017 17:05:55 GMT 1, no success
link please
no success
link please
|
|
Sic
New Member
π¨οΈ 342
ππ» 242
January 2014
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by Sic on Mar 31, 2017 17:05:59 GMT 1, No luck here
No luck here
|
|
cutiehoney
New Member
π¨οΈ 193
ππ» 117
March 2009
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by cutiehoney on Mar 31, 2017 17:09:12 GMT 1, no joy here either! 
no joy here either! |
|
HRE
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,184
ππ» 413
March 2007
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by HRE on Mar 31, 2017 17:09:27 GMT 1, Site crashed.
Where was the buy button? I could see the amount of stock going down but no buy button on the page.
I have to say website is a little crap with the fade in loading when it is working.
Site crashed.
Where was the buy button? I could see the amount of stock going down but no buy button on the page.
I have to say website is a little crap with the fade in loading when it is working.
|
|
msobel3
New Member
π¨οΈ 184
ππ» 115
November 2014
|
|
|
kendo
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,212
ππ» 1,208
August 2010
|
Daniel Arsham πΊπΈ New York β’ Eroded Future Relic, by kendo on Mar 31, 2017 17:10:04 GMT 1, Has anyone seen a purchase button?
Has anyone seen a purchase button?
|
|
