|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Deleted on Jan 11, 2017 13:48:40 GMT 1, Fairey should finance himself. Why ask people for money for this project. Give it to the homeless and poor not rich self serving so called artists.
Fairey should finance himself. Why ask people for money for this project. Give it to the homeless and poor not rich self serving so called artists.
|
|
londonboy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,295
๐๐ป 1,181
June 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by londonboy on Jan 11, 2017 17:22:59 GMT 1, Wonder who is the biggest demagogue at times
Wonder who is the biggest demagogue at times
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nobokov on Jan 15, 2017 7:00:25 GMT 1, Taken from the Campaign Update:
Wow! There are a lot of you! And we are 100% floored that we get to give every single one of you this powerful art to share with our country. We want to give this art to you AND your friends. So please, take this little link to our FREE ART DOWNLOADS:
bit.ly/wtpdownloads
And share it with every person you know. Share it on Facebook with a link to this campaign. Use one of the images found therein and post it on Instagram. I donโt know how to tweet but I bet you do, so go for it! This art is for EVERYONE and we want EVERYONE to have it now so you can start printing it, pasting it, pinning it to your wall, wearing it on your head, make a paper airplane . . . share it, wear it, however your heart desires. (Just please don't sell it-- this art is free for everyone)
 
Taken from the Campaign Update: Wow! There are a lot of you! And we are 100% floored that we get to give every single one of you this powerful art to share with our country. We want to give this art to you AND your friends. So please, take this little link to our FREE ART DOWNLOADS: bit.ly/wtpdownloadsAnd share it with every person you know. Share it on Facebook with a link to this campaign. Use one of the images found therein and post it on Instagram. I donโt know how to tweet but I bet you do, so go for it! This art is for EVERYONE and we want EVERYONE to have it now so you can start printing it, pasting it, pinning it to your wall, wearing it on your head, make a paper airplane . . . share it, wear it, however your heart desires. (Just please don't sell it-- this art is free for everyone) |
|
Art Fan 2011
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,671
๐๐ป 1,952
February 2012
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Art Fan 2011 on Jan 15, 2017 9:27:51 GMT 1, Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it!
Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it!
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nobokov on Jan 20, 2017 23:29:25 GMT 1, Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it!
The D-face flag didn't appeal to me at all. I wonder if being inundated with our nation's flag since childhood, imprints it into our minds and brainwashes us into seeing it as something beautiful. Most prints with the US flag appeal to me, like Faile's version of it. How well was the Faile flag received on this forum?
Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it! I'm surprised that there hasn't been more discussion about these prints on this forum. Does that indicate that the forum is more UK-centric and these images appeal more to Americans, especially the flag one? I'm curious about what the point of view is from non-US members. The D-face flag didn't appeal to me at all. I wonder if being inundated with our nation's flag since childhood, imprints it into our minds and brainwashes us into seeing it as something beautiful. Most prints with the US flag appeal to me, like Faile's version of it. How well was the Faile flag received on this forum? |
|
|
|
yorkie
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 867
๐๐ป 708
June 2016
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by yorkie on Jan 20, 2017 23:36:37 GMT 1, Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it! I'm surprised that there hasn't been more discussion about these prints on this forum. Does that indicate that the forum is more UK-centric and these images appeal more to Americans, especially the flag one? I'm curious about what the point of view is from non-US members. The D-face flag didn't appeal to me at all. I wonder if being inundated with our nation's flag since childhood, imprints it into our minds and brainwashes us into seeing it as something beautiful. Most prints with the US flag appeal to me, like Faile's version of it. How well was the Faile flag received on this forum?
I don't know if I count as I live in the USA at the moment but I am struggling with a couple of the images being representative of the cause.... I also feel that this is a try to be different as in - fund and then share but, as seen on this forum its actually shared to all without funding.
Images are not super strong in my opinion and I don't think that there is anything in that comment that is because I'm from the UK.
Lets not forget there are a lot of people that follow him - many many more US based and so I think it was a pretty sure thing that the funding was going to be big.... the real question is did it work?
I don't have an answer to that but if you look at the remit - then it probably has not done what he wanted it to do ..... YET!
Yorkie
Think they underestimated the level of demand for this project, donations have gone crazy for it! I'm surprised that there hasn't been more discussion about these prints on this forum. Does that indicate that the forum is more UK-centric and these images appeal more to Americans, especially the flag one? I'm curious about what the point of view is from non-US members. The D-face flag didn't appeal to me at all. I wonder if being inundated with our nation's flag since childhood, imprints it into our minds and brainwashes us into seeing it as something beautiful. Most prints with the US flag appeal to me, like Faile's version of it. How well was the Faile flag received on this forum? You bring up some really good points here.... I don't know if I count as I live in the USA at the moment but I am struggling with a couple of the images being representative of the cause.... I also feel that this is a try to be different as in - fund and then share but, as seen on this forum its actually shared to all without funding. Images are not super strong in my opinion and I don't think that there is anything in that comment that is because I'm from the UK. Lets not forget there are a lot of people that follow him - many many more US based and so I think it was a pretty sure thing that the funding was going to be big.... the real question is did it work? I don't have an answer to that but if you look at the remit - then it probably has not done what he wanted it to do ..... YET! Yorkie |
|
cornholio
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 300
๐๐ป 98
February 2011
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by cornholio on Jan 23, 2017 5:25:27 GMT 1, That's funny, the U.S. flag being used a hijab, a symbol of modesty forced on women by men of Muslim faith. Ironic isn't it? In my city (in America) there's a muslim center. Above the door is a sign that says "<--- women's entrance around the building on the left." How is that even legal? Are there religious exemptions on individual rights? I can only imagine the crazy fierce raging expression on Shepard Fairey's face if that kind of move was attempted by Christian males. But for whatever reason, the misogynistic nature of the Muslim faith is completely ignored by leftists. It's like they get so many bonus points for fulfilling some kind of diversity quota that failings that would ordinarily drive leftists into rage are completely ignored.
That's funny, the U.S. flag being used a hijab, a symbol of modesty forced on women by men of Muslim faith. Ironic isn't it? In my city (in America) there's a muslim center. Above the door is a sign that says "<--- women's entrance around the building on the left." How is that even legal? Are there religious exemptions on individual rights? I can only imagine the crazy fierce raging expression on Shepard Fairey's face if that kind of move was attempted by Christian males. But for whatever reason, the misogynistic nature of the Muslim faith is completely ignored by leftists. It's like they get so many bonus points for fulfilling some kind of diversity quota that failings that would ordinarily drive leftists into rage are completely ignored.
|
|
nex
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,573
๐๐ป 1,819
February 2009
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nex on Jan 23, 2017 5:35:34 GMT 1, Funny it took me literally less than a minute to google discussion on the hijab and see that the view it's used as suppression is but one rather limited generally right wing assertation to fit their agenda...
* Shrugs wonders why he bothered and leaves *
Funny it took me literally less than a minute to google discussion on the hijab and see that the view it's used as suppression is but one rather limited generally right wing assertation to fit their agenda...
* Shrugs wonders why he bothered and leaves *
|
|
cornholio
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 300
๐๐ป 98
February 2011
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by cornholio on Jan 23, 2017 5:42:02 GMT 1, I never said "suppression" I said it's a symbol of modesty and it's worn when they may come into the presence of males outside of their family. This from Wikipedia and pretty much the same description everywhere.
* Shrugs wonders why I think a non one sided discussion could even occur on the topic and leaves *
I never said "suppression" I said it's a symbol of modesty and it's worn when they may come into the presence of males outside of their family. This from Wikipedia and pretty much the same description everywhere.
* Shrugs wonders why I think a non one sided discussion could even occur on the topic and leaves *
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Deleted on Jan 23, 2017 6:16:34 GMT 1, I never said "suppression" I said it's a symbol of modesty and it's worn when they may come into the presence of males outside of their family. This from Wikipedia and pretty much the same description everywhere. * Shrugs wonders why I think a non one sided discussion could even occur on the topic and leaves *
There is a little bit more to it than that... I think it's a pretty strong image personally.
Huff Post ran a pretty interesting / powerful campaign last year with an effort to provide some perspective and context as to why women CHOOSE to wear the hijab in America. #hijabtome
link below:
m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57320575e4b0bc9cb0482225
All this leftist vs right wing nonsense reminds me of a couple of quotes.
"There are two kinds of people in the world: those who believe there are two kinds of people in the world, and those who donโt." - not sure who said that..
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function."
- F.Scott.Fitzgerald
I never said "suppression" I said it's a symbol of modesty and it's worn when they may come into the presence of males outside of their family. This from Wikipedia and pretty much the same description everywhere. * Shrugs wonders why I think a non one sided discussion could even occur on the topic and leaves * There is a little bit more to it than that... I think it's a pretty strong image personally. Huff Post ran a pretty interesting / powerful campaign last year with an effort to provide some perspective and context as to why women CHOOSE to wear the hijab in America. #hijabtome link below: m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57320575e4b0bc9cb0482225All this leftist vs right wing nonsense reminds me of a couple of quotes. "There are two kinds of people in the world: those who believe there are two kinds of people in the world, and those who donโt." - not sure who said that.. "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function." - F.Scott.Fitzgerald |
|
cornholio
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 300
๐๐ป 98
February 2011
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by cornholio on Jan 23, 2017 6:39:36 GMT 1, No doubt some choose to wear it for whatever reasons they have but it's sexist roots are impossible to deny and so it's use at a woman's rights rally strikes me as odd, hypocritical, myopic etc.
The better retort would be that not all Muslim women wear one. That whether it's mandatory is debatable. And that not all Muslim centers force women to enter from a back or side door. But there are plenty that do abide by these extremes. Again if the shoe was on the other foot and only some Catholic churches forced women to enter in the back and only some sects forced women to wear veils when encountering men ... would it be tolerated by those same people who attended the march?
As far as your left/right addendum - Huff is very left. I used to read it regularly. But I've given up on anything that is so overtly biased. As for Fitzgerald's quote, ... I don't think I've seen intelligence displayed by either side in quite some time.
No doubt some choose to wear it for whatever reasons they have but it's sexist roots are impossible to deny and so it's use at a woman's rights rally strikes me as odd, hypocritical, myopic etc.
The better retort would be that not all Muslim women wear one. That whether it's mandatory is debatable. And that not all Muslim centers force women to enter from a back or side door. But there are plenty that do abide by these extremes. Again if the shoe was on the other foot and only some Catholic churches forced women to enter in the back and only some sects forced women to wear veils when encountering men ... would it be tolerated by those same people who attended the march?
As far as your left/right addendum - Huff is very left. I used to read it regularly. But I've given up on anything that is so overtly biased. As for Fitzgerald's quote, ... I don't think I've seen intelligence displayed by either side in quite some time.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nobokov on Jan 23, 2017 7:39:19 GMT 1, Here's an explanation from the photographer who created this image. Then Shepard Fairey turned it into an illustration...
http://instagram.com/p/BPNIjsbhHDP
|
|
thomasmer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,107
๐๐ป 565
July 2014
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by thomasmer on Jan 23, 2017 11:04:05 GMT 1, Personally thought that the Hijab would put a lot of people off due to them mostly being uneducated, miss informed or just plain ignorant about them.
I quite like that image.
Personally thought that the Hijab would put a lot of people off due to them mostly being uneducated, miss informed or just plain ignorant about them.
I quite like that image.
|
|
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,527
September 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Poster Bob on Jan 23, 2017 11:18:26 GMT 1, If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism.
If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism.
|
|
thomasmer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,107
๐๐ป 565
July 2014
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by thomasmer on Jan 23, 2017 15:41:42 GMT 1, If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism.
Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab?
If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab? |
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,527
September 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Poster Bob on Jan 23, 2017 15:57:11 GMT 1, If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab?
If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab? I said "To question wearing one" not "to question a woman about wearing one". |
|
randomname
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,962
๐๐ป 1,810
June 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by randomname on Jan 23, 2017 21:41:12 GMT 1, If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism.
I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go fuck yourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear.
If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go fuck yourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear. |
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,527
September 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Poster Bob on Jan 24, 2017 0:04:13 GMT 1, If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go f**kyourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear.
If you are a modern liberal in America you must fall lock-step in line with the current groupthink. That is, hijabs are a symbol of those held in highest esteem on the victimisation pyramid, Islam is a beautiful religion of peace, hijabs let women be judged by their character and not their beauty, and to question wearing one is to be a racist, misogynist xenophobe. All hail neo-Marxism. I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go f**kyourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear. I have no idea what point you are trying to make but your macroaggression has violated my safe space. |
|
randomname
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,962
๐๐ป 1,810
June 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by randomname on Jan 24, 2017 0:42:55 GMT 1, I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go f**kyourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear. I have no idea what point you are trying to make but your macroaggression has violated my safe space.
Somehow I'm not surprised that you struggle to understand simple English.
I think the idea is more that no one is telling you what you can and can't wear. Go f**kyourself if you think you can tell someone else what to wear. I have no idea what point you are trying to make but your macroaggression has violated my safe space. Somehow I'm not surprised that you struggle to understand simple English. |
|
thomasmer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,107
๐๐ป 565
July 2014
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by thomasmer on Jan 24, 2017 4:04:21 GMT 1, Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab? I said "To question wearing one" not "to question a woman about wearing one".
My wife wears a hijab, her sister does not however, there are no issues within their family about the wearing and not wearing of one. I myself am an atheist and couldn't care if she does or doesn't whatever makes her happy.
Why would you question a woman about wearing a Hijab? I said "To question wearing one" not "to question a woman about wearing one". ohhh 'to question' sorry I read that wrong. My wife wears a hijab, her sister does not however, there are no issues within their family about the wearing and not wearing of one. I myself am an atheist and couldn't care if she does or doesn't whatever makes her happy. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
|
|
|
|
daveart
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 940
๐๐ป 885
February 2008
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by daveart on Jan 24, 2017 15:13:17 GMT 1, this can be an interesting thread if you guys can avoid taking every misstatement and making it a battle field of name calling and insensitivity.
when i first saw this image i was struck by the irony of a USA Flag turned Hijab. I wondered first if the woman didnt realize she was wearing what "Some" "MAY" interpret as a sign of repressing women. But then I thought maybe that's the point - she is taking that symbol. owning it in a powerful way - making the USA flag work with her on a statement of freedom etc. so, basically what i am saying is my first thought and last thought were pretty far apart. I have no idea if the woman actually thought this hard about it to begin with.
it is important - and this is an art forum so i think people should be willing to discuss this - it is important to realize that symbols have great meaning beyond the thing its self. you use a hijab, a flag, a nun, a priest, a white cross, shackles, etc. you know you are going to get strong reaction.. so, you cant be surprised when in fact, you get a strong reaction.
It was a march for women. some women are terribly abused in the usa and around the world. i think we can give them some space on how they respond back about it.
this can be an interesting thread if you guys can avoid taking every misstatement and making it a battle field of name calling and insensitivity.
when i first saw this image i was struck by the irony of a USA Flag turned Hijab. I wondered first if the woman didnt realize she was wearing what "Some" "MAY" interpret as a sign of repressing women. But then I thought maybe that's the point - she is taking that symbol. owning it in a powerful way - making the USA flag work with her on a statement of freedom etc. so, basically what i am saying is my first thought and last thought were pretty far apart. I have no idea if the woman actually thought this hard about it to begin with.
it is important - and this is an art forum so i think people should be willing to discuss this - it is important to realize that symbols have great meaning beyond the thing its self. you use a hijab, a flag, a nun, a priest, a white cross, shackles, etc. you know you are going to get strong reaction.. so, you cant be surprised when in fact, you get a strong reaction.
It was a march for women. some women are terribly abused in the usa and around the world. i think we can give them some space on how they respond back about it.
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,527
September 2013
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by Poster Bob on Jan 24, 2017 15:48:47 GMT 1, this can be an interesting thread if you guys can avoid taking every misstatement and making it a battle field of name calling and insensitivity. when i first saw this image i was struck by the irony of a USA Flag turned Hijab. I wondered first if the woman didnt realize she was wearing what "Some" "MAY" interpret as a sign of repressing women. But then I thought maybe that's the point - she is taking that symbol. owning it in a powerful way - making the USA flag work with her on a statement of freedom etc. so, basically what i am saying is my first thought and last thought were pretty far apart. I have no idea if the woman actually thought this hard about it to begin with. it is important - and this is an art forum so i think people should be willing to discuss this - it is important to realize that symbols have great meaning beyond the thing its self. you use a hijab, a flag, a nun, a priest, a white cross, shackles, etc. you know you are going to get strong reaction.. so, you cant be surprised when in fact, you get a strong reaction. It was a march for women. some women are terribly abused in the usa and around the world. i think we can give them some space on how they respond back about it.
this can be an interesting thread if you guys can avoid taking every misstatement and making it a battle field of name calling and insensitivity. when i first saw this image i was struck by the irony of a USA Flag turned Hijab. I wondered first if the woman didnt realize she was wearing what "Some" "MAY" interpret as a sign of repressing women. But then I thought maybe that's the point - she is taking that symbol. owning it in a powerful way - making the USA flag work with her on a statement of freedom etc. so, basically what i am saying is my first thought and last thought were pretty far apart. I have no idea if the woman actually thought this hard about it to begin with. it is important - and this is an art forum so i think people should be willing to discuss this - it is important to realize that symbols have great meaning beyond the thing its self. you use a hijab, a flag, a nun, a priest, a white cross, shackles, etc. you know you are going to get strong reaction.. so, you cant be surprised when in fact, you get a strong reaction. It was a march for women. some women are terribly abused in the usa and around the world. i think we can give them some space on how they respond back about it. I "get" the image. I think it's a strong image but as is to be expected, the context is lost in Fairey's version because it doesn't look like it was taken in NYC. Also, I think wearing a flag is just trashy as hell. There's nothing worse than seeing bikinis and swim trunks with flags on them. |
|
A.R.T.
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 630
๐๐ป 258
July 2007
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by A.R.T. on Jan 24, 2017 17:21:50 GMT 1,
You guys arguing should read the article. Most of what you are talking about is addressed by the artist/photographer.
You guys arguing should read the article. Most of what you are talking about is addressed by the artist/photographer. |
|
Pawel
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,801
๐๐ป 3,274
June 2015
|
|
|
daveart
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 940
๐๐ป 885
February 2008
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by daveart on Feb 4, 2017 0:48:57 GMT 1, i posted in the art wanted as well.. .but if anyone bought the signed edition of these prints and wants to move them on .. id love to get them to use as an auction item for an event i am sponsoring at a city social club here in my town.. send me a PM.
i posted in the art wanted as well.. .but if anyone bought the signed edition of these prints and wants to move them on .. id love to get them to use as an auction item for an event i am sponsoring at a city social club here in my town.. send me a PM.
|
|
nawf
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 91
๐๐ป 69
November 2015
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nawf on Feb 4, 2017 18:14:26 GMT 1, I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one.
I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one.
|
|
tranito
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 265
๐๐ป 181
February 2016
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by tranito on Feb 4, 2017 19:49:38 GMT 1, I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one.
Which one? Careful using the term signed edition. There is the s/n 18x24 screen prints out of 450, but there is also the signed but unnumbered 24x36 offsets.. Big difference in value, collectability, print quality.. Just make sure you know what you're after and what you're getting to pay accordingly. Cheers.
I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one. Which one? Careful using the term signed edition. There is the s/n 18x24 screen prints out of 450, but there is also the signed but unnumbered 24x36 offsets.. Big difference in value, collectability, print quality.. Just make sure you know what you're after and what you're getting to pay accordingly. Cheers. |
|
nawf
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 91
๐๐ป 69
November 2015
|
Shephard Fairey Prints for Amplifier Foundation, by nawf on Feb 4, 2017 23:52:14 GMT 1, I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one. Which one? Careful using the term signed edition. There is the s/n 18x24 screen prints out of 450, but there is also the signed but unnumbered 24x36 offsets.. Big difference in value, collectability, print quality.. Just make sure you know what you're after and what you're getting to pay accordingly. Cheers.
Thanks. Was thinking one of the editioned screen prints really. I ordered a set of the unsigned lithos but wouldn't mind a signed edition too  You know if they're much nicer and what a fair price for one would be?
I'd be interested in a signed greater print if anyones got one. Which one? Careful using the term signed edition. There is the s/n 18x24 screen prints out of 450, but there is also the signed but unnumbered 24x36 offsets.. Big difference in value, collectability, print quality.. Just make sure you know what you're after and what you're getting to pay accordingly. Cheers. Thanks. Was thinking one of the editioned screen prints really. I ordered a set of the unsigned lithos but wouldn't mind a signed edition too You know if they're much nicer and what a fair price for one would be? |
|
You know if they're much nicer and what a fair price for one would be?
