Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on Nov 25, 2017 0:56:21 GMT 1, Hasn’t sold well at auction?? His last auctioned piece was a HF print that sold over £60k. I’m no math genius but that seems like a pretty solid result. And the other prints that barely hit the estimates? Do you have Prints? Are you trying to protect your interest? Simply trying to provide some actual insight to your so far uninformed anecdotal rambling. Owning prints or not owning prints has nothing to do with you making an unqualified statement that has (current) factual counter evidence. Too much of this on here in my opinion.
It's clear you are more interested in your quarrel with Artfanatic75 than having an actual discussion. As I said, shouldn't have stuck my nose in. Carry on then. Enjoy your evening.
Hasn’t sold well at auction?? His last auctioned piece was a HF print that sold over £60k. I’m no math genius but that seems like a pretty solid result. And the other prints that barely hit the estimates? Do you have Prints? Are you trying to protect your interest? Simply trying to provide some actual insight to your so far uninformed anecdotal rambling. Owning prints or not owning prints has nothing to do with you making an unqualified statement that has (current) factual counter evidence. Too much of this on here in my opinion. It's clear you are more interested in your quarrel with Artfanatic75 than having an actual discussion. As I said, shouldn't have stuck my nose in. Carry on then. Enjoy your evening.
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Artfanatic75 on Nov 25, 2017 9:10:51 GMT 1, And the other prints that barely hit the estimates? Do you have Prints? Are you trying to protect your interest? Simply trying to provide some actual insight to your so far uninformed anecdotal rambling. Owning prints or not owning prints has nothing to do with you making an unqualified statement that has (current) factual counter evidence. Too much of this on here in my opinion. It's clear you are more interested in your quarrel with Artfanatic75 than having an actual discussion. As I said, shouldn't have stuck my nose in. Carry on then. Enjoy your evening.
I wouldn’t waste your energy on this one George.. some people are just hate filled.. hope alls well with you?
And the other prints that barely hit the estimates? Do you have Prints? Are you trying to protect your interest? Simply trying to provide some actual insight to your so far uninformed anecdotal rambling. Owning prints or not owning prints has nothing to do with you making an unqualified statement that has (current) factual counter evidence. Too much of this on here in my opinion. It's clear you are more interested in your quarrel with Artfanatic75 than having an actual discussion. As I said, shouldn't have stuck my nose in. Carry on then. Enjoy your evening. I wouldn’t waste your energy on this one George.. some people are just hate filled.. hope alls well with you?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 22, 2018 19:02:22 GMT 1,
Harland Miller - to cool to lose perfect condition with gallery invoice provenance screenprint on Somerset paper edition of 50 63.5 x 45.5 cm
open to offers around £12000 and potentially trades for banksy pieces.
Please DM with any questions.
Thanks
Harland Miller - to cool to lose perfect condition with gallery invoice provenance screenprint on Somerset paper edition of 50 63.5 x 45.5 cm open to offers around £12000 and potentially trades for banksy pieces. Please DM with any questions. Thanks
|
|
Sundowner
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,227
👍🏻 2,429
September 2008
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Sundowner on May 22, 2018 19:33:06 GMT 1, Legendary.....
Legendary.....
|
|
alk
New Member
🗨️ 223
👍🏻 134
March 2017
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by alk on May 22, 2018 20:01:55 GMT 1, “It’s not getting any better. The art peaked and is now on the decline. 30% down on 4 months ago when this was a 14k print.”
I guess u can say the same thing about HM here...
“It’s not getting any better. The art peaked and is now on the decline. 30% down on 4 months ago when this was a 14k print.”
I guess u can say the same thing about HM here...
|
|
lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by lg2771 on May 22, 2018 20:05:42 GMT 1, “It’s not getting any better. The art peaked and is now on the decline. 30% down on 4 months ago when this was a 14k print.” I guess u can say the same thing about HM here...
What’s the quote from?
“It’s not getting any better. The art peaked and is now on the decline. 30% down on 4 months ago when this was a 14k print.” I guess u can say the same thing about HM here... What’s the quote from?
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 22, 2018 20:27:31 GMT 1, A recent Invader for sale thread.
A recent Invader for sale thread.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 22, 2018 20:51:34 GMT 1, Completely agree Harland prices have softened without question. These ups and downs are very common in the art world. Class artists always rise again
What a lot of people don’t seem to know or understand is that the invader dramatic price increases were entirely caused by manipulation of a few galleries / consortiums and when they dumped it was over. His prices won’t recover. Harlands will continue to rise for many years.
The 2 artists are non comparable in what they are. Invader is pure street art brilliance and a legend but not collected as someone like Harland is.. Harland is a fine artist supported by major galleries and collectors and that gives him more longevity.
But thanks for your revenge post , nice try x 😂
Completely agree Harland prices have softened without question. These ups and downs are very common in the art world. Class artists always rise again
What a lot of people don’t seem to know or understand is that the invader dramatic price increases were entirely caused by manipulation of a few galleries / consortiums and when they dumped it was over. His prices won’t recover. Harlands will continue to rise for many years.
The 2 artists are non comparable in what they are. Invader is pure street art brilliance and a legend but not collected as someone like Harland is.. Harland is a fine artist supported by major galleries and collectors and that gives him more longevity.
But thanks for your revenge post , nice try x 😂
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Adam The Collector on May 22, 2018 21:01:56 GMT 1, Totally agree @thelegend! I have always wanted an Invader but avoided for that reason. And due to that reason I now look at a few Harlands on a daily basis in my home with this being one of them!
Totally agree @thelegend! I have always wanted an Invader but avoided for that reason. And due to that reason I now look at a few Harlands on a daily basis in my home with this being one of them!
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by giuseppe57 on May 22, 2018 21:08:07 GMT 1, Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM unless is a gallery addict, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone.
Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM unless is a gallery addict, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone.
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by oxfordwelshchap on May 22, 2018 21:15:24 GMT 1, Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM outside UK, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone. Nar, your average Joe has no idea who invader or Harland miller is, I just asked a collection of 7 non-collectors for you.
Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM outside UK, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone. Nar, your average Joe has no idea who invader or Harland miller is, I just asked a collection of 7 non-collectors for you.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 22, 2018 21:19:18 GMT 1, Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM outside UK, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone. Nar, your average Joe has no idea who invader or Harland miller is, I just asked a collection of 7 non-collectors for you.
😂😂 I’m sure due the street art aspect of invader he’s probably better known / more visible to the public but that means nothing in the art collecting world.
Oh god I’m de railing my own thread! 🙄
Totally disagree, but anyone has his own opinions..... The two artists mentioned have totally different history and appeal, and target I would add. Don't think the average person knows HM outside UK, Invader is all over the world, even at Kathmandu, and anyone has a picture of some of his works taken along the street in his phone. Nar, your average Joe has no idea who invader or Harland miller is, I just asked a collection of 7 non-collectors for you. 😂😂 I’m sure due the street art aspect of invader he’s probably better known / more visible to the public but that means nothing in the art collecting world. Oh god I’m de railing my own thread! 🙄
|
|
Slip
New Member
🗨️ 182
👍🏻 85
May 2015
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Slip on May 22, 2018 21:29:20 GMT 1, Lovely print. So much better in the flesh. One of his best in my opinion.
Lovely print. So much better in the flesh. One of his best in my opinion.
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Everyone Owes on May 22, 2018 22:17:56 GMT 1, Lovely print. So much better in the flesh. One of his best in my opinion.
What, no comment on the price?!
Lovely print. So much better in the flesh. One of his best in my opinion. What, no comment on the price?!
|
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Adam The Collector on May 23, 2018 0:37:36 GMT 1, Last sale I know of was 13k GBP... so seems reasonable.
Last sale I know of was 13k GBP... so seems reasonable.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 23, 2018 1:43:39 GMT 1, Last sale I know of was 13k GBP... so seems reasonable.
Where was this sale ?
Last sale I know of was 13k GBP... so seems reasonable. Where was this sale ?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on May 29, 2018 13:27:59 GMT 1, Sold..
Sold..
|
|
lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by lg2771 on Jul 7, 2018 3:26:59 GMT 1, There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real?
There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on Jul 7, 2018 3:32:37 GMT 1, There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real? No. it states that it’s a giclee and being sold as a “copy”
I’ve reported this person for selling fakes many times. Keeps coming back.
There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real? No. it states that it’s a giclee and being sold as a “copy” I’ve reported this person for selling fakes many times. Keeps coming back.
|
|
lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by lg2771 on Jul 7, 2018 4:25:48 GMT 1, There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real? No. it states that it’s a giclee and being sold as a “copy” I’ve reported this person for selling fakes many times. Keeps coming back.
Thanks. Was thinking about bidding 200. Surprised there are copies of Harland’s work.
There’s one on eBay that’s unsigned and unnumbered. And says no COA. Is there any way it’s real? No. it states that it’s a giclee and being sold as a “copy” I’ve reported this person for selling fakes many times. Keeps coming back. Thanks. Was thinking about bidding 200. Surprised there are copies of Harland’s work.
|
|
shy
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,590
👍🏻 646
June 2018
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by shy on Jul 7, 2018 5:18:44 GMT 1, It's definitely a fake.
It's definitely a fake.
|
|
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Adam The Collector on Jul 20, 2020 16:17:08 GMT 1, Hello everyone, looking to get a valuation on my "Too Cool To Lose". I am interested in selling depending on current market value. From 2012, edition of 50, excellent condition. I love the print and have had it for years, just putting feelers out.
Hello everyone, looking to get a valuation on my "Too Cool To Lose". I am interested in selling depending on current market value. From 2012, edition of 50, excellent condition. I love the print and have had it for years, just putting feelers out.
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Harland Miller • Too cool to lose, by Deleted on Jul 20, 2020 19:21:47 GMT 1, Around £20000 I’d guess
Around £20000 I’d guess
|
|