Forbidden Love
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,283
Likes โข 1,083
September 2011
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Forbidden Love on Dec 23, 2019 11:52:01 GMT 1, They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not.
They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not.
|
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,508
Likes โข 6,372
October 2019
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Terry Fuckwitt on Dec 23, 2019 12:19:06 GMT 1, They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not.
Yes it does. It is one of the most important factors in defining a print to a poster.
They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not. Yes it does. It is one of the most important factors in defining a print to a poster.
|
|
orchid
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,444
Likes โข 1,131
May 2018
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by orchid on Dec 23, 2019 12:24:38 GMT 1, Lovely posters on easily rippled paper. ๐โโ๏ธ
Lovely posters on easily rippled paper. ๐โโ๏ธ
|
|
beicoblack
New Member
Posts โข 737
Likes โข 911
September 2018
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by beicoblack on Dec 23, 2019 12:35:03 GMT 1, They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not. Yes it does. It is one of the most important factors in defining a print to a poster. " difference between print and poster" - Google says:
Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper.
BUT maybe the screen print makes the difference here again... I don't know. I don't own one so its an ugly poster. If I had one it would be a nice print for sure.
They are prints, paper gsm doesnโt define if they are a print or not. Yes it does. It is one of the most important factors in defining a print to a poster. " difference between print and poster" - Google says: Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper. BUT maybe the screen print makes the difference here again... I don't know. I don't own one so its an ugly poster. If I had one it would be a nice print for sure.
|
|
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Duke Down Stairs on Dec 23, 2019 13:00:49 GMT 1, Depends on if you are looking to Buy or Sell.
Depends on if you are looking to Buy or Sell.
|
|
churchwood
New Member
Posts โข 747
Likes โข 836
March 2016
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by churchwood on Dec 23, 2019 18:45:39 GMT 1, I would have said it's a screen print but on sub standard quality paper.
If it was a computer based print onto this paper I would class it a poster.
I am most likely wrong but for me, it's the technique used to impart the image onto the paper that I think determines print or poster.
So these, in my opinion are screen prints
I would have said it's a screen print but on sub standard quality paper.
If it was a computer based print onto this paper I would class it a poster.
I am most likely wrong but for me, it's the technique used to impart the image onto the paper that I think determines print or poster.
So these, in my opinion are screen prints
|
|
|
churchwood
New Member
Posts โข 747
Likes โข 836
March 2016
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by churchwood on Dec 23, 2019 18:46:43 GMT 1, I would have said it's a screen print but on sub standard quality paper. If it was a computer based print onto this paper I would class it a poster. I am most likely wrong but for me, it's the technique used to impart the image onto the paper that I think determines print or poster. So these, in my opinion are screen prints
And that is why opinions are like arse holes, we all have them and most of them stink
I would have said it's a screen print but on sub standard quality paper. If it was a computer based print onto this paper I would class it a poster. I am most likely wrong but for me, it's the technique used to impart the image onto the paper that I think determines print or poster. So these, in my opinion are screen prints And that is why opinions are like arse holes, we all have them and most of them stink
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Deleted on Dec 23, 2019 19:48:28 GMT 1, Look You fuckers
A poster is like the tesco soup can
A screen print is where an item has been fucking screen printed
It's really not that difficult to comprehend
I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one
It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied
So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows
Look You fuckers
A poster is like the tesco soup can
A screen print is where an item has been fucking screen printed
It's really not that difficult to comprehend
I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one
It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied
So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows
|
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,508
Likes โข 6,372
October 2019
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Terry Fuckwitt on Dec 23, 2019 20:08:27 GMT 1, Look You fuckers A poster is like the tesco soup can A screen print is where an item has been f**kingscreen printed It's really not that difficult to comprehend I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows
Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles.
'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper'
'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print.
Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.'
' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.'
'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.'
... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
Look You fuckers A poster is like the tesco soup can A screen print is where an item has been f**kingscreen printed It's really not that difficult to comprehend I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles. 'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper' 'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print. Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.' ' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.' 'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.' ... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Deleted on Dec 23, 2019 20:16:19 GMT 1, Look You fuckers A poster is like the tesco soup can A screen print is where an item has been f**kingscreen printed It's really not that difficult to comprehend I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles. 'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper' 'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print. Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.' ' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.' 'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.' ... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable fucker I am
Look You fuckers A poster is like the tesco soup can A screen print is where an item has been f**kingscreen printed It's really not that difficult to comprehend I don't care if this was a poster or a print, i don't think it would make any difference to the price if its either one It's a nice collectable keep sake that's been SCREEN PRINTED rather than photocopied So stop it now, or Santa will shave off your eye brows Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles. 'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper' 'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print. Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.' ' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.' 'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.' ... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable fucker I am
|
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,508
Likes โข 6,372
October 2019
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Terry Fuckwitt on Dec 23, 2019 20:20:04 GMT 1, Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles. 'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper' 'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print. Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.' ' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.' 'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.' ... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable f**kerI amย
Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway?
Calm down calm down, it's only a discussion. Here's the answer to the question you've now deleted, because I've just spent 5 bloody minutes finding articles. 'Generally the difference is in the level of quality. Wall posters are typically printed in large volume on less expensive paper, fine-art posters are printed on high-quality paper, and fine-art prints are printed with careful attention to true color reproduction on high-quality paper' 'Art prints are also typically printed on something like medium-weight, slightly textured cotton paper. And, normally (but not always), thereโs a white border around the artwork so itโs easier to frame the print. Typically, posters are printed in bulk and use lower quality inks and paper. The paper is usually printed on smooth semi-glossy or glossy paper.Its lower standards of quality are what make posters much more affordable than art prints, but limits their life span.' ' Art posters are made of cheaper, thin and silky-finish papers, while, art prints are printed on thicker canvases using quality ink. It may appear that art prints are expensive, but the extra money you spend on art prints will prove its worth in the long run.' 'In comparison, fine art printing focuses on quality instead of quantity. Poster reproductions of a famous painting might sell at $3 each while a thousand fine art prints of the same work might sell at $35 each. Cost of production is important but definitely not crucial here. Hence, it all boils down to quality: fine art prints use better quality inks and printing surfaces, better resemble the original work, and will deteriorate much slower than a poster.' ... and why is soup can a poster and not a print? ๐ค๐
I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable f**kerI amย Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway?
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,486
Likes โข 3,288
April 2015
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Inknart on Dec 23, 2019 20:25:15 GMT 1, I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable f**kerI am Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway? I would classify a poster as something mass produced through a printer, essentially digital.
I would classify a print as something that requires a stencil that is hand screened over whatever you want to hand screen it onto, whether it be acrylic, wood, good paper, bad paper, wallpaper, wrapping paper, skateboard, clock.....
I deleted it as I dont people to know what a miserable f**kerI am Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway? I would classify a poster as something mass produced through a printer, essentially digital. I would classify a print as something that requires a stencil that is hand screened over whatever you want to hand screen it onto, whether it be acrylic, wood, good paper, bad paper, wallpaper, wrapping paper, skateboard, clock.....
|
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,508
Likes โข 6,372
October 2019
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Terry Fuckwitt on Dec 23, 2019 20:29:28 GMT 1, Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway? I would classify a poster as something mass produced through a printer, essentially digital.ย I would classify a print as something that requires a stencil that is hand screened over whatever you want to hand screen it onto, whether it be acrylic, wood, good paper, bad paper, wallpaper, wrapping paper, skateboard, clock.....ย
For argument sake you are probably maybe definitely 100% right or wrong. I stopped giving a sh!t about 10 minutes ago๐
Haha, not at all. I'm even bored of the print/poster discussion myself now. I don't think there is a real defining answer. Don't/didn't Americans call prints posters anyway? I would classify a poster as something mass produced through a printer, essentially digital.ย I would classify a print as something that requires a stencil that is hand screened over whatever you want to hand screen it onto, whether it be acrylic, wood, good paper, bad paper, wallpaper, wrapping paper, skateboard, clock.....ย For argument sake you are probably maybe definitely 100% right or wrong. I stopped giving a sh!t about 10 minutes ago๐
|
|
cest
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,725
Likes โข 1,160
September 2018
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by cest on Dec 24, 2019 4:15:27 GMT 1, Dumbest argument ive seen here.
Either way, it gets tarriffs
Dumbest argument ive seen here.
Either way, it gets tarriffs
|
|
|
Greg
New Member
Posts โข 360
Likes โข 223
April 2007
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Greg on Dec 26, 2019 0:20:22 GMT 1, I have a GDP Rat and Thrower available. Picked up myself directly from the Croydon show on the last day.
I would accept ยฃ900 for the two
I have a GDP Rat and Thrower available. Picked up myself directly from the Croydon show on the last day.
I would accept ยฃ900 for the two
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Deleted on Jan 9, 2020 0:26:20 GMT 1, I have a GDP Rat and Thrower available. Picked up myself directly from the Croydon show on the last day. I would accept ยฃ900 for the two
Are any of these still available?
I have a GDP Rat and Thrower available. Picked up myself directly from the Croydon show on the last day. I would accept ยฃ900 for the two Are any of these still available?
|
|
winston
New Member
Posts โข 222
Likes โข 85
August 2014
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by winston on Jan 9, 2020 18:04:22 GMT 1, How many of these were done? Any idea?
How many of these were done? Any idea?
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,486
Likes โข 3,288
April 2015
|
GDP Banksy Rat, Thrower, Crisis As Usual, by Inknart on Jan 9, 2020 18:10:59 GMT 1, How many of these were done? Any idea? I think the rats were 1000, from what i've seen and heard.
How many of these were done? Any idea? I think the rats were 1000, from what i've seen and heard.
|
|