toshspice
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 676
๐๐ป 878
January 2006
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by toshspice on May 4, 2017 22:58:50 GMT 1, Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it!
It's a PR job. Wool just got himself a whole heap of publicity.
Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! It's a PR job. Wool just got himself a whole heap of publicity.
|
|
tartarus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,628
๐๐ป 2,169
February 2013
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by tartarus on May 4, 2017 23:12:26 GMT 1, Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! It's a PR job. Wool just got himself a whole heap of publicity. oh! i just assumed he was dead already since its 3 million quids worth!
Sorry Mr Wool!
Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! It's a PR job. Wool just got himself a whole heap of publicity. oh! i just assumed he was dead already since its 3 million quids worth! Sorry Mr Wool!
|
|
Viking Surfer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,390
๐๐ป 3,508
February 2015
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Viking Surfer on May 4, 2017 23:21:48 GMT 1, Looking at his art on google images, I would genuinely take a Bambi La La Land.
Looking at his art on google images, I would genuinely take a Bambi La La Land.
|
|
tartarus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,628
๐๐ป 2,169
February 2013
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by tartarus on May 5, 2017 0:12:37 GMT 1, Looking at his art on google images, I would genuinely take a Bambi La La Land. that doesnt sound like good news!
Looking at his art on google images, I would genuinely take a Bambi La La Land. that doesnt sound like good news!
|
|
gmidd
Junior Member
Addicted2Art.com
๐จ๏ธ 1,246
๐๐ป 797
April 2014
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by gmidd on May 5, 2017 1:22:20 GMT 1, Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it!
Insurance scam? It all seems a bit fishy to me. Very odd.
Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! Insurance scam? It all seems a bit fishy to me. Very odd.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Deleted on May 5, 2017 4:07:28 GMT 1, CW - if you know you know, makes Banksy prices look like a bargain....
CW - if you know you know, makes Banksy prices look like a bargain....
|
|
|
milo99
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 320
๐๐ป 73
December 2015
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by milo99 on May 5, 2017 4:50:31 GMT 1, Never understood art like this, I know he doesn't need any publicity though
Never understood art like this, I know he doesn't need any publicity though
|
|
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Sliding on the Walls on May 5, 2017 6:18:54 GMT 1, THAT'S AWFUL!!!!
(the painting, I mean)
THAT'S AWFUL!!!!
(the painting, I mean)
|
|
tartarus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,628
๐๐ป 2,169
February 2013
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by tartarus on May 5, 2017 10:23:16 GMT 1, Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! Insurance scam? It all seems a bit fishy to me. Very odd. Would be weird if it was, anything is possible of course! But the damage looks so minimal and clean the repair isnt that hard or expensive. I think the publicity idea is probably spot on. Patch the back, touch up, back on sale in a week!
Destroys? well if that isnt a bit over the top as an explanation god knows what is! Looks like a couple of slashes with a razor blade or stanley blade so should be easy fixed. Bloody pointless thing to do, cant imagine what the hell he got out of doing it! Insurance scam? It all seems a bit fishy to me. Very odd. Would be weird if it was, anything is possible of course! But the damage looks so minimal and clean the repair isnt that hard or expensive. I think the publicity idea is probably spot on. Patch the back, touch up, back on sale in a week!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Deleted on May 5, 2017 11:13:36 GMT 1, It certainly looks like a set up.
Whether it's and excuse for a potential buyer to back out or whether it's a publicity stunt. Or whether this valued at millions painting is insured, it doe slook like a very delicate slash and looking at the artists ouevres. I'm sure he could knock out anotehr one easily.
It certainly looks like a set up.
Whether it's and excuse for a potential buyer to back out or whether it's a publicity stunt. Or whether this valued at millions painting is insured, it doe slook like a very delicate slash and looking at the artists ouevres. I'm sure he could knock out anotehr one easily.
|
|
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Howard Johnson on Aug 22, 2017 1:34:41 GMT 1, I have a near mint first edition of Christopher Wool & Felix Gonzalez Torres "show is over" lithograph, and would like to trade for my favorite wool "if you can't take a joke" poster. I'm not sure on the market value of these two but happy to add a bit of cash or another print to make it happen. Thank you!
I have a near mint first edition of Christopher Wool & Felix Gonzalez Torres "show is over" lithograph, and would like to trade for my favorite wool "if you can't take a joke" poster. I'm not sure on the market value of these two but happy to add a bit of cash or another print to make it happen. Thank you!
|
|
adewilliams
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,190
๐๐ป 321
May 2009
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by adewilliams on Oct 30, 2017 11:59:53 GMT 1, Looking to sell
Christopher Wool and Felix Gonzalez-Torres Untitled (poster), 1993 56 x 37 in. / 142.2 x 94 cm.
It is a large poster and has some marks and a small, less than 5mm tear in one corner, overall though, in nice condition.
Central London based but happy to post in a tube.
I am looking to get as close to ยฃ1k as possible, very happy to take offers.
thanks
Created originally in 1993 for the Printed Matter exhibition at Dia in New York as a "stack" piece.
Publisher: Printed Matter, New York
Looking to sell Christopher Wool and Felix Gonzalez-Torres Untitled (poster), 1993 56 x 37 in. / 142.2 x 94 cm. It is a large poster and has some marks and a small, less than 5mm tear in one corner, overall though, in nice condition. Central London based but happy to post in a tube. I am looking to get as close to ยฃ1k as possible, very happy to take offers. thanks
Created originally in 1993 for the Printed Matter exhibition at Dia in New York as a "stack" piece. Publisher: Printed Matter, New York
|
|
rosac
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,894
๐๐ป 1,538
July 2015
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by rosac on Oct 30, 2017 12:40:51 GMT 1, fantastic. love mine.
fantastic. love mine.
|
|
purpleandred
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 274
๐๐ป 231
September 2017
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by purpleandred on Oct 30, 2017 12:44:37 GMT 1, I'll swap you a MINT Banksy Soup cans
Nice poster, GLWTS
I'll swap you a MINT Banksy Soup cans Nice poster, GLWTS
|
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,963
๐๐ป 4,581
January 2008
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Ruggs on Oct 30, 2017 12:46:26 GMT 1, This is mine framed up.
This is mine framed up.
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,155
๐๐ป 4,461
March 2007
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Winter on Oct 30, 2017 14:17:09 GMT 1, Love his work, looks great
Love his work, looks great
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,963
๐๐ป 4,581
January 2008
|
|
|
adewilliams
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,190
๐๐ป 321
May 2009
|
makes this one a steal, a deal, sale of the f**kingcentury. In fact i think i'll keep it. Unless someone wants to buy it.
|
|
adewilliams
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,190
๐๐ป 321
May 2009
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by adewilliams on Nov 1, 2017 15:01:34 GMT 1, Now sold, thanks
Now sold, thanks
|
|
ryry1984
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 8
๐๐ป 1
October 2011
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by ryry1984 on Nov 7, 2017 20:43:08 GMT 1, Gutted I missed this, love it
Gutted I missed this, love it
|
|
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Sliding on the Walls on Nov 7, 2017 23:17:38 GMT 1, Dont know what it is about Christopher Wool but his art really angers me
Dont know what it is about Christopher Wool but his art really angers me
|
|
slayer
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 48
๐๐ป 50
November 2016
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by slayer on Nov 12, 2017 18:32:28 GMT 1, Dont know what it is about Christopher Wool but his art really angers me Haha...a realy good requirement for not buying a Piece of art for displaying at home
Dont know what it is about Christopher Wool but his art really angers me Haha...a realy good requirement for not buying a Piece of art for displaying at home
|
|
|
mose
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 410
๐๐ป 424
May 2017
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by mose on Nov 12, 2017 18:43:30 GMT 1, This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them:
www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-video
Now, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium. But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned?
This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them: www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-videoNow, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium. But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned?
|
|
rosac
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,894
๐๐ป 1,538
July 2015
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by rosac on Nov 12, 2017 21:54:15 GMT 1, This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them: www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-videoNow, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium.ย But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned?
The version I have framed came from the Felix Gonzalez Torres retrospective at Guggenheim museum NY in spring of 1995. It was produced by Felix Gonzalez Torres as a stack piece in collaboration with Wool. The piece is dated 1993, which is when it was first exhibited, with printing date listed as 1995 because this was specifically from the Guggenheim installation. FGT stack pieces are always printed on thin uncoated stock. Not just this poster, all posters FGT produced for all of his stack sculptures. If you see one that's on glossy stock like being sold here then itโs a similar Wool poster produced much more recently (without involvement of FGT, obviously, since he's been dead for 20 years). Wool made several paintings in early 90s using this same text but with variations in how text was formatted and other details. I don't know for a fact that these new Gagosian posters were printed on coated stock but large format posters typically are, and the Gonzalez-Torres/Wool posters definitely are not so if its a thick shiny poster that's probably what it is.
From collecting standpoint the one I have is earlier, it's Wool and FGT, it's a real artist's multiple, it's documented in the FGT catalogue raissone, among other places.
New or old these printed sheets are produced and made available for visitors to take each and every time the artwork is exhibited. There is the potential for thousands upon thousands of these sheets to be in circulation, so very tough verifying the exhibition from which any particular sheet was taken.
I have fairly strong provenance/story to go with mine and Iโm confident itโs genuine. So Iโm happy with that.
Itโs a beautiful and very powerful piece Iโm proud to have on my wall.
This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them: www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-videoNow, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium.ย But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned? The version I have framed came from the Felix Gonzalez Torres retrospective at Guggenheim museum NY in spring of 1995. It was produced by Felix Gonzalez Torres as a stack piece in collaboration with Wool. The piece is dated 1993, which is when it was first exhibited, with printing date listed as 1995 because this was specifically from the Guggenheim installation. FGT stack pieces are always printed on thin uncoated stock. Not just this poster, all posters FGT produced for all of his stack sculptures. If you see one that's on glossy stock like being sold here then itโs a similar Wool poster produced much more recently (without involvement of FGT, obviously, since he's been dead for 20 years). Wool made several paintings in early 90s using this same text but with variations in how text was formatted and other details. I don't know for a fact that these new Gagosian posters were printed on coated stock but large format posters typically are, and the Gonzalez-Torres/Wool posters definitely are not so if its a thick shiny poster that's probably what it is. From collecting standpoint the one I have is earlier, it's Wool and FGT, it's a real artist's multiple, it's documented in the FGT catalogue raissone, among other places. New or old these printed sheets are produced and made available for visitors to take each and every time the artwork is exhibited. There is the potential for thousands upon thousands of these sheets to be in circulation, so very tough verifying the exhibition from which any particular sheet was taken. I have fairly strong provenance/story to go with mine and Iโm confident itโs genuine. So Iโm happy with that. Itโs a beautiful and very powerful piece Iโm proud to have on my wall.
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,963
๐๐ป 4,581
January 2008
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Ruggs on Nov 12, 2017 21:59:32 GMT 1, This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them: www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-videoNow, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium. But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned? The version I have framed came from the Felix Gonzalez Torres retrospective at Guggenheim museum NY in spring of 1995. It was produced by Felix Gonzalez Torres as a stack piece in collaboration with Wool. The piece is dated 1993, which is when it was first exhibited, with printing date listed as 1995 because this was specifically from the Guggenheim installation. FGT stack pieces are always printed on thin uncoated stock. Not just this poster, all posters FGT produced for all of his stack sculptures. If you see one that's on glossy stock like being sold here then itโs a similar Wool poster produced much more recently (without involvement of FGT, obviously, since he's been dead for 20 years). Wool made several paintings in early 90s using this same text but with variations in how text was formatted and other details. I don't know for a fact that these new Gagosian posters were printed on coated stock but large format posters typically are, and the Gonzalez-Torres/Wool posters definitely are not so if its a thick shiny poster that's probably what it is. From collecting standpoint the one I have is earlier, it's Wool and FGT, it's a real artist's multiple, it's documented in the FGT catalogue raissone, among other places. New or old these printed sheets are produced and made available for visitors to take each and every time the artwork is exhibited. There is the potential for thousands upon thousands of these sheets to be in circulation, so very tough verifying the exhibition from which any particular sheet was taken. I have fairly strong provenance/story to go with mine and Iโm confident itโs genuine. So Iโm happy with that. Itโs a beautiful and very powerful piece Iโm proud to have on my wall. My version pictured earlier in this thread is from the same Guggenheim Museum exhibition. Here's some close-ups.
This piece is fantastic, but also a concern for me. What's to stop it being reproduced by the thousands when the Felix Gonzalez-Torres work is shown again? It was already shown in 2013 at Gagosian London, another fat stack of them: www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/the-show-is-over--october-15-2013/exhibition-videoNow, if there was a way to differentiate them, there's something. To me, an identifiable, first-showing, Felix Gonzalez-Torres still alive example from Printed Matter is something special indeed. A true piece of history worth premium. But, being that there is nothing like a receipt or whatnot, can variations be discerned? The version I have framed came from the Felix Gonzalez Torres retrospective at Guggenheim museum NY in spring of 1995. It was produced by Felix Gonzalez Torres as a stack piece in collaboration with Wool. The piece is dated 1993, which is when it was first exhibited, with printing date listed as 1995 because this was specifically from the Guggenheim installation. FGT stack pieces are always printed on thin uncoated stock. Not just this poster, all posters FGT produced for all of his stack sculptures. If you see one that's on glossy stock like being sold here then itโs a similar Wool poster produced much more recently (without involvement of FGT, obviously, since he's been dead for 20 years). Wool made several paintings in early 90s using this same text but with variations in how text was formatted and other details. I don't know for a fact that these new Gagosian posters were printed on coated stock but large format posters typically are, and the Gonzalez-Torres/Wool posters definitely are not so if its a thick shiny poster that's probably what it is. From collecting standpoint the one I have is earlier, it's Wool and FGT, it's a real artist's multiple, it's documented in the FGT catalogue raissone, among other places. New or old these printed sheets are produced and made available for visitors to take each and every time the artwork is exhibited. There is the potential for thousands upon thousands of these sheets to be in circulation, so very tough verifying the exhibition from which any particular sheet was taken. I have fairly strong provenance/story to go with mine and Iโm confident itโs genuine. So Iโm happy with that. Itโs a beautiful and very powerful piece Iโm proud to have on my wall. My version pictured earlier in this thread is from the same Guggenheim Museum exhibition. Here's some close-ups.
|
|
bjoern
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,293
๐๐ป 569
September 2014
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by bjoern on Nov 13, 2017 11:49:26 GMT 1, Awesome!
Awesome!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Deleted on Mar 9, 2018 21:59:45 GMT 1, Hey all,
Sorry not to post in art wanted, I just don't think it's used these days as others have said.
I'm looking to buy a Christopher Wool / Felix Gonzalez 'Untitled' poster. It's unsigned and really just a fakeable poster, but I think its cool and would like to put it up. If you've got one for sale please let me know,
Thanks !!!
Hey all,
Sorry not to post in art wanted, I just don't think it's used these days as others have said.
I'm looking to buy a Christopher Wool / Felix Gonzalez 'Untitled' poster. It's unsigned and really just a fakeable poster, but I think its cool and would like to put it up. If you've got one for sale please let me know,
Thanks !!!
|
|
rosac
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,894
๐๐ป 1,538
July 2015
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by rosac on Mar 9, 2018 22:24:50 GMT 1, Hey all, Sorry not to post in art wanted, I just don't think it's used these days as others have said. I'm looking to buy a Christopher Wool / Felix Gonzalez 'Untitled' poster. It's unsigned and really just a fakeable poster, but I think its cool and would like to put it up. If you've got one for sale please let me know, Thanks !!!
I have one but itโs not for sale... One of my favourite pieces despite only a โposterโ. Good luck with your search
Hey all, Sorry not to post in art wanted, I just don't think it's used these days as others have said. I'm looking to buy a Christopher Wool / Felix Gonzalez 'Untitled' poster. It's unsigned and really just a fakeable poster, but I think its cool and would like to put it up. If you've got one for sale please let me know, Thanks !!! I have one but itโs not for sale... One of my favourite pieces despite only a โposterโ. Good luck with your search
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Deleted on Mar 9, 2018 22:32:43 GMT 1, Yeah, its not the most expensive or "high quality" piece, but I'm a fan, cool image
Yeah, its not the most expensive or "high quality" piece, but I'm a fan, cool image
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,963
๐๐ป 4,581
January 2008
|
Christopher Wool ๐บ๐ธ Stencil Letters โข Book โข Print Release, by Ruggs on Mar 9, 2018 22:56:45 GMT 1, I purchased one from the US last year from a very good source. Mine is a smaller sized poster from an exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum, New York in 1995. Absolutely love it. There's a much larger sized format that was available from an exhibition at the Gagosian Gallery, London in 2013 that might be worth trying to track down. Good luck sourcing one losvce.
I purchased one from the US last year from a very good source. Mine is a smaller sized poster from an exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum, New York in 1995. Absolutely love it. There's a much larger sized format that was available from an exhibition at the Gagosian Gallery, London in 2013 that might be worth trying to track down. Good luck sourcing one losvce.
|
|