daniel3886
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,250
ππ» 995
October 2006
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by daniel3886 on Sept 2, 2020 18:33:31 GMT 1, I was told it sold the morning after, I will confirm.
I was told it sold the morning after, I will confirm.
|
|
daniel3886
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,250
ππ» 995
October 2006
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by daniel3886 on Sept 15, 2020 11:09:36 GMT 1, The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation.
Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday.
βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ
The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com.
We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time.
Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.com
The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation.
Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday.
βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ
The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com.
We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time.
Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.com
|
|
coller
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,384
ππ» 2,371
April 2015
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by coller on Sept 15, 2020 12:49:14 GMT 1, grabbing popcorn before the bidder posts again
grabbing popcorn before the bidder posts again
|
|
reg
New Member
π¨οΈ 339
ππ» 499
October 2007
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by reg on Sept 15, 2020 13:12:22 GMT 1, I've no horse in this particular race but am genuinely interested in what happens in a scenario where a seller withdraws after the hammer or the buyer fails to pay.
It must happen, without going into the specifics of this thread is there an industry wide protocol / approach?
I've no horse in this particular race but am genuinely interested in what happens in a scenario where a seller withdraws after the hammer or the buyer fails to pay.
It must happen, without going into the specifics of this thread is there an industry wide protocol / approach?
|
|
reg
New Member
π¨οΈ 339
ππ» 499
October 2007
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by reg on Sept 15, 2020 13:12:43 GMT 1, I've no horse in this particular race but am genuinely interested in what happens in a scenario where a seller withdraws after the hammer or the buyer fails to pay.
It must happen, without going into the specifics of this thread is there an industry wide protocol / approach?
I've no horse in this particular race but am genuinely interested in what happens in a scenario where a seller withdraws after the hammer or the buyer fails to pay.
It must happen, without going into the specifics of this thread is there an industry wide protocol / approach?
|
|
urbanflik
New Member
π¨οΈ 484
ππ» 372
February 2010
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by urbanflik on Sept 15, 2020 13:24:19 GMT 1, Are Tate not allowed to change their stance on the matter then?
Are Tate not allowed to change their stance on the matter then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Daylight Robber on Sept 15, 2020 13:35:16 GMT 1, The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation. Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday. βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com. We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time.Β Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.comΒ
Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion.
The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation. Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday. βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com. We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time.Β Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.comΒ Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion. |
|
Graham H
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,304
ππ» 2,417
November 2012
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Graham H on Sept 15, 2020 13:39:42 GMT 1, I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation..
They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward..
Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation
The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation. Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday. βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com. We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time. Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.com Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion.
I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation.. They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward.. Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation The original thread seems to have disappeared (not at my request), I wanted to update members here on the outcome of the situation. Following discussions with our legal team and consigner the following offer was made to the winning bidder yesterday. βWe will complete the sale if we receive cleared funds by 5pm on Wednesdayβ The buyer has decided not to proceed. This closes the matter from our side if there are any further questions Iβll be happy to answer them here or via mail Danny@tateward.com. We have thousands of satisfied customers, inevitably there will be the a small number of times when issues occur. We will always work to resolve these amicably and to the satisfaction of both sides and if that requires us to make a profit over reputation choice weβll choose reputation every time. Consignments for our next sale (Oct 14th) close 23rd September so please send any works youβd like to consign to Harry@tateward.com Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion. |
|
cest
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,725
ππ» 1,160
September 2018
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by cest on Sept 15, 2020 13:45:53 GMT 1, I had a good experience with buying from tate ward, but this is concerning. I hope they tighten up the seller x auction house contracts
I had a good experience with buying from tate ward, but this is concerning. I hope they tighten up the seller x auction house contracts
|
|
|
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Daylight Robber on Sept 15, 2020 13:51:24 GMT 1, I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation.. They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward..Β Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion.
A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement.
I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation.. They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward..Β Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation Hardly working to resolve to the satisfaction of both sides if you lay down short deadlines without discussion. A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement. |
|
ollie288
New Member
π¨οΈ 40
ππ» 32
September 2019
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by ollie288 on Sept 15, 2020 13:58:22 GMT 1, Have used Tate Ward multiple times, only as a buyer, and have had a great level of service each time. Hope this is sorted out, but I personally have had no complaints.
Have used Tate Ward multiple times, only as a buyer, and have had a great level of service each time. Hope this is sorted out, but I personally have had no complaints.
|
|
|
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Happy Shopper on Sept 15, 2020 14:01:26 GMT 1, I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation.. They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward.. Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement.
That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay.
Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward.
Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again.
I have no affiliation with the Auction House.. but id say that it appears that they have at least offered a solution rather than use legal excuses or ignore a genuine situation.. They at least gave the winner the option and i may be wrong but looks like the timescale would still be longer than he had to pay when winning originally.. and for some reason he chose not to take it forward.. Cant do any more in my eyes.. other than learn a lesson and therefore with those learnings hope not to repeat the situation A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement. That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay. Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward. Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again. |
|
Winter
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 7,155
ππ» 4,461
March 2007
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Winter on Sept 15, 2020 14:02:29 GMT 1, Sounds like the buyer was given ample time to make payment and has chosen not to. Sounds like a fair amount of time to me.
Sounds like the buyer was given ample time to make payment and has chosen not to. Sounds like a fair amount of time to me.
|
|
coller
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,384
ππ» 2,371
April 2015
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by coller on Sept 15, 2020 14:03:13 GMT 1, it seemed like the auction house caused the problems. and it seems like the auction house is supposed to be the middle man between buyer and seller, but is mainly operating to benefit the seller here.
it seemed like the auction house caused the problems. and it seems like the auction house is supposed to be the middle man between buyer and seller, but is mainly operating to benefit the seller here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Daylight Robber on Sept 15, 2020 14:09:16 GMT 1, A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement. That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay. Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward. Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again.
But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss.
A solution entirely on their terms isn't working towards an amicable solution with all interested parties. In my humble opinion it shows how little they value the customer who through no fault of his own was originally screwed over. The best way to right the wrong would've been to talk it through together like grown ups and come to an agreement. That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay. Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward. Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again. But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. |
|
18921892
New Member
π¨οΈ 659
ππ» 369
May 2020
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by 18921892 on Sept 15, 2020 14:15:42 GMT 1, It's a bit rich for the potential buyer to come on here and moan about the auction house, then they work out a way to sell the piece to the seller and they don't want it. What a waste of time for everyone, possibly didn't have the money or buyers remorse that's why they were messing about with credit cards.
It's a bit rich for the potential buyer to come on here and moan about the auction house, then they work out a way to sell the piece to the seller and they don't want it. What a waste of time for everyone, possibly didn't have the money or buyers remorse that's why they were messing about with credit cards.
|
|
Majestic
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,042
ππ» 1,462
January 2016
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Majestic on Sept 15, 2020 14:21:00 GMT 1, I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase.
'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind...
I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase.
'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind...
|
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by NYart on Sept 15, 2020 14:23:10 GMT 1, That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay. Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward. Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again. But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss.
I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only.
That's like accusing a shop of "only selling on their terms". It is what it is. Pay or don't pay. Seems like it was the seller that caused the main issue, not the auction house. They just tried to resolve it, but then the buyer didn't help himself by being a bit awkward. Just an unfortunate set of circumstances, that probably won't be repeated again. But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only. |
|
therivler1
New Member
π¨οΈ 988
ππ» 479
July 2011
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by therivler1 on Sept 15, 2020 14:25:06 GMT 1, But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only.
But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only. Wire clears in one day. Buyer should have been prepared to wire funds fully after winning. Asking to put that much money on a credit card is nonsense. |
|
|
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Daylight Robber on Sept 15, 2020 14:25:54 GMT 1, I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase. 'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind...
Or someone who doesn't want to hand over their hard earned to an outfit who acted unprofessionally in the 1st instance and who then did little to resolve 'amicably'.
I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase. 'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind... Or someone who doesn't want to hand over their hard earned to an outfit who acted unprofessionally in the 1st instance and who then did little to resolve 'amicably'. |
|
18921892
New Member
π¨οΈ 659
ππ» 369
May 2020
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by 18921892 on Sept 15, 2020 14:37:18 GMT 1, But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only.
But it wasn't an attempt to resolve in a manner which was satisfactory to all concerned, as was stated. Having been messed around initially a small amount of courtesy wouldn't have gone amiss. I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only. It should be bank transfer only. |
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by NYart on Sept 15, 2020 14:38:09 GMT 1, Wire clears in one day.Β Buyer should have been prepared to wire funds fully after winning.Β Asking to put that much money on a credit card is nonsense. Depending on what points he collects it would be enough points for two free 1st class tickets to somewhere nice.
Its certainly not βnonsenseβ , I charge anything and everything the vendor and my limits will allow. Zero benefit for the buyer to use wire, debit, or cash.
All my point is, people are suggesting heβs a tire kicker, canβt afford it anyway etc. They initially OKβd credit and now the βresolutionβ is necessitating a wire transfer. That and the house giving back the seller their print before the payment deadline had passed are the only two relevant facts in my eyes. The rest is speculation and finger pointing.
Wire clears in one day.Β Buyer should have been prepared to wire funds fully after winning.Β Asking to put that much money on a credit card is nonsense. Depending on what points he collects it would be enough points for two free 1st class tickets to somewhere nice. Its certainly not βnonsenseβ , I charge anything and everything the vendor and my limits will allow. Zero benefit for the buyer to use wire, debit, or cash. All my point is, people are suggesting heβs a tire kicker, canβt afford it anyway etc. They initially OKβd credit and now the βresolutionβ is necessitating a wire transfer. That and the house giving back the seller their print before the payment deadline had passed are the only two relevant facts in my eyes. The rest is speculation and finger pointing. |
|
|
|
therivler1
New Member
π¨οΈ 988
ππ» 479
July 2011
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by therivler1 on Sept 15, 2020 14:38:18 GMT 1, Wire clears in one day. Buyer should have been prepared to wire funds fully after winning. Asking to put that much money on a credit card is nonsense. Depending on what points he collects it would be enough points for two free 1st class tickets to somewhere nice.
Wire clears in one day. Buyer should have been prepared to wire funds fully after winning. Asking to put that much money on a credit card is nonsense. Depending on what points he collects it would be enough points for two free 1st class tickets to somewhere nice. True, but irrelevant. No harm in asking, but if you bid, you have to be prepared to pay cash. |
|
Graham H
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,304
ππ» 2,417
November 2012
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Graham H on Sept 15, 2020 14:38:40 GMT 1, Takes a strongly principled man to hold such a grudge with the piece he could have had and the market how it is
We havent had the buyers reasons as to why he didnt go through with it.. so its all subjective
I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase. 'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind... Or someone who doesn't want to hand over their hard earned to an outfit who acted unprofessionally in the 1st instance and who then did little to resolve 'amicably'.
Takes a strongly principled man to hold such a grudge with the piece he could have had and the market how it is We havent had the buyers reasons as to why he didnt go through with it.. so its all subjective I think if the buyer wanted it enough they had every opportunity to purchase. 'Tyre Kicker' comes to mind... Or someone who doesn't want to hand over their hard earned to an outfit who acted unprofessionally in the 1st instance and who then did little to resolve 'amicably'. |
|
Lazarus II
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,804
ππ» 2,429
August 2019
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Lazarus II on Sept 15, 2020 14:40:37 GMT 1, I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only. It should be bank transfer only.Β
probably would save a load of problems but it wasnt and buyers payment terms had already been accepted up front.
I think the issue is βCleared payment by 5pm Wednesdayβ had they not given the print back to the seller, theyβd have likely had cleared funds from the buyer by now. Now the deals suddenly potentially back on and he has to scramble - not to get funds sent - but to have them cleared? Heβs in no control over that, they may as well have said bank transfer only. It should be bank transfer only.Β probably would save a load of problems but it wasnt and buyers payment terms had already been accepted up front. |
|
T-Bro
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,522
ππ» 1,422
April 2006
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by T-Bro on Sept 15, 2020 14:47:17 GMT 1, My Experience with Tateward has been faultless as a buyer and a seller. From my perspective, they have given me the white glove treatment and I am not on the top of either category.
Knowing Danny and his team they would have done everything they could to sort out the situation and keep all parties happy.
My Experience with Tateward has been faultless as a buyer and a seller. From my perspective, they have given me the white glove treatment and I am not on the top of either category.
Knowing Danny and his team they would have done everything they could to sort out the situation and keep all parties happy.
|
|
Lazarus II
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,804
ππ» 2,429
August 2019
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Lazarus II on Sept 15, 2020 14:49:32 GMT 1, I have to admit, I'm rather confused by this. Is Daniel the buyer and is now publicly moaning because TateWard didn't give him enough time to complete the purchase? Who's who in this? And what exactly is the problem?
Daniel is part of Tate Ward.
I have to admit, I'm rather confused by this. Is Daniel the buyer and is now publicly moaning because TateWard didn't give him enough time to complete the purchase? Who's who in this? And what exactly is the problem? Daniel is part of Tate Ward. |
|
Winter
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 7,155
ππ» 4,461
March 2007
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Winter on Sept 15, 2020 14:49:42 GMT 1, Buyer still has over 24hours to pay - surprised they didnβt find a way
Buyer still has over 24hours to pay - surprised they didnβt find a way
|
|
Lazarus II
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,804
ππ» 2,429
August 2019
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Lazarus II on Sept 15, 2020 14:51:10 GMT 1, Buyer still has over 24hours to pay - surprised they didnβt find a way
with every hour that passes the value increases, apparently Banksy is hot just now.
Buyer still has over 24hours to pay - surprised they didnβt find a way with every hour that passes the value increases, apparently Banksy is hot just now. |
|
Rubberneck
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,050
ππ» 1,433
October 2018
|
TateWard β’ Art Auctions π¬π§, by Rubberneck on Sept 15, 2020 14:58:27 GMT 1, What a clusterfuck .. the buyer lost me at airmiles but definitely has been badly handled.. breaking your own rules is not a good look.
What a clusterfuck .. the buyer lost me at airmiles but definitely has been badly handled.. breaking your own rules is not a good look.
|
|
