When I’ve asked them for condition reports in the past, they have highlighted any issues and provided me with all the photos I had requested (nothing was hidden at all). If you ask for specific information they have always been very open and honest, so I would therefore advise that any buyers should be specific with what they want to see.

My experiences have been pretty mixed. As a buyer make sure you get a lot of additional good quality photographs of the actual piece as they do use stock photos. Preferably go and see the piece. However, to be fair when you push they always provide pictures and ultimately the condition reports have been reasonably accurate. However my wariness of them has always made less likely to buy from them and certainly not bid high, I go looking for bargains.

As a seller though their reputation goes before them with the issue around fakes tarnishing their image. Rather than retreat away from that market with a fulsome apology, they continued in it, not a good call in my opinion. So this has personally made me stay away from them especially as a sales route.

Personally I have found all of the individuals professional to deal with and pretty knowledgeable, they are simply trying to make a business work and perhaps, again in my own opinion, may have strayed a little close to the sun in the past!! They are prepared to try and offer something different which is a credit to them.

Bought and sold loads with them, no issues and I find them a lot easier to deal with than most of the big boys. Like a few people of said if you're consigning do your homework, they get some very strong results for certain artists but obviously quite urban focused.

I have used Tate for a few years now and have found them great to deal with and make sure that the buyers and sellers are happy.

I have sold privately, sold in auction and bought through auction and the process has been pretty seamless. I have got to know Danny and the team and their customer service has always been top-notch.

As a new auction house, I think they accepted all sorts of lots but they are now a lot more selective and I think they are maturing into their business. I am sure they have their faults and each person's experience is different but I wanted to put in my tuppence, for what it's worth.

I would advise prospective sellers (and buyers) to direct any questions or concerns to the Tate ward team and see if they settle your reservations.

£5,000 - £7,000 estimates on currency unique prints...

Looks like both Suanjaya prints passed, including All In Home below retail. Oli Epp's Red did 1800gbp however

Could anyone share a link to the results please? I can’t seem to find them in the Tate ward website.

Does anyone know what the Martin Whatson 'Rock Climber (Brass)', 2021 went for? cant find the results :/

This. Kills me every time...

Something is really aloft with the market - James Mac Queen prints sell for thousands and multiple bids while perfectly scoops of Invader and Harland’s are passed. And most Connor Brother prints are fought over. What is going on?

I personally think this is a terrible thing for an auction house to do, they know themselves at Tate Ward that these Shrigley posters are still available. If its true that they are an up and coming reputable auction house then they really shouldnt have these up for sale. Its sad for the buyers and just creates bad press for TW surely?

Hello,
Does anyone know where we can find the results of this last sale?
Thanks

From the link you can see that it was an LED. Perhaps one of the numerous Tate Ward representatives that frequent the forum can tell us what happened. A refresher:
urbanartassociation.com/thread/168924/tate-ward-selling-fakes

I have recopied the link:
www.tateward.com/auction/lot/lot-304---invader-french-1969--led-2017/?lot=15513&so=0&st=&sto=0&au=89&ef=&et=&ic=False&sd=1&pp=96&pn=4&g=1

Results:
www.tateward.com/auction/details/062-tate-ward--artsy---by-collectors-for-collectors/?au=89