|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Charlie Bronson on May 4, 2021 22:30:04 GMT 1, Where are we at with Kaws at the moment - is $6,000 a good price, given what his prints go for on the secondary market? yes he def commands that price on release, not a fan of the image but if u like kaws n can park almost 7k after tax n let it sit, it’ll def appreciate, like all kaws prints
I agree. I got a lot of shit from some members on here(ones that I don’t like or respect)about buying the Urge set. Truth is I bought two of them, sold one for north of $45k and kept the other. One member had the audacity to post “let’s revisit this post in a year” when we were disagreeing on whether Urge would flip well.
Where are we at with Kaws at the moment - is $6,000 a good price, given what his prints go for on the secondary market? yes he def commands that price on release, not a fan of the image but if u like kaws n can park almost 7k after tax n let it sit, it’ll def appreciate, like all kaws prints I agree. I got a lot of shit from some members on here(ones that I don’t like or respect)about buying the Urge set. Truth is I bought two of them, sold one for north of $45k and kept the other. One member had the audacity to post “let’s revisit this post in a year” when we were disagreeing on whether Urge would flip well. |
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 4, 2021 22:36:22 GMT 1, Well that worked out pretty fine for Warhol, his collectors and his legacy
I think it’s hard for us to understand when you’re at that level of success and everybody is begging for a piece of you at any price why you should resist releasing another print..
Even if it’s not the most revolutionary piece and doesn’t add anything to your artistic legacy.
All artist do it until collectors get tired of them and stop buying.
But Kaws has already been there for 30 years and know very well how to play this game.
Well that worked out pretty fine for Warhol, his collectors and his legacy
I think it’s hard for us to understand when you’re at that level of success and everybody is begging for a piece of you at any price why you should resist releasing another print..
Even if it’s not the most revolutionary piece and doesn’t add anything to your artistic legacy.
All artist do it until collectors get tired of them and stop buying.
But Kaws has already been there for 30 years and know very well how to play this game.
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Inknart on May 4, 2021 22:52:12 GMT 1, Well that worked out pretty fine for Warhol, his collectors and his legacy I think it’s hard for us to understand when you’re at that level of success and everybody is begging for a piece of you at any price why you should resist releasing another print.. Even if it’s not the most revolutionary piece and doesn’t add anything to your artistic legacy. All artist do it until collectors get tired of them and stop buying. But Kaws has already been there for 30 years and know very well how to play this game.
I don't think anyone is begging for these releases anymore. Especially these depressing Companion images, but hey at least this one has a little color.
I also don't think KAWS has been a blue chip artist for 30 years. 10 years ago nobody cared, it was mostly Kidrobot forum discussions selling and buying his toys.
Well that worked out pretty fine for Warhol, his collectors and his legacy I think it’s hard for us to understand when you’re at that level of success and everybody is begging for a piece of you at any price why you should resist releasing another print.. Even if it’s not the most revolutionary piece and doesn’t add anything to your artistic legacy. All artist do it until collectors get tired of them and stop buying. But Kaws has already been there for 30 years and know very well how to play this game. Actually, from what I understand he made so much art that they couldn't give it away. His life being cut short contributed to his legacy and collection imo. I don't think anyone is begging for these releases anymore. Especially these depressing Companion images, but hey at least this one has a little color. I also don't think KAWS has been a blue chip artist for 30 years. 10 years ago nobody cared, it was mostly Kidrobot forum discussions selling and buying his toys. |
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Terry Fuckwitt on May 4, 2021 23:58:18 GMT 1, Kaws is not even close to Warhol. I can't stand brainwash, but he's closer to Warhol than kaws. And Murakami is closer to Warhol than brainwash. This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?
Pharrell Williams?
Kaws is not even close to Warhol. I can't stand brainwash, but he's closer to Warhol than kaws. And Murakami is closer to Warhol than brainwash. This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?Pharrell Williams? |
|
timmundo
New Member
🗨️ 125
👍🏻 183
September 2017
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by timmundo on May 5, 2021 0:23:55 GMT 1, Fellow NY area artist should have waited a couple days with BASK news earlier.
Fellow NY area artist should have waited a couple days with BASK news earlier.
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Ildefonso 77 on May 5, 2021 2:40:43 GMT 1, this is crazy! i feel depressed and angry at the same time.
Props to Kaws for feeding the addicts he's created.
Even if i had the funds i wont be falling for this one.
But who needs me when there are thousands following
the tune of the piper.
this is crazy! i feel depressed and angry at the same time.
Props to Kaws for feeding the addicts he's created.
Even if i had the funds i wont be falling for this one.
But who needs me when there are thousands following
the tune of the piper.
|
|
|
|
stavi
New Member
🗨️ 184
👍🏻 151
September 2017
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by stavi on May 5, 2021 3:15:34 GMT 1, I like everything overall, but i think i would like it more if it was an edition of 100. Well, at least at that price.
I like everything overall, but i think i would like it more if it was an edition of 100. Well, at least at that price.
|
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 5, 2021 7:30:52 GMT 1, Kaws is not even close to Warhol. I can't stand brainwash, but he's closer to Warhol than kaws. And Murakami is closer to Warhol than brainwash. This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?
It’s all personal opinions and preferences..
Some people like Kaws or Murakami or even Brainwash
Today Kaws is one of the most successful and relevant artists in the world,
like what Murakami was maybe 10 years ago
While Murakami’s works are sitting now unsold in galleries,
Kaws can sell about anything for any price he commands
Time will tell who of them will end up closer to Warhol
It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind
Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible
Kaws is not even close to Warhol. I can't stand brainwash, but he's closer to Warhol than kaws. And Murakami is closer to Warhol than brainwash. This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?It’s all personal opinions and preferences.. Some people like Kaws or Murakami or even Brainwash Today Kaws is one of the most successful and relevant artists in the world, like what Murakami was maybe 10 years ago While Murakami’s works are sitting now unsold in galleries, Kaws can sell about anything for any price he commands Time will tell who of them will end up closer to Warhol It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible |
|
Reader
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,272
👍🏻 2,831
June 2016
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Reader on May 5, 2021 8:02:15 GMT 1, This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible
This is like one of those GCSE logic questions. If Kaws is not close to Warhol, and Brainwash is closer to Warhol than Kaws, but Murakami is closer to Warhol than Brainwash, who is standing next to Kaws?It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible A lot of people seem to "project" this, but I've worked with and been around artists all my life...I've yet to meet one who has this as inspiration, motivation or a goal. |
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 5, 2021 8:24:24 GMT 1, It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible A lot of people seem to "project" this, but I've worked with and been around artists all my life...I've yet to meet one who has this as inspiration, motivation or a goal.
IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this
Maybe not even to themselves
However actions speak louder than words
Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar
Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work
And honestly I don’t blame them..
At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table
It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do!
Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job.
It’s clear that both have the same goal Warhol had in mind Sell everything they can sell and make as much money as possible A lot of people seem to "project" this, but I've worked with and been around artists all my life...I've yet to meet one who has this as inspiration, motivation or a goal. IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this Maybe not even to themselves However actions speak louder than words Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work And honestly I don’t blame them.. At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do! Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job. |
|
Reader
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,272
👍🏻 2,831
June 2016
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Reader on May 5, 2021 8:34:14 GMT 1, A lot of people seem to "project" this, but I've worked with and been around artists all my life...I've yet to meet one who has this as inspiration, motivation or a goal. IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this Maybe not even to themselves However actions speak louder than words Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work And honestly I don’t blame them.. At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do! Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job.
A lot of people seem to "project" this, but I've worked with and been around artists all my life...I've yet to meet one who has this as inspiration, motivation or a goal. IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this Maybe not even to themselves However actions speak louder than words Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work And honestly I don’t blame them.. At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do! Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job. If you run the numbers, the data doesn't come close to bearing this out. If you cross reference the amount of visual artists in any town/city or country's artist union, with the amount that say that sales of art or public grants are their main source of income, you'll find a tiny percentage. The vast majority of artists exist below or close to the poverty line. This is the reason they jumped on NFT's, not for an "extra buck", but for any buck. We exist in a little privileged bubble here, it's far from reality for 99% of artists. |
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 5, 2021 8:39:55 GMT 1, IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this Maybe not even to themselves However actions speak louder than words Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work And honestly I don’t blame them.. At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do! Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job. If you run the numbers, the data doesn't come close to bearing your opinion out. If you cross reference the amount of visual artists in any town/city or country's artist union, with the amount that say that sales of art or public grants are their main source of income, you'll find a tiny percentage. The vast majority of artists exist below or close to the poverty line. This is the reason they jumped on NFT's, not for an "extra buck", but for any buck. We exist in a little privileged bubble here, it's far from reality for 99% of artists.
I understand and agree with everything you say.
Of course I was not referring to all artists
I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money
It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive
I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have
IMHO most artists do it but would never admit this Maybe not even to themselves However actions speak louder than words Just look at the whole NFT thing and how many artists jumped right away releasing shit just to make an extra dollar Same with releasing prints and editions that don’t add anything new to their work And honestly I don’t blame them.. At the end of the day it’s also their job and what puts food on the table It’s like me as an architect saying that I don’t take certain jobs mainly for the money.. Of course I do! Every now and then there’s a certain project that inspires me and I do it for my personal enjoyment and “legacy” but meanwhile I do many other projects because it’s basically my job. If you run the numbers, the data doesn't come close to bearing your opinion out. If you cross reference the amount of visual artists in any town/city or country's artist union, with the amount that say that sales of art or public grants are their main source of income, you'll find a tiny percentage. The vast majority of artists exist below or close to the poverty line. This is the reason they jumped on NFT's, not for an "extra buck", but for any buck. We exist in a little privileged bubble here, it's far from reality for 99% of artists. I understand and agree with everything you say. Of course I was not referring to all artists I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have |
|
Reader
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,272
👍🏻 2,831
June 2016
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Reader on May 5, 2021 8:58:17 GMT 1, If you run the numbers, the data doesn't come close to bearing your opinion out. If you cross reference the amount of visual artists in any town/city or country's artist union, with the amount that say that sales of art or public grants are their main source of income, you'll find a tiny percentage. The vast majority of artists exist below or close to the poverty line. This is the reason they jumped on NFT's, not for an "extra buck", but for any buck. We exist in a little privileged bubble here, it's far from reality for 99% of artists. I understand and agree with everything you say. Of course I was not referring to all artists I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have
If you run the numbers, the data doesn't come close to bearing your opinion out. If you cross reference the amount of visual artists in any town/city or country's artist union, with the amount that say that sales of art or public grants are their main source of income, you'll find a tiny percentage. The vast majority of artists exist below or close to the poverty line. This is the reason they jumped on NFT's, not for an "extra buck", but for any buck. We exist in a little privileged bubble here, it's far from reality for 99% of artists. I understand and agree with everything you say. Of course I was not referring to all artists I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have Ah, apologies, I misunderstood, but again I still don't really see it as a "general rule", I guess the likes of Murakami banging out a relentless stream of consumer goods would claim that it was intrinsic to his concept. i'm presuming Kaws with his plates and teapots and plush etc would now retrofit his success into his concept but I think there's a difference between the two. But yes, there's a fine line between quite a few consumer lines and the primary work and this seems to be the prints. Maybe this is why they're forced to "go big" with the primary works, just to show your average consumer there's still a difference between the two. I was just looking at the Adam Pendelton DADA print and it's obvious he enagages with the form as an art, same with the likes of Phlegm etc. Whilst quite a lot of others seem happy to just hit the print button. |
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 5, 2021 9:45:44 GMT 1, I understand and agree with everything you say. Of course I was not referring to all artists I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have Ah, apologies, I misunderstood, but again I still don't really see it as a "general rule", I guess the likes of Murakami banging out a relentless stream of consumer goods would claim that it was intrinsic to his concept. i'm presuming Kaws with his plates and teapots and plush etc would now retrofit his success into his concept but I think there's a difference between the two. But yes, there's a fine line between quite a few consumer lines and the primary work and this seems to be the prints. Maybe this is why they're forced to "go big" with the primary works, just to show your average consumer there's still a difference between the two. I was just looking at the Adam Pendelton DADA print and it's obvious he enagages with the form as an art, same with the likes of Phlegm etc. Whilst quite a lot of others seem happy to just hit the print button.
Your point about these artists “going big” with their primary work is very interesting and true.
I guess they want to reinforce the concept that you can get a small piece of them if you pay a certain amount but if you want the real bigger deal you have to pay more.
Maybe they also are thinking about their clients and where these works end up.. Building lobbies, rich people with big houses who want to show off these works etc
I also agree about the engagement with print as a form of art,
but unfortunately most of these artists just hit the print button because it’s only another easy product to put on the market..
I understand and agree with everything you say. Of course I was not referring to all artists I’m sure nobody decides to become an artist for the money It’s such a tough and competitive field where even the most talented ones struggle to economically survive I’m only referring to that 1% of artists who have commercial success and are in the position to sell anything because of the huge follow they have Ah, apologies, I misunderstood, but again I still don't really see it as a "general rule", I guess the likes of Murakami banging out a relentless stream of consumer goods would claim that it was intrinsic to his concept. i'm presuming Kaws with his plates and teapots and plush etc would now retrofit his success into his concept but I think there's a difference between the two. But yes, there's a fine line between quite a few consumer lines and the primary work and this seems to be the prints. Maybe this is why they're forced to "go big" with the primary works, just to show your average consumer there's still a difference between the two. I was just looking at the Adam Pendelton DADA print and it's obvious he enagages with the form as an art, same with the likes of Phlegm etc. Whilst quite a lot of others seem happy to just hit the print button. Your point about these artists “going big” with their primary work is very interesting and true. I guess they want to reinforce the concept that you can get a small piece of them if you pay a certain amount but if you want the real bigger deal you have to pay more. Maybe they also are thinking about their clients and where these works end up.. Building lobbies, rich people with big houses who want to show off these works etc I also agree about the engagement with print as a form of art, but unfortunately most of these artists just hit the print button because it’s only another easy product to put on the market.. |
|
|
|
sgolby
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,890
👍🏻 2,892
November 2012
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by sgolby on May 5, 2021 13:50:21 GMT 1, I wrote this when NGV did the retrospective, about Kaws. Dome things have changed, but my opinions remain fairly similar. The one thing I will say about his prints. The secondary market is not flooded with them, as it is Murakami. This means one of two things, people are holding for value, or better yet, he has real collectors. None of his prints are bought as “insta flips,” if they are that is a risky purchase in my opinion. Honestly, you see more Banksy prints at auction than you do Kaws.
http://instagr.am/p/B1wA0JDgxd3
I wrote this when NGV did the retrospective, about Kaws. Dome things have changed, but my opinions remain fairly similar. The one thing I will say about his prints. The secondary market is not flooded with them, as it is Murakami. This means one of two things, people are holding for value, or better yet, he has real collectors. None of his prints are bought as “insta flips,” if they are that is a risky purchase in my opinion. Honestly, you see more Banksy prints at auction than you do Kaws. http://instagr.am/p/B1wA0JDgxd3 |
|
jimmyjam
New Member
🗨️ 578
👍🏻 546
October 2019
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by jimmyjam on May 5, 2021 14:35:24 GMT 1, Murakami Vs. KAWS.
I don't understand the comparison between KAWS and Murakami at all. Murakami releases a ton "Offset lithograph" prints in edition of 300. They are lithographs... He has mentioned in interviews, long time ago, he loves prints and that's one of this main things. These were meant to be cheap and for collectors without a major budget. They are not comparable to KAWS silkscreens.
Murakami silkscreens - his real prints - are much harder to get and typically much more expensive. Murakami Offset lithographs are not his real prints.
NFT VS KAWS.
You are talking about NFT artists who are selling a peak prices now but dropping in value already- compared to fine art artists who started cheap and are raising. Anyone paying for an NFT is paying at peak prices right now.
KAWS at Brooklyn Museum
I thought his market was dead - until I went to the brooklyn show. If you go online it's still sold out for a lot of time slots - during a pandemic. Also, this time at the gift shop - it's not all sneakerheads... it's grandmas and parents buying crap for their kids and grandkids. I actually think his market is much stronger than what most people are saying. He is collected by some pretty big people now. There have been some weak sales but also some strong ones as well... just like everyone else right now. His market shot up pretty quickly these past couple years. Still the Urge set, which I thought would do very poorly, is actually reselling pretty well right now.
I respect he hasn't done a NFT yet. I thought out of all the artist he would... He's actually for the first time leaving money on the table. His NFTs would sell in a second at ridiculous prices.
Murakami Vs. KAWS.
I don't understand the comparison between KAWS and Murakami at all. Murakami releases a ton "Offset lithograph" prints in edition of 300. They are lithographs... He has mentioned in interviews, long time ago, he loves prints and that's one of this main things. These were meant to be cheap and for collectors without a major budget. They are not comparable to KAWS silkscreens.
Murakami silkscreens - his real prints - are much harder to get and typically much more expensive. Murakami Offset lithographs are not his real prints.
NFT VS KAWS.
You are talking about NFT artists who are selling a peak prices now but dropping in value already- compared to fine art artists who started cheap and are raising. Anyone paying for an NFT is paying at peak prices right now.
KAWS at Brooklyn Museum
I thought his market was dead - until I went to the brooklyn show. If you go online it's still sold out for a lot of time slots - during a pandemic. Also, this time at the gift shop - it's not all sneakerheads... it's grandmas and parents buying crap for their kids and grandkids. I actually think his market is much stronger than what most people are saying. He is collected by some pretty big people now. There have been some weak sales but also some strong ones as well... just like everyone else right now. His market shot up pretty quickly these past couple years. Still the Urge set, which I thought would do very poorly, is actually reselling pretty well right now.
I respect he hasn't done a NFT yet. I thought out of all the artist he would... He's actually for the first time leaving money on the table. His NFTs would sell in a second at ridiculous prices.
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Down The Rabbit Hole on May 6, 2021 1:02:01 GMT 1, The price fits the sentiment of the print perfectly IMO...
The price fits the sentiment of the print perfectly IMO...
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by eldukerman 212 on May 6, 2021 14:23:46 GMT 1, raffle period is over - anyone have any luck?
raffle period is over - anyone have any luck?
|
|
soupy
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,108
👍🏻 2,611
April 2014
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by soupy on May 6, 2021 14:28:52 GMT 1, raffle period is over - anyone have any luck?
raffle period is over - anyone have any luck? no it is not. goes til noon eastern. |
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by eldukerman 212 on May 6, 2021 14:32:51 GMT 1, raffle period is over - anyone have any luck? no it is not. goes til noon eastern.
Kaws website says it’s over
raffle period is over - anyone have any luck? no it is not. goes til noon eastern. Kaws website says it’s over |
|
soupy
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,108
👍🏻 2,611
April 2014
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by soupy on May 6, 2021 14:47:19 GMT 1, weird... page is still live and the email stated it would be open until noon.
"For more details on order inquiries, visit prints.kawsone.com between now and May 6th, 12pm EDT to submit your information for an order. If we are able to accommodate your request, you will receive an emailed invoice from prints@kaws.com"
prints.kawsone.com/products/separated
weird... page is still live and the email stated it would be open until noon. "For more details on order inquiries, visit prints.kawsone.com between now and May 6th, 12pm EDT to submit your information for an order. If we are able to accommodate your request, you will receive an emailed invoice from prints@kaws.com"prints.kawsone.com/products/separated |
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Art Buy Guy on May 6, 2021 17:46:09 GMT 1, raffle period is over - anyone have any luck?
raffle period is over - anyone have any luck? I think I read that the lucky 250 will be informed by email on 14 May. |
|
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by christbait on May 7, 2021 12:29:20 GMT 1, woke up to find an invoice in my emails:)
woke up to find an invoice in my emails:)
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Arty Farty 15 on May 7, 2021 12:45:10 GMT 1, Invoices arriving!
Invoices arriving!
|
|
artzzzy
New Member
🗨️ 246
👍🏻 214
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by artzzzy on May 7, 2021 13:15:08 GMT 1, Nothing for me
Congrats to those who entered and got selected 
Nothing for me Congrats to those who entered and got selected |
|
sm3gz
New Member
🗨️ 89
👍🏻 62
March 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by sm3gz on May 7, 2021 13:24:14 GMT 1, woke up to find an invoice in my emails:)
Best spam mail in a long time
woke up to find an invoice in my emails:) Thanks for the heads up, thankfully checked spam. Best spam mail in a long time |
|
msaleem1
New Member
🗨️ 37
👍🏻 4
January 2021
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by msaleem1 on May 7, 2021 13:43:33 GMT 1, No luck here 😭
No luck here 😭
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Georgie Poppit on May 7, 2021 13:48:20 GMT 1, No luck here, maybe I should have entered.
No luck here, maybe I should have entered.
|
|
|
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by sandinthedesert on May 7, 2021 13:53:18 GMT 1, no luck...
no luck...
|
|
Rsyok
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,375
👍🏻 507
January 2008
|
New Kaws Print: SEPARATED, by Rsyok on May 7, 2021 14:09:05 GMT 1, No luck here, maybe I should have entered.
Ha I have that problem all the time.
No luck here, maybe I should have entered. Ha I have that problem all the time. |
|
