|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 13:43:08 GMT 1, For the sake of the forum leave it the fxxx alone Pete please. Clearly you two have different opinions, but away from never looking at the noir thread again ( which I have now been put off by the ramblings of henners and like), I now have to see this on here too! Life is too short surely Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine.
Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry.
He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me.
For the sake of the forum leave it the fxxx alone Pete please. Clearly you two have different opinions, but away from never looking at the noir thread again ( which I have now been put off by the ramblings of henners and like), I now have to see this on here too! Life is too short surely Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine. Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry. He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Deleted on Jul 16, 2023 15:05:02 GMT 1, Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you.
thanks
Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 15:29:08 GMT 1, Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks I wonder if he will fall short of his overworked gob yet again.
Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks I wonder if he will fall short of his overworked gob yet again.
|
|
bookends
New Member
🗨️ 374
👍🏻 465
May 2022
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by bookends on Jul 16, 2023 15:29:53 GMT 1, For the sake of the forum leave it the fxxx alone Pete please. Clearly you two have different opinions, but away from never looking at the noir thread again ( which I have now been put off by the ramblings of henners and like), I now have to see this on here too! Life is too short surely Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine. Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry. He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me. The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ??
For the sake of the forum leave it the fxxx alone Pete please. Clearly you two have different opinions, but away from never looking at the noir thread again ( which I have now been put off by the ramblings of henners and like), I now have to see this on here too! Life is too short surely Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine. Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry. He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me. The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ??
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 15:40:11 GMT 1, Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine. Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry. He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me. The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ?? Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all.
To be fair, it doesnt take much time, its all freely available online information.
Agreed, and if he decides to leave people the hell alone, then fine. Funny its always coming back at me though. He went on the attack on noir and then me, i get its boring, thats fair. But he seems to think, like others, that they can now go trashing others sales threads. That was never allowed here, except in cases of cons, and it was better that way. Your not wrong, at all. I guess im just sick of the p*ick, and havnt burned it out quite yet, sorry. He does seem to be a very murky presence now ive seen the companies house disclosures though. Very weird reading to me. The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ?? Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all. To be fair, it doesnt take much time, its all freely available online information.
|
|
Wearology
Junior Member
Staff at FatFreeArt
🗨️ 3,596
👍🏻 4,512
April 2008
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Wearology on Jul 16, 2023 15:44:16 GMT 1, It has become common place on here for people to verbally attack one another and make up accusations that are very often not based in fact. It has been that way since the art many of us collect started to have high values. Like all forums the people, topics and demeanors of its members change through the years. I have been on this forum for 17 years now and I often question what am I still doing here. Maybe the original members are getting too old and our purpose for conversing with complete strangers all across the world has lost its allure. There is a reason that many forum members in the know started other forums and whattsapp chat groups. Yes they exists and yes you were not invited to join them (and either was I). Once we told Banksy's assistant that he knew nothing about Banksy and then chased off world famous artists and then allowed people to put items for sale with no asking price and encourage "The Who Offered Me The Most Via DM Sales Strategy" - the wheels began to fall off. I have virtually known Silky for almost 20 years now and he has run a great website all these years - but if you read the threads from 2006 - 2010 and read the threads from 2019 - 2023 it is a completely different site and not for the better.
It has become common place on here for people to verbally attack one another and make up accusations that are very often not based in fact. It has been that way since the art many of us collect started to have high values. Like all forums the people, topics and demeanors of its members change through the years. I have been on this forum for 17 years now and I often question what am I still doing here. Maybe the original members are getting too old and our purpose for conversing with complete strangers all across the world has lost its allure. There is a reason that many forum members in the know started other forums and whattsapp chat groups. Yes they exists and yes you were not invited to join them (and either was I). Once we told Banksy's assistant that he knew nothing about Banksy and then chased off world famous artists and then allowed people to put items for sale with no asking price and encourage "The Who Offered Me The Most Via DM Sales Strategy" - the wheels began to fall off. I have virtually known Silky for almost 20 years now and he has run a great website all these years - but if you read the threads from 2006 - 2010 and read the threads from 2019 - 2023 it is a completely different site and not for the better.
|
|
|
cemltz
New Member
🗨️ 496
👍🏻 920
October 2022
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by cemltz on Jul 16, 2023 15:49:04 GMT 1, Love me my MBW.
Love me my MBW.
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 16:04:08 GMT 1, It has become common place on here for people to verbally attack one another and make up accusations that are very often not based in fact. It has been that way since the art many of us collect started to have high values. Like all forums the people, topics and demeanors of its members change through the years. I have been on this forum for 17 years now and I often question what am I still doing here. Maybe the original members are getting too old and our purpose for conversing with complete strangers all across the world has lost its allure. There is a reason that many forum members in the know started other forums and whattsapp chat groups. Yes they exists and yes you were not invited to join them (and either was I). Once we told Banksy's assistant that he knew nothing about Banksy and then chased off world famous artists and then allowed people to put items for sale with no asking price and encourage "The Who Offered Me The Most Via DM Sales Strategy" - the wheels began to fall off. I have virtually known Silky for almost 20 years now and he has run a great website all these years - but if you read the threads from 2006 - 2010 and read the threads from 2019 - 2023 it is a completely different site and not for the better. Well said.
The early years for me, 2012 were awesome, learned loads, bought loads, gave away loads (as we all did eh!), met lots of good people. We all used to look out for each other, help each other (fundraisers even! (albeit, this did hold out as still real for me n George tons more thanks all!!)). Most of us that did, would sure as shit give NOTHING away in a competition these days. why bother.
This place really has become shite to be fair. Its toxic AF, but this could be changed. Its needs moderating with a sock full of pool balls, ban the arseholes, and let them open new accounts (they will anyway), but once they show out, ban again. It will end the enthusiasm for anyone who wants to keep their account, and would be a bit draining for those that dont care. All it needs is the attention and the total zero tolerance for a while. It COULD be turned right round, if someone wanted to.
I know silk is 100% best the hell out of this shit to get himself better, so that isnt a knock! But hand some actual power to a few people that arent muppets, and let it be done!
We already lost a hell of a lot of the oldschoolers who knew shit, rather than talk shit. But we arent sunk yet!! That other place and us are basically one, this side kept all the negativity though, needs purged.
It has become common place on here for people to verbally attack one another and make up accusations that are very often not based in fact. It has been that way since the art many of us collect started to have high values. Like all forums the people, topics and demeanors of its members change through the years. I have been on this forum for 17 years now and I often question what am I still doing here. Maybe the original members are getting too old and our purpose for conversing with complete strangers all across the world has lost its allure. There is a reason that many forum members in the know started other forums and whattsapp chat groups. Yes they exists and yes you were not invited to join them (and either was I). Once we told Banksy's assistant that he knew nothing about Banksy and then chased off world famous artists and then allowed people to put items for sale with no asking price and encourage "The Who Offered Me The Most Via DM Sales Strategy" - the wheels began to fall off. I have virtually known Silky for almost 20 years now and he has run a great website all these years - but if you read the threads from 2006 - 2010 and read the threads from 2019 - 2023 it is a completely different site and not for the better. Well said. The early years for me, 2012 were awesome, learned loads, bought loads, gave away loads (as we all did eh!), met lots of good people. We all used to look out for each other, help each other (fundraisers even! (albeit, this did hold out as still real for me n George tons more thanks all!!)). Most of us that did, would sure as shit give NOTHING away in a competition these days. why bother. This place really has become shite to be fair. Its toxic AF, but this could be changed. Its needs moderating with a sock full of pool balls, ban the arseholes, and let them open new accounts (they will anyway), but once they show out, ban again. It will end the enthusiasm for anyone who wants to keep their account, and would be a bit draining for those that dont care. All it needs is the attention and the total zero tolerance for a while. It COULD be turned right round, if someone wanted to. I know silk is 100% best the hell out of this shit to get himself better, so that isnt a knock! But hand some actual power to a few people that arent muppets, and let it be done! We already lost a hell of a lot of the oldschoolers who knew shit, rather than talk shit. But we arent sunk yet!! That other place and us are basically one, this side kept all the negativity though, needs purged.
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 16:05:45 GMT 1, Love me my MBW. I was looking at a picture of this the other day! Didnt realise it was MBW, pretty sweet.
Love me my MBW. I was looking at a picture of this the other day! Didnt realise it was MBW, pretty sweet.
|
|
henryc
New Member
🗨️ 225
👍🏻 302
December 2020
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by henryc on Jul 16, 2023 16:18:28 GMT 1,
I like this print tbh,it was free, had a great night queueing with many members,many sh!t on Brainwash but were more than happy to cash up on it. Sweet Sweet hypocrisy lol
I always planned to frame it side by side with the Banksy time out. Hopefully I will one day..
I like this print tbh,it was free, had a great night queueing with many members,many sh!t on Brainwash but were more than happy to cash up on it. Sweet Sweet hypocrisy lol I always planned to frame it side by side with the Banksy time out. Hopefully I will one day..
|
|
LJCal
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,980
👍🏻 4,523
December 2019
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by LJCal on Jul 16, 2023 18:08:27 GMT 1, The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ?? Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all. To be fair, it doesnt take much time, it’s all freely available online information. Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. You chose to reply to my comment on this thread, and now you’re gas lighting making out I’m the problem. If people care to look at your history you have personally attacked and trolled dozens of members, you’re basically a nasty piece of work with a huge chip on his shoulder.
But I’ve figured out why, you pretend you’re a baller but you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's.
The only thing weird is you, Don't you have anything better in your life than stalking him daily ?? Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all. To be fair, it doesnt take much time, it’s all freely available online information. Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. You chose to reply to my comment on this thread, and now you’re gas lighting making out I’m the problem. If people care to look at your history you have personally attacked and trolled dozens of members, you’re basically a nasty piece of work with a huge chip on his shoulder. But I’ve figured out why, you pretend you’re a baller but you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's.
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Jimini Cricket on Jul 16, 2023 18:20:18 GMT 1, Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks Don't feel attacked. You're only being called out because you have google and you put in very little effort to get comparables. If you actually tried, then you would have known not to ask for £3000. But instead you asked to be corrected, and you were. Namaste.
Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks Don't feel attacked. You're only being called out because you have google and you put in very little effort to get comparables. If you actually tried, then you would have known not to ask for £3000. But instead you asked to be corrected, and you were. Namaste.
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 18:26:30 GMT 1, Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all. To be fair, it doesnt take much time, it’s all freely available online information. Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. But I’ve figured out why, you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's. Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate.
Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone.
You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown.
Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance.
Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one.
What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate.
Lol, funny thing here, thats exactly how he pissed me off so bad, by stalking my every move. I told him many times to GTF, he didnt want to at all. To be fair, it doesnt take much time, it’s all freely available online information. Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. But I’ve figured out why, you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's. Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate. Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone. You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown. Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance. Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one. What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate.
|
|
LJCal
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,980
👍🏻 4,523
December 2019
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by LJCal on Jul 16, 2023 18:57:05 GMT 1, Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. But I’ve figured out why, you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's. Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate. Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone. You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown. Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance. Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one. What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate. This isn’t where you live and your art collection? Why do you photograph everything on your bed? I’m guessing you live alone, must be lonely I guess.
Stalking, Robin, you’ve looked up old press articles on me, been through companies house looking for my details, been through my social media, doxed my personal data on the board, been through by businesses website, that’s stalking. But I’ve figured out why, you’re a loser who lives in what looks like a squat or your parents attic, your art collection is mostly tat and utter garbage and the reason you’re so desperate to hype stik and noir is it’s literally the only thing you own worth more than a few hundred quid and that’s dropping in value by the day. You say you run your own business but you don’t even own a car and live like a teenager who has just been kicked out of home. You’re a nasty little troll who’s bitter he’s got such a pointless existence, well don’t take it out on me, call the Samaritan's. Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate. Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone. You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown. Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance. Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one. What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate. This isn’t where you live and your art collection? Why do you photograph everything on your bed? I’m guessing you live alone, must be lonely I guess.
|
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 19:09:55 GMT 1, Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate. Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone. You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown. Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance. Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one. What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate. This isn’t where you live and your art collection? Why do you photograph everything on your bed? I’m guessing you live alone, must be lonely I guess. Lol, yes Brave sir lancelot, killer of horses, that is my home and a VERY small part of my collection (and the jacket i used to wear when painting with Thierry and others). What is your actual point?
Photos on the bed, since its easier for pretty much anything. Again, whats your actual point?
You always just assume dont you, you may be right, but you wouldnt know would you.
Why is "your gallery" registered in someone elses name? Seems more than likely its daddy huh? Which of us is still being babied lol.
Clutching at straws there Lancelot, when you find me, the door code is Higgs boson mate. Wrong on all counts, as ever bud. remember i told you to leave me alone countless times while you hassled my every move. Seem a bit pissed now you have nothing to go on, while your entire life is 2 clicks away for anyone. You really are a bit of an idiot arent you, in the same sentence, i live in my parents attic, and have been kicked out of home. What a cretin. Your really just blowing up at your own stupidity now, you should probably just walk away you pathetic clown. Told you you wouldnt like it if you persisted with the gaslighter stalking shit didnt i. I can tell how pissed off and incapable you are right now. Powerless and pathetic as ever lance. Why isnt the "gallery" registered in your name? Interested in that one. What was the car point about? that seemed a little out there and beyond desperation mate. This isn’t where you live and your art collection? Why do you photograph everything on your bed? I’m guessing you live alone, must be lonely I guess. Lol, yes Brave sir lancelot, killer of horses, that is my home and a VERY small part of my collection (and the jacket i used to wear when painting with Thierry and others). What is your actual point? Photos on the bed, since its easier for pretty much anything. Again, whats your actual point? You always just assume dont you, you may be right, but you wouldnt know would you. Why is "your gallery" registered in someone elses name? Seems more than likely its daddy huh? Which of us is still being babied lol.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Deleted on Jul 16, 2023 19:16:36 GMT 1, please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks Don't feel attacked. You're only being called out because you have google and you put in very little effort to get comparables. If you actually tried, then you would have known not to ask for £3000. But instead you asked to be corrected, and you were. Namaste. attacked?
simply stated I will buy one of them for £500. I think thats a great price. imho
maybe you could "actually try" and find me one for £500.
this whole thread is very weird. it went left when someone critiqued the artist not the price.
thanks
please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks Don't feel attacked. You're only being called out because you have google and you put in very little effort to get comparables. If you actually tried, then you would have known not to ask for £3000. But instead you asked to be corrected, and you were. Namaste. attacked? simply stated I will buy one of them for £500. I think thats a great price. imho maybe you could "actually try" and find me one for £500. this whole thread is very weird. it went left when someone critiqued the artist not the price. thanks
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 19:18:21 GMT 1, Funny thing about those pictures, that set of posters, is the set you were 100% sure were "just like all the others on ebay" that time. You know, the ones i said were a legit authenticated set from stik. But you gobshitted on and on about how you knew better, how you would check with James at Christeis and get back to us.
Only to realise you were being full of shit, and that they were real, authenticated gifted from stik and fuck all like the ones on ebay.
Which was funny to listen to you talk such utter shit, as id only just submitted 2 sets to sell at Christies, through James.
Lol #gaslighter #stalker #artpro #prat
Funny thing about those pictures, that set of posters, is the set you were 100% sure were "just like all the others on ebay" that time. You know, the ones i said were a legit authenticated set from stik. But you gobshitted on and on about how you knew better, how you would check with James at Christeis and get back to us. Only to realise you were being full of shit, and that they were real, authenticated gifted from stik and fuck all like the ones on ebay. Which was funny to listen to you talk such utter shit, as id only just submitted 2 sets to sell at Christies, through James. Lol #gaslighter #stalker #artpro #prat
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by nobokov on Jul 16, 2023 20:35:00 GMT 1, What's going on in this thread? From what I gather, two members got intimate with each other in a Stik Shrine and are now having spats in every room of the UAA house? Weird stuff....
What's going on in this thread? From what I gather, two members got intimate with each other in a Stik Shrine and are now having spats in every room of the UAA house? Weird stuff....
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Pete the Post on Jul 16, 2023 20:57:56 GMT 1, What's going on in this thread? From what I gather, two members got intimate with each other in a Stik Shrine and are now having spats in every room of the UAA house? Weird stuff.... You didnt need to add though did you.
What's going on in this thread? From what I gather, two members got intimate with each other in a Stik Shrine and are now having spats in every room of the UAA house? Weird stuff.... You didnt need to add though did you.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Hairbland on Jul 17, 2023 6:24:38 GMT 1, I stopped checking this site, and participating, at least 2 years ago. As have many long time members before me and since. I popped in recently to see what the chatter was, and threads like this, 41 pages of Banksy stamps and endless Noir solidify my choice. Keep it up!
I stopped checking this site, and participating, at least 2 years ago. As have many long time members before me and since. I popped in recently to see what the chatter was, and threads like this, 41 pages of Banksy stamps and endless Noir solidify my choice. Keep it up!
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,796
👍🏻 6,762
June 2009
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by met on Jul 17, 2023 6:42:58 GMT 1, Love me my MBW.
Moi non plus.
Love me my MBW. Moi non plus.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Deleted on Jul 17, 2023 8:37:04 GMT 1, Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks
I'll increase my offer to £750.
thanks
Last two at auction didn't make a grand with BP, so there's that. Given state of the market I'd be surprised if anyone is buying these for more than £500 please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks I'll increase my offer to £750. thanks
|
|
|
cemltz
New Member
🗨️ 496
👍🏻 920
October 2022
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by cemltz on Jul 17, 2023 14:04:02 GMT 1, Mon ami, tu me brises le coeur!
Perhaps it is the lack of context that leaves you on the fence. Below, you can see the sheer scale of this monstrosity. In addition, it has been allocated the prime real estate of the front entry way. Very much a "welcome to my collection of horrors", if you will.
And (probably going out on a limb here) I'll bet dollars to dimes you are a HUGE fan of Stikki Peaches. No?
How you like me now?
Mon ami, tu me brises le coeur! Perhaps it is the lack of context that leaves you on the fence. Below, you can see the sheer scale of this monstrosity. In addition, it has been allocated the prime real estate of the front entry way. Very much a "welcome to my collection of horrors", if you will. And (probably going out on a limb here) I'll bet dollars to dimes you are a HUGE fan of Stikki Peaches. No? How you like me now?
|
|
bookends
New Member
🗨️ 374
👍🏻 465
May 2022
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by bookends on Jul 17, 2023 15:25:12 GMT 1, You got the monstrosity bit right !
You got the monstrosity bit right !
|
|
Londown 01
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,214
👍🏻 1,013
September 2021
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Londown 01 on Jul 17, 2023 19:53:26 GMT 1, Screenprint and stencil in colors on paper Does anyone know which parts are screenprinted and especially which made with a stencil? Seems like an unusual combination of two different techniques ...
Screenprint and stencil in colors on paper Does anyone know which parts are screenprinted and especially which made with a stencil? Seems like an unusual combination of two different techniques ...
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,796
👍🏻 6,762
June 2009
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by met on Jul 19, 2023 12:53:19 GMT 1, met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections
Thank you for this.
And apologies in advance. Because debate‑wise, the wall of text that follows may be a little dull, with so little appearing to separate our respective positions.
__________
There are some resellers who wish to use this forum as their personal selling platform, but without the bothersome eBay or auction‑house fees. And without the inconvenience of negative quips by other members.
We see this rather often. A misplaced entitlement by resellers is immediately exposed each time one of them refers to "my thread". Such wording almost suggests they believe a thread they initiated on a public message board should be treated by others as their private property. In other words, something they (in their own minds) feel they have the right to be territorial over.
And when that sense of entitlement is somehow threatened, a number of these resellers quickly pivot to shrill mode: defensive, passive‑aggressive, and/or hysterical.
For an adult, one who should normally possess an adult‑level of resilience, that sort of behaviour seems unbecoming.
__________
Thankfully, yet also unsurprisingly given your posting history, I sense no general desire by you to stifle discussion or commentary.
The appropriate location for comments may well be the sole point on which we diverge.
And actually, the scope of our disagreement is possibly even more limited:
Perhaps you aren't referring to all comments — but only those that could be perceived as criticisms, whether in substance or tone.
Please correct me if this speculation on my part is wrong.
I mention the point because I've never witnessed a reseller throw a hissy fit when the works they were offloading received any comments of praise. You know the type:
"Stunning print, mate. GLWTS"
"Awesome!!! This will be gone in a flash!!!"
"If I didn't already own one of these prints, I would bite your hand off at that price."
etc., etc.
Such remarks can quickly lead to the kind of thread‑post asymmetry that is loved by resellers who want it both ways. Their thoughts easily summarised:
"Commentary is most welcome in my sales thread, but please respect the fact that only positive comments are acceptable."
__________
Cheers again for your kind words on the contributions I try to make regarding dubious or deceptive posts.
There is though another broad area I frequently allocate my time to. Eschewing false modesty, this is where I believe I can occasionally also bring something fresh to table, and hopefully add value to the forum. Predictably, however, my posts on these matters are more contentious (whether or not due to vested interests that might be affected).
For me as a long‑term art enthusiast, the target audience here is especially fellow members who may be less informed, less experienced, less discerning, or simply less demanding.
Such posts are never intended to tell anybody what to think, but rather to encourage more thinking. In a clearheaded manner.
"Question everything" (including everything I write) would be the highly‑unoriginal advice I find myself repeating, either earnestly or through attempts at humour.
Obvious basic questions exist, that each of us must consider when weighing up a possible purchase.
But with newer, younger or overly‑enthusiastic collectors, I often sense they aren't actually asking themselves these questions, let alone answering them. It may be that they're sometimes under the undue influence of sales patter, hype, the fear of missing out, or a sense of false urgency.
And so, one of my duties (which others have every right to knock, should they so wish) is to encourage those collectors to step back, pause, and reflect a little further. With a more critical and discriminating mindset. To reduce their likelihood of making what they might later deem to be purchase mistakes.
I've cited them before*, but here is a handful of these questions:
(i) Why exactly do I like this piece?
Or, if the reasons are different, Why do I want to own this piece?
(ii) What are the artwork's strengths, and what are its weaknesses?
(iii) Is the art / artist actually any good?
(iv) Am I perhaps buying with my ears rather than my eyes, and therefore behaving like a lemming? To what extent is my desire to acquire this piece being influenced by what other people are buying, or appearing to buy?
To potential purchasers, I believe that direct or indirect reminders of these basic questions are opportune and most helpfully relevant when posted within actual sale threads. If only for balance.
In addition, such reminders arguably become pressing, if not urgent, for works with sale prices in the four+ figures.
And all the more so when, individual tastes and preferences aside*, and according instead to standards/criteria broadly accepted by the art world, those works can without unfairness be dismissed as objectively poor — for example, due to their patently derivative, trite, formulaic, incoherent or vacuous nature.
__________
While I don't expect to sway many members, especially resellers, as to the merits of my stance, I do hope the above will assist in showing that my occasional pisstaking is motivated neither by pettiness nor by malice.
Of course, some of the thinner‑skinned resellers among us will always take issue with a bit of cheerful ribbing.
But I suspect that is also offset by the casual offensiveness of their own actions — particularly when they cynically target naive or less‑informed members with bad art at exhorbitant prices. And then expect everyone else to shut up.
Thus, rather fortuitously, mutual grievances on the forum tend to balance each other out. What we end up with collectively is a harmonious‑dissonance.
And I myself am reasonably comfortable with that.
met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections Thank you for this. And apologies in advance. Because debate‑wise, the wall of text that follows may be a little dull, with so little appearing to separate our respective positions. __________ There are some resellers who wish to use this fo rum as their personal selling platform, but without the bothersome eB ay or auction‑house fees. And without the inconvenience of negative quips by other members. We see this rather often. A misplaced entitlement by resellers is immediately exposed each time one of them refers to "my thread". Such wording almost suggests they believe a thread they initiated on a public message board should be treated by others as their private property. In other words, something they (in their own minds) feel they have the right to be territorial over. And when that sense of entitlement is somehow threatened, a number of these resellers quickly pivot to shrill mode: defensive, passive‑aggressive, and/or hysterical. For an adult, one who should normally possess an adult‑level of resilience, that sort of behaviour seems unbecoming. __________ Thankfully, yet also unsurprisingly given your posting history, I sense no general desire by you to stifle discussion or commentary. The appropriate location for comments may well be the sole point on which we diverge. And actually, the scope of our disagreement is possibly even more limited: Perhaps you aren't referring to all comments — but only those that could be perceived as criticisms, whether in substance or tone. Please correct me if this speculation on my part is wrong. I mention the point because I've never witnessed a reseller throw a hissy fit when the works they were offloading received any comments of praise. You know the type: "Stunning print, mate. GLWTS""Awesome!!! This will be gone in a flash!!!""If I didn't already own one of these prints, I would bite your hand off at that price."etc., etc. Such remarks can quickly lead to the kind of thread‑post asymmetry that is loved by resellers who want it both ways. Their thoughts easily summarised: "Commentary is most welcome in my sales thread, but please respect the fact that only positive comments are acceptable."__________ Cheers again for your kind words on the contributions I try to make regarding dubious or deceptive posts. There is though another broad area I frequently allocate my time to. Eschewing false modesty, this is where I believe I can occasionally also bring something fresh to table, and hopefully add value to the for um. Predictably, however, my posts on these matters are more contentious (whether or not due to vested interests that might be affected). For me as a long‑term art enthusiast, the target audience here is especially fellow members who may be less informed, less experienced, less discerning, or simply less demanding. Such posts are never intended to tell anybody what to think, but rather to encourage more thinking. In a clearheaded manner. "Question everything" (including everything I write) would be the highly‑unoriginal advice I find myself repeating, either earnestly or through attempts at humour. Obvious basic questions exist, that each of us must consider when weighing up a possible purchase. But with newer, younger or overly‑enthusiastic collectors, I often sense they aren't actually asking themselves these questions, let alone answering them. It may be that they're sometimes under the undue influence of sales patter, hype, the fear of missing out, or a sense of false urgency. And so, one of my duties (which others have every right to knock, should they so wish) is to encourage those collectors to step back, pause, and reflect a little further. With a more critical and discriminating mindset. To reduce their likelihood of making what they might later deem to be purchase mistakes. I've cited them before *, but here is a handful of these questions: (i) Why exactly do I like this piece?Or, if the reasons are different, Why do I want to own this piece?(ii) What are the artwork's strengths, and what are its weaknesses?(iii) Is the art / artist actually any good?(iv) Am I perhaps buying with my ears rather than my eyes, and therefore behaving like a lemming? To what extent is my desire to acquire this piece being influenced by what other people are buying, or appearing to buy?To potential purchasers, I believe that direct or indirect reminders of these basic questions are opportune and most helpfully relevant when posted within actual sale threads. If only for balance. In addition, such reminders arguably become pressing, if not urgent, for works with sale prices in the four+ figures. And all the more so when, individual tastes and preferences aside*, and according instead to standards/criteria broadly accepted by the art world, those works can without unfairness be dismissed as objectively poor — for example, due to their patently derivative, trite, formulaic, incoherent or vacuous nature. __________ While I don't expect to sway many members, especially resellers, as to the merits of my stance, I do hope the above will assist in showing that my occasional pisstaking is motivated neither by pettiness nor by malice. Of course, some of the thinner‑skinned resellers among us will always take issue with a bit of cheerful ribbing. But I suspect that is also offset by the casual offensiveness of their own actions — particularly when they cynically target naive or less‑informed members with bad art at exhorbitant prices. And then expect everyone else to shut up. Thus, rather fortuitously, mutual grievances on the fo rum tend to balance each other out. What we end up with collectively is a harmonious‑dissonance. And I myself am reasonably comfortable with that.
|
|
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Shoot Again on Jul 19, 2023 14:28:15 GMT 1, met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections Thank you for this. And apologies in advance. Because debate‑wise, the wall of text that follows may be a little dull, with so little appearing to separate our respective positions. __________ There are some resellers who wish to use this fo rum as their personal selling platform, but without the bothersome eB ay or auction‑house fees. And without the inconvenience of negative quips by other members. We see this rather often. A misplaced entitlement by resellers is immediately exposed each time one of them refers to "my thread". Such wording almost suggests they believe a thread they initiated on a public message board should be treated by others as their private property. In other words, something they (in their own minds) feel they have the right to be territorial over. And when that sense of entitlement is somehow threatened, a number of these resellers quickly pivot to shrill mode: defensive, passive‑aggressive, and/or hysterical. For an adult, one who should normally possess an adult‑level of resilience, that sort of behaviour seems unbecoming. __________ Thankfully, yet also unsurprisingly given your posting history, I sense no general desire by you to stifle discussion or commentary. The appropriate location for comments may well be the sole point on which we diverge. And actually, the scope of our disagreement is possibly even more limited: Perhaps you aren't referring to all comments — but only those that could be perceived as criticisms, whether in substance or tone. Please correct me if this speculation on my part is wrong. I mention the point because I've never witnessed a reseller throw a hissy fit when the works they were offloading received any comments of praise. You know the type: "Stunning print, mate. GLWTS""Awesome!!! This will be gone in a flash!!!""If I didn't already own one of these prints, I would bite your hand off at that price."etc., etc. Such remarks can quickly lead to the kind of thread‑post asymmetry that is loved by resellers who want it both ways. Their thoughts easily summarised: "Commentary is most welcome in my sales thread, but please respect the fact that only positive comments are acceptable."__________ Cheers again for your kind words on the contributions I try to make regarding dubious or deceptive posts. There is though another broad area I frequently allocate my time to. Eschewing false modesty, this is where I believe I can occasionally also bring something fresh to table, and hopefully add value to the for um. Predictably, however, my posts on these matters are more contentious (whether or not due to vested interests that might be affected). For me as a long‑term art enthusiast, the target audience here is especially fellow members who may be less informed, less experienced, less discerning, or simply less demanding. Such posts are never intended to tell anybody what to think, but rather to encourage more thinking. In a clearheaded manner. "Question everything" (including everything I write) would be the highly‑unoriginal advice I find myself repeating, either earnestly or through attempts at humour. Obvious basic questions exist, that each of us must consider when weighing up a possible purchase. But with newer, younger or overly‑enthusiastic collectors, I often sense they aren't actually asking themselves these questions, let alone answering them. It may be that they're sometimes under the undue influence of sales patter, hype, the fear of missing out, or a sense of false urgency. And so, one of my duties (which others have every right to knock, should they so wish) is to encourage those collectors to step back, pause, and reflect a little further. With a more critical and discriminating mindset. To reduce their likelihood of making what they might later deem to be purchase mistakes. I've cited them before *, but here is a handful of these questions: (i) Why exactly do I like this piece?Or, if the reasons are different, Why do I want to own this piece?(ii) What are the artwork's strengths, and what are its weaknesses?(iii) Is the art / artist actually any good?(iv) Am I perhaps buying with my ears rather than my eyes, and therefore behaving like a lemming? To what extent is my desire to acquire this piece being influenced by what other people are buying, or appearing to buy?To potential purchasers, I believe that direct or indirect reminders of these basic questions are opportune and most helpfully relevant when posted within actual sale threads. If only for balance. In addition, such reminders arguably become pressing, if not urgent, for works with sale prices in the four+ figures. And all the more so when, individual tastes and preferences aside*, and according instead to standards/criteria broadly accepted by the art world, those works can without unfairness be dismissed as objectively poor — for example, due to their patently derivative, trite, formulaic, incoherent or vacuous nature. __________ While I don't expect to sway many members, especially resellers, as to the merits of my stance, I do hope the above will assist in showing that my occasional pisstaking is motivated neither by pettiness nor by malice. Of course, some of the thinner‑skinned resellers among us will always take issue with a bit of cheerful ribbing. But I suspect that is also offset by the casual offensiveness of their own actions — particularly when they cynically target naive or less‑informed members with bad art at exhorbitant prices. And then expect everyone else to shut up. Thus, rather fortuitously, mutual grievances on the fo rum tend to balance each other out. What we end up with collectively is a harmonious‑dissonance. And I myself am reasonably comfortable with that. Such a valuable post for new (and old) collectors ! If I may add my very own advice from 15 years + of collecting : when you feel like (fear of) missing out never forget that "there is always another one (ie. "nice artwork") around the corner" !
met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections Thank you for this. And apologies in advance. Because debate‑wise, the wall of text that follows may be a little dull, with so little appearing to separate our respective positions. __________ There are some resellers who wish to use this fo rum as their personal selling platform, but without the bothersome eB ay or auction‑house fees. And without the inconvenience of negative quips by other members. We see this rather often. A misplaced entitlement by resellers is immediately exposed each time one of them refers to "my thread". Such wording almost suggests they believe a thread they initiated on a public message board should be treated by others as their private property. In other words, something they (in their own minds) feel they have the right to be territorial over. And when that sense of entitlement is somehow threatened, a number of these resellers quickly pivot to shrill mode: defensive, passive‑aggressive, and/or hysterical. For an adult, one who should normally possess an adult‑level of resilience, that sort of behaviour seems unbecoming. __________ Thankfully, yet also unsurprisingly given your posting history, I sense no general desire by you to stifle discussion or commentary. The appropriate location for comments may well be the sole point on which we diverge. And actually, the scope of our disagreement is possibly even more limited: Perhaps you aren't referring to all comments — but only those that could be perceived as criticisms, whether in substance or tone. Please correct me if this speculation on my part is wrong. I mention the point because I've never witnessed a reseller throw a hissy fit when the works they were offloading received any comments of praise. You know the type: "Stunning print, mate. GLWTS""Awesome!!! This will be gone in a flash!!!""If I didn't already own one of these prints, I would bite your hand off at that price."etc., etc. Such remarks can quickly lead to the kind of thread‑post asymmetry that is loved by resellers who want it both ways. Their thoughts easily summarised: "Commentary is most welcome in my sales thread, but please respect the fact that only positive comments are acceptable."__________ Cheers again for your kind words on the contributions I try to make regarding dubious or deceptive posts. There is though another broad area I frequently allocate my time to. Eschewing false modesty, this is where I believe I can occasionally also bring something fresh to table, and hopefully add value to the for um. Predictably, however, my posts on these matters are more contentious (whether or not due to vested interests that might be affected). For me as a long‑term art enthusiast, the target audience here is especially fellow members who may be less informed, less experienced, less discerning, or simply less demanding. Such posts are never intended to tell anybody what to think, but rather to encourage more thinking. In a clearheaded manner. "Question everything" (including everything I write) would be the highly‑unoriginal advice I find myself repeating, either earnestly or through attempts at humour. Obvious basic questions exist, that each of us must consider when weighing up a possible purchase. But with newer, younger or overly‑enthusiastic collectors, I often sense they aren't actually asking themselves these questions, let alone answering them. It may be that they're sometimes under the undue influence of sales patter, hype, the fear of missing out, or a sense of false urgency. And so, one of my duties (which others have every right to knock, should they so wish) is to encourage those collectors to step back, pause, and reflect a little further. With a more critical and discriminating mindset. To reduce their likelihood of making what they might later deem to be purchase mistakes. I've cited them before *, but here is a handful of these questions: (i) Why exactly do I like this piece?Or, if the reasons are different, Why do I want to own this piece?(ii) What are the artwork's strengths, and what are its weaknesses?(iii) Is the art / artist actually any good?(iv) Am I perhaps buying with my ears rather than my eyes, and therefore behaving like a lemming? To what extent is my desire to acquire this piece being influenced by what other people are buying, or appearing to buy?To potential purchasers, I believe that direct or indirect reminders of these basic questions are opportune and most helpfully relevant when posted within actual sale threads. If only for balance. In addition, such reminders arguably become pressing, if not urgent, for works with sale prices in the four+ figures. And all the more so when, individual tastes and preferences aside*, and according instead to standards/criteria broadly accepted by the art world, those works can without unfairness be dismissed as objectively poor — for example, due to their patently derivative, trite, formulaic, incoherent or vacuous nature. __________ While I don't expect to sway many members, especially resellers, as to the merits of my stance, I do hope the above will assist in showing that my occasional pisstaking is motivated neither by pettiness nor by malice. Of course, some of the thinner‑skinned resellers among us will always take issue with a bit of cheerful ribbing. But I suspect that is also offset by the casual offensiveness of their own actions — particularly when they cynically target naive or less‑informed members with bad art at exhorbitant prices. And then expect everyone else to shut up. Thus, rather fortuitously, mutual grievances on the fo rum tend to balance each other out. What we end up with collectively is a harmonious‑dissonance. And I myself am reasonably comfortable with that. Such a valuable post for new (and old) collectors ! If I may add my very own advice from 15 years + of collecting : when you feel like (fear of) missing out never forget that "there is always another one (ie. "nice artwork") around the corner" !
|
|
Matt
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,357
👍🏻 3,449
September 2014
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Matt on Jul 19, 2023 21:30:29 GMT 1, Thanks for taking the time to answer so thoroughly and constructively met
I had indeed failed to consider the antithesis to my proposition, that if the comment had been positive I - like most - would not have taken issue with it (and I feel rather foolish now that you have pointed it out)
My argument falls flat. It is obviously untenable to accept praise if criticism is not equally welcome.
< insert gif of Homer Simpson retreating into the bushes >
Thanks for taking the time to answer so thoroughly and constructively met I had indeed failed to consider the antithesis to my proposition, that if the comment had been positive I - like most - would not have taken issue with it (and I feel rather foolish now that you have pointed it out) My argument falls flat. It is obviously untenable to accept praise if criticism is not equally welcome. < insert gif of Homer Simpson retreating into the bushes >
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by nobokov on Jul 19, 2023 22:54:52 GMT 1, met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections Thank you for this. Not that I would abide by it or anyone else, but I wonder if comments of any sort (positive or negative) should not be appropriate within a for sale thread, beyond those who are genuinely interested in purchasing the item. Perhaps that would lead to a less toxic environment.
If I wanted to have a garage sale and sell my junk, I don't think I'd want neighbors coming around interfering and telling potential buyers what it's really worth. Just let me rip them off in peace please.
In an ideal forum setup, I'd like to visit a separate section to converse and ridicule. The "Art News" heading should fit the bill, but unfortunately there are 30 permanent threads that one needs to scroll past to get to anything new. And using the only other feasible alternative "New Threads" as a default, we are then subjected to seeing the endless supply of worthless knickknacks that users are attempting to unload on others.
If the permanent threads in Art News could be removed by Daniel Silk perhaps that would reduce the weirdness emanating throughout this place. Oh, and can we get another section for the crazies?
met is undoubtedly one of the most helpful and valuable contributors on this fo rum, especially when it comes to calling out misleading, dubious or deceiving posts However this sales thread is none of those things Quite the contrary : it is forthcoming, legible, detailed, illustrated, with a price guide, and invitation for discussion. Commenting on the art is probably best reserved to the dedicated sections Thank you for this. Not that I would abide by it or anyone else, but I wonder if comments of any sort (positive or negative) should not be appropriate within a for sale thread, beyond those who are genuinely interested in purchasing the item. Perhaps that would lead to a less toxic environment.
If I wanted to have a garage sale and sell my junk, I don't think I'd want neighbors coming around interfering and telling potential buyers what it's really worth. Just let me rip them off in peace please.
In an ideal forum setup, I'd like to visit a separate section to converse and ridicule. The "Art News" heading should fit the bill, but unfortunately there are 30 permanent threads that one needs to scroll past to get to anything new. And using the only other feasible alternative "New Threads" as a default, we are then subjected to seeing the endless supply of worthless knickknacks that users are attempting to unload on others.
If the permanent threads in Art News could be removed by Daniel Silk perhaps that would reduce the weirdness emanating throughout this place. Oh, and can we get another section for the crazies?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
met and co's critique on MBW, by Deleted on Jul 28, 2023 6:15:14 GMT 1, please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks I'll increase my offer to £750. thanks I'll increase my offer again to £1000
thanks.
please find me one for £500, I'll buy it off you. thanks I'll increase my offer to £750. thanks I'll increase my offer again to £1000 thanks.
|
|