|
|
LAZ Censership, by finsburyparkranger on Mar 12, 2007 19:25:36 GMT 1, Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads?
Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads?
|
|
Run Pig Run
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,437
๐๐ป 9
January 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by Run Pig Run on Mar 12, 2007 19:30:33 GMT 1, dunno.
dunno.
|
|
ยฉhief'
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,079
๐๐ป 47
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by ยฉhief' on Mar 12, 2007 19:31:09 GMT 1, Wow ! well spotted FPR.
Wow ! well spotted FPR.
|
|
Octopus UK
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 881
๐๐ป 196
February 2007
|
LAZ Censership, by Octopus UK on Mar 12, 2007 19:47:28 GMT 1, Maybe I'm missing something but this afternoon "at work" I noticed a (longish) threat pointing out some issues people were having with LAZ and POW. Now I've got home I can't see the thread anywhere.
Maybe I'm missing something but this afternoon "at work" I noticed a (longish) threat pointing out some issues people were having with LAZ and POW. Now I've got home I can't see the thread anywhere.
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by Daniel Silk on Mar 12, 2007 19:49:01 GMT 1, Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads?
Sorry, but they have been removed.
After a little investigating it was found that a bit of underhand backstabbing was going on  I dunt think it would be fair to say much more than that, but I assure you that if you knew the full story you would completely agree with its removal 
Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads? Sorry, but they have been removed. After a little investigating it was found that a bit of underhand backstabbing was going on I dunt think it would be fair to say much more than that, but I assure you that if you knew the full story you would completely agree with its removal |
|
rolyateel
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 600
๐๐ป 9
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by rolyateel on Mar 12, 2007 19:54:49 GMT 1, good work silky
whilst i have problems with some of the things PoW have done recently those threads were obviously extremley negetive & pointed
good work silky whilst i have problems with some of the things PoW have done recently those threads were obviously extremley negetive & pointed |
|
|
|
BK83
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,604
๐๐ป 10
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by BK83 on Mar 12, 2007 20:38:22 GMT 1, very interesting indeed......
very interesting indeed......
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by corblimeyswife on Mar 12, 2007 20:55:16 GMT 1, very interesting indeed......
yes interesting but that meant my very first post was deleted 
very interesting indeed...... yes interesting but that meant my very first post was deleted |
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by Daniel Silk on Mar 12, 2007 21:08:50 GMT 1, very interesting indeed...... yes interesting but that meant my very first post was deleted
oops! sorry about that  Welcome to the forum ;D
very interesting indeed...... yes interesting but that meant my very first post was deleted oops! sorry about that Welcome to the forum ;D |
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by tomhills1 on Mar 12, 2007 21:11:39 GMT 1, i missed all this and i'm intrigued. is this an example of the big boys flexing their muscles? or were there some highly libelous comments that could not be substantiated. obviously you can't repeat what was said or else we'll be back to where we were, but if someone could perhaps say why they think the thread was removed it might make sense.
don't put anything up that shouldn't go up, yeah.
i missed all this and i'm intrigued. is this an example of the big boys flexing their muscles? or were there some highly libelous comments that could not be substantiated. obviously you can't repeat what was said or else we'll be back to where we were, but if someone could perhaps say why they think the thread was removed it might make sense.
don't put anything up that shouldn't go up, yeah.
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by tomhills1 on Mar 12, 2007 21:13:19 GMT 1, Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads? Sorry, but they have been removed. After a little investigating it was found that a bit of underhand backstabbing was going on I dunt think it would be fair to say much more than that, but I assure you that if you knew the full story you would completely agree with its removal
forget my last post, i trust and respect your opinion silk. 
Where are all the recent anti LAZ threads? Sorry, but they have been removed. After a little investigating it was found that a bit of underhand backstabbing was going on I dunt think it would be fair to say much more than that, but I assure you that if you knew the full story you would completely agree with its removal forget my last post, i trust and respect your opinion silk. |
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by finsburyparkranger on Mar 12, 2007 21:38:00 GMT 1, Silky, I read all the thread and all that was written was a combination of posts that suggested LAZ is preocupied with making money and that POW are failing its cutomers because of disinformation and high prices for some poor pieces of art. Also the thread was making suggestions of better art outlets available including homeless art auctions. It seems that freedom of speach does not exist on Banksy's own web site.
Silky, I read all the thread and all that was written was a combination of posts that suggested LAZ is preocupied with making money and that POW are failing its cutomers because of disinformation and high prices for some poor pieces of art. Also the thread was making suggestions of better art outlets available including homeless art auctions. It seems that freedom of speach does not exist on Banksy's own web site.
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by Daniel Silk on Mar 12, 2007 21:43:51 GMT 1, Silky, I read all the thread and all that was written was a combination of posts that suggested LAZ is preocupied with making money and that POW are failing its cutomers because of disinformation and high prices for some poor pieces of art. Also the thread was making suggestions of better art outlets available including homeless art auctions. It seems that freedom of speach does not exist on Banksy's own web site.
Thats all fine, but its really about who were making the comments and the motives 
Silky, I read all the thread and all that was written was a combination of posts that suggested LAZ is preocupied with making money and that POW are failing its cutomers because of disinformation and high prices for some poor pieces of art. Also the thread was making suggestions of better art outlets available including homeless art auctions. It seems that freedom of speach does not exist on Banksy's own web site. Thats all fine, but its really about who were making the comments and the motives |
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by tomhills1 on Mar 12, 2007 21:49:52 GMT 1, [quote author=admin board=general thread=1173723936 post=1173732231
Thats all fine, but its really about who were making the comments and the motives [/quote]
i didn't read it but i can guess what occurred, reading between the lines. not as much what was said but by whom.
i'm all up for the conspiracy theories though FPR
[quote author=admin board=general thread=1173723936 post=1173732231 Thats all fine, but its really about who were making the comments and the motives [/quote] i didn't read it but i can guess what occurred, reading between the lines. not as much what was said but by whom. i'm all up for the conspiracy theories though FPR |
|
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by corblimeylimey on Mar 12, 2007 21:55:57 GMT 1, My guess is it's something to do with a boy scout activity and a woman known as having a large chest in the carry on films.
and multiple personalities.
Just a guess.
Ooo eeer I hope this thread doesn't get pulled now, my wife won't like having her second post deleted as well.
My guess is it's something to do with a boy scout activity and a woman known as having a large chest in the carry on films.
and multiple personalities.
Just a guess.
Ooo eeer I hope this thread doesn't get pulled now, my wife won't like having her second post deleted as well.
|
|
goffy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,401
๐๐ป 0
November 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by goffy on Mar 12, 2007 21:59:09 GMT 1, The whole thread seemed to go quite mad, very quickly. And worse of all, it wasn't just expressing opinion but at times it was nasty. It was a certainly a strange one.
The whole thread seemed to go quite mad, very quickly. And worse of all, it wasn't just expressing opinion but at times it was nasty. It was a certainly a strange one.
|
|
stuey09
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 49
๐๐ป 1
August 2008
|
LAZ Censership, by stuey09 on Mar 12, 2007 22:04:49 GMT 1, There seemed to be quite a few negative comments over the last few days about dealers and personalities connected with galleries. Given that I live in the north east I am quite detached from all of this (thankfully). However, it didn't make for good reading and created a bit of a bad vibe. Personally I'm looking forward to the release of Modern Tarot Cards and some other exciting work, which will help maintain this site to what it does best, and that is discussing some sh*t hot art
There seemed to be quite a few negative comments over the last few days about dealers and personalities connected with galleries. Given that I live in the north east I am quite detached from all of this (thankfully). However, it didn't make for good reading and created a bit of a bad vibe. Personally I'm looking forward to the release of Modern Tarot Cards and some other exciting work, which will help maintain this site to what it does best, and that is discussing some sh*t hot art
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by corblimeylimey on Mar 12, 2007 22:07:51 GMT 1, There seemed to be quite a few negative comments over the last few days about dealers and personalities connected with galleries. Given that I live in the north east I am quite detached from all of this (thankfully). However, it didn't make for good reading and created a bit of a bad vibe. Personally I'm looking forward to the release of Modern Tarot Cards and some other exciting work, which will help maintain this site to what it does best, and that is discussing some sh*t hot art
Me too, I hope they post some pics before they go on sale so we've got time to consider them.
There seemed to be quite a few negative comments over the last few days about dealers and personalities connected with galleries. Given that I live in the north east I am quite detached from all of this (thankfully). However, it didn't make for good reading and created a bit of a bad vibe. Personally I'm looking forward to the release of Modern Tarot Cards and some other exciting work, which will help maintain this site to what it does best, and that is discussing some sh*t hot art Me too, I hope they post some pics before they go on sale so we've got time to consider them. |
|
stuey09
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 49
๐๐ป 1
August 2008
|
LAZ Censership, by stuey09 on Mar 12, 2007 22:12:37 GMT 1, Yeah. I think we'll get a good couple of minutes before the sold out sign goes up. Call me pessimistic, but there will be plenty of scalpers waiting in the wings for this print to go on sale and I just hope the people that buy the print do so for the right reasons
Yeah. I think we'll get a good couple of minutes before the sold out sign goes up. Call me pessimistic, but there will be plenty of scalpers waiting in the wings for this print to go on sale and I just hope the people that buy the print do so for the right reasons
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by corblimeylimey on Mar 12, 2007 22:19:59 GMT 1, I've been hunting for images of his work and asked Jon @ SoS and beejoir for pics and I've found none. If like the Turin Scam the pic will be posted for weeks or at least days before the sale (I hope) as for baggers I hope they don't get involved, they shouldn't, it's unproven ground and SoS deserve much more respect.
I've been hunting for images of his work and asked Jon @ SoS and beejoir for pics and I've found none. If like the Turin Scam the pic will be posted for weeks or at least days before the sale (I hope) as for baggers I hope they don't get involved, they shouldn't, it's unproven ground and SoS deserve much more respect.
|
|
BK83
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,604
๐๐ป 10
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by BK83 on Mar 12, 2007 23:22:11 GMT 1, It is funny though that anything that cuts a little too close to Banksy/Laz gets pulled. remember the Banksy pictures thread got pulled as well recently....
Not having a go at all -- just find it interesting and maybe Laz, POW and/or Banksy have more to do with this forum than we think......
if you'll excuse I have to go find my garlic necklace and my aluminium foil hat......
J
It is funny though that anything that cuts a little too close to Banksy/Laz gets pulled. remember the Banksy pictures thread got pulled as well recently....
Not having a go at all -- just find it interesting and maybe Laz, POW and/or Banksy have more to do with this forum than we think......
if you'll excuse I have to go find my garlic necklace and my aluminium foil hat......
J
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by Daniel Silk on Mar 12, 2007 23:33:17 GMT 1, It is funny though that anything that cuts a little too close to Banksy/Laz gets pulled. remember the Banksy pictures thread got pulled as well recently.... Not having a go at all -- just find it interesting and maybe Laz, POW and/or Banksy have more to do with this forum than we think...... if you'll excuse I have to go find my garlic necklace and my aluminium foil hat..... J
Nah! If this forum was under any control by Banksy or Laz would we have an advert for BlackRatPress or CNPD? I dunt think so all the forums are run totally independent from the artists and galleries and thats how it will always be ;D
It is funny though that anything that cuts a little too close to Banksy/Laz gets pulled. remember the Banksy pictures thread got pulled as well recently.... Not having a go at all -- just find it interesting and maybe Laz, POW and/or Banksy have more to do with this forum than we think...... if you'll excuse I have to go find my garlic necklace and my aluminium foil hat..... J Nah! If this forum was under any control by Banksy or Laz would we have an advert for BlackRatPress or CNPD? I dunt think so all the forums are run totally independent from the artists and galleries and thats how it will always be ;D |
|
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by sausageboonwee on Mar 12, 2007 23:35:53 GMT 1, I s'pose when you get large sums of money involved you're always going to get a bit of naughtiness. I think that the one area that everything needs to be improved is customer service by you know who. It doesn't take much effort.
On a completely separate note (well almost) the Faile show is one of the best collections from one artist(s) in one gallery that I have ever seen. The amount of work in some of the pieces, particularly the designed crates/boxes is amazing, I think some credit has to go to Mr Laz for bringing that show to London.
(Do I get my commission now?)
I s'pose when you get large sums of money involved you're always going to get a bit of naughtiness. I think that the one area that everything needs to be improved is customer service by you know who. It doesn't take much effort.
On a completely separate note (well almost) the Faile show is one of the best collections from one artist(s) in one gallery that I have ever seen. The amount of work in some of the pieces, particularly the designed crates/boxes is amazing, I think some credit has to go to Mr Laz for bringing that show to London.
(Do I get my commission now?)
|
|
trevk008
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 5
๐๐ป 0
August 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by trevk008 on Mar 12, 2007 23:54:06 GMT 1, While the post may have been stated by an agenda, there seemed to be alot of back up on the comments, I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received, agenda and all.
We can see through agendas, we can also see through galleries protecting their pitch by getting negative slides pulled.
While the post may have been stated by an agenda, there seemed to be alot of back up on the comments, I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received, agenda and all.
We can see through agendas, we can also see through galleries protecting their pitch by getting negative slides pulled.
|
|
dotdot
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,658
๐๐ป 1,030
December 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by dotdot on Mar 12, 2007 23:59:45 GMT 1, Silky - I for for one - would have to say thanks for offing said thread it's not exactly what any forum is about - I'm sure most folks would agree -some less than others.
cheers
..
Silky - I for for one - would have to say thanks for offing said thread it's not exactly what any forum is about - I'm sure most folks would agree -some less than others.
cheers
..
|
|
pw
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 308
๐๐ป 1
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by pw on Mar 13, 2007 0:03:26 GMT 1, "I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received"
I fully agree. some of the comments made by campbarbara were out of line, but the comments of the many other people deserve to be heard.
I must say that I have also found the staff of Lazinc to be at best nonchalent, and at worst utterly useless.
"I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received"
I fully agree. some of the comments made by campbarbara were out of line, but the comments of the many other people deserve to be heard.
I must say that I have also found the staff of Lazinc to be at best nonchalent, and at worst utterly useless.
|
|
|
|
LAZ Censership, by Daniel Silk on Mar 13, 2007 0:08:17 GMT 1, While the post may have been stated by an agenda, there seemed to be alot of back up on the comments, I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received, agenda and all. We can see through agendas, we can also see through galleries protecting their pitch by getting negative slides pulled.
I know, I know, but it was a tough one to call I also agreed with many of the points raised on the thread 
While the post may have been stated by an agenda, there seemed to be alot of back up on the comments, I personally think the post should have stayed, give the back-up it received, agenda and all. We can see through agendas, we can also see through galleries protecting their pitch by getting negative slides pulled. I know, I know, but it was a tough one to call I also agreed with many of the points raised on the thread |
|
RBK
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,925
๐๐ป 104
September 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by RBK on Mar 13, 2007 0:46:35 GMT 1, At the end of the day this is Silky's forum (not a truly free/public one) and he has the right to make these determinations. If he believes it was best to delete the post - my guess is he probably gave it a lot of thought and most likely made the right decision.
I for one am a big fan of the layout (except the bad background - zing! ), organization, and informatoin on this forum and am thankful for all of Silky's hard work.
At the end of the day this is Silky's forum (not a truly free/public one) and he has the right to make these determinations. If he believes it was best to delete the post - my guess is he probably gave it a lot of thought and most likely made the right decision. I for one am a big fan of the layout (except the bad background - zing! ), organization, and informatoin on this forum and am thankful for all of Silky's hard work. |
|
gbh
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,595
๐๐ป 14
May 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by gbh on Mar 13, 2007 1:03:33 GMT 1, nice one Silk.
There was some ugliness on the light side as well.
slags.
nice one Silk.
There was some ugliness on the light side as well.
slags.
|
|
pastiepie
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 446
๐๐ป 0
October 2006
|
LAZ Censership, by pastiepie on Mar 13, 2007 2:26:28 GMT 1, I for one am a big fan of the layout (except the bad background - zing! ), organization, and informatoin on this forum and am thankful for all of Silky's hard work.
So Silky do you have a reason for deleting at least 2 threads from people complaining about the hideous background?
Let the conspiracy theories begin!
I for one am a big fan of the layout (except the bad background - zing! ), organization, and informatoin on this forum and am thankful for all of Silky's hard work. So Silky do you have a reason for deleting at least 2 threads from people complaining about the hideous background? Let the conspiracy theories begin! |
|
I dunt think it would be fair to say much more than that, but I assure you that if you knew the full story you would completely agree with its removal 
Welcome to the forum ;D
