walters
New Member
🗨️ 691
👍🏻 0
December 2007
|
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by veralynn on Nov 19, 2009 21:59:03 GMT 1, If you don't pay the duty, then chances are that FedEx will sell the debt on, the HMRC might come and have a look through your personal tax affairs.
Eventually you might end up with a default registered against you with Equifax/Experian meaning you'll struggle to get credit for a loooonnnnggg time.
As an alternative, you could phone FedEx on the number on the invoice - explain that you think duty is payable at 5% as the pieces were created by the Artist and they will credit you with £20ish.....I did this this morning and I think it's fair and reasonable.
If you don't pay the duty, then chances are that FedEx will sell the debt on, the HMRC might come and have a look through your personal tax affairs.
Eventually you might end up with a default registered against you with Equifax/Experian meaning you'll struggle to get credit for a loooonnnnggg time.
As an alternative, you could phone FedEx on the number on the invoice - explain that you think duty is payable at 5% as the pieces were created by the Artist and they will credit you with £20ish.....I did this this morning and I think it's fair and reasonable.
|
|
skanky
New Member
🗨️ 887
👍🏻 60
August 2007
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by skanky on Nov 19, 2009 22:48:54 GMT 1, Thanks good advice, I have been charged £40 which I think is unreasonable.
Thanks good advice, I have been charged £40 which I think is unreasonable.
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
🗨️ 8,963
👍🏻 4,581
January 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ruggs on Nov 19, 2009 23:53:40 GMT 1, Can't wait to get my print tomorrow.
Can't wait to get my print tomorrow.
|
|
Rsyok
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,375
👍🏻 507
January 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Rsyok on Nov 20, 2009 12:03:09 GMT 1, The prune person I spoke to (via option 4 on the phone) said I had to dispute it in writing the account would be zeroed and would take several months to resolve. I think I'll just ring back & try option 1 instead.
The prune person I spoke to (via option 4 on the phone) said I had to dispute it in writing the account would be zeroed and would take several months to resolve. I think I'll just ring back & try option 1 instead.
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
🗨️ 8,963
👍🏻 4,581
January 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ruggs on Nov 20, 2009 13:35:33 GMT 1, Got mine this morning. Wow! Fantastic print! Really, really nice Faile. Hope to get it framed real soon.
Got mine this morning. Wow! Fantastic print! Really, really nice Faile. Hope to get it framed real soon.
|
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by silvermyn on Nov 20, 2009 13:54:57 GMT 1, The thing that annoued me about the FedEx letter was that £10.50 was the VAT charge (roughly 5%) and the remaining £10.00 was a FedEx advancement fee. I mean, who authorised FedEx to advance me money? Sure as hell wasn't me!
If they hold onto the print until the £10.50 is paid then fair enough but to pay it and then claim I owe them money because they gave me an advance is a bit much. A £10 charge on a £10.50 VAT bill is taking the p*55. Almost doubled the bill...
If 150 of the 300 prints came to the UK then FedEx made £1,500 out of advancing us all money. Cunning b*stards!
On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too
The thing that annoued me about the FedEx letter was that £10.50 was the VAT charge (roughly 5%) and the remaining £10.00 was a FedEx advancement fee. I mean, who authorised FedEx to advance me money? Sure as hell wasn't me! If they hold onto the print until the £10.50 is paid then fair enough but to pay it and then claim I owe them money because they gave me an advance is a bit much. A £10 charge on a £10.50 VAT bill is taking the p*55. Almost doubled the bill... If 150 of the 300 prints came to the UK then FedEx made £1,500 out of advancing us all money. Cunning b*stards! On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too
|
|
Ryan Lazy
New Member
🗨️ 90
👍🏻 0
December 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ryan Lazy on Nov 20, 2009 14:01:49 GMT 1, ... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too
Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number?
... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number?
|
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ottomatik on Nov 20, 2009 14:11:23 GMT 1, ... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number?
you got the print. Isn't that enough? I missed it, the way PM were putting the up in different intervals...every time I went to the site it was sold out. Then someone on the forum would say it was up again, but when I refreshed the page it was sold out again!! So, in conclusion, be happy/proud of your #298.
... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? you got the print. Isn't that enough? I missed it, the way PM were putting the up in different intervals...every time I went to the site it was sold out. Then someone on the forum would say it was up again, but when I refreshed the page it was sold out again!! So, in conclusion, be happy/proud of your #298.
|
|
walters
New Member
🗨️ 691
👍🏻 0
December 2007
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by walters on Nov 20, 2009 14:18:54 GMT 1, ... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number?
it doesn't matter at all. i never checked what number mine was,i think it was on the back of the print? i'll check the coa.
... On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? it doesn't matter at all. i never checked what number mine was,i think it was on the back of the print? i'll check the coa.
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by silvermyn on Nov 20, 2009 14:20:48 GMT 1, The prints are all the same so don't worry about that. I just like to have low numbers, especially where the edition size is large. No other reason than just personal preference.
The prints are all the same so don't worry about that. I just like to have low numbers, especially where the edition size is large. No other reason than just personal preference.
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by silvermyn on Nov 20, 2009 14:25:19 GMT 1, Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? it doesn't matter at all. i never checked what number mine was,i think it was on the back of the print? i'll check the coa.
Where there COA's...?
Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? it doesn't matter at all. i never checked what number mine was,i think it was on the back of the print? i'll check the coa. Where there COA's...?
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by monkeyballs on Nov 20, 2009 14:32:08 GMT 1, Yeah, they're attached in plastic on the outside of the tube
Yeah, they're attached in plastic on the outside of the tube
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
🗨️ 8,963
👍🏻 4,581
January 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ruggs on Nov 20, 2009 14:33:07 GMT 1, I got one. It was attached to the tube.
I got one. It was attached to the tube.
|
|
|
Rsyok
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,375
👍🏻 507
January 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Rsyok on Nov 20, 2009 14:38:22 GMT 1, The thing that annoued me about the FedEx letter was that £10.50 was the VAT charge (roughly 5%) and the remaining £10.00 was a FedEx advancement fee. I mean, who authorised FedEx to advance me money? Sure as hell wasn't me! If they hold onto the print until the £10.50 is paid then fair enough but to pay it and then claim I owe them money because they gave me an advance is a bit much. A £10 charge on a £10.50 VAT bill is taking the p*55. Almost doubled the bill... If 150 of the 300 prints came to the UK then FedEx made £1,500 out of advancing us all money. Cunning b*stards! On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Royal mail charge admin as well its pretty universal. Interesting your vat was at 5% mine charged at 15. COA is on the tube btw.
The thing that annoued me about the FedEx letter was that £10.50 was the VAT charge (roughly 5%) and the remaining £10.00 was a FedEx advancement fee. I mean, who authorised FedEx to advance me money? Sure as hell wasn't me! If they hold onto the print until the £10.50 is paid then fair enough but to pay it and then claim I owe them money because they gave me an advance is a bit much. A £10 charge on a £10.50 VAT bill is taking the p*55. Almost doubled the bill... If 150 of the 300 prints came to the UK then FedEx made £1,500 out of advancing us all money. Cunning b*stards! On the upside my print was numbered below 10 so I was please with that. A lovely print too Royal mail charge admin as well its pretty universal. Interesting your vat was at 5% mine charged at 15. COA is on the tube btw.
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by silvermyn on Nov 20, 2009 15:15:14 GMT 1, Thanks everyone. I'd better go fish that tube out of the bin then.
Thanks everyone. I'd better go fish that tube out of the bin then.
|
|
Ryan Lazy
New Member
🗨️ 90
👍🏻 0
December 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by Ryan Lazy on Nov 20, 2009 16:14:39 GMT 1, Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? you got the print. Isn't that enough? I missed it, the way PM were putting the up in different intervals...every time I went to the site it was sold out. Then someone on the forum would say it was up again, but when I refreshed the page it was sold out again!! So, in conclusion, be happy/proud of your #298.
Don't get me wrong I am very happy... sorry you missed out
(I should point out mine was 290-something-ish, so to the person who that actually has 298 i am sorry if I had you worried for a second)
Does it matter what number you get or is this just a personal preference? I got number 298... is that worse than one with a low number? you got the print. Isn't that enough? I missed it, the way PM were putting the up in different intervals...every time I went to the site it was sold out. Then someone on the forum would say it was up again, but when I refreshed the page it was sold out again!! So, in conclusion, be happy/proud of your #298. Don't get me wrong I am very happy... sorry you missed out (I should point out mine was 290-something-ish, so to the person who that actually has 298 i am sorry if I had you worried for a second)
|
|
|
nipper
New Member
🗨️ 590
👍🏻 310
October 2006
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by nipper on Nov 21, 2009 16:44:12 GMT 1, Looking forward to mine which has been to London and back to New York courtesy of FedEx!!
It's on its way back to me tagain from Papermonster. I hope they don't try to charge me the tax again...
Looking forward to mine which has been to London and back to New York courtesy of FedEx!!
It's on its way back to me tagain from Papermonster. I hope they don't try to charge me the tax again...
|
|
howies
New Member
🗨️ 942
👍🏻 518
July 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by howies on Nov 22, 2009 0:54:51 GMT 1, I received mine and it's really dirty, I love it my first Faile, I prefer this so much more to there other releases IMHO ( but this could be as this is the first I have seen in the flesh) , Also no GST (VAT) to pay here in OZ on any purchase under $1000 so every parcel comes straight to me with no extra charge.
I received mine and it's really dirty, I love it my first Faile, I prefer this so much more to there other releases IMHO ( but this could be as this is the first I have seen in the flesh) , Also no GST (VAT) to pay here in OZ on any purchase under $1000 so every parcel comes straight to me with no extra charge.
|
|
rillo
New Member
🗨️ 657
👍🏻 59
April 2006
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by rillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:30:59 GMT 1, I know these have been overposted but I loves it - one of mY favorite failes
]
I know these have been overposted but I loves it - one of mY favorite failes ]
|
|
rillo
New Member
🗨️ 657
👍🏻 59
April 2006
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by rillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:33:44 GMT 1, will rest next to
will rest next to
|
|
|
rillo
New Member
🗨️ 657
👍🏻 59
April 2006
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by rillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:38:40 GMT 1, will probably frame like
will probably frame like
|
|
digitalkid
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,282
👍🏻 35
October 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by digitalkid on Nov 24, 2009 12:40:40 GMT 1, Can I ask everyones opinion - Are you going to use uv protective glass when you frame this print? Is the cost really worth it for all prints? This Faile is a keeper for the foreseeable future, I'm just not sure if the print warrants it or not?
Can I ask everyones opinion - Are you going to use uv protective glass when you frame this print? Is the cost really worth it for all prints? This Faile is a keeper for the foreseeable future, I'm just not sure if the print warrants it or not?
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by grantb on Nov 24, 2009 12:49:42 GMT 1, yes because prints can get dis coloured by sun light as we have seen we some banksy prints.
yes because prints can get dis coloured by sun light as we have seen we some banksy prints.
|
|
digitalkid
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,282
👍🏻 35
October 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by digitalkid on Nov 24, 2009 13:07:40 GMT 1, Even if they are out of direct sunlight?
I have used 99% UV protective glass for my most prized prints.
Even if they are out of direct sunlight?
I have used 99% UV protective glass for my most prized prints.
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by jesustheba on Nov 24, 2009 13:16:43 GMT 1, normal float glass has UV light filtering approx. 45%.
normal float glass has UV light filtering approx. 45%.
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by sand on Nov 24, 2009 13:22:05 GMT 1, Can I ask everyones opinion - Are you going to use uv protective glass when you frame this print? Is the cost really worth it for all prints? This Faile is a keeper for the foreseeable future, I'm just not sure if the print warrants it or not?
As for UV glass, I cannot emphasis enough how damaging UV light of any type is to prints. UV glass is a must on all of my own personnel framing, be it a print of value or just a photograph. Damage from UV light starts the moment your framed art is hung. You may not notice any difference for a couple of years, but everyday that passes the pigmentation in the colours of the print are fading. A little test you can do is to take a photo of non importance and cover half of it with a piece of card. Place in your window and after 2-3 weeks you will see a significant difference between the two halves. Although no artwork should be hung in direct light this small test will show just how much damage UV light can, and will do. And although UV glass will not totaly protect your artwork from UV light it does drastically reduce the damage done. So please, for the small additional cost, I emphatically advise the use of UV protective glass. I hope this is of help to you Martin
Can I ask everyones opinion - Are you going to use uv protective glass when you frame this print? Is the cost really worth it for all prints? This Faile is a keeper for the foreseeable future, I'm just not sure if the print warrants it or not? As for UV glass, I cannot emphasis enough how damaging UV light of any type is to prints. UV glass is a must on all of my own personnel framing, be it a print of value or just a photograph. Damage from UV light starts the moment your framed art is hung. You may not notice any difference for a couple of years, but everyday that passes the pigmentation in the colours of the print are fading. A little test you can do is to take a photo of non importance and cover half of it with a piece of card. Place in your window and after 2-3 weeks you will see a significant difference between the two halves. Although no artwork should be hung in direct light this small test will show just how much damage UV light can, and will do. And although UV glass will not totaly protect your artwork from UV light it does drastically reduce the damage done. So please, for the small additional cost, I emphatically advise the use of UV protective glass. I hope this is of help to you Martin
|
|
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by sputnikeye on Nov 24, 2009 20:19:08 GMT 1, still haven't received mine yet . contacted them at papermonster@mac.com, no answer yet. Does anyone have another email or contact info for them ? Can't get no info from the fed ex i.d too.
still haven't received mine yet . contacted them at papermonster@mac.com, no answer yet. Does anyone have another email or contact info for them ? Can't get no info from the fed ex i.d too.
|
|
digitalkid
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,282
👍🏻 35
October 2008
|
Faile Flag • Star Spangled Shadows Print, by digitalkid on Nov 24, 2009 20:28:21 GMT 1, Well mines at the framers now, gone for something slightly different and should hopefully work very well. And yes 99% UV glass!
Well mines at the framers now, gone for something slightly different and should hopefully work very well. And yes 99% UV glass!
|
|