;D

In light of POWS last 2 releases with embossing, anyone think that the next Banksy may adopt this style?

Discuss...

let's think about this logically, Invader print with embossing makes sense because his images are 'tiled'. Might Mo was produced in this manner to make it sufficently different to the last Mighty Mo release and therefore sell.

I'd therefore conclude, unless Banksy produces an image that in someway needs embossing ooh it's a stickle brick flower thrower, or suddenly his market bombs and he needs a 'special feature' to help sell his print, that it's very unlikely.

Mr B doesnt need gimmicks the image does the talkin

[quote author=jdwheeler Also, I wish he would sign the entire run like other artists.

[/quote]


He does now.

The next Banksy print?

that would be a good print me thinks

cant see why not, he has made the effort to make up the rest of the image, so looks like this is the one

I prefered the version in the bristol show.. but that will be harder to screenprint probably...

Excellent!

I feel that these poor sods (excluding flippers) who queue up all night should at least get a signature!!
[/quote]

surley its been a couple of years since any were sold unsigned ?

Personally I feel the bristol version was a lot better, compostion was far superior

that composition would not work on a print, it would be cut off and all sorts

why would it not work ? So it works in a 50k original yet not on a print ? That makes no sense to me.