stuey09
New Member
🗨️ 49
👍🏻 1
August 2008
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by stuey09 on Aug 9, 2007 9:10:22 GMT 1, I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays This is conceivable. Glad I've got that october date booked in the diary
Has this one been confirmed? I was told it was TBC and not widely known just yet.
I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays This is conceivable. Glad I've got that october date booked in the diary Has this one been confirmed? I was told it was TBC and not widely known just yet.
|
|
pezlow
Junior Member
🗨️ 5,388
👍🏻 254
January 2007
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by pezlow on Aug 9, 2007 9:17:03 GMT 1, Pretty sure it is confirmed stuey - give holly or stephanne a ring.
Pretty sure it is confirmed stuey - give holly or stephanne a ring.
|
|
ratpack
New Member
🗨️ 353
👍🏻 4
September 2006
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by ratpack on Aug 9, 2007 9:18:31 GMT 1, Yes, J Hewlett 67% B Hudd 5% S Lazarides 18% S Parkin 10% as of 2/6/07
Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that?
Yes, J Hewlett 67% B Hudd 5% S Lazarides 18% S Parkin 10% as of 2/6/07 Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that?
|
|
goffy
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,401
👍🏻 0
November 2006
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by goffy on Aug 9, 2007 9:25:21 GMT 1, If none of the last LA prints will be released through POW, is that the last of a cheap Banksy?
If none of the last LA prints will be released through POW, is that the last of a cheap Banksy?
|
|
Montubu7
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,196
👍🏻 5
November 2006
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by Montubu7 on Aug 9, 2007 9:29:04 GMT 1, I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays
Yep, i go with that idea as well.
I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays Yep, i go with that idea as well.
|
|
stuey09
New Member
🗨️ 49
👍🏻 1
August 2008
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by stuey09 on Aug 9, 2007 9:31:32 GMT 1, Good call Pezlow. Thank God I got WCIP.
Good call Pezlow. Thank God I got WCIP.
|
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by carlito on Aug 9, 2007 9:32:59 GMT 1, nice one Pez and Stuey - I'd completely forgotten about that
nice one Pez and Stuey - I'd completely forgotten about that
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by slowmo on Aug 9, 2007 10:37:49 GMT 1, Yes, J Hewlett 67% B Hudd 5% S Lazarides 18% S Parkin 10% as of 2/6/07 Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that?
Maybe he is Ben Hudd
Yes, J Hewlett 67% B Hudd 5% S Lazarides 18% S Parkin 10% as of 2/6/07 Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that? Maybe he is Ben Hudd
|
|
Curley
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,012
👍🏻 7
June 2006
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by Curley on Aug 9, 2007 10:49:30 GMT 1, I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays Yep, i go with that idea as well.
Cant see Laz selling the unsigned edition, too much of a bunfight for them. But I can see them selling the signed at £5K
I have heard that no more LA prints will be released through POW. Only conjecture but it seems feasible given the delays Yep, i go with that idea as well. Cant see Laz selling the unsigned edition, too much of a bunfight for them. But I can see them selling the signed at £5K
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by corblimeylimey on Aug 9, 2007 10:53:28 GMT 1, These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means)
These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means)
|
|
rillo
New Member
🗨️ 657
👍🏻 59
April 2006
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by rillo on Aug 9, 2007 11:08:18 GMT 1, Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that? Maybe he is Ben Hudd
Don't be silly, then he would have written HUDD in big letter all over Shoreditch. Though Hudd was the accountant.
Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that? Maybe he is Ben Hudd Don't be silly, then he would have written HUDD in big letter all over Shoreditch. Though Hudd was the accountant.
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by mammal2 on Aug 9, 2007 11:12:16 GMT 1, Why would you write your real name around Shoreditch? Maybe he should include his phone number also!
Why would you write your real name around Shoreditch? Maybe he should include his phone number also!
|
|
njr911
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,381
👍🏻 420
April 2007
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by njr911 on Aug 9, 2007 11:15:10 GMT 1, These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means)
100 shares at £1 each that means. That's not an indication of the value of the company as it is Private and not Public.
These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means) 100 shares at £1 each that means. That's not an indication of the value of the company as it is Private and not Public.
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by corblimeylimey on Aug 9, 2007 11:23:02 GMT 1, These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means) 100 shares at £1 each that means. That's not an indication of the value of the company as it is Private and not Public.
No, 100 shares at £100 each, but yes I get what you're saying.
These shares are valued at only £100 each (there's 100 in total) I not an accountant and don't understand this sort of thing, but at Companies House the Share Capital is marked down as 100 ordinary shares, the 'aggregate nominal value of issued shares' is £100 (whatever that means) 100 shares at £1 each that means. That's not an indication of the value of the company as it is Private and not Public. No, 100 shares at £100 each, but yes I get what you're saying.
|
|
|
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by numusic on Aug 9, 2007 12:14:05 GMT 1, Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that? Maybe he is Ben Hudd
not anymore
Really?! where does Ben Eine fit into that? Maybe he is Ben Hudd not anymore
|
|
bond
New Member
🗨️ 958
👍🏻 0
January 2007
|
and after all this, more from the LA series, by bond on Aug 9, 2007 12:33:30 GMT 1, HI all
I hope this all makes sense !
If an company is listed on the stock exchange as a PLC -- Public limited company then the price of the shares is determined by supply and demand.
When the shares are initially sold to investors the value of the company will be determined by examing the assets and then the quantity of shares can be determined by setting a price at which they will be attractive to investors to make the offering a success . After that they are at the mercy of the financial world.
- If a company such as P.O.W is not listed on the stock exchange then the company is owned by the directors who will divide it into " nominal shares " usually at a £ 1. These shares of course bear no relation to the actual market value of the company.
- Right , now where's the new Banksy print pls !!!!!!!!!!
HI all
I hope this all makes sense !
If an company is listed on the stock exchange as a PLC -- Public limited company then the price of the shares is determined by supply and demand.
When the shares are initially sold to investors the value of the company will be determined by examing the assets and then the quantity of shares can be determined by setting a price at which they will be attractive to investors to make the offering a success . After that they are at the mercy of the financial world.
- If a company such as P.O.W is not listed on the stock exchange then the company is owned by the directors who will divide it into " nominal shares " usually at a £ 1. These shares of course bear no relation to the actual market value of the company.
- Right , now where's the new Banksy print pls !!!!!!!!!!
|
|