jimbob68
New Member
π¨οΈ 151
ππ» 1
January 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by jimbob68 on Sept 9, 2009 20:06:22 GMT 1, i think cartrain may be remembered as one of the many people that have tried to take on hirsts huge art machine but i think like the stuckist charles thomson he will not be remembered fdor his own art contribution
which is a shame for an artist no?
i think cartrain may be remembered as one of the many people that have tried to take on hirsts huge art machine but i think like the stuckist charles thomson he will not be remembered fdor his own art contribution
which is a shame for an artist no?
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by They call me Stephen on Sept 9, 2009 20:09:06 GMT 1, i don't think he will be remembered at all along with a large percentage of this scene
i don't think he will be remembered at all along with a large percentage of this scene
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 9, 2009 20:09:45 GMT 1, Can i ask silky or one of the new admins why cashman, richy, alsbabar and dudebro17 are all showing as guests???
I dont know Theycallmestephen, nowt to do with me fraid, i can only modify and move posts until i have served the apprenticeship  .
Can i ask silky or one of the new admins why cashman, richy, alsbabar and dudebro17 are all showing as guests??? I dont know Theycallmestephen, nowt to do with me fraid, i can only modify and move posts until i have served the apprenticeship . |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by They call me Stephen on Sept 9, 2009 20:11:16 GMT 1, keep on trucking wiz...i'm sure if you keep your socks pulled up and your shoes polished you will make the grade
it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions without fear of getting banned. what is the point of a forum or place of discussion if cartrain certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??
"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
George Orwell
keep on trucking wiz...i'm sure if you keep your socks pulled up and your shoes polished you will make the grade
it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions without fear of getting banned. what is the point of a forum or place of discussion if cartrain certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??
"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
George Orwell
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Guest on Sept 9, 2009 20:17:18 GMT 1, No word from Silky regarding this?
No word from Silky regarding this?
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 9, 2009 21:21:57 GMT 1, "it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions"
Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them.
"certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??"
Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed.
Its as simple as that really  anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions.
"it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. |
|
|
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 5,833
ππ» 1,091
March 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by curiousgeorge on Sept 9, 2009 22:03:26 GMT 1, For the banned bro's 
For the banned bro's |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by speebe on Sept 9, 2009 22:34:20 GMT 1, i think cartrain may be remembered as one of the many people that have tried to take on hirsts huge art machine but i think like the stuckist charles thomson he will not be remembered fdor his own art contribution which is a shame for an artist no?
As time passes he'll be fondly remembered... akin to the wart on DaVinci's nut sack.
IMO he's made an equal contribution... The young parasite has nerve but little substance, although I do admire his 'spunk'.
i think cartrain may be remembered as one of the many people that have tried to take on hirsts huge art machine but i think like the stuckist charles thomson he will not be remembered fdor his own art contribution which is a shame for an artist no? As time passes he'll be fondly remembered... akin to the wart on DaVinci's nut sack. IMO he's made an equal contribution... The young parasite has nerve but little substance, although I do admire his 'spunk'. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 9, 2009 22:39:24 GMT 1, Now watch all the wanna be rebels make posts to show how rebellious they are on an Internet forum 
Now watch all the wanna be rebels make posts to show how rebellious they are on an Internet forum |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by speebe on Sept 9, 2009 22:54:43 GMT 1, Now watch all the wanna be rebels make posts to show how rebellious they are on an Internet forum
As we all know opinions are like Arseholes... I assume I'm allowed to express mine beings that I'm being bombarded with crap about this whole s**tstorm via twitter and the urban art association updates... Surely you want me to respond??
I'm no rebel... Just a forum member unless you'd like to rectify that?
Now watch all the wanna be rebels make posts to show how rebellious they are on an Internet forum As we all know opinions are like Arseholes... I assume I'm allowed to express mine beings that I'm being bombarded with crap about this whole s**tstorm via twitter and the urban art association updates... Surely you want me to respond?? I'm no rebel... Just a forum member unless you'd like to rectify that? |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by monkeyballs on Sept 9, 2009 22:57:45 GMT 1, "it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions.
You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible.
Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok?
"it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok? |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 9, 2009 23:00:33 GMT 1, You can opt out of the forum Newsletter if you wish, by changing that option in your profile. I can do that for you if you are not sure how to do it.
Sorry, Cant do anything about Twitter  I keep away from that myself.
You can opt out of the forum Newsletter if you wish, by changing that option in your profile. I can do that for you if you are not sure how to do it. Sorry, Cant do anything about Twitter I keep away from that myself. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Guest on Sept 9, 2009 23:25:54 GMT 1, "it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok?
Ditto, same here.
"it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok? Ditto, same here. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 9, 2009 23:26:00 GMT 1, "it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok?
To start with you were not banned otherwise you would not now be posting.
Using the S, F, C and other such words directed at People, Artists, Art and Galleries is not really welcome on this forum as its not respectful, and disrupts what could otherwise be a civilized discussion. Swearing is fine, as long as its used in a clearly fun and light hearted way.
I realize many people would rather not follow those guide lines, but from past experience they are normally the very first people to be contacting me about somebody being abusive to them.
I'm always happy to answer questions like this from people who are able to discuss things in a calm and civilized way, but I fear from past experience those people are few and far between 
Hope that helps Thanks!
"it's a shame that members cannot express their opinions" Most of the people who are removed from this forum are done so to protect the freedom of speech of all the others, without being bullied and abused if they don't agree with them. "certain subjects cannot be discussed when they happen to differ from managements point of view??" Your point of view and my point of view are both as valid as eachother. Nobody is removed from the forum because of their opinion about anything! The problem occurs when they can't express their opinion in a way that also respects others. Swearing, abuse and threats against other members just because they don't agree with you are not acceptable, and those members run the risk of being removed. Its as simple as that really anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions. You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok? To start with you were not banned otherwise you would not now be posting. Using the S, F, C and other such words directed at People, Artists, Art and Galleries is not really welcome on this forum as its not respectful, and disrupts what could otherwise be a civilized discussion. Swearing is fine, as long as its used in a clearly fun and light hearted way. I realize many people would rather not follow those guide lines, but from past experience they are normally the very first people to be contacting me about somebody being abusive to them. I'm always happy to answer questions like this from people who are able to discuss things in a calm and civilized way, but I fear from past experience those people are few and far between Hope that helps Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Guest on Sept 9, 2009 23:28:28 GMT 1, You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok? To start with you were not banned otherwise you would not now be posting. Using the S, F, C and other such words directed at People, Artists, Art and Galleries is not really welcome on this forum as its not respectful, and disrupts what could otherwise be a civilized discussion. Swearing is fine, as long as its used in a clearly fun and light hearted way. I realize many people would rather not follow those guide lines, but from past experience they are normally the very first people to be contacting me about somebody being abusive to them. I'm always happy to answer questions like this from people who are able to discuss things in a calm and civilized way, but I fear from past experience those people are few and far between Hope that helps Thanks!
you make it sound like you have created a monster that is out of control?
You banned me for what I thought was humour and wearology agreed with shortly before I was banned, without explanation until I asked you directly days after who was responsible. Now your use of swearing (albeit with an asterisk) as humour kind of rankles me. If you don't want swearing, don't swear. Otherwise you just set an example that given the right scenario swearing is ok, hence where are we suposed to know when it is ok? To start with you were not banned otherwise you would not now be posting. Using the S, F, C and other such words directed at People, Artists, Art and Galleries is not really welcome on this forum as its not respectful, and disrupts what could otherwise be a civilized discussion. Swearing is fine, as long as its used in a clearly fun and light hearted way. I realize many people would rather not follow those guide lines, but from past experience they are normally the very first people to be contacting me about somebody being abusive to them. I'm always happy to answer questions like this from people who are able to discuss things in a calm and civilized way, but I fear from past experience those people are few and far between Hope that helps Thanks! you make it sound like you have created a monster that is out of control? |
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 5,833
ππ» 1,091
March 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by curiousgeorge on Sept 9, 2009 23:44:16 GMT 1, It's bigger than that Mr.Hill
It's bigger than that Mr.Hill
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 10, 2009 0:54:25 GMT 1, Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube
68% Female, and 50% of those are aged 55-64 
Cartrain attracting a completely new section of the public to this sort of art? Your guess is as good as mine.
Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube 68% Female, and 50% of those are aged 55-64 Cartrain attracting a completely new section of the public to this sort of art? Your guess is as good as mine. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by daz205 on Sept 10, 2009 16:52:27 GMT 1, school teachers, friends and family maybe?
otherwise maybe looking for crashes with cars and trains ?
cant think that 368 people watched that video intentionally!
school teachers, friends and family maybe?
otherwise maybe looking for crashes with cars and trains ?
cant think that 368 people watched that video intentionally!
|
|
BlightSociety
Art Gallery
New Member
π¨οΈ 124
ππ» 0
June 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by BlightSociety on Sept 10, 2009 23:41:38 GMT 1, Cartrain is in court today I think (11 sept) anyone going down to sit in the public gallery and get the scoop for us?
I want to know what the judge has got to say about all this.
Cartrain is in court today I think (11 sept) anyone going down to sit in the public gallery and get the scoop for us?
I want to know what the judge has got to say about all this.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 10, 2009 23:43:46 GMT 1, Court? i thought he was answering Bail today?.
Court? i thought he was answering Bail today?.
|
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 11, 2009 9:02:07 GMT 1, I thought it was on Sept 12.
I thought it was on Sept 12.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 11, 2009 9:09:39 GMT 1, My mistake, just had another look at the bail form on 100artworks site and it says 14/09/2009 at 11.30am.
My mistake, just had another look at the bail form on 100artworks site and it says 14/09/2009 at 11.30am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 11, 2009 9:09:44 GMT 1, Daily Mail - "He is on bail until September 14."
Thisislondon - "The Met said that Cartrain's father was bailed to return to a police station on 14 September."
The Independent - "Cartrain is on bail and, if convicted, his actions will feature among the highest value modern art thefts in Britain."
The Telegraph - "Cartrain is now on bail until September 11, and if convicted, the incident will be one of the highest value modern art thefts in Britain."
Daily Mail - "He is on bail until September 14."
Thisislondon - "The Met said that Cartrain's father was bailed to return to a police station on 14 September."
The Independent - "Cartrain is on bail and, if convicted, his actions will feature among the highest value modern art thefts in Britain."
The Telegraph - "Cartrain is now on bail until September 11, and if convicted, the incident will be one of the highest value modern art thefts in Britain."
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Sept 11, 2009 9:29:43 GMT 1, As and when, or if it gets to court, do you think Mr Hirst will show up? Possibly in disguise?
As and when, or if it gets to court, do you think Mr Hirst will show up? Possibly in disguise?
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by doublehelix on Sept 11, 2009 9:46:09 GMT 1, Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube
He's not the most articulate of people is he.
Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube He's not the most articulate of people is he. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Sept 11, 2009 9:49:10 GMT 1, Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube He's not the most articulate of people is he.
Your gonna love this one then -
Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube He's not the most articulate of people is he. Your gonna love this one then - |
|
nex
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,573
ππ» 1,819
February 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nex on Sept 11, 2009 9:58:30 GMT 1, Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube 68% Female, and 50% of those are aged 55-64 Cartrain attracting a completely new section of the public to this sort of art? Your guess is as good as mine.
the old people they like their cheeky young whippersnappers!
Really unusual stats from the people watching the Cartrain Interview video on youtube 68% Female, and 50% of those are aged 55-64 Cartrain attracting a completely new section of the public to this sort of art? Your guess is as good as mine. the old people they like their cheeky young whippersnappers! |
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,319
ππ» 2
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by robinbanks on Sept 11, 2009 10:54:24 GMT 1, After reading all the arguments and counter arguments and watching some of the vids I've come to the conclusion that Cartrain is just a stupid kid.
It makes sense really - his work has always lacked intelligence / originality.
This "prank" of his was neither clever nor funny. Surely it would have been much funnier (and a lot less illegal) to insert a piece of his own into Hirst's Pharamcy - maybe a pack of Hirst Sense of Humour Erasers or something along those lines (I dunno - I'm not the one pretending to be an artist)? Maybe then send Mr Hirst a bunch of flowers with a card saying he hoped he liked the gift - no hard feelings. Even make a humorous short 5 minute documentary about the whole ridiculous affair and post it on YouTube. And then let us all know about it.
But no - Cartrain is just a stupid kid. The trouble is, in the eyes of the law, he may well be stupid but he aint a kid. And so I fear this may be a very costly lesson for him to learn.
After reading all the arguments and counter arguments and watching some of the vids I've come to the conclusion that Cartrain is just a stupid kid.
It makes sense really - his work has always lacked intelligence / originality.
This "prank" of his was neither clever nor funny. Surely it would have been much funnier (and a lot less illegal) to insert a piece of his own into Hirst's Pharamcy - maybe a pack of Hirst Sense of Humour Erasers or something along those lines (I dunno - I'm not the one pretending to be an artist)? Maybe then send Mr Hirst a bunch of flowers with a card saying he hoped he liked the gift - no hard feelings. Even make a humorous short 5 minute documentary about the whole ridiculous affair and post it on YouTube. And then let us all know about it.
But no - Cartrain is just a stupid kid. The trouble is, in the eyes of the law, he may well be stupid but he aint a kid. And so I fear this may be a very costly lesson for him to learn.
|
|
darrenrapley
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,858
ππ» 229
June 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by darrenrapley on Sept 11, 2009 10:57:54 GMT 1, That would have actually been quite funny
That would have actually been quite funny
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by crazyarsemother on Sept 11, 2009 11:02:40 GMT 1, After reading all the arguments and counter arguments and watching some of the vids I've come to the conclusion that Cartrain is just a stupid kid. It makes sense really - his work has always lacked intelligence / originality. This "prank" of his was neither clever nor funny. Surely it would have been much funnier (and a lot less illegal) to insert a piece of his own into Hirst's Pharamcy - maybe a pack of Hirst Sense of Humour Erasers or something along those lines (I dunno - I'm not the one pretending to be an artist)? Maybe then send Mr Hirst a bunch of flowers with a card saying he hoped he liked the gift - no hard feelings. Even make a humorous short 5 minute documentary about the whole ridiculous affair and post it on YouTube. And then let us all know about it. But no - Cartrain is just a stupid kid. The trouble is, in the eyes of the law, he may well be stupid but he aint a kid. And so I fear this may be a very costly lesson for him to learn.
My girlfriend worked in posh restaurant in London and once Daryl Hannah gave her, her hand bag to look after. She rang me and I persuaded her to put something in the handbag. All she could find was a photo of a Chinese couple getting married. He he. I still imagine Daryl's confusion.
After reading all the arguments and counter arguments and watching some of the vids I've come to the conclusion that Cartrain is just a stupid kid. It makes sense really - his work has always lacked intelligence / originality. This "prank" of his was neither clever nor funny. Surely it would have been much funnier (and a lot less illegal) to insert a piece of his own into Hirst's Pharamcy - maybe a pack of Hirst Sense of Humour Erasers or something along those lines (I dunno - I'm not the one pretending to be an artist)? Maybe then send Mr Hirst a bunch of flowers with a card saying he hoped he liked the gift - no hard feelings. Even make a humorous short 5 minute documentary about the whole ridiculous affair and post it on YouTube. And then let us all know about it. But no - Cartrain is just a stupid kid. The trouble is, in the eyes of the law, he may well be stupid but he aint a kid. And so I fear this may be a very costly lesson for him to learn. My girlfriend worked in posh restaurant in London and once Daryl Hannah gave her, her hand bag to look after. She rang me and I persuaded her to put something in the handbag. All she could find was a photo of a Chinese couple getting married. He he. I still imagine Daryl's confusion. |
|
.
anything else is just s**t that they throw into the mix to try and justify their actions.
I keep away from that myself. 
