|
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by Schrödinger's Chat on Jun 8, 2015 10:31:36 GMT 1, Saw this Currys advert this morning at Burgess Hill station, it's not quite Eternal Reflection. I can see why Whatson choose a butterfly over a reflection of his Grandparents.
Saw this Currys advert this morning at Burgess Hill station, it's not quite Eternal Reflection. I can see why Whatson choose a butterfly over a reflection of his Grandparents. |
|
|
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by Schrödinger's Chat on Jun 8, 2015 10:33:57 GMT 1, Just for comparison (and before Dappy puts up his ER on metal) I'll post mine:
Just for comparison (and before Dappy puts up his ER on metal) I'll post mine: |
|
DrWhite
Junior Member
Posts • 4,107
Likes • 5,395
August 2012
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by DrWhite on Jun 8, 2015 10:37:03 GMT 1,
Where is .dappy ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by Schrödinger's Chat on Jun 8, 2015 11:25:18 GMT 1, That was quick!
That was quick!
|
|
tab1
Full Member
Posts • 8,519
Likes • 3,678
September 2011
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by tab1 on Jun 8, 2015 11:36:02 GMT 1, Saw this Currys advert this morning at Burgess Hill station, it's not quite Eternal Reflection. I can see why Whatson choose a butterfly over a reflection of his Grandparents.
Might get stencilled with a butterfly now
Saw this Currys advert this morning at Burgess Hill station, it's not quite Eternal Reflection. I can see why Whatson choose a butterfly over a reflection of his Grandparents. Might get stencilled with a butterfly now |
|
|
|
WOOF
Junior Member
Posts • 4,459
Likes • 4,753
March 2014
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by WOOF on Jun 8, 2015 14:37:48 GMT 1, I thought this was public knowledge that he used the NASA photos. And their images are in the public domain and free use, so besides being a bit lazy, there's not really anything wrong with it. Made for, likely, his best print...
I thought this was public knowledge that he used the NASA photos. And their images are in the public domain and free use, so besides being a bit lazy, there's not really anything wrong with it. Made for, likely, his best print...
|
|
11
Junior Member
Posts • 4,810
Likes • 6,711
February 2011
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by 11 on Jun 8, 2015 14:50:50 GMT 1, I love it when i see a magazine image and then realise it is the stock photo of some other image I particularly enjoy - Miss Universe etc etc
I don't see the issue here - they are just re-appropriation of images available to all. I think when individuals or print houses actually make outright copies of other artists work without any permission and try and excuse themselves for charity or other such things - that is the kind of behaviour and activity i find REALLY shady.
I love it when i see a magazine image and then realise it is the stock photo of some other image I particularly enjoy - Miss Universe etc etc
I don't see the issue here - they are just re-appropriation of images available to all. I think when individuals or print houses actually make outright copies of other artists work without any permission and try and excuse themselves for charity or other such things - that is the kind of behaviour and activity i find REALLY shady.
|
|
|
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by Schrödinger's Chat on Jun 8, 2015 17:17:47 GMT 1, I don't have an issue with it, I was just surprised / amused to see it on the wall in my lounge over breakfast and then on a billboard on my commute to work.
It is my favourite Whatson by a country mile and the stencil work is awesome, I never tire of looking at it.
I don't have an issue with it, I was just surprised / amused to see it on the wall in my lounge over breakfast and then on a billboard on my commute to work.
It is my favourite Whatson by a country mile and the stencil work is awesome, I never tire of looking at it.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,836
Likes • 9,446
December 2010
|
Eternal Reflection?!?, by .dappy on Jun 8, 2015 17:26:31 GMT 1, I thought this was public knowledge that he used the NASA photos. And their images are in the public domain and free use, so besides being a bit lazy, there's not really anything wrong with it. Made for, likely, his best print... 
I thought this was public knowledge that he used the NASA photos. And their images are in the public domain and free use, so besides being a bit lazy, there's not really anything wrong with it. Made for, likely, his best print... who said there was anything wrong with it - stop moaning |
|
|
|
