11
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,810
Likes โข 6,711
February 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by 11 on Nov 16, 2011 17:51:58 GMT 1, So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments.
Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment.
Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price.
Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists.
Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand
What are your views?
So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments.
Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment.
Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price.
Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists.
Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand
What are your views?
|
|
twinkle
New Member
Posts โข 223
Likes โข 38
December 2009
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by twinkle on Nov 16, 2011 17:56:48 GMT 1, I got laughed about six months ago for suggesting prices would come down, including Banksy prints.... It's happening and will continue to do so..... mark my words..... mwhhahahahahah...
Sadly the global economy is in such a mess. Fact.
I got laughed about six months ago for suggesting prices would come down, including Banksy prints.... It's happening and will continue to do so..... mark my words..... mwhhahahahahah...
Sadly the global economy is in such a mess. Fact.
|
|
eschiff
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,062
Likes โข 995
January 2010
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by eschiff on Nov 16, 2011 18:01:26 GMT 1, if true, great time to buy!
if true, great time to buy!
|
|
love
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,644
Likes โข 389
October 2009
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by love on Nov 16, 2011 18:06:17 GMT 1, Not yet, prices will fall. Everything is falling, so you have be be a idiot if you think art values won't drop.
Not yet, prices will fall. Everything is falling, so you have be be a idiot if you think art values won't drop.
|
|
11
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,810
Likes โข 6,711
February 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by 11 on Nov 16, 2011 18:10:00 GMT 1, Also meant to make the point that whilst we are seeing a general demise and global recession is the obvious reason there are artists that are bucking this trend and are achieving significant and sustainable growth - Keyes and Geddes being two that spring to mind.....
Also meant to make the point that whilst we are seeing a general demise and global recession is the obvious reason there are artists that are bucking this trend and are achieving significant and sustainable growth - Keyes and Geddes being two that spring to mind.....
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by hunter007 on Nov 16, 2011 18:11:23 GMT 1, na cant see prices falling myself
na cant see prices falling myself
|
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by des77 on Nov 16, 2011 18:13:27 GMT 1, Sadly the global economy is in such a mess. Fact.
And will only get worse, Wars are not cheap and Iran will be a whole different level.
Sadly the global economy is in such a mess. Fact. And will only get worse, Wars are not cheap and Iran will be a whole different level.
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by xmyart on Nov 16, 2011 18:19:11 GMT 1, lol well put des. on the cards for a long time that one!!
lol well put des. on the cards for a long time that one!!
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Brushstrokes 75 on Nov 16, 2011 18:21:27 GMT 1, Arf..... Just wrote a big paragraph just to click on some link deleting it all......
Arf..... Just wrote a big paragraph just to click on some link deleting it all......
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by des77 on Nov 16, 2011 18:23:53 GMT 1, lol well put des. on the cards for a long time that one!!
Indeed. The training and weapons testing mission is coming to an end in Afghanistan, so worrying times ahead.
lol well put des. on the cards for a long time that one!! Indeed. The training and weapons testing mission is coming to an end in Afghanistan, so worrying times ahead.
|
|
AoT Framing
Art Gallery
New Member
Posts โข 570
Likes โข 292
April 2006
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by AoT Framing on Nov 16, 2011 18:26:57 GMT 1, It's definitely a buyer's market but Micallef's show sold out within a week of opening for record prices. I think his prints were overpriced especially the Impure Idols prints, but now that they're around the ยฃ400 mark I think they're spot on and represent good value. PR is a massive part of the hype and to date Micallef hasn't really had any press whereas Hirst seems to be in the press daily! It's all about perception, but personally I buy what I like as on the few occasions In the past where I've bought for investment I've lost my shirt!
It's definitely a buyer's market but Micallef's show sold out within a week of opening for record prices. I think his prints were overpriced especially the Impure Idols prints, but now that they're around the ยฃ400 mark I think they're spot on and represent good value. PR is a massive part of the hype and to date Micallef hasn't really had any press whereas Hirst seems to be in the press daily! It's all about perception, but personally I buy what I like as on the few occasions In the past where I've bought for investment I've lost my shirt!
|
|
Ruggs
Full Member
Posts โข 8,955
Likes โข 4,577
January 2008
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Ruggs on Nov 16, 2011 18:29:55 GMT 1, Don't think Banksy prices have been affected too much really. Infact, i'd say unsigned editions have been increasing in value and signed editions prices have remained very strong.
Don't think Banksy prices have been affected too much really. Infact, i'd say unsigned editions have been increasing in value and signed editions prices have remained very strong.
|
|
achtungbono
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,093
Likes โข 156
May 2008
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by achtungbono on Nov 16, 2011 18:31:18 GMT 1, if you bought it as investment, then view it & handle it like an investment and sort yerself out with a stop loss
if you bought it cos you like it , then it doesnt matter
very few people bought this stuff for love of the image alone. me included.
have a word with yourself - if investment was 51% of the decision and image was 49%, then sort out your priorities and look for an exit level thats acceptable to swallow.
If I had gone and spunked ยฃ4K on an aftermarket CYW, I would be hating myself now.
Its only a bit of paper at the end of the day. bear that in mind
if you bought it as investment, then view it & handle it like an investment and sort yerself out with a stop loss
if you bought it cos you like it , then it doesnt matter
very few people bought this stuff for love of the image alone. me included.
have a word with yourself - if investment was 51% of the decision and image was 49%, then sort out your priorities and look for an exit level thats acceptable to swallow.
If I had gone and spunked ยฃ4K on an aftermarket CYW, I would be hating myself now.
Its only a bit of paper at the end of the day. bear that in mind
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Brushstrokes 75 on Nov 16, 2011 18:34:54 GMT 1, Not yet, prices will fall. Everything is falling, so you have be be a idiot if you think art values won't drop.
Market is cyclical anyway. Prices drop and rises again......
Anyway, no point in being alarmed at the moment. I don't see how people can say that art is in a bad state right now.
The Contemporary Evening November Session in NY just proved that the market is still going. You just have to see how many (personal & worlwide) records were broken this month.
The Urban Art market had a pretty good year. Banksy prints prices have been rising over the past year.
Obviously the high point was 2008 and the urban art market has been falling ever since. But the whole contemporary scene went downtown incl. the top tier Koons-Murakami-Hirst. People left the contemporary scene to go back to sure thing like old & modern masters (exact same reaction than with stocks...).
But A number of artists had pretty strong results (street art wise) this year.
You're talking about Mic prices as if it was something new.
It's just an addition of factors. Mic didn't produce much since 2007. NW didn't have great management either.
Obviously, prices go down when your investors stop backing you up and pushing your prices forward. Some artists takes the hype and others leaves it, especially with the contemporary scene.
But people forget that art is a market of its own. It's lightly correlated w/ the stock market but has different trends. Even inside the art market, the print & paintings trends are different (I can give a few examples if requested).
From experience, I can say that the category that suffers more the economic climate are middle range prices (ie 10s of thousands to a few 100s thousands). "Low Prices" usually stands still because of newcomers or ex middle range buyers. High prices still drive high prices (even if prices can go down) because rich people stay rich (or get richer).
If you take volatility in the context for such illiquid products, it ain't that bad really!
Not yet, prices will fall. Everything is falling, so you have be be a idiot if you think art values won't drop. Market is cyclical anyway. Prices drop and rises again...... Anyway, no point in being alarmed at the moment. I don't see how people can say that art is in a bad state right now. The Contemporary Evening November Session in NY just proved that the market is still going. You just have to see how many (personal & worlwide) records were broken this month. The Urban Art market had a pretty good year. Banksy prints prices have been rising over the past year. Obviously the high point was 2008 and the urban art market has been falling ever since. But the whole contemporary scene went downtown incl. the top tier Koons-Murakami-Hirst. People left the contemporary scene to go back to sure thing like old & modern masters (exact same reaction than with stocks...). But A number of artists had pretty strong results (street art wise) this year. You're talking about Mic prices as if it was something new. It's just an addition of factors. Mic didn't produce much since 2007. NW didn't have great management either. Obviously, prices go down when your investors stop backing you up and pushing your prices forward. Some artists takes the hype and others leaves it, especially with the contemporary scene. But people forget that art is a market of its own. It's lightly correlated w/ the stock market but has different trends. Even inside the art market, the print & paintings trends are different (I can give a few examples if requested). From experience, I can say that the category that suffers more the economic climate are middle range prices (ie 10s of thousands to a few 100s thousands). "Low Prices" usually stands still because of newcomers or ex middle range buyers. High prices still drive high prices (even if prices can go down) because rich people stay rich (or get richer). If you take volatility in the context for such illiquid products, it ain't that bad really!
|
|
|
Prescription Art
Art Gallery
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,141
Likes โข 1,205
November 2007
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Prescription Art on Nov 16, 2011 18:41:15 GMT 1, So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments. Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment. Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price. Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists. Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand What are your views?
Maybe the secret is to buy things that are actually good & good value, rather than jumping onto whatever is flavour of the month here or represented by Lazarides.
You then go on to mention Keyes and Geddes as two artists who are 'bucking the trend' with 'sustainable growth'... now don't get me wrong I think they're both fine artists, however their secondary market prices are astronomical for artists at such early stages in their careers. I wish them both every success, however I think you'd be a brave man to predict that prices are going to only continue to go in one direction.
Be patient, wait for the right pieces to come up at the right price for you, and you can build a great collection for not much money.
So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments. Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment. Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price. Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists. Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand What are your views? Maybe the secret is to buy things that are actually good & good value, rather than jumping onto whatever is flavour of the month here or represented by Lazarides. You then go on to mention Keyes and Geddes as two artists who are 'bucking the trend' with 'sustainable growth'... now don't get me wrong I think they're both fine artists, however their secondary market prices are astronomical for artists at such early stages in their careers. I wish them both every success, however I think you'd be a brave man to predict that prices are going to only continue to go in one direction. Be patient, wait for the right pieces to come up at the right price for you, and you can build a great collection for not much money.
|
|
johnnyh
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,492
Likes โข 2,102
March 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by johnnyh on Nov 16, 2011 18:58:02 GMT 1, Below is a copy of an earlier thread and my comment then. Think it is still the same. Art is not in recession butncountries are so people who fell less secure will be more hesitancy to buy. If they do they will buy safer as pert many of the comments here but less cash in general is available so the market is not so competitive. It pure economics.
So when you look at artists bucking the trend one could also say it is still affecting them as my be in. Non recessionary market they woul d have sold for higher - no one will ever know of course.
Some artists can also become more popular due to their art or messages meeting that feeling. The punk movement trend music etc was a part of this - yet the sex Pistols did well - if all the youth of the uk were loaded and had jobs they may not have been so successful. So you can only look at the whole market and less money means prices over all fall in terms of growth etc.
Art in general and not genres follows equity prices. Equities fall followed by real estate followed by luxuries. This is a Fact. Equities recover then sondomhouse prices and son do luxuries somthere is a delay in each stage.
It's a fact that they will if equities are low.
When equities are low the following happens - Real Estate prices drop followed by luxuries (art being a luxury).
When equities increase this is followed by a rise in real estate and then an increase in luxuries.
Based on the fact that equities indicate what is happening to companies if companies are not doing well this raises the fear or causes lossesof jobs so people stop buying houses and luxuries and hang on to the cash if they have any.
When companioes doing well jobs safe wages hopefully rise buy new house or ne wcar or Banksy print.
Always exceptions eg how come this goes up then. however could say did not go up as much as it would of if no equity dip or recession.
So it does and will happen to art prices as well. It has also over the last 10 years. there was a graph in an older post on art and equities that highlighted this over the last 10 years looking at the top 500 art prices.
if interested search it out as was very int.
Johnny
Below is a copy of an earlier thread and my comment then. Think it is still the same. Art is not in recession butncountries are so people who fell less secure will be more hesitancy to buy. If they do they will buy safer as pert many of the comments here but less cash in general is available so the market is not so competitive. It pure economics.
So when you look at artists bucking the trend one could also say it is still affecting them as my be in. Non recessionary market they woul d have sold for higher - no one will ever know of course.
Some artists can also become more popular due to their art or messages meeting that feeling. The punk movement trend music etc was a part of this - yet the sex Pistols did well - if all the youth of the uk were loaded and had jobs they may not have been so successful. So you can only look at the whole market and less money means prices over all fall in terms of growth etc.
Art in general and not genres follows equity prices. Equities fall followed by real estate followed by luxuries. This is a Fact. Equities recover then sondomhouse prices and son do luxuries somthere is a delay in each stage.
It's a fact that they will if equities are low.
When equities are low the following happens - Real Estate prices drop followed by luxuries (art being a luxury).
When equities increase this is followed by a rise in real estate and then an increase in luxuries.
Based on the fact that equities indicate what is happening to companies if companies are not doing well this raises the fear or causes lossesof jobs so people stop buying houses and luxuries and hang on to the cash if they have any.
When companioes doing well jobs safe wages hopefully rise buy new house or ne wcar or Banksy print.
Always exceptions eg how come this goes up then. however could say did not go up as much as it would of if no equity dip or recession.
So it does and will happen to art prices as well. It has also over the last 10 years. there was a graph in an older post on art and equities that highlighted this over the last 10 years looking at the top 500 art prices.
if interested search it out as was very int.
Johnny
|
|
jusdeep
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,797
Likes โข 464
October 2007
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by jusdeep on Nov 16, 2011 19:04:54 GMT 1, You then go on to mention Keyes and Geddes as two artists who are 'bucking the trend' with 'sustainable growth'... now don't get me wrong I think they're both fine artists, however their secondary market prices are astronomical for artists at such early stages in their careers. I wish them both every success, however I think you'd be a brave man to predict that prices are going to only continue to go in one direction. Be patient, wait for the right pieces to come up at the right price for you, and you can build a great collection for not much money. Well said. You're looking it it all wrong if you're in this game for the money. There are plenty of artists that don't even get a sniff on this board and relatively cost peanuts. Doesn't mean in the long-term they won't realise the same return. There's far too many artists at the moment commanding ludicrous prices that aren't even out of dipers.
You then go on to mention Keyes and Geddes as two artists who are 'bucking the trend' with 'sustainable growth'... now don't get me wrong I think they're both fine artists, however their secondary market prices are astronomical for artists at such early stages in their careers. I wish them both every success, however I think you'd be a brave man to predict that prices are going to only continue to go in one direction. Be patient, wait for the right pieces to come up at the right price for you, and you can build a great collection for not much money. Well said. You're looking it it all wrong if you're in this game for the money. There are plenty of artists that don't even get a sniff on this board and relatively cost peanuts. Doesn't mean in the long-term they won't realise the same return. There's far too many artists at the moment commanding ludicrous prices that aren't even out of dipers.
|
|
Hubble Bubble
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,098
Likes โข 3,532
December 2010
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Hubble Bubble on Nov 16, 2011 19:06:23 GMT 1, Things change. Always have, always will.
Things change. Always have, always will.
|
|
sport1
New Member
Posts โข 109
Likes โข 18
February 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by sport1 on Nov 16, 2011 19:16:54 GMT 1, "Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable"
Can I ask which of the most collectible Banksy piece's you are talking about here.......? I agree with a previous post that Banksy prices seem to remain strong , if your looking at canvas pieces they seem to only of gone from strength to strength.
"Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable"
Can I ask which of the most collectible Banksy piece's you are talking about here.......? I agree with a previous post that Banksy prices seem to remain strong , if your looking at canvas pieces they seem to only of gone from strength to strength.
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Brushstrokes 75 on Nov 16, 2011 19:22:16 GMT 1, It's difficult to compare but annualized return from January 2000 to January 2011 of the S&p gives 0.31%. Not sure that most artist have such a low return (impossible to find out for the whole market though without bias).
You can't also compare (unfortunately) gallery prices with fair market value.
It's a mix of price manipulation, PR, management, hype....... etc
Most newly published art nowadays is overpriced at source (or inflated at gallery prices).
It's difficult to compare but annualized return from January 2000 to January 2011 of the S&p gives 0.31%. Not sure that most artist have such a low return (impossible to find out for the whole market though without bias).
You can't also compare (unfortunately) gallery prices with fair market value.
It's a mix of price manipulation, PR, management, hype....... etc
Most newly published art nowadays is overpriced at source (or inflated at gallery prices).
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by rperry on Nov 16, 2011 19:22:45 GMT 1, I agree with Prescription and Jus art is more than money to those of us that collect it, however modestly.
I also think that with a keen eye and a bit of luck, you can occassionally score something great at a low price that will be a good long term investment no matter what the financial climate or your pocket depth. I scored my some of my best pictures at auction when I knew nothing about the artists and with a very limited budget.
But there is always an ebb and flow of current taste: some things go into favor as others fall out of favor.
I agree with Prescription and Jus art is more than money to those of us that collect it, however modestly.
I also think that with a keen eye and a bit of luck, you can occassionally score something great at a low price that will be a good long term investment no matter what the financial climate or your pocket depth. I scored my some of my best pictures at auction when I knew nothing about the artists and with a very limited budget.
But there is always an ebb and flow of current taste: some things go into favor as others fall out of favor.
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by maumau93 on Nov 16, 2011 19:23:42 GMT 1, WOW... a nice depressing thread
WOW... a nice depressing thread
|
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Daniel Silk on Nov 16, 2011 20:07:03 GMT 1, Too many people buying absolutely anything that gets released, and purely on the word of two or three people on a forum talking it up
Too many people buying absolutely anything that gets released, and purely on the word of two or three people on a forum talking it up
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by fingerz on Nov 16, 2011 20:13:37 GMT 1, ^ ... ;D
^ ... ;D
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Daniel Silk on Nov 16, 2011 20:20:50 GMT 1, They then try to sell it, and are surprised that only those two or three people show any interest in buying it. At below cost of course
They then try to sell it, and are surprised that only those two or three people show any interest in buying it. At below cost of course
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by manty on Nov 16, 2011 20:35:06 GMT 1, It's definitely a buyer's market but Micallef's show sold out within a week of opening for record prices. I think his prints were overpriced especially the Impure Idols prints, but now that they're around the ยฃ400 mark I think they're spot on and represent good value. PR is a massive part of the hype and to date Micallef hasn't really had any press whereas Hirst seems to be in the press daily! It's all about perception, but personally I buy what I like as on the few occasions In the past where I've bought for investment I've lost my shirt! This is true I have lost a few shirts over the years ;D
It's definitely a buyer's market but Micallef's show sold out within a week of opening for record prices. I think his prints were overpriced especially the Impure Idols prints, but now that they're around the ยฃ400 mark I think they're spot on and represent good value. PR is a massive part of the hype and to date Micallef hasn't really had any press whereas Hirst seems to be in the press daily! It's all about perception, but personally I buy what I like as on the few occasions In the past where I've bought for investment I've lost my shirt! This is true I have lost a few shirts over the years ;D
|
|
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by remirough on Nov 16, 2011 20:43:13 GMT 1, So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments. Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment. Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price. Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists. Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand What are your views?
I hate to be the one to say it... But maybe part of the problem stems back to people like yourself who 'buy simply to invest' So you're saying your sole reason for buying 'some' of your art was to simply sell on for more money? When you don't get the prices you want, or expect, really it can only come back to you (the person), (not yourself exactly!). Not a gallerist or artist. You (the person)... have overvalued something, thats causes people to think twice about buying it as it's clearly overprices, which kind of goes right back to what you're saying.
I may have written this badly as I have a headache and a cold, but I know what I mean anyway, and thats all that matters...
They do say art is only worth what someone will pay for it... And in my humble opinion, there's your reason right there.
A lot of artists and gallerists have been a tad greedy and hiked prices ridiculously, but most of them have since all gone and the ones that are left are obviously the ones with good business acumen, and dare I say it.... possibly even some good artists?
Jus, has a good point about artists whith astronomical prices who are hardly out of nappies too.
I think maybe you've lost the point of it too... Art isn't about money gallerists and flippers are, but 'the art' is about connectivity, understanding, questioning and learning. If all it is to some people is a wad of cash, then that's really f**king sad in my opinion.
I make art for the sheer love and passion of it, if I make a living out of it, amazing! If not, well... I'm still going to make art.
So, I've been avidly collecting for the past couple of years, some as pieces I love and want to put up on my walls and others I have bought purely as investments. Even a year ago I was seeing the 'royalty' of the urban art world continue to generate massive interest and an immediate increase in value of work. TMA New York selling at more than double it's release value. Micallef's being coveted as lucrative investments with massive increases on release prices and an across the board feeling of even the most obscure artists being a sound investment. Now we are seeing some of the prices of the same top tier in the urban art world crumbling almost day by day. Where some of the most collectible banksys were previously way out of my reach they have become affordable and ( micallef in particular) we are witnessing works that were commanding double or triple the release price now struggling to achieve their cost price. Is this simply a result of economic climes and therefore is a buyers market or are we witnessing the death of some of the current stars and the emergence of a new group of artists. Don't get me wrong, Banksy is always going to be in demand but when you have the likes of Laz pushing his big artists with massive prices for the og's (mic & faile in particular) yet the market seems indifferent to them it makes me wonder if there is genuine demand or just PR in trying to maintain some sort of perception of demand What are your views? I hate to be the one to say it... But maybe part of the problem stems back to people like yourself who 'buy simply to invest' So you're saying your sole reason for buying 'some' of your art was to simply sell on for more money? When you don't get the prices you want, or expect, really it can only come back to you (the person), (not yourself exactly!). Not a gallerist or artist. You (the person)... have overvalued something, thats causes people to think twice about buying it as it's clearly overprices, which kind of goes right back to what you're saying. I may have written this badly as I have a headache and a cold, but I know what I mean anyway, and thats all that matters... They do say art is only worth what someone will pay for it... And in my humble opinion, there's your reason right there. A lot of artists and gallerists have been a tad greedy and hiked prices ridiculously, but most of them have since all gone and the ones that are left are obviously the ones with good business acumen, and dare I say it.... possibly even some good artists? Jus, has a good point about artists whith astronomical prices who are hardly out of nappies too. I think maybe you've lost the point of it too... Art isn't about money gallerists and flippers are, but 'the art' is about connectivity, understanding, questioning and learning. If all it is to some people is a wad of cash, then that's really f**king sad in my opinion. I make art for the sheer love and passion of it, if I make a living out of it, amazing! If not, well... I'm still going to make art.
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
Posts โข 9,190
Likes โข 8,542
May 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by iamzero on Nov 16, 2011 20:57:21 GMT 1, I hate to be the one to say it... But maybe part of the problem stems back to people like yourself who 'buy simply to invest' So you're saying your sole reason for buying 'some' of your art was to simply sell on for more money? When you don't get the prices you want, or expect, really it can only come back to you (the person), (not yourself exactly!). Not a gallerist or artist. You (the person)... have overvalued something, that's causes people to think twice about buying it as it's clearly overprices, which kind of goes right back to what you're saying. I may have written this badly as I have a headache and a cold, but I know what I mean anyway, and that's all that matters... They do say art is only worth what someone will pay for it... And in my humble opinion, there's your reason right there. A lot of artists and gallerists have been a tad greedy and hiked prices ridiculously, but most of them have since all gone and the ones that are left are obviously the ones with good business acumen, and dare I say it.... possibly even some good artists? Jus, has a good point about artists whith astronomical prices who are hardly out of nappies too. I think maybe you've lost the point of it too... Art isn't about money gallerists and flippers are, but 'the art' is about connectivity, understanding, questioning and learning. If all it is to some people is a wad of cash, then that's really f**king sad in my opinion. I make art for the sheer love and passion of it, if I make a living out of it, amazing! If not, well... I'm still going to make art. I'm not a fan of you 'just for investment types' as it just means that someone like myself that would love to own a Banksy will simply never be able to own one because the prices are just too high. I hope those people get their fingers burned for being greedy...
I hate to be the one to say it... But maybe part of the problem stems back to people like yourself who 'buy simply to invest' So you're saying your sole reason for buying 'some' of your art was to simply sell on for more money? When you don't get the prices you want, or expect, really it can only come back to you (the person), (not yourself exactly!). Not a gallerist or artist. You (the person)... have overvalued something, that's causes people to think twice about buying it as it's clearly overprices, which kind of goes right back to what you're saying. I may have written this badly as I have a headache and a cold, but I know what I mean anyway, and that's all that matters... They do say art is only worth what someone will pay for it... And in my humble opinion, there's your reason right there. A lot of artists and gallerists have been a tad greedy and hiked prices ridiculously, but most of them have since all gone and the ones that are left are obviously the ones with good business acumen, and dare I say it.... possibly even some good artists? Jus, has a good point about artists whith astronomical prices who are hardly out of nappies too. I think maybe you've lost the point of it too... Art isn't about money gallerists and flippers are, but 'the art' is about connectivity, understanding, questioning and learning. If all it is to some people is a wad of cash, then that's really f**king sad in my opinion. I make art for the sheer love and passion of it, if I make a living out of it, amazing! If not, well... I'm still going to make art. I'm not a fan of you 'just for investment types' as it just means that someone like myself that would love to own a Banksy will simply never be able to own one because the prices are just too high. I hope those people get their fingers burned for being greedy...
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by Deleted on Nov 16, 2011 21:03:11 GMT 1, "Being good in business is the most fascinating kind of art. Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art."
Andy Warhol
"Being good in business is the most fascinating kind of art. Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art."
Andy Warhol
|
|
11
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,810
Likes โข 6,711
February 2011
|
Urban Art in Recession?, by 11 on Nov 16, 2011 21:45:10 GMT 1, I'm not a fan of you 'just for investment types' as it just means that someone like myself that would love to own a Banksy will simply never be able to own one because the prices are just too high. I hope those people get their fingers burned for being greedy...
I'm really pleased at the discussion that this thread has created, it is something I've been pondering for some time, I was just sitting on a train travelling home and again pondering the same and thought I'd see what everyone else thought, that is after all the purpose of these forums. I think the last comment was a bit harsh. I'm not a flipper and never have been, my thoughts on an investment are quite simply that if in 10-15 years time my children need Uni fees or pay a fine for graffiti ;D it is something that I would consider selling if I ever needed access to funds. I bought micallef's GIWTBB - an edition of 1000 that can be picked up on eBay at under cost but I still bought from POW because it was from source and I love the image - clearly not an investment. I simply meant that the more expensive a piece is the more I have to consider whether I am simply that flush I don't ever need to worry about the cost or whether one day it will provide at least enough return to cover my cost. I wish I had enough money to not care what I am spending on but unfortunately live in the real world. Please don't let this discussion become about the rights and wrongs of flipping - there have been some very interesting views and I have valued the insight...
I'm not a fan of you 'just for investment types' as it just means that someone like myself that would love to own a Banksy will simply never be able to own one because the prices are just too high. I hope those people get their fingers burned for being greedy... I'm really pleased at the discussion that this thread has created, it is something I've been pondering for some time, I was just sitting on a train travelling home and again pondering the same and thought I'd see what everyone else thought, that is after all the purpose of these forums. I think the last comment was a bit harsh. I'm not a flipper and never have been, my thoughts on an investment are quite simply that if in 10-15 years time my children need Uni fees or pay a fine for graffiti ;D it is something that I would consider selling if I ever needed access to funds. I bought micallef's GIWTBB - an edition of 1000 that can be picked up on eBay at under cost but I still bought from POW because it was from source and I love the image - clearly not an investment. I simply meant that the more expensive a piece is the more I have to consider whether I am simply that flush I don't ever need to worry about the cost or whether one day it will provide at least enough return to cover my cost. I wish I had enough money to not care what I am spending on but unfortunately live in the real world. Please don't let this discussion become about the rights and wrongs of flipping - there have been some very interesting views and I have valued the insight...
|
|