Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 12, 2014 10:00:37 GMT 1, Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60....
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29170371
I would hang the fucker responsible then burn the bastard. Fact.
|
|
robertjones
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,506
๐๐ป 1,017
February 2013
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by robertjones on Sept 12, 2014 10:10:45 GMT 1, Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs !
Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs !
|
|
darwin
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 193
๐๐ป 75
April 2013
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by darwin on Sept 12, 2014 10:13:56 GMT 1, There are no words for this
There are no words for this
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 12, 2014 10:15:32 GMT 1, Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs ! Not very funny.
Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs ! Not very funny.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 12, 2014 10:20:29 GMT 1, Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs ! Aplogise for this comment please.
Poor shame, But on the other hand I do like hotdogs ! Aplogise for this comment please.
|
|
kel
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,111
๐๐ป 511
October 2008
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by kel on Sept 12, 2014 10:27:21 GMT 1, Shame it is a 15 year old will end up being protected by the state and be sent to young offenders for 3 years then back on the streets to be another waste of space to society.
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated.
Shame it is a 15 year old will end up being protected by the state and be sent to young offenders for 3 years then back on the streets to be another waste of space to society.
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated.
|
|
|
Hubble Bubble
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,117
๐๐ป 3,567
December 2010
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Hubble Bubble on Sept 12, 2014 10:33:31 GMT 1, Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals.
It raised ยฃ15,000.
I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be.
Just sayin'
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin'
|
|
kimble
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 446
๐๐ป 69
September 2011
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by kimble on Sept 12, 2014 10:52:41 GMT 1, Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense.
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense.
|
|
letiss
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,658
๐๐ป 689
August 2011
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by letiss on Sept 12, 2014 10:57:15 GMT 1, When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't the dog's home have insurance though?
When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't the dog's home have insurance though?
|
|
kimble
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 446
๐๐ป 69
September 2011
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by kimble on Sept 12, 2014 11:12:11 GMT 1, The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't the dog's home have insurance though? Yeah, you're right. They probably paid out this morning so everything is cool now. I'm going to ask for my donation back.
The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't the dog's home have insurance though? Yeah, you're right. They probably paid out this morning so everything is cool now. I'm going to ask for my donation back.
|
|
Hubble Bubble
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,117
๐๐ป 3,567
December 2010
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Hubble Bubble on Sept 12, 2014 11:26:48 GMT 1, When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. My purpose wasn't to compare the funds, kimbleโฆ it was to compare the level of response to two different causes. And I make no judgements as someone who grew up with dogs and as a dog lover (but not owner) myself. Humans have been murdered, dogs have been murdered. Monies have been asked for. Monies have been donated. Dogs win.
Edit -- and I was simply using the Philpott fund as an example of how emotional response is often greater for distressed animals than humans. I remember a famous case in Los Angeles where a woman out walking her dog was killed (along with her dog) by a hit and run driver. The two funds ran in parallel and the dog's raised many times more.
When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' The dog fund isn't for a funeral for the dead dogs. The fund will probably be used to rebuild a new shelter for dogs abused and abandoned by humans or find temporary accommodation for the dogs now without shelter. Comparing two funds that have completely different purposes doesn't make any sense. My purpose wasn't to compare the funds, kimbleโฆ it was to compare the level of response to two different causes. And I make no judgements as someone who grew up with dogs and as a dog lover (but not owner) myself. Humans have been murdered, dogs have been murdered. Monies have been asked for. Monies have been donated. Dogs win. Edit -- and I was simply using the Philpott fund as an example of how emotional response is often greater for distressed animals than humans. I remember a famous case in Los Angeles where a woman out walking her dog was killed (along with her dog) by a hit and run driver. The two funds ran in parallel and the dog's raised many times more.
|
|
kel
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,111
๐๐ป 511
October 2008
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by kel on Sept 12, 2014 11:26:42 GMT 1, Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' Only just been having the same conversation in the office though not with the same Philpott incident.
IMO it is probably due to people viewing that the dogs were unable to look after themselves where as you would expect a human to be able to escape a fire. Personally I would love to have a dog but work commitments and time away from home would mean the poor thing would be left on its own a lot of the time. Maybe when I win the lottery to allow me to retire.
Slightly off the topic but I always find it strange we have the RSPCA (Royal) and NSPCC (National).
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' Only just been having the same conversation in the office though not with the same Philpott incident.
IMO it is probably due to people viewing that the dogs were unable to look after themselves where as you would expect a human to be able to escape a fire. Personally I would love to have a dog but work commitments and time away from home would mean the poor thing would be left on its own a lot of the time. Maybe when I win the lottery to allow me to retire.
Slightly off the topic but I always find it strange we have the RSPCA (Royal) and NSPCC (National).
|
|
johnnyh
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,492
๐๐ป 2,102
March 2011
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by johnnyh on Sept 12, 2014 17:37:26 GMT 1, What a terrible thing to happen. Even worse if it's Arson. He deserves a right good kicking if he did it. Hopefully he will get it as well.
What a terrible thing to happen. Even worse if it's Arson. He deserves a right good kicking if he did it. Hopefully he will get it as well.
|
|
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by commissioner on Sept 12, 2014 22:11:49 GMT 1, Heartless act ;'(
Heartless act ;'(
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 20:13:39 GMT 1, just hearing about this now. heartbreaking. why do we attack those who can't defend against themselves?
just hearing about this now. heartbreaking. why do we attack those who can't defend against themselves?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 13, 2014 23:49:27 GMT 1, Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
Over ยฃ350K raised so far which is a great effort by all that have donated. When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 0:10:54 GMT 1, When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' ย It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
ย ย It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
ย ย ย The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
ย ย I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
Wow! You're on a roll today. While I agree that both incidents are terrible - what the fuck has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much?
UmBongo.
When Mick Philpott raised his home to the ground, burning alive his six children, there was a fund for their funerals. It raised ยฃ15,000. I find this strange, no matter how tragic the loss of a dog's life might be. Just sayin' ย It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
ย ย It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
ย ย ย The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
ย ย I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
Wow! You're on a roll today. While I agree that both incidents are terrible - what the fuck has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much? UmBongo.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Manchester Dogs' Home blaze: Death toll reaches 60, by Deleted on Sept 14, 2014 0:25:11 GMT 1, It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
Wow! You're on a roll today. While I agree that both incidents are terrible - what the f**k has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much? UmBongo. I read all mainstream propaganda rags.
It was about donations and money thats all.
and I was replying to a post someone made about Philpott.
"- what the f**k has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much?"
and what the fuck does this have to do with you?
It's sad but probably only 15,000 was needed and the other sad part about Philpott is he probably claimed tens of thousands in benefits which is public money anyway.
It makes one Wonder what goes on in peoples minds that this kid decided to burn down the dogs home that could have ended in staff being casualties as well as the dogs.
The money raised just shows that lots of people sent small amounts and the dogs home is liked because it rehomes unwanted dogs and takes them in rather than owners just dumping them on the streets.
I'm sure they will put the donations to good use.
Wow! You're on a roll today. While I agree that both incidents are terrible - what the f**k has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much? UmBongo. I read all mainstream propaganda rags.
It was about donations and money thats all.
and I was replying to a post someone made about Philpott.
"- what the f**k has any of that got to do with someone collecting benefits. Read the Daily Mail much?"
and what the fuck does this have to do with you?
|
|