Dungle
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,008
๐๐ป 5,174
June 2011
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Dungle on Mar 25, 2015 22:30:17 GMT 1, Going out on a limb hereโฆNo Martha, then no forum
Do you think she'd be prepared to do a stint as a mod then?
Going out on a limb hereโฆNo Martha, then no forum Do you think she'd be prepared to do a stint as a mod then?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 22:31:34 GMT 1, So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art?
So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art?
|
|
lha
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,604
๐๐ป 1,793
August 2009
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 22:38:32 GMT 1, Going out on a limb hereโฆNo Martha, then no forum Do you think she'd be prepared to do a stint as a mod then? Somehow, I think her definition of "mod" will be different.
Going out on a limb hereโฆNo Martha, then no forum Do you think she'd be prepared to do a stint as a mod then? Somehow, I think her definition of "mod" will be different.
|
|
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Coach on Mar 25, 2015 22:41:55 GMT 1,
Fabulous! Hadn't seen that before.
Martha Cooper is a legend, and has been for a looong time.
Fabulous! Hadn't seen that before. Martha Cooper is a legend, and has been for a looong time.
|
|
Dr Plip
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,043
๐๐ป 8,981
August 2011
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Dr Plip on Mar 25, 2015 22:44:21 GMT 1, So if Martha Cooper can't use Banksy's image as part of her photographic print of a man on a couch, is it ok for Banksy to use Keith Haring's dog on his prints?
Is there a street art lawyer in the house?
So if Martha Cooper can't use Banksy's image as part of her photographic print of a man on a couch, is it ok for Banksy to use Keith Haring's dog on his prints?
Is there a street art lawyer in the house?
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 22:48:55 GMT 1, I hated CYW too... that release was the real low point in this hobby.
I hated CYW too... that release was the real low point in this hobby.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,841
๐๐ป 9,462
December 2010
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by .dappy on Mar 25, 2015 22:51:15 GMT 1, ... I thought EVERYONE on this forum was ...
... I thought EVERYONE on this forum was ...
|
|
lha
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,604
๐๐ป 1,793
August 2009
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by lha on Mar 25, 2015 22:52:31 GMT 1, Noticed this on the one still up, not sure if that applies to whole edition of 75 - great if it does! Shipped the day after the vernissage of the expo in Gaeta 30March. With the artwork you receive the Catalog of the Italian Exposition and with and unsigned poster of the exposition with keith haring
Noticed this on the one still up, not sure if that applies to whole edition of 75 - great if it does! Shipped the day after the vernissage of the expo in Gaeta 30March. With the artwork you receive the Catalog of the Italian Exposition and with and unsigned poster of the exposition with keith haring
|
|
randomname
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,962
๐๐ป 1,810
June 2013
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by randomname on Mar 25, 2015 22:56:05 GMT 1, So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art?
Not at all. My opinion is that this particular photograph didn't add anything to Banksy's piece. If anything, I think it dumbs it down.
Through most of her career, there was a novelty to treating graffiti (which was considered urban decay by most) as fine art. That's not really the case when you're staging a photo shoot in front of a Banksy.
Anyway, I think if you like a piece simply because you like it, you should buy it. If you only like it because of who did it, I would probably pass.
So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art? Not at all. My opinion is that this particular photograph didn't add anything to Banksy's piece. If anything, I think it dumbs it down. Through most of her career, there was a novelty to treating graffiti (which was considered urban decay by most) as fine art. That's not really the case when you're staging a photo shoot in front of a Banksy. Anyway, I think if you like a piece simply because you like it, you should buy it. If you only like it because of who did it, I would probably pass.
|
|
Dibbs 45
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,913
๐๐ป 4,881
October 2012
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Dibbs 45 on Mar 25, 2015 22:57:28 GMT 1, Martha has been documenting the street art world for a long ass time. She's as much a part of it as any of the OG's... I'm aware of her work. I'm being cynical. I'm aware of that too.
I still stand by my words. At 125, it was a pricey photo by legendary photographer. At the 250 pricing scheme, it was a depressing cash grab made by standing on the shoulders of another artist's work.
Does Banksy need to approve this too? (Like the Glitter Gorilla people were so upset over?) Or is it OK for Martha to take a Banksy image and profit from it, because of who she is/was?
"Does Banksy need to approve this too" I think Banksy would feel honoured that Martha took this photo. I'm sure he would have no problem that a seventy year old photography legend was taking photos of his work.
Martha has been documenting the street art world for a long ass time. She's as much a part of it as any of the OG's... I'm aware of her work. I'm being cynical. I'm aware of that too.
I still stand by my words. At 125, it was a pricey photo by legendary photographer. At the 250 pricing scheme, it was a depressing cash grab made by standing on the shoulders of another artist's work.
Does Banksy need to approve this too? (Like the Glitter Gorilla people were so upset over?) Or is it OK for Martha to take a Banksy image and profit from it, because of who she is/was?
"Does Banksy need to approve this too" I think Banksy would feel honoured that Martha took this photo. I'm sure he would have no problem that a seventy year old photography legend was taking photos of his work.
|
|
|
nighthawk
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,338
๐๐ป 1,219
February 2013
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by nighthawk on Mar 25, 2015 23:01:01 GMT 1, So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art?
Yes, aparently some people seem to think that. And to top it off, a Martha Copper photo isn't worth โฌ125. Especially one capturing a Banksy NYC exhibit, that is signed by Martha, and is limited to only 75 copies.
So is the argument here that photography isn't a form of art? Yes, aparently some people seem to think that. And to top it off, a Martha Copper photo isn't worth โฌ125. Especially one capturing a Banksy NYC exhibit, that is signed by Martha, and is limited to only 75 copies.
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,155
๐๐ป 4,461
March 2007
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Winter on Mar 25, 2015 23:01:49 GMT 1, I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely!
I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely!
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 23:05:09 GMT 1, I'm aware of her work. I'm being cynical. I'm aware of that too.
I still stand by my words. At 125, it was a pricey photo by legendary photographer. At the 250 pricing scheme, it was a depressing cash grab made by standing on the shoulders of another artist's work.
Does Banksy need to approve this too? (Like the Glitter Gorilla people were so upset over?) Or is it OK for Martha to take a Banksy image and profit from it, because of who she is/was?
"Does Banksy need to approve this too" I think Banksy would feel honoured that Martha took this photo. I'm sure he would have no problem that a seventy year old photography legend was taking photos of his work. And I think Banksy would be honored anyone at all is knocking off his stuff, regardless of age or legendary status. That is why he seems to allow the reproduction of his works. Right?
I'm aware of her work. I'm being cynical. I'm aware of that too.
I still stand by my words. At 125, it was a pricey photo by legendary photographer. At the 250 pricing scheme, it was a depressing cash grab made by standing on the shoulders of another artist's work.
Does Banksy need to approve this too? (Like the Glitter Gorilla people were so upset over?) Or is it OK for Martha to take a Banksy image and profit from it, because of who she is/was?
"Does Banksy need to approve this too" I think Banksy would feel honoured that Martha took this photo. I'm sure he would have no problem that a seventy year old photography legend was taking photos of his work. And I think Banksy would be honored anyone at all is knocking off his stuff, regardless of age or legendary status. That is why he seems to allow the reproduction of his works. Right?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 23:07:19 GMT 1, Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous.
Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous.
|
|
mc9205
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 332
๐๐ป 69
October 2009
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by mc9205 on Mar 25, 2015 23:13:29 GMT 1,
That's exactly what she's doing
That's exactly what she's doing
|
|
Dr Plip
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,043
๐๐ป 8,981
August 2011
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Dr Plip on Mar 25, 2015 23:18:40 GMT 1, My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction?
Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish.
My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction?
Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 23:23:28 GMT 1, Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous. And you think that's Martha ? lol.
Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous. And you think that's Martha ? lol.
|
|
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Jeezuz Jones Snr on Mar 25, 2015 23:28:31 GMT 1, Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous. good luck to her making as much as she can, a game of bingo is expensive these days
Honoured to count Martha as a friend, to say she's trying to profit from a Banksy image or that this is a money grab is patently ridiculous. And your claim that doubling the price in the span of a couple of hours is not a money grab is also patently ridiculous. good luck to her making as much as she can, a game of bingo is expensive these days
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 23:29:56 GMT 1, That's exactly what she's doing Back to street art school for you.
That's exactly what she's doing Back to street art school for you.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 25, 2015 23:32:24 GMT 1, OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha.
She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well.
OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha.
She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well.
|
|
|
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Coach on Mar 25, 2015 23:35:43 GMT 1, I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely!
Spot on mate.
I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely! Spot on mate.
|
|
meh.
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 411
๐๐ป 209
September 2014
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by meh. on Mar 25, 2015 23:45:50 GMT 1, I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely! Spot on mate. the maya hayuk print was sold by galleries who represent her
I'm sure Banksy would be flattered to have his work photographed by Martha Cooper. I have no doubt he knows her personally and recognises how important she is to the world of street art. Same with the Maya Hayuk 'Chem Trails' edition. She has also produced many books documenting street art. Think it's fair to say any legal action is unlikely! Spot on mate. the maya hayuk print was sold by galleries who represent her
|
|
randomname
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,962
๐๐ป 1,810
June 2013
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by randomname on Mar 26, 2015 0:05:21 GMT 1, My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction? Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish. David Anasagasti, a.k.a. Ahol Sniffs Glue, sued American Eagle for using a mural as a backdrop in a fashion shoot. I believe they settled out of court.
My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction? Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish. David Anasagasti, a.k.a. Ahol Sniffs Glue, sued American Eagle for using a mural as a backdrop in a fashion shoot. I believe they settled out of court.
|
|
Jimmy Oscar
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 300
๐๐ป 231
April 2013
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Jimmy Oscar on Mar 26, 2015 0:10:22 GMT 1, OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha. She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well.
Hate when people try and make a living.
OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha. She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well. Hate when people try and make a living.
|
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,833
๐๐ป 1,091
March 2007
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by curiousgeorge on Mar 26, 2015 0:16:01 GMT 1, www.amazon.co.uk/Subway-art-anniversary-Henry-Chalfant/dp/889536340X
I've got some of these left which I'll sell at cost.ยฃ30 from memory, these were singed by Martha and Henry
Few pm's about these!!! They will now increase ยฃ30 as each one sellsโฆRemember these are the singed versions
|
|
nighthawk
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,338
๐๐ป 1,219
February 2013
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by nighthawk on Mar 26, 2015 0:19:43 GMT 1, OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha. She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well.
Shady (somewhat ironic), what's your issue with the release? As someone pointed out already, these have been up for a week! You're seriously upset that the gallery decided to sell their last copy for x2 cost? And because of that alone, Martha Cooper should never deal with them again?
To my experience and knowledge, most galleries will keep a few of whatever release they're releasing, and sell them at a marked up price down the road. I don't see this as "shady" business, but rather par for the course. Or simply put...business.
OK, so the entity Martha authorized to sell her work were the money grabbers, not Martha. She had nothing to do with the release scheme. I'll take your word for it. But when you associate yourself with people like that, it's easy for outsiders to make other associations as well. Shady (somewhat ironic), what's your issue with the release? As someone pointed out already, these have been up for a week! You're seriously upset that the gallery decided to sell their last copy for x2 cost? And because of that alone, Martha Cooper should never deal with them again? To my experience and knowledge, most galleries will keep a few of whatever release they're releasing, and sell them at a marked up price down the road. I don't see this as "shady" business, but rather par for the course. Or simply put...business.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by Deleted on Mar 26, 2015 0:39:19 GMT 1, Nothing shady about me my friend. I am just one guy in Florida whose been around the block a time or two. I am not a proponent of the way certain galleries and their minions behave. I am also very aware of a lot of other nefarious behavior on these types of boards, ebay, social media etc. Consider me a bearish troll who enjoys seeing the monetary benefits of this hobby dry up. I don't have a business or flat file filled with prints waiting to be sold.
I am a fan of the misbehavers like BNE, Hanksy, MBW, Pepper Spray, and other upstart artists who are bucking (mocking) the trend and doing things their own way.
It's a new beginning for me, hence the "Welcome Home" banner in my avatar.
As for these prints, I didn't know about them until today. I didn't take interest until the cost doubled. You are right, it is the way certain sellers run their "business." In my opinion, the business is shady, not me.
Nothing shady about me my friend. I am just one guy in Florida whose been around the block a time or two. I am not a proponent of the way certain galleries and their minions behave. I am also very aware of a lot of other nefarious behavior on these types of boards, ebay, social media etc. Consider me a bearish troll who enjoys seeing the monetary benefits of this hobby dry up. I don't have a business or flat file filled with prints waiting to be sold.
I am a fan of the misbehavers like BNE, Hanksy, MBW, Pepper Spray, and other upstart artists who are bucking (mocking) the trend and doing things their own way.
It's a new beginning for me, hence the "Welcome Home" banner in my avatar.
As for these prints, I didn't know about them until today. I didn't take interest until the cost doubled. You are right, it is the way certain sellers run their "business." In my opinion, the business is shady, not me.
|
|
WOOF
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,464
๐๐ป 4,762
March 2014
|
Martha Cooper ๐บ๐ธ Subway Art Book โข New York Graffiti , by WOOF on Mar 26, 2015 0:42:54 GMT 1, My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction? Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish. David Anasagasti, a.k.a. Ahol Sniffs Glue, sued American Eagle for using a mural as a backdrop in a fashion shoot. I believe they settled out of court. You're correct, he got monies and it's over now.
My memory is terrible, but wasn't there a street artist that attempted to protect his street work from photographic reproduction? Edit: I mean through legal means, not some reflective spray varnish. David Anasagasti, a.k.a. Ahol Sniffs Glue, sued American Eagle for using a mural as a backdrop in a fashion shoot. I believe they settled out of court. You're correct, he got monies and it's over now.
|
|