There is a public site with the info, sent it to you first since you seem to want it 

I just want to call out that just because something sold at that price on ebay, doesn't mean that's the market norm. Both of these pieces sold at the above prices were auctions and not firm pricing. Those auctions are all dependent on timing and starting bid. $1 starting bid with an auction time that is short and that ends at a later time sometimes (perhaps even often) finish on a lower price than expected, which is excellent for the buyer. I've definitely won on several auctions where my winning bid was much lower than the fair market value (with sometimes the same print selling at a much higher set price just days later).

I think it's fair to say that the Couples Therapy selling for £273 was a steal, while the Doll was closer to general market value (I actually bought the Doll on eBay for cheaper than that, but only through private negotiation with the seller). So I wouldn't completely gauge value off eBay, especially with auction style sales...just my two cents.

26 left.

That is one nice looking image and the quality will be even better. How on earth does he balance all that colour

Wonder why they are still available?

Wouldn't say moaning more, informing & discussing. Believe what forums were generally created for.

Still 21 left. Slowly trickling down.

Still sold out within minutes...

Antagonizing is a horrible quality. Already stated this particular re print shouldnt be supported in a form of another edition. Love the guys work but greed is not a flattering thing anyone should get behind. No matter how much you like/collect the artist. This particular run is a disgrace and a money grab. I wont support that and neither should you. Imagine you are a graphics designer and was contracted by a company to make them something as simple as a logo. You make the logo and your work is done. You get hired by another company and take the same logo and slap different colors on it and try and sell that to the new company for a more expensive price. Do not think that would go to well. No different with this drop. This re print is even more expensive then the original print.

So how do you feel about sales end version 2?

I’m assuming the same way.

I purchased the original run of DUDE directly from Roger Gastman when he opened the "Work In Progress" pop-up on Black Friday in 2015. I've been following POSE's graffiti for over a decade now and was always a huge fan of his pieces - his economy of line in his street pieces are excellent and think that he translates that style to his fine art work.

As for the reprints that he does I have some lingering sentiments. He's free to do whatever he wants and should not be compared to someone who creates unoriginal images for others, per the example given about the "logo." With that being said, I think it's a little bizarre and IMO very uninspiring/unimaginative to release the same image in a different colorway several years later. I see how his approach makes collectors not want to purchase any more of his work. For many of us, dare I say most, we purchase a piece with the understanding that the image and it's run are final, and if there is to be an additional variant, that it be released together with the original. There's a certain zest that goes along with a purchase when it's limited and knowing that there are only so many in collections.

The last thing I would want would be for POSE to fail or be unsuccessful, but I do not think this approach to print releases/images is sustainable.

I believe there are some key differences. If I'm not mistaken, POW mentioned that they were reprinted soon after the first run (I could be wrong about this), they were released a decade later, the newer edition is signed, the signed edition of 500 is a reworked image, whereas POSE simply changes the colors (and in this case the title of the print from DUDE --> GENT), and lastly, the rerelease of prints has become characteristic of POSE, which I do not think can be said for Banksy.

With that said, I think a collector should be cognizant of the possibilty that POSE will reprint an image.

There are huge false equivalence problems here, starting with the fact that graphic designers are contracted to do work for a company, and those contracts state who owns the rights to the work produced - usually the company. Buyers of art have no such agreement, most of the time, and artists almost always retain the rights to their work, allowing them to change and release new versions of images if they so choose. 

It is not my intention to be fueling the flames of discontent that exist in this thread.

I can see the validity from both sides of this discussion. Yes, it might make some collectors unhappy that an image that they purchased originally gets a makeover and is released later. And yet, collectors like myself appreciate the variation and approach to improving something and updating it to a current or different color palette. Still other collectors, those specifically that missed out on the first version, jump at the chance of getting to own a piece that they might have been looking to add, but without the inflated prices of secondary markets.

Many artists work in series, both originals and in prints. Ultimately the artist knows their market and understands it is impossible to please everyone at the same time. I think POSE is working thru composition/color/imagery the best way he sees fit. If that means that one print release image gets updated to look like a HPM variant that existed beforehand, then that's his prerogative. And as a consumer, its our prerogative to purchase or pass.

In my opinion it was smart to do reprints of previous editions. With Doll, that was a print first released by Jonathan LeVine Gallery and honestly looked nothing like how his current prints with POP look. Seems like he just wanted to give it the POP!NK treatment.

I guess at the end of the day, the artist will do whatever they want. Its a job that has no rules. Or if there are rules, they are self-imposed by the artist.

The most interesting thing about this re-release (there isn't much, since it's business as usual) is the change in title.