Invasion Kit #16 sold for 3.500€ at auction, by Lroy on Jul 1, 2015 22:29:41 GMT 1,

Jul 1, 2015 22:03:07 GMT 1 WOOF said:

Jul 1, 2015 21:42:55 GMT 1 Lroy said:

The man is provocative, unic, it is the only one who will stay in street art.
It's a fact.

I respectfully disagree. It's not like the entire world has forgotten about pop art besides Warhol. Monet isn't the only impressionist we still talk about. Banksy is a part of the street art movement - he is not the definition of street art, not by a long shot.

i disagree too but I have no arguments apart that my Phobe screen is too small and my finger tired, and I don't speak about my Englush.
Without Banksy no street art.
Without Warhol and Lichtenstein, no prints.
Without Pop art, nothing, most of pop art was weak. Even Warhol who created photoshop before computers. Most of you, U.S., likes it now because the vintage thing and hype ( and because, apart contemporary art , there is nothing to see for the people that we are !
Without music, rythm n blues, funk, rock pop and punk, nothing.
Without pubs, nothing ( bis )
UK made a lot !

I know a lot about Impressionism, expressionism, Dadaism, cretinism, soupinism, etc ...
Which ones are the only that we remember or know ? Picasso, Dali, Van Gogh, Monet and some other great actors.. But what about pointillism per example ... Seurat ? Not fab.
I prefer from far the Nabis more creative, and going far away in colors.
Well I used a bit too much distirsions and once again I am list and my finger burns..
In fact I disagree what you are disagreeing.
Don't forget the rock side of street art.
Banksy made the great robbery of the century ! Not others, followers.
Yes I am agree I like some others with their ladder but then what happened most of tiles : they don't catch the moon .. I love them , piers and rebels they are.
I am agree.

Jul 1, 2015 22:03:07 GMT 1 WOOF said:

Jul 1, 2015 21:42:55 GMT 1 Lroy said:

The man is provocative, unic, it is the only one who will stay in street art.
It's a fact.

I respectfully disagree. It's not like the entire world has forgotten about pop art besides Warhol. Monet isn't the only impressionist we still talk about. Banksy is a part of the street art movement - he is not the definition of street art, not by a long shot.

i disagree too but I have no arguments apart that my Phobe screen is too small and my finger tired, and I don't speak about my Englush.
Without Banksy no street art.
Without Warhol and Lichtenstein, no prints.
Without Pop art, nothing, most of pop art was weak. Even Warhol who created photoshop before computers. Most of you, U.S., likes it now because the vintage thing and hype ( and because, apart contemporary art , there is nothing to see for the people that we are !
Without music, rythm n blues, funk, rock pop and punk, nothing.
Without pubs, nothing ( bis )
UK made a lot !

I know a lot about Impressionism, expressionism, Dadaism, cretinism, soupinism, etc ...
Which ones are the only that we remember or know ? Picasso, Dali, Van Gogh, Monet and some other great actors.. But what about pointillism per example ... Seurat ? Not fab.
I prefer from far the Nabis more creative, and going far away in colors.
Well I used a bit too much distirsions and once again I am list and my finger burns..
In fact I disagree what you are disagreeing.
Don't forget the rock side of street art.
Banksy made the great robbery of the century ! Not others, followers.
Yes I am agree I like some others with their ladder but then what happened most of tiles : they don't catch the moon .. I love them , piers and rebels they are.
I am agree.