Urban Art Association

He’s massively overpriced those Miss Universe prints. I had the gold and struggled to sell it. Got less than a third of what he reckons. I’ve still got a silver and there is no way it’s worth 3k

I am sure you will cry yourself to sleep. A bit pathetic if you ask me, having to explain your flipping ways having been found commenting on us on the forum to your money grabbing friends elsewhere. Others will no doubt take note.

By the way you need to quote me if you want me to see your hilarious responses... its such a shame the mods have no guts to ban you though.

lol such a funny little chap. I wouldn't buy from a flipper like you. You ll get abuse as long as you leech from others. Your the epitome of everything that is now wrong with this art forum. As I said earlier its such a shame the moderators can't get rid of you.

Oh I'm in my safe place, although I feel safe anywhere to be honest. I can enjoy this all night long. As for snowflake, that little english insult is hilarious. You sure your not a politician?

Oh there is no need to get your second persona mrcharm to like your comments, no one is watching...

Yes, and... whats your point?

or does your second profile need to comment?

I think it has something to do with transparency. You say some things on the silver forum that have rubbed people up the wrong way.

You just got called out on your true intentions for being here. If the other sellers were identified, they'd probably get the same treatment.

Oh I'm sure my IQ is very low, thats why I'm into street art

Please take this to PM.

Apart from the gladiatorial spectacle, it is clogging up the 'latest posts'.

I am genuinely interested in finding out more.

Please start a thread.

ok a friend has dropped me a PM so i am out of this. Sorry to other members for the ranting.

Very thoughtful of you.
It's just that this is an art forum. Not a speculation forum. 
Nothing wrong with speculation - I'm all for that.
But it will cluther the latest post thread with non-art related posts just like Bitcoins did/does.
Which will be less efficient and not very benificial.

Just as I don't get someone who would go through the hassle of flipping a print for a couple of 100$, I guess flippers just don't get how it makes someone feel who wants a specific image they absolutely love to hang on their walls, only to have it snagged by someone that has absolutely no interest in the image or the artist itself and sell it at a price they can't logically afford.

I mean, flipping the new Banksy print? Meh, I still hate it, but I could see the merit in filling in your email addy and finding out, a few weeks later, that you just bought a 10k print for $500, from an established artist that presumably doesn't need the money anymore. I own a few Banksy's and as much as I like the images, they are partly investment. I like my Nick Walker - Love Vandal way way way more than all my my Banksy prints combined.

But this? A print from an upcoming artist? Which people actually love and enjoy for what he is and what he creates? Fuck off flipping that shit within a week and leave it to the people actually loving the art.

To me it's a pretty hard question as I'm pretty much a right wing capitalist kinda guy myself. I believe in property rights, so in a theoretical way I'm fine with people using opportunities to create value for themselves.

But morally, I mean come on. There's a fine line somewhere and I strongly believe that flipping prints from emerging artists where people actually have a strong desire to frame and hang the print is over that line.