J0NNY
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,054
ππ» 705
December 2014
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by J0NNY on Nov 11, 2017 4:27:35 GMT 1, People are quick to whinge about the flippers but will still put posts out there asking for people to sell them new releases for a quick profit . Kinda just fueling the fire.
People are quick to whinge about the flippers but will still put posts out there asking for people to sell them new releases for a quick profit . Kinda just fueling the fire.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by nobokov on Nov 11, 2017 4:32:22 GMT 1, Is it just me, or does that sound a bit hypocritical? I think that if you're gonna take the anti-flipping stance, wouldn't it make sense to be against all flipping? Or is the problem that their profit margin isn't large enough? To me it's a pretty hard question as I'm pretty much a right wing capitalist kinda guy myself. I believe in property rights, so in a theoretical way I'm fine with people using opportunities to create value for themselves. But morally, I mean come on. There's a fine line somewhere and I strongly believe that flipping prints from emerging artists where people actually have a strong desire to frame and hang the print is over that line.
If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price.
Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later?
Is it just me, or does that sound a bit hypocritical? I think that if you're gonna take the anti-flipping stance, wouldn't it make sense to be against all flipping? Or is the problem that their profit margin isn't large enough? To me it's a pretty hard question as I'm pretty much a right wing capitalist kinda guy myself. I believe in property rights, so in a theoretical way I'm fine with people using opportunities to create value for themselves. But morally, I mean come on. There's a fine line somewhere and I strongly believe that flipping prints from emerging artists where people actually have a strong desire to frame and hang the print is over that line. I don't know. I'm having a tough time seeing it as morality debate. One person wants to buy art to hang and one wants to sell to profit from it. But who's getting hurt and why is one action wrong and the other right? If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price. Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later? |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 4:37:00 GMT 1, Is this guy even flipping it for more? yes I thought he said at cost? nope Offer him cost and mark this as sold. I too have lost out to prints I wanted. But Iβve also sold some to pay for new ones, sometimes right away as these damn releases come fast these days, so cant hate. yes, can hate, if you felt the need to sell right away, you shouldn't have bought the print in the first place as you clearly don't even like the image enough to frame/hang But if the secondary market had patience it could get pieces essentially at cost as there are a lot of people trying to flip that are not able to hold onto the art too long. not able to hold onto the art too long? then don't buy if you cant afford it In summary canβt hate someone for trying to make money because if they knocked on your door asking for food because they were hungry youβd probably say F&(#( off or get a job. can hate, there's a pretty large difference between not being able to eat, and just trying to accumulate even more wealth
Is this guy even flipping it for more? yes I thought he said at cost? nope Offer him cost and mark this as sold. I too have lost out to prints I wanted. But Iβve also sold some to pay for new ones, sometimes right away as these damn releases come fast these days, so cant hate. yes, can hate, if you felt the need to sell right away, you shouldn't have bought the print in the first place as you clearly don't even like the image enough to frame/hang But if the secondary market had patience it could get pieces essentially at cost as there are a lot of people trying to flip that are not able to hold onto the art too long. not able to hold onto the art too long? then don't buy if you cant afford it In summary canβt hate someone for trying to make money because if they knocked on your door asking for food because they were hungry youβd probably say F&(#( off or get a job. can hate, there's a pretty large difference between not being able to eat, and just trying to accumulate even more wealth |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 4:38:51 GMT 1, People are quick to whinge about the flippers but will still put posts out there asking for people to sell them new releases for a quick profit . Kinda just fueling the fire.
People are quick to whinge about the flippers but will still put posts out there asking for people to sell them new releases for a quick profit . Kinda just fueling the fire. Meh I'd pay 10% above cost to cover their time actually F5'ing for the print or standing in line, but flippers mostly ask 3/4/5x. |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 4:42:46 GMT 1, To me it's a pretty hard question as I'm pretty much a right wing capitalist kinda guy myself. I believe in property rights, so in a theoretical way I'm fine with people using opportunities to create value for themselves. But morally, I mean come on. There's a fine line somewhere and I strongly believe that flipping prints from emerging artists where people actually have a strong desire to frame and hang the print is over that line. I don't know. I'm having a tough time seeing it as morality debate. One person wants to buy art to hang and one wants to sell to profit from it. But who's getting hurt and why is one action wrong and the other right? If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price. Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later?
The person getting hurt is the person that wanted to pay the artists price for the piece of art for the image provided, but who is deprived of being able to buy it at said price because of someone with no love whatsoever for the image, that just decided it's a good opportunity to accumulate wealth.
To me it's a pretty hard question as I'm pretty much a right wing capitalist kinda guy myself. I believe in property rights, so in a theoretical way I'm fine with people using opportunities to create value for themselves. But morally, I mean come on. There's a fine line somewhere and I strongly believe that flipping prints from emerging artists where people actually have a strong desire to frame and hang the print is over that line. I don't know. I'm having a tough time seeing it as morality debate. One person wants to buy art to hang and one wants to sell to profit from it. But who's getting hurt and why is one action wrong and the other right? If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price. Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later? This is all focusing on price. What about the actual image of the art? The person getting hurt is the person that wanted to pay the artists price for the piece of art for the image provided, but who is deprived of being able to buy it at said price because of someone with no love whatsoever for the image, that just decided it's a good opportunity to accumulate wealth. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by nobokov on Nov 11, 2017 4:49:37 GMT 1,
I don't know. I'm having a tough time seeing it as morality debate. One person wants to buy art to hang and one wants to sell to profit from it. But who's getting hurt and why is one action wrong and the other right? If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price. Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later? This is all focusing on price. What about the actual image of the art? The person getting hurt is the person that wanted to pay the artists price for the piece of art for the image provided, but who is deprived of being able to buy it at said price because of someone with no love whatsoever for the image, that just decided it's a good opportunity to accumulate wealth.
But isn't owning art mainly all about the price? If Pez decided to price the print at $1500, would you still be in? He'd still be an emerging artist. Would you still buy the print if it was $1500, and there were 125 remaining in stock?
I don't know. I'm having a tough time seeing it as morality debate. One person wants to buy art to hang and one wants to sell to profit from it. But who's getting hurt and why is one action wrong and the other right? If you have a strong desire to own the artwork to frame, how strong is that desire? Is it strong enough to pay $100 over MSRP? or $400? Or is the main appeal of an emerging artist that they're affordable and perhaps you can sell one at a great profit one day? If that's the case, the anger might be stemming from the flipper reducing your future profit and increasing the monetary risk of owning that artwork today and making you choose whether you love that artwork, believe in the artist's rise, enough to pay the flipper price. Does flipping artwork hurt the artists? They lose out on the profit that they might have earned if they had sold at a higher price originally, but I wonder if it helps the artists and galleries who might profit from the hype to see the artwork potentially pass through the hands of many segments of society. If the ultimate goal of the artist is to become famous and sell their artwork at high prices, how does flipping hurt them? Flipping seems to put the artwork in the hands of those in higher economic strata while keeping the ones in lower levels feening for more. The audience that makes the most sense for the artist are the rich so does it hurt their popularity if the artwork gets into that higher stratum sooner rather than later? This is all focusing on price. What about the actual image of the art? The person getting hurt is the person that wanted to pay the artists price for the piece of art for the image provided, but who is deprived of being able to buy it at said price because of someone with no love whatsoever for the image, that just decided it's a good opportunity to accumulate wealth. But isn't owning art mainly all about the price? If Pez decided to price the print at $1500, would you still be in? He'd still be an emerging artist. Would you still buy the print if it was $1500, and there were 125 remaining in stock? |
|
|
|
Express Post
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 3,330
ππ» 2,479
January 2008
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Express Post on Nov 11, 2017 5:11:02 GMT 1, This is all focusing on price...Β But isn't owning art mainly all about the price? If Pez decided to price the print at $1500, would you still be in? He'd still be an emerging artist. Would you still buy the print if it was $1500, and there were 125 remaining in stock?
Price is a gateway into owning art and controlling demand.
If the price is set high enough, then the purchase will be made primarily on the desire to own the image. If the incentive/upside is removed, then the acquisition will become less about money.
Obviously the artist has to eat, so to generate sales, the price will usually be lower than perceived market value.
It can get ugly if the pricing is off, and I look to Robert and Ethel Scull who made a market out of the pop art movement from the 60s.
This is all focusing on price...Β But isn't owning art mainly all about the price? If Pez decided to price the print at $1500, would you still be in? He'd still be an emerging artist. Would you still buy the print if it was $1500, and there were 125 remaining in stock? Price is a gateway into owning art and controlling demand. If the price is set high enough, then the purchase will be made primarily on the desire to own the image. If the incentive/upside is removed, then the acquisition will become less about money. Obviously the artist has to eat, so to generate sales, the price will usually be lower than perceived market value. It can get ugly if the pricing is off, and I look to Robert and Ethel Scull who made a market out of the pop art movement from the 60s. |
|
wow
New Member
π¨οΈ 258
ππ» 126
September 2013
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by wow on Nov 12, 2017 13:31:07 GMT 1, Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this?
Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this? |
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 6,194
ππ» 9,453
October 2015
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Dive Jedi on Nov 12, 2017 13:56:29 GMT 1, Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this?
Better contact CN and ask them. Send them the pics.
They probably have a few left in case of damage, so you might be able to return yours.
Better then a refund.
Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this? Don't think that is supposed to be there. Better contact CN and ask them. Send them the pics. They probably have a few left in case of damage, so you might be able to return yours. Better then a refund. |
|
Redbirds
New Member
π¨οΈ 938
ππ» 807
March 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Redbirds on Nov 12, 2017 14:06:37 GMT 1, Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this?Β Don't think that is supposed to be there. Better contact CN and ask them. Send them the pics. They probably have a few left in case of damage, so you might be able to return yours. Better then a refund.
Got mine other day ..I can second Jedi ..stripe not suppose be there ..GP always makes things right in my experience ..had issue once and was offered AP of print if things didnβt work out ..
Is this stripe on you're prints??? Dont like it. Should i contact classic nouveau about this?Β Don't think that is supposed to be there. Better contact CN and ask them. Send them the pics. They probably have a few left in case of damage, so you might be able to return yours. Better then a refund. Got mine other day ..I can second Jedi ..stripe not suppose be there ..GP always makes things right in my experience ..had issue once and was offered AP of print if things didnβt work out .. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by nobokov on Nov 12, 2017 16:16:00 GMT 1, You're lucky its GP. Other galleries would argue that its a result of the unique nature of screenprinting
You're lucky its GP. Other galleries would argue that its a result of the unique nature of screenprinting
|
|
wow
New Member
π¨οΈ 258
ππ» 126
September 2013
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by wow on Nov 12, 2017 18:12:25 GMT 1, Hope they can help me out. I cant frame this print. All i see is the stripe.
That said, awesome print and details.
Thanks for the replyes!
Hope they can help me out. I cant frame this print. All i see is the stripe.
That said, awesome print and details.
Thanks for the replyes!
|
|
Pjam
New Member
π¨οΈ 586
ππ» 257
March 2014
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Pjam on Nov 13, 2017 2:48:18 GMT 1, Nice nod to Invader, this is my first time noticing this.
Nice nod to Invader, this is my first time noticing this.
|
|
maxs13
New Member
π¨οΈ 82
ππ» 67
June 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by maxs13 on Nov 16, 2017 2:28:28 GMT 1, Just got mine today in NYC.... the detail on it is insane... can't stop staring.
Pretty new to collecting so gotta thank this forum for introducing me to Pez... obsessed.
Just got mine today in NYC.... the detail on it is insane... can't stop staring.
Pretty new to collecting so gotta thank this forum for introducing me to Pez... obsessed.
|
|
|
|
sal
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,009
ππ» 2,326
January 2011
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by sal on Nov 16, 2017 15:17:59 GMT 1, Sold few more things and just added couple of new bits for anyone interested:
Pez - World Cup - $250
Few prints by Jason Limon - offers
Dabs Myla (handfinished AP) - offers (pardon the blurry pic)
Interesni Kazki / Waone - Interesting Fairytale - $1600 (stock image)
Interesni Kazki / Aec - Time Machine - $1600 (stock image)
Sold few more things and just added couple of new bits for anyone interested: Pez - World Cup - $250 Few prints by Jason Limon - offers Dabs Myla (handfinished AP) - offers (pardon the blurry pic) Interesni Kazki / Waone - Interesting Fairytale - $1600 (stock image) Interesni Kazki / Aec - Time Machine - $1600 (stock image) |
|
tgimre
New Member
π¨οΈ 1
ππ» 0
November 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by tgimre on Nov 17, 2017 10:15:55 GMT 1, I am starting to collect PEZ pixel series.
If you have any, Black mirror, Twin Pix, Alter Ego or others please contact me!
I am starting to collect PEZ pixel series.
If you have any, Black mirror, Twin Pix, Alter Ego or others please contact me!
|
|
morleys
New Member
π¨οΈ 184
ππ» 145
August 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by morleys on Nov 17, 2017 12:07:00 GMT 1, Hello !
Very nice choice ! I love the Pez work ! I have the Twin Pix and the Alter Ego in gold version and they are gorgeous
I just suggest you to introduce you here : urbanartassociation.com/thread/129460/introduce-thread
and put a little hello when you start a thread 
Good luck with your research
Morleys
Hello ! Very nice choice ! I love the Pez work ! I have the Twin Pix and the Alter Ego in gold version and they are gorgeous I just suggest you to introduce you here : urbanartassociation.com/thread/129460/introduce-threadand put a little hello when you start a thread Good luck with your research Morleys |
|
clueless
New Member
π¨οΈ 903
ππ» 454
October 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by clueless on Nov 19, 2017 14:00:19 GMT 1, An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then.
An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then.
|
|
thebot
New Member
π¨οΈ 77
ππ» 88
April 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by thebot on Nov 19, 2017 14:05:04 GMT 1, I think Royal Mail change the status "to passed on to USPS before the parcel leaves the UK". It can often take quite a while for it to reemerge as it were.
I think Royal Mail change the status "to passed on to USPS before the parcel leaves the UK". It can often take quite a while for it to reemerge as it were.
|
|
Redbirds
New Member
π¨οΈ 938
ππ» 807
March 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by Redbirds on Nov 19, 2017 14:22:49 GMT 1, An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then.
Yes USA buyer and got it awhile ago -way over a weak ago
An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then. Yes USA buyer and got it awhile ago -way over a weak ago |
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by NYart on Nov 19, 2017 14:38:19 GMT 1, Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π
Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π
|
|
davin550
New Member
π¨οΈ 94
ππ» 102
September 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by davin550 on Nov 19, 2017 15:51:41 GMT 1, Mine cleared customs on Nov 10th. I got a notice that they tried to deliver on the 16th and I picked it up at the post office on the 17th. It's my first Pez and it's stunning. I took it to get framed yesterday. I can't wait to get it back and up on the wall. I'm happy to say that it's going to be the first (and not the last) piece of urban art going up in my new home.
Mine cleared customs on Nov 10th. I got a notice that they tried to deliver on the 16th and I picked it up at the post office on the 17th. It's my first Pez and it's stunning. I took it to get framed yesterday. I can't wait to get it back and up on the wall. I'm happy to say that it's going to be the first (and not the last) piece of urban art going up in my new home.
|
|
|
|
lucyloo
New Member
π¨οΈ 229
ππ» 116
June 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by lucyloo on Nov 19, 2017 18:47:54 GMT 1, Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π 
Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π same here |
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by NYart on Nov 19, 2017 18:56:13 GMT 1, Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π same here
Least weβre not alone I suppose. Still a bummer but reassuring
Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π same here Least weβre not alone I suppose. Still a bummer but reassuring |
|
chevyav53
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,356
ππ» 1,134
August 2017
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by chevyav53 on Nov 19, 2017 19:00:33 GMT 1, Mine was as well but preordered so just seems as came faster after release.
Mine was as well but preordered so just seems as came faster after release.
|
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by NYart on Nov 20, 2017 11:38:28 GMT 1, Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π same here
Mine randomly popped up at my regional facility this morning
Mine has been stuck in customs since the 9th π same here Mine randomly popped up at my regional facility this morning |
|
|
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by oxfordwelshchap on Nov 20, 2017 12:45:26 GMT 1, An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then.
An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then. I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US |
|
rosac
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,894
ππ» 1,538
July 2015
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by rosac on Nov 20, 2017 13:00:13 GMT 1, An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then. I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US
Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics
An other US buyers - USPS tracking hasn't updated? Royal Mail says passed onto USPS on November 4th.. Radio silence ever since then. I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics |
|
|
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by oxfordwelshchap on Nov 20, 2017 13:09:58 GMT 1, I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics
That's tricky when the seller is someone like Faile though that ship a certain way.
I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics That's tricky when the seller is someone like Faile though that ship a certain way. |
|
NYart
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,221
ππ» 844
January 2016
|
PEZ π«π· Pierre-Yves Riveau β’ New Release β’ Art For Sale, by NYart on Nov 20, 2017 13:15:18 GMT 1, I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics
I donβt think there are any flight logistics locations in the US are there?
I wonder if there is any way of getting around the Royal mail to USPS and visa versa system. It seems to create no end of angst my end when I get prints shipped from the US Pay extra and get seller to use Flight logistics I donβt think there are any flight logistics locations in the US are there? |
|
