racket
Junior Member
Posts • 1,163
Likes • 677
September 2017
|
Art Wanted, by racket on Feb 4, 2021 17:27:59 GMT 1, Looking for Paul Kremer crevice print from a few years ago exhibitiona.com/collections/paul-kremer Have cash + trades
|
|
|
Art Wanted, by artcomesfirst on Feb 4, 2021 19:16:22 GMT 1, Looking for Bozo. Thanks.
Looking for Bozo. Thanks.
|
|
roubasss
New Member
Posts • 31
Likes • 4
February 2021
|
Art Wanted, by roubasss on Feb 4, 2021 23:21:46 GMT 1, Looking for any JAN KALAB pieces:)
Looking for any JAN KALAB pieces:)
|
|
pklong17
New Member
Posts • 373
Likes • 358
October 2015
|
Art Wanted, by pklong17 on Feb 5, 2021 5:38:21 GMT 1, Looking for Christopher Wool signed book and Cats in Bag Bags in River print/poster
Looking for Christopher Wool signed book and Cats in Bag Bags in River print/poster
|
|
kjg
Junior Member
Posts • 4,349
Likes • 6,313
December 2014
|
Art Wanted, by kjg on Feb 5, 2021 9:55:27 GMT 1, Looking for Christopher Wool signed book and Cats in Bag Bags in River print/poster Are you looking for a signed Cats in Bag/Bags in River poster?
Looking for Christopher Wool signed book and Cats in Bag Bags in River print/poster Are you looking for a signed Cats in Bag/Bags in River poster?
|
|
jp226
Junior Member
Posts • 1,068
Likes • 933
July 2010
|
Art Wanted, by jp226 on Feb 5, 2021 18:45:06 GMT 1, Looking for Barry McGee envelopes.
Looking for Barry McGee envelopes.
|
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts • 2,782
Likes • 6,706
June 2009
|
Art Wanted, by met on Feb 6, 2021 18:38:47 GMT 1, What if WCP is just Banksy running off more of his prints? With respect, I would discourage you and anyone else from making comments like this on the forum. Your "What if..." suggestion is not only incorrect, but also completely unfounded. It thus contributes to the spread of delusional ideas on the basis of zero or highly-misleading evidence. [By the way, how can anyone be certain vaccinations don't cause autism? And is it really just a coincidence that we find ourselves in a pandemic during the global rollout of 5G?]The potential effect, even when simply phrased as a question, is to give false hope to those among your fellow art collectors who are naive, foolish and/or easily-led. Such posts can entice people to purchase obvious knockoffs, thereby condoning intellectual property theft and rewarding The West Country Prince (along with the likes of Full Colour Black and Mrs Banksy) for their prat-like opportunism — in the tragically misguided belief that maybe, just maybe, the pieces being acquired are authentic Ban ksys. __________ Alarm bells do ring each time I come across this kind of thing. I'll typically place the author of the relevant post in one of three broad categories, based on their suspected intent — ranging from innocent to deceitful / corrupt: (i) ignorant, and reckless with their public comments (a case of the blind leading the blind); (ii) knowing, disinterested (i.e. with no vested interest), and deliberately trying to mislead others simply for personal amusement; or (iii) knowing, with an undisclosed vested interest, and deliberately trying to mislead others for financial gain. Wow! Talk about judging people? I state a lighthearted what if? (I know that WCP isn’t Banksy by the way). I’m ever so sorry I posted on Your Forum and obviously I’m not worthy of your hi-intellect! But I can confirm which of the 3 brackets you’ve decided to label me as i) ignorant? No not really, just like starting conversations with people, you know in a social kind of way ii) Deliberately trying to mislead? Mislead what exactly? iii) vested interest? Lol no, I don’t own any Banksy’s but I did just pick up a WCP print last week. Am I hoping it’s worth a lot? Not really, going to stick it on my wall. I think I’m iv - taking part in a forum and talking to people. But thank you for judging me and deciding I’m obviously a piece of shit! Cheers
From your tone, it seems like what I wrote caused offence. That wasn't the aim, and I apologise if my words were clumsy.
The objective for me is always to express myself in a clear, straightforward manner — as I would if chatting with someone face-to-face while having a drink at the pub.
Leaving aside its usage for comedic effect, I therefore generally avoid euphemistic language. Because by very definition it is imprecise, if not inaccurate. Moreover, it's arguably patronising: Being unduly diplomatic (and too keen to spare hurt feelings) is to assume the other person lacks mental resilience, and perhaps must be spoken to like a child. In effect, it is to assume the other person is not one's equal.
But when my candour draws out a defensive response, I also see this as a failure by me to communicate effectively. It means the words I chose created an unhelpful distraction — leading my conversation partner to focus more on the belief they were slighted, and less on the substance of the message I was trying to get across.
__________
The loose assumption for me (which I now understand was incorrect) had been that your "What if..." question was based on ignorance — being number (i) in that earlier list of three broad-brush categories. [As a brief aside, ignorance in itself is a neutral state. Unless wilful, it elicits no value judgement from me. Granted, however, the added reference to "reckless with their public comments" was an express criticism.]
Many thanks for clarifying your knowledge that The West Country Prince is not Banksy, and your post had simply been lighthearted.
I agree this would place you in a separate category, distinct from the three I previously mentioned — that of someone who's knowing (conscious of the truth, with a full grasp on reality), and who's looking to share fanciful musings and untruths with others, but without trying to mislead them.
There is common ground between us, since I indulge in reveries as well.
Here are some of my recent ones (which, until now, I'd been keeping to myself):
(a) What if, due to their lighter bone structure, children can actually fly — but are being lied to by envious adults who say it's impossible? What if, to harness their true potential, kids just have to concentrate really, really hard before jumping off a roof? If they only dared to believe, their faith might be rewarded.
(b) What if the real way for people to beat cancer is to shun doctors, hospitals and their so-called medicines, and instead to focus exclusively on a natural-remedy diet and the healing powers of crystals?
(c) What if we could in fact avoid catching Covid-19 by drinking or injecting bleach? We need to test this, because (aside from eliminating tough stains) bleach actually does kill 99.9% of the germs in my bathroom.
Now, where we might disagree is on the extent to which lighthearted private musings should be expressed publicly.
On this issue, the possible (and foreseeable) impact of sharing without strong caveats* is worth considering. What I find is that keeping in mind the potential consequences helps me to filter my thoughts, and to choose between either broadcasting them or self-censoring.
__________
Bringing the discussion back to the parasite and thief that is The West Country Prince, there are people reading this forum who are less knowledgeable than the two of us.
Among the throng of new Banksy enthusiasts, plenty may be asking themselves the same question you did (just as others have done here before you) — but doing so from a position of nescience. Their decision on whether to buy a fake would therefore be based on cluelessness.
Part of my concern also relates to the illusory truth effect* — whereby the more often a falsehood is stated, the more believable it becomes. Repetition alone enhances perceived legitimacy.
Under these circumstances, my argument would be as follows:
In the interest of our fellow members who are still wet behind the ears, forum posts are best avoided if they risk leading people astray — including by encouraging them to live in a fool's paradise and to waste their money and time on wishful thinking.
__________
[As a separate more trivial matter, our views appear to differ on the subject of judging people.
I always assume that I'll be judged for my words and actions (or inactions). And I believe everyone else should assume likewise.
Indeed, why would anybody be excluded from judgement? Provided it's even-handed, the scrutiny of our peers seems not only natural but desirable (at least on balance). It's known to have a moderating effect with most individuals, contributing to their socialisation. Just look at what happens when people cease to be held accountable for what they do and say — including when they're able to hide behind anonymous usernames. It often isn't pretty.
So, in relation to my own forum posts, I do expect them to be viewed with a critical eye by everyone who reads them. And if any post is badly drafted, misinformed or poorly considered, it can only be beneficial to the greater conversation when those shortcomings are pointed out.]
__________
By way of courtesy endnote, while I don't mind coming across as unpleasant, I am very much attached to the notion of fairness.
For this reason, if you feel any of my comments have been unfair, please let me know and I'll give them further thought.
What if WCP is just Banksy running off more of his prints? With respect, I would discourage you and anyone else from making comments like this on the forum. Your "What if..." suggestion is not only incorrect, but also completely unfounded. It thus contributes to the spread of delusional ideas on the basis of zero or highly-misleading evidence. [By the way, how can anyone be certain vaccinations don't cause autism? And is it really just a coincidence that we find ourselves in a pandemic during the global rollout of 5G?]The potential effect, even when simply phrased as a question, is to give false hope to those among your fellow art collectors who are naive, foolish and/or easily-led. Such posts can entice people to purchase obvious knockoffs, thereby condoning intellectual property theft and rewarding The West Country Prince (along with the likes of Full Colour Black and Mrs Banksy) for their prat-like opportunism — in the tragically misguided belief that maybe, just maybe, the pieces being acquired are authentic Ban ksys. __________ Alarm bells do ring each time I come across this kind of thing. I'll typically place the author of the relevant post in one of three broad categories, based on their suspected intent — ranging from innocent to deceitful / corrupt: (i) ignorant, and reckless with their public comments (a case of the blind leading the blind); (ii) knowing, disinterested (i.e. with no vested interest), and deliberately trying to mislead others simply for personal amusement; or (iii) knowing, with an undisclosed vested interest, and deliberately trying to mislead others for financial gain. Wow! Talk about judging people? I state a lighthearted what if? (I know that WCP isn’t Banksy by the way). I’m ever so sorry I posted on Your Forum and obviously I’m not worthy of your hi-intellect! But I can confirm which of the 3 brackets you’ve decided to label me as i) ignorant? No not really, just like starting conversations with people, you know in a social kind of way ii) Deliberately trying to mislead? Mislead what exactly? iii) vested interest? Lol no, I don’t own any Banksy’s but I did just pick up a WCP print last week. Am I hoping it’s worth a lot? Not really, going to stick it on my wall. I think I’m iv - taking part in a forum and talking to people. But thank you for judging me and deciding I’m obviously a piece of shit! Cheers From your tone, it seems like what I wrote caused offence. That wasn't the aim, and I apologise if my words were clumsy. The objective for me is always to express myself in a clear, straightforward manner — as I would if chatting with someone face-to-face while having a drink at the pub. Leaving aside its usage for comedic effect, I therefore generally avoid euphemistic language. Because by very definition it is imprecise, if not inaccurate. Moreover, it's arguably patronising: Being unduly diplomatic (and too keen to spare hurt feelings) is to assume the other person lacks mental resilience, and perhaps must be spoken to like a child. In effect, it is to assume the other person is not one's equal. But when my candour draws out a defensive response, I also see this as a failure by me to communicate effectively. It means the words I chose created an unhelpful distraction — leading my conversation partner to focus more on the belief they were slighted, and less on the substance of the message I was trying to get across. __________ The loose assumption for me (which I now understand was incorrect) had been that your "What if..." question was based on ignorance — being number (i) in that earlier list of three broad-brush categories. [As a brief aside, ignorance in itself is a neutral state. Unless wilful, it elicits no value judgement from me. Granted, however, the added reference to "reckless with their public comments" was an express criticism.]Many thanks for clarifying your knowledge that The West Country Prince is not Ban ksy, and your post had simply been lighthearted. I agree this would place you in a separate category, distinct from the three I previously mentioned — that of someone who's knowing (conscious of the truth, with a full grasp on reality), and who's looking to share fanciful musings and untruths with others, but without trying to mislead them. There is common ground between us, since I indulge in reveries as well. Here are some of my recent ones (which, until now, I'd been keeping to myself): (a) What if, due to their lighter bone structure, children can actually fly — but are being lied to by envious adults who say it's impossible? What if, to harness their true potential, kids just have to concentrate really, really hard before jumping off a roof? If they only dared to believe, their faith might be rewarded.(b) What if the real way for people to beat cancer is to shun doctors, hospitals and their so-called medicines, and instead to focus exclusively on a natural-remedy diet and the healing powers of crystals?(c) What if we could in fact avoid catching Covid-19 by drinking or injecting bleach? We need to test this, because (aside from eliminating tough stains) bleach actually does kill 99.9% of the germs in my bathroom.Now, where we might disagree is on the extent to which lighthearted private musings should be expressed publicly. On this issue, the possible (and foreseeable) impact of sharing without strong caveats * is worth considering. What I find is that keeping in mind the potential consequences helps me to filter my thoughts, and to choose between either broadcasting them or self-censoring. __________ Bringing the discussion back to the parasite and thief that is The West Country Prince, there are people reading this forum who are less knowledgeable than the two of us. Among the throng of new Ban ksy enthusiasts, plenty may be asking themselves the same question you did (just as others have done here before you) — but doing so from a position of nescience. Their decision on whether to buy a fake would therefore be based on cluelessness. Part of my concern also relates to the illusory truth effect* — whereby the more often a falsehood is stated, the more believable it becomes. Repetition alone enhances perceived legitimacy. Under these circumstances, my argument would be as follows: In the interest of our fellow members who are still wet behind the ears, forum posts are best avoided if they risk leading people astray — including by encouraging them to live in a fool's paradise and to waste their money and time on wishful thinking.__________ [As a separate more trivial matter, our views appear to differ on the subject of judging people.
I always assume that I'll be judged for my words and actions (or inactions). And I believe everyone else should assume likewise.
Indeed, why would anybody be excluded from judgement? Provided it's even-handed, the scrutiny of our peers seems not only natural but desirable (at least on balance). It's known to have a moderating effect with most individuals, contributing to their socialisation. Just look at what happens when people cease to be held accountable for what they do and say — including when they're able to hide behind anonymous usernames. It often isn't pretty.
So, in relation to my own forum posts, I do expect them to be viewed with a critical eye by everyone who reads them. And if any post is badly drafted, misinformed or poorly considered, it can only be beneficial to the greater conversation when those shortcomings are pointed out.]__________ By way of courtesy endnote, while I don't mind coming across as unpleasant, I am very much attached to the notion of fairness. For this reason, if you feel any of my comments have been unfair, please let me know and I'll give them further thought.
|
|
Schooner
New Member
Posts • 41
Likes • 46
November 2020
|
Art Wanted, by Schooner on Feb 6, 2021 21:49:39 GMT 1, Wow! Talk about judging people? I state a lighthearted what if? (I know that WCP isn’t Banksy by the way). I’m ever so sorry I posted on Your Forum and obviously I’m not worthy of your hi-intellect! But I can confirm which of the 3 brackets you’ve decided to label me as i) ignorant? No not really, just like starting conversations with people, you know in a social kind of way ii) Deliberately trying to mislead? Mislead what exactly? iii) vested interest? Lol no, I don’t own any Banksy’s but I did just pick up a WCP print last week. Am I hoping it’s worth a lot? Not really, going to stick it on my wall. I think I’m iv - taking part in a forum and talking to people. But thank you for judging me and deciding I’m obviously a piece of shit! Cheers From your tone, it seems like what I wrote caused offence. That wasn't the aim, and I apologise if my words were clumsy. The objective for me is always to express myself in a clear, straightforward manner — as I would if chatting with someone face-to-face while having a drink at the pub. Leaving aside its usage for comedic effect, I therefore generally avoid euphemistic language. Because by very definition it is imprecise, if not inaccurate. Moreover, it's arguably patronising: Being unduly diplomatic (and too keen to spare hurt feelings) is to assume the other person lacks mental resilience, and perhaps must be spoken to like a child. In effect, it is to assume the other person is not one's equal. But when my candour draws out a defensive response, I also see this as a failure by me to communicate effectively. It means the words I chose created an unhelpful distraction — leading my conversation partner to focus more on the belief they were slighted, and less on the substance of the message I was trying to get across. __________ The loose assumption for me (which I now understand was incorrect) had been that your "What if..." question was based on ignorance — being number (i) in that earlier list of three broad-brush categories. [As a brief aside, ignorance in itself is a neutral state. Unless wilful, it elicits no value judgement from me. Granted, however, the added reference to "reckless with their public comments" was an express criticism.]Many thanks for clarifying your knowledge that The West Country Prince is not Ban ksy, and your post had simply been lighthearted. I agree this would place you in a separate category, distinct from the three I previously mentioned — that of someone who's knowing (conscious of the truth, with a full grasp on reality), and who's looking to share fanciful musings and untruths with others, but without trying to mislead them. There is common ground between us, since I indulge in reveries as well. Here are some of my recent ones (which, until now, I'd been keeping to myself): (a) What if, due to their lighter bone structure, children can actually fly — but are being lied to by envious adults who say it's impossible? What if, to harness their true potential, kids just have to concentrate really, really hard before jumping off a roof? If they only dared to believe, their faith might be rewarded.(b) What if the real way for people to beat cancer is to shun doctors, hospitals and their so-called medicines, and instead to focus exclusively on a natural-remedy diet and the healing powers of crystals?(c) What if we could in fact avoid catching Covid-19 by drinking or injecting bleach? We need to test this, because (aside from eliminating tough stains) bleach actually does kill 99.9% of the germs in my bathroom.Now, where we might disagree is on the extent to which lighthearted private musings should be expressed publicly. On this issue, the possible (and foreseeable) impact of sharing without strong caveats * is worth considering. What I find is that keeping in mind the potential consequences helps me to filter my thoughts, and to choose between either broadcasting them or self-censoring. __________ Bringing the discussion back to the parasite and thief that is The West Country Prince, there are people reading this forum who are less knowledgeable than the two of us. Among the throng of new Ban ksy enthusiasts, plenty may be asking themselves the same question you did (just as others have done here before you) — but doing so from a position of nescience. Their decision on whether to buy a fake would therefore be based on cluelessness. Part of my concern also relates to the illusory truth effect* — whereby the more often a falsehood is stated, the more believable it becomes. Repetition alone enhances perceived legitimacy. Under these circumstances, my argument would be as follows: In the interest of our fellow members who are still wet behind the ears, forum posts are best avoided if they risk leading people astray — including by encouraging them to live in a fool's paradise and to waste their money and time on wishful thinking.__________ [As a separate more trivial matter, our views appear to differ on the subject of judging people.
I always assume that I'll be judged for my words and actions (or inactions). And I believe everyone else should assume likewise.
Indeed, why would anybody be excluded from judgement? Provided it's even-handed, the scrutiny of our peers seems not only natural but desirable (at least on balance). It's known to have a moderating effect with most individuals, contributing to their socialisation. Just look at what happens when people cease to be held accountable for what they do and say — including when they're able to hide behind anonymous usernames. It often isn't pretty.
So, in relation to my own forum posts, I do expect them to be viewed with a critical eye by everyone who reads them. And if any post is badly drafted, misinformed or poorly considered, it can only be beneficial to the greater conversation when those shortcomings are pointed out.]__________ By way of courtesy endnote, while I don't mind coming across as unpleasant, I am very much attached to the notion of fairness. For this reason, if you feel any of my comments have been unfair, please let me know and I'll give them further thought.
Can you give me 8 words that will summarise the above. Will make it lots easier....
Wow! Talk about judging people? I state a lighthearted what if? (I know that WCP isn’t Banksy by the way). I’m ever so sorry I posted on Your Forum and obviously I’m not worthy of your hi-intellect! But I can confirm which of the 3 brackets you’ve decided to label me as i) ignorant? No not really, just like starting conversations with people, you know in a social kind of way ii) Deliberately trying to mislead? Mislead what exactly? iii) vested interest? Lol no, I don’t own any Banksy’s but I did just pick up a WCP print last week. Am I hoping it’s worth a lot? Not really, going to stick it on my wall. I think I’m iv - taking part in a forum and talking to people. But thank you for judging me and deciding I’m obviously a piece of shit! Cheers From your tone, it seems like what I wrote caused offence. That wasn't the aim, and I apologise if my words were clumsy. The objective for me is always to express myself in a clear, straightforward manner — as I would if chatting with someone face-to-face while having a drink at the pub. Leaving aside its usage for comedic effect, I therefore generally avoid euphemistic language. Because by very definition it is imprecise, if not inaccurate. Moreover, it's arguably patronising: Being unduly diplomatic (and too keen to spare hurt feelings) is to assume the other person lacks mental resilience, and perhaps must be spoken to like a child. In effect, it is to assume the other person is not one's equal. But when my candour draws out a defensive response, I also see this as a failure by me to communicate effectively. It means the words I chose created an unhelpful distraction — leading my conversation partner to focus more on the belief they were slighted, and less on the substance of the message I was trying to get across. __________ The loose assumption for me (which I now understand was incorrect) had been that your "What if..." question was based on ignorance — being number (i) in that earlier list of three broad-brush categories. [As a brief aside, ignorance in itself is a neutral state. Unless wilful, it elicits no value judgement from me. Granted, however, the added reference to "reckless with their public comments" was an express criticism.]Many thanks for clarifying your knowledge that The West Country Prince is not Ban ksy, and your post had simply been lighthearted. I agree this would place you in a separate category, distinct from the three I previously mentioned — that of someone who's knowing (conscious of the truth, with a full grasp on reality), and who's looking to share fanciful musings and untruths with others, but without trying to mislead them. There is common ground between us, since I indulge in reveries as well. Here are some of my recent ones (which, until now, I'd been keeping to myself): (a) What if, due to their lighter bone structure, children can actually fly — but are being lied to by envious adults who say it's impossible? What if, to harness their true potential, kids just have to concentrate really, really hard before jumping off a roof? If they only dared to believe, their faith might be rewarded.(b) What if the real way for people to beat cancer is to shun doctors, hospitals and their so-called medicines, and instead to focus exclusively on a natural-remedy diet and the healing powers of crystals?(c) What if we could in fact avoid catching Covid-19 by drinking or injecting bleach? We need to test this, because (aside from eliminating tough stains) bleach actually does kill 99.9% of the germs in my bathroom.Now, where we might disagree is on the extent to which lighthearted private musings should be expressed publicly. On this issue, the possible (and foreseeable) impact of sharing without strong caveats * is worth considering. What I find is that keeping in mind the potential consequences helps me to filter my thoughts, and to choose between either broadcasting them or self-censoring. __________ Bringing the discussion back to the parasite and thief that is The West Country Prince, there are people reading this forum who are less knowledgeable than the two of us. Among the throng of new Ban ksy enthusiasts, plenty may be asking themselves the same question you did (just as others have done here before you) — but doing so from a position of nescience. Their decision on whether to buy a fake would therefore be based on cluelessness. Part of my concern also relates to the illusory truth effect* — whereby the more often a falsehood is stated, the more believable it becomes. Repetition alone enhances perceived legitimacy. Under these circumstances, my argument would be as follows: In the interest of our fellow members who are still wet behind the ears, forum posts are best avoided if they risk leading people astray — including by encouraging them to live in a fool's paradise and to waste their money and time on wishful thinking.__________ [As a separate more trivial matter, our views appear to differ on the subject of judging people.
I always assume that I'll be judged for my words and actions (or inactions). And I believe everyone else should assume likewise.
Indeed, why would anybody be excluded from judgement? Provided it's even-handed, the scrutiny of our peers seems not only natural but desirable (at least on balance). It's known to have a moderating effect with most individuals, contributing to their socialisation. Just look at what happens when people cease to be held accountable for what they do and say — including when they're able to hide behind anonymous usernames. It often isn't pretty.
So, in relation to my own forum posts, I do expect them to be viewed with a critical eye by everyone who reads them. And if any post is badly drafted, misinformed or poorly considered, it can only be beneficial to the greater conversation when those shortcomings are pointed out.]__________ By way of courtesy endnote, while I don't mind coming across as unpleasant, I am very much attached to the notion of fairness. For this reason, if you feel any of my comments have been unfair, please let me know and I'll give them further thought. Can you give me 8 words that will summarise the above. Will make it lots easier....
|
|
roubasss
New Member
Posts • 31
Likes • 4
February 2021
|
Art Wanted, by roubasss on Feb 6, 2021 22:13:17 GMT 1, Anyone selling any JAN KALAB or KAWS or PASTA ONER?
Anyone selling any JAN KALAB or KAWS or PASTA ONER?
|
|
Ruskr
New Member
Posts • 313
Likes • 227
December 2015
|
Art Wanted, by Ruskr on Feb 7, 2021 0:06:06 GMT 1, Anyone selling any JAN KALAB or KAWS or PASTA ONER?
A lot of gallery’s have his works available.
http://instagram.com/p/CJOOlUJFuTi Here a couple of mine )
|
|
roubasss
New Member
Posts • 31
Likes • 4
February 2021
|
Art Wanted, by roubasss on Feb 7, 2021 0:07:02 GMT 1,
Hoped to get somre prints for a good price hehe or maybe some originals for good price as well - one can dream! Also I follow you on IG x
Hoped to get somre prints for a good price hehe or maybe some originals for good price as well - one can dream! Also I follow you on IG x
|
|
wazzerfpv
New Member
Posts • 11
Likes • 13
December 2020
|
Art Wanted, by wazzerfpv on Feb 7, 2021 9:52:51 GMT 1, Has anyone received there print yet? I had a email on Monday saying they were shipped but I've not had mine yet.
Has anyone received there print yet? I had a email on Monday saying they were shipped but I've not had mine yet.
|
|
casual
New Member
Posts • 162
Likes • 428
November 2019
|
Art Wanted, by casual on Feb 7, 2021 10:10:41 GMT 1, Has anyone received there print yet? I had a email on Monday saying they were shipped but I've not had mine yet.
Yes received mine on Friday, no dispatch email weirdly but they are here nevertheless.
Has anyone received there print yet? I had a email on Monday saying they were shipped but I've not had mine yet. Yes received mine on Friday, no dispatch email weirdly but they are here nevertheless.
|
|
begs
New Member
Posts • 996
Likes • 338
September 2010
|
Art Wanted, by begs on Feb 7, 2021 10:53:51 GMT 1, Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy
Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy
|
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts • 2,782
Likes • 6,706
June 2009
|
Art Wanted, by met on Feb 7, 2021 11:52:38 GMT 1, Can you give me 8 words that will summarise the above. Will make it lots easier....
Completely understandable (and Onket's earlier comment was also more than fair).
I'm happy to offer you a choice of three alternatives.
Take your pick:
1. Nuance is the victim when conciseness is prioritised.
2. The easy, lazy paths are often false economies.
3. Encouraging and rationalising theft from artists is wrong.
Can you give me 8 words that will summarise the above. Will make it lots easier.... Completely understandable (and Onket's earlier comment was also more than fair). I'm happy to offer you a choice of three alternatives. Take your pick:1. Nuance is the victim when conciseness is prioritised.2. The easy, lazy paths are often false economies.3. Encouraging and rationalising theft from artists is wrong.
|
|
|
Art Wanted, by Lroy on Feb 7, 2021 12:20:58 GMT 1, I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals...
Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland.
WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market.
we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do
I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals...
Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland.
WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market.
we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do
|
|
matp
New Member
Posts • 501
Likes • 499
March 2013
|
Art Wanted, by matp on Feb 7, 2021 13:03:10 GMT 1, Looking for Todd James prints. What's out there? I've just listed my Pirate Radio on eBay.
Looking for Todd James prints. What's out there? I've just listed my Pirate Radio on eBay.
|
|
casual
New Member
Posts • 162
Likes • 428
November 2019
|
Art Wanted, by casual on Feb 7, 2021 13:33:01 GMT 1, Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy What did you order?
I appreciate the question wasn’t directed at me but I’m equally happy with my order, I had reasonable expectations & both prints are impressive.
I received a NOLA white rain & a LIITA red, both for little over £100 was a no brainer for me, the NOLA specifically really ‘pops’.
Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy What did you order? I appreciate the question wasn’t directed at me but I’m equally happy with my order, I had reasonable expectations & both prints are impressive. I received a NOLA white rain & a LIITA red, both for little over £100 was a no brainer for me, the NOLA specifically really ‘pops’.
|
|
mark1
New Member
Posts • 420
Likes • 567
July 2018
|
Art Wanted, by mark1 on Feb 7, 2021 13:41:58 GMT 1, Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍
Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍
|
|
casual
New Member
Posts • 162
Likes • 428
November 2019
|
Art Wanted, by casual on Feb 7, 2021 13:48:54 GMT 1, Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍
I was getting some strange looks from the wife when she caught me sniffing the tube when they arrived yesterday haha.
Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍 I was getting some strange looks from the wife when she caught me sniffing the tube when they arrived yesterday haha.
|
|
og
New Member
Posts • 222
Likes • 316
December 2020
|
Art Wanted, by og on Feb 7, 2021 14:08:20 GMT 1,
Welcome to Hell just received. It’s going on the stairs on the way into the cellar, figured it was apt.
Agree with the print smell, you can certainly smell the ink. For me, quality of print and paper is really good. Appreciate it’s not for all but I’m happy with it.
Welcome to Hell just received. It’s going on the stairs on the way into the cellar, figured it was apt. Agree with the print smell, you can certainly smell the ink. For me, quality of print and paper is really good. Appreciate it’s not for all but I’m happy with it.
|
|
begs
New Member
Posts • 996
Likes • 338
September 2010
|
Art Wanted, by begs on Feb 7, 2021 14:19:23 GMT 1, Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy What did you order? The pulp fiction ,I actually ordered GWB but cancelled it . Thought I would see what they where like .
Yes received mine on Saturday, really please with it for £70 a great copy What did you order? The pulp fiction ,I actually ordered GWB but cancelled it . Thought I would see what they where like .
|
|
|
mark1
New Member
Posts • 420
Likes • 567
July 2018
|
Art Wanted, by mark1 on Feb 7, 2021 15:11:01 GMT 1, Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍 I was getting some strange looks from the wife when she caught me sniffing the tube when they arrived yesterday haha.
Should of said it was batch of used knickers from the bay and see what she would of said 😂
Still love the stinky ink when you pull a print out of the tube, Picked up a flying copper and toxic and very happy with them. 1000th of the cost I believe 👍 I was getting some strange looks from the wife when she caught me sniffing the tube when they arrived yesterday haha. Should of said it was batch of used knickers from the bay and see what she would of said 😂
|
|
spanksy
Junior Member
Posts • 1,002
Likes • 114
December 2007
|
Art Wanted, by spanksy on Feb 7, 2021 15:27:59 GMT 1, I got a couple for future kids bedrooms and as gifts:
Liita Pulp Gwb Nola Laugh now
Not bad. Obviously Not the qual as POW banksys but I think it’s a great way to enjoy the image in screenprint form for what it costs to by a inkjet bad copy.
I got a couple for future kids bedrooms and as gifts:
Liita Pulp Gwb Nola Laugh now
Not bad. Obviously Not the qual as POW banksys but I think it’s a great way to enjoy the image in screenprint form for what it costs to by a inkjet bad copy.
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts • 2,782
Likes • 6,706
June 2009
|
Art Wanted, by met on Feb 7, 2021 20:26:57 GMT 1, I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals... Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland. WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market. we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do
Let's fall back on the Sagan standard: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
If you believe you know how Banksy feels about of The West Country Prince, and you don't think Banksy considers this thief to be a thief, what facts are you relying on to support such a claim?
Because without specific and compelling evidence, you would simply be projecting — using your imagination in an effort to:
(i) rationalise wholesale intellectual property theft (if my understanding is correct, your position is that stealing an artist's work is either okay or not okay, depending on the quality of the fakes produced);
(ii) justify your purchases of prints that directly emanate from artistic theft; and
(iii) defend a shameless chancer who has repeatedly stolen from an artist for at least a decade.
I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals... Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland. WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market. we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do Let's fall back on the Sagan standard: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.If you believe you know how Banksy feels about of The West Country Prince, and you don't think Ban ksy considers this thief to be a thief, what facts are you relying on to support such a claim? Because without specific and compelling evidence, you would simply be projecting — using your imagination in an effort to: (i) rationalise wholesale intellectual property theft (if my understanding is correct, your position is that stealing an artist's work is either okay or not okay, depending on the quality of the fakes produced); (ii) justify your purchases of prints that directly emanate from artistic theft; and (iii) defend a shameless chancer who has repeatedly stolen from an artist for at least a decade.
|
|
|
Art Wanted, by Lroy on Feb 7, 2021 20:37:31 GMT 1, I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals... Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland. WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market. we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do Let's fall back on the Sagan standard: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.If you believe you know how Banksy feels about of The West Country Prince, and you don't think Ban ksy considers this thief to be a thief, what facts are you relying on to support such a claim? Because without specific and compelling evidence, you would simply be projecting — using your imagination in an effort to: (i) rationalise wholesale intellectual property theft (if my understanding is correct, your position is that stealing an artist's work is either okay or not okay, depending on the quality of the fakes produced); (ii) justify your purchases of prints that directly emanate from artistic theft; and (iii) defend a shameless chancer who has repeatedly stolen from an artist for at least a decade.
Reason is simple : if he was really angry he would say no to Gary ( the WCP ) as it’s really ( or mostly ) replicas. And the ( nice ) guy would obey to him or to Pc - as you are sayin, I imagine ( let’s dream a bit ;-) ) Anyway I’m wrong maybe .. Anyway 3 reasons
-Is Banksy is bothered by WCP ?
- Who can afford Banksy prints now ? The third answer will follow ( I have only a phone ) Thanks mon ami
I'm not in the conferences, however I don't think Banksy considers WCP to be a thug or thief; on the contrary, he should be quite proud or happy (or he doesn't care), these are reproductions at the height of his talent and the originals... Nothing to do with his dirty forgers who copy his prints on bad shiny paper, giclées, or canvas and who sell it on ebay like others on poudland. WCP? for me a must have (one or wto) as Banksy is too expensive for us. And that paying for a 5 or 7k poster doesn't mean anything and even tarnishes the image of Banksy and the art market. we can also benefit from prints from below the table, backstage, never seen or made, that's not nothing !Some as the soup can and Stikman ( the blue one) are beautiful ! Next buying taht I will do Let's fall back on the Sagan standard: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.If you believe you know how Banksy feels about of The West Country Prince, and you don't think Ban ksy considers this thief to be a thief, what facts are you relying on to support such a claim? Because without specific and compelling evidence, you would simply be projecting — using your imagination in an effort to: (i) rationalise wholesale intellectual property theft (if my understanding is correct, your position is that stealing an artist's work is either okay or not okay, depending on the quality of the fakes produced); (ii) justify your purchases of prints that directly emanate from artistic theft; and (iii) defend a shameless chancer who has repeatedly stolen from an artist for at least a decade. Reason is simple : if he was really angry he would say no to Gary ( the WCP ) as it’s really ( or mostly ) replicas. And the ( nice ) guy would obey to him or to Pc - as you are sayin, I imagine ( let’s dream a bit ;-) ) Anyway I’m wrong maybe .. Anyway 3 reasons -Is Banksy is bothered by WCP ? - Who can afford Banksy prints now ? The third answer will follow ( I have only a phone ) Thanks mon ami
|
|
|
Art Wanted, by Lroy on Feb 7, 2021 20:38:48 GMT 1, To met
Third answer ! A top one !! What a beauty ? Who seen it before ?
To met Third answer ! A top one !! What a beauty ? Who seen it before ?
|
|
|
Art Wanted, by Charlie Bronson on Feb 8, 2021 1:58:48 GMT 1, Looking for a Julio Cabanding painting. Please DM if you have one for sale.
Looking for a Julio Cabanding painting. Please DM if you have one for sale.
|
|
Sauce Moola
New Member
Posts • 268
Likes • 98
April 2011
|
Art Wanted, by Sauce Moola on Feb 8, 2021 6:27:04 GMT 1, Still looking for Susumu Kamijo, Baldur Helgason , and Roby works if there’s any good ones out there......
Still looking for Susumu Kamijo, Baldur Helgason , and Roby works if there’s any good ones out there......
|
|
chomsky
New Member
Posts • 364
Likes • 276
April 2019
|
Art Wanted, by chomsky on Feb 8, 2021 14:37:45 GMT 1, Hi UAA community ! I'm looking for Shepard Fairey Burmese monk print, and Peace Dove Holiday 2020 print Also Blek Anarchist rat And Ernest Zacharevic Rage against the machine, or Splash and Burn ...ideally in EU Thanks in advance !
Hi UAA community ! I'm looking for Shepard Fairey Burmese monk print, and Peace Dove Holiday 2020 print Also Blek Anarchist rat And Ernest Zacharevic Rage against the machine, or Splash and Burn ...ideally in EU Thanks in advance !
|
|