|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by mariorossitana on Feb 22, 2017 20:15:48 GMT 1, Hey guys
I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy.
The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one!
For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance.
Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.com
Payment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery
Hey guys I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy. The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one! For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance. Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.comPayment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery
|
|
dreadnatty
Junior Member
Posts โข 5,431
Likes โข 6,992
February 2013
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by dreadnatty on Feb 22, 2017 20:36:31 GMT 1, Hey guys I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy. The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one! For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance. Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.comPayment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery Where they purchased from the source? If not, Daniel Silk can you please do something here - its the 2nd time he has tried this?
Hey guys I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy. The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one! For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance. Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.comPayment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery Where they purchased from the source? If not, Daniel Silk can you please do something here - its the 2nd time he has tried this?
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Lroy on Feb 22, 2017 22:19:10 GMT 1, Hey guys I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy. The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one! For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance. Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.comPayment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery Where they purchased from the source? If not,ย Daniel Silk can you please do something here - its the 2nd time he has tried this? no my friend third time ! Enough is enough this guy is mocking us... ahaha , we can laugh too too Italian bro !
Hey guys I sell my last 6 Clet Abraham artworks, from Rome, Italy. The price for one artwork is just 300โฌ!!! Discount if you take more than one! For the haters I repeat that cartels were purchased from a friend / acquaintance. Please contact me in my private email address for info: mario.rossitana@gmail.comPayment secured by PayPal or cash on delivery Where they purchased from the source? If not,ย Daniel Silk can you please do something here - its the 2nd time he has tried this? no my friend third time ! Enough is enough this guy is mocking us... ahaha , we can laugh too too Italian bro !
|
|
thugs
New Member
Posts โข 377
Likes โข 577
November 2016
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by thugs on Feb 22, 2017 23:23:25 GMT 1, hey mario!
sei un parasita, vai a fan culo.
hey mario!
sei un parasita, vai a fan culo.
|
|
sl
New Member
Posts โข 460
Likes โข 241
September 2016
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by sl on Feb 23, 2017 0:46:02 GMT 1, Another stencil on street sign how original
Another stencil on street sign how original
|
|
WOOF
Junior Member
Posts โข 4,462
Likes โข 4,757
March 2014
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by WOOF on Feb 23, 2017 0:49:09 GMT 1, Personally, I wouldn't buy a piece stolen off the streets. I wouldn't recommend anyone doing it either.
Personally, I wouldn't buy a piece stolen off the streets. I wouldn't recommend anyone doing it either.
|
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Lroy on Feb 23, 2017 8:30:51 GMT 1, no my friend third time ! Enough is enough this guy is mocking us... ahaha , we can laugh too too Italian bro ! Someone can give his contact and email address to Clet Abraham directly.
Bah, what can Clet do ? Nothing. Apart blacklisted him if el ragazzo wants to buy a panel. It's not a rob. Or it's a rob only for the police. But police maybe does not care and who will call the police ? No me !! Painting on sign roads , walls , etc ... is a crime. And Banksy always knows that ( and stay anonymous ) . The forum could just be attacked for concealment of stolen artworks ( sic , or stolen sign roads - double lol But who cares in fact ? As said a memebet if it was Banksy street signs ;-D ... But Clet..,,,
no my friend third time ! Enough is enough this guy is mocking us... ahaha , we can laugh too too Italian bro ! Someone can give his contact and email address to Clet Abraham directly. Bah, what can Clet do ? Nothing. Apart blacklisted him if el ragazzo wants to buy a panel. It's not a rob. Or it's a rob only for the police. But police maybe does not care and who will call the police ? No me !! Painting on sign roads , walls , etc ... is a crime. And Banksy always knows that ( and stay anonymous ) . The forum could just be attacked for concealment of stolen artworks ( sic , or stolen sign roads - double lol But who cares in fact ? As said a memebet if it was Banksy street signs ;-D ... But Clet..,,,
|
|
bustart
Artist
New Member
Posts โข 156
Likes โข 119
September 2015
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by bustart on Feb 23, 2017 11:34:30 GMT 1, this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad
this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad
|
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 11:47:23 GMT 1, Abraham prmotes himself via his stickers and makes money from it. Someone removes the sign with the sticker and sells it to make money. It's just a reflection on todays get rich quick flip society where some rules only apply to some people. Regardless of legalities.
Abraham prmotes himself via his stickers and makes money from it. Someone removes the sign with the sticker and sells it to make money. It's just a reflection on todays get rich quick flip society where some rules only apply to some people. Regardless of legalities.
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by SturbanHasSaggyTits on Feb 23, 2017 11:56:16 GMT 1, this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad
Yep, very sad. Sold on a forum supposedly for street art lovers. Not sure why Daniel Silk is allowing sales like this here. Congrats buyers! Enjoy your unauthenticated road signs and if you missed out, I'm sure this seller will be back with more pieces soon.
this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad Yep, very sad. Sold on a forum supposedly for street art lovers. Not sure why Daniel Silk is allowing sales like this here. Congrats buyers! Enjoy your unauthenticated road signs and if you missed out, I'm sure this seller will be back with more pieces soon.
|
|
phischa
New Member
Posts โข 689
Likes โข 543
May 2015
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by phischa on Feb 23, 2017 12:14:11 GMT 1, this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad Yep, very sad. Sold on a forum supposedly for street art lovers. Not sure why Daniel Silk is allowing sales like this here. Congrats buyers! Enjoy your unauthenticated road signs and if you missed out, I'm sure this seller will be back with more pieces soon. I remember how happy I've been finding the road signs when I was in Paris last year. For me, this is Street Art at its best. In the context of a Urban Art Forum it doesn't matter if it's legal or not to screw off road signs, it's the lack of ethic of a street art fan to sell or buy stolen art pieces.
this guy is funny.. but did he had not more signs to sell last time?.... looks like he sold some already... not so funny... #sad Yep, very sad. Sold on a forum supposedly for street art lovers. Not sure why Daniel Silk is allowing sales like this here. Congrats buyers! Enjoy your unauthenticated road signs and if you missed out, I'm sure this seller will be back with more pieces soon. I remember how happy I've been finding the road signs when I was in Paris last year. For me, this is Street Art at its best. In the context of a Urban Art Forum it doesn't matter if it's legal or not to screw off road signs, it's the lack of ethic of a street art fan to sell or buy stolen art pieces.
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Rouen Cathedral on Feb 23, 2017 15:32:40 GMT 1, Can someone explain this to me:
Artist illegal creates street art. Fan illegally takes street art. Fan 'illegally' sells street art. (Notices quotation)
Isn't this just part of street art? Not sure I completely get the outrage of someone 'illegally' selling something they took illegally done by someone who did it illegally? :-)
Can someone explain this to me:
Artist illegal creates street art. Fan illegally takes street art. Fan 'illegally' sells street art. (Notices quotation)
Isn't this just part of street art? Not sure I completely get the outrage of someone 'illegally' selling something they took illegally done by someone who did it illegally? :-)
|
|
Harveyn
Forum Guardian
Full Member
Posts โข 7,726
Likes โข 4,888
Member is Online
July 2007
Staff Member
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Harveyn on Feb 23, 2017 15:35:31 GMT 1, Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free.
Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free.
|
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Happy Shopper on Feb 23, 2017 15:36:15 GMT 1, Can someone explain this to me: Artist illegal creates street art. Fan illegally takes street art. Fan 'illegally' sells street art. (Notices quotation) Isn't this just part of street art? Not sure I completely get the outrage of someone 'illegally' selling something they took illegally done by someone who did it illegally? :-) I think it's that people would rather street art was left on the street. But people stealing these off the street is fairly inevitable when the versions the artist sells in galleries are pretty identical!
Can someone explain this to me: Artist illegal creates street art. Fan illegally takes street art. Fan 'illegally' sells street art. (Notices quotation) Isn't this just part of street art? Not sure I completely get the outrage of someone 'illegally' selling something they took illegally done by someone who did it illegally? :-) I think it's that people would rather street art was left on the street. But people stealing these off the street is fairly inevitable when the versions the artist sells in galleries are pretty identical!
|
|
avec art
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,727
Likes โข 3,061
March 2014
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by avec art on Feb 23, 2017 15:41:11 GMT 1, because ethics and law are not always the same thing.
because ethics and law are not always the same thing.
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Rouen Cathedral on Feb 23, 2017 15:42:01 GMT 1, Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free.
That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist.
So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public?
Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist. So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public?
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Rouen Cathedral on Feb 23, 2017 15:43:08 GMT 1, because ethics and law are not always the same thing.
I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't?
because ethics and law are not always the same thing. I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't?
|
|
phischa
New Member
Posts โข 689
Likes โข 543
May 2015
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by phischa on Feb 23, 2017 15:55:34 GMT 1, because ethics and law are not always the same thing. I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't? legal or not legal is not the question imho. Stealing street art is like picking flowers in a botanic garden for your dining room table.
because ethics and law are not always the same thing. I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't? legal or not legal is not the question imho. Stealing street art is like picking flowers in a botanic garden for your dining room table.
|
|
Harveyn
Forum Guardian
Full Member
Posts โข 7,726
Likes โข 4,888
Member is Online
July 2007
Staff Member
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Harveyn on Feb 23, 2017 16:01:47 GMT 1, Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist. So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public? Interesting points.
On Mr Abraham's contribution to society or intended contribution I would say that unless the artists intent was to place works illegally/legally on the street to be removed by any 3rd party then they should remain there irrespective of the actual intent (fame/fortune/public benefit etc).
On a commissioned Caravaggio I guess the answer is the same except in that case it should be the preference of the client that should dictate the location or change of location of the artwork unless the artist has specifically produced the work on the understanding that its original intended use would remain so.
Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist. So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public? Interesting points.
On Mr Abraham's contribution to society or intended contribution I would say that unless the artists intent was to place works illegally/legally on the street to be removed by any 3rd party then they should remain there irrespective of the actual intent (fame/fortune/public benefit etc).
On a commissioned Caravaggio I guess the answer is the same except in that case it should be the preference of the client that should dictate the location or change of location of the artwork unless the artist has specifically produced the work on the understanding that its original intended use would remain so.
|
|
avec art
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,727
Likes โข 3,061
March 2014
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by avec art on Feb 23, 2017 16:18:48 GMT 1, I made the point about ethics, as you had initially made comparisons between the two things as they are both illegal. So I was simply pointing out that they are not necessarily, morally the same issues, just because they are both illegal in the eyes of the law.
I was trying to help answer your question about how someone can be outraged, by illegally placed art being taken off the streets and sold. I was not actually taking sides, and I quite agree with your later point that people have different ethics.
I made the point about ethics, as you had initially made comparisons between the two things as they are both illegal. So I was simply pointing out that they are not necessarily, morally the same issues, just because they are both illegal in the eyes of the law.
I was trying to help answer your question about how someone can be outraged, by illegally placed art being taken off the streets and sold. I was not actually taking sides, and I quite agree with your later point that people have different ethics.
|
|
Dr Plip
Junior Member
Posts โข 7,043
Likes โข 8,981
August 2011
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Dr Plip on Feb 23, 2017 16:49:57 GMT 1, because ethics and law are not always the same thing. I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't?
because ethics and law are not always the same thing. I guess but who's to say the ethics of the artist illegally creating the art is okay while the ethics of the person illegally taking it isn't?
|
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Rouen Cathedral on Feb 23, 2017 16:57:35 GMT 1, That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist. So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public? Interesting points.
On Mr Abraham's contribution to society or intended contribution I would say that unless the artists intent was to place works illegally/legally on the street to be removed by any 3rd party then they should remain there irrespective of theย actual intent (fame/fortune/public benefitย etc).
On a commissioned Caravaggio I guess the answer is the same except in that case it should be the preference of the client that should dictate the location or change of location of the artwork unless the artist has specifically produced the work on the understanding that its original intended use would remain so.
Yeah it is interesting to think about. I guess in the terms of street art there really is not a client. So it would make sense that if the client of the Caravaggio made a decision to move it that's their perogative. However, the 'ownership' of those types of historical works im sure are a lot more complicated in reality.
But in similarity to street art I'd imagine many religious commissions were seen as 'donations to the spiritual world' in the artists eyes regardless of who paid the bill. To me it would appear as if relocating these pieces should be viewed as just as big of a 'crime'.
That's interesting. The intention or purpose of the artist. So what do we make of a commissioned Caravaggio intended for a display in a private religious space, but now relocated to a gallery for the public? Interesting points.
On Mr Abraham's contribution to society or intended contribution I would say that unless the artists intent was to place works illegally/legally on the street to be removed by any 3rd party then they should remain there irrespective of theย actual intent (fame/fortune/public benefitย etc).
On a commissioned Caravaggio I guess the answer is the same except in that case it should be the preference of the client that should dictate the location or change of location of the artwork unless the artist has specifically produced the work on the understanding that its original intended use would remain so.
Yeah it is interesting to think about. I guess in the terms of street art there really is not a client. So it would make sense that if the client of the Caravaggio made a decision to move it that's their perogative. However, the 'ownership' of those types of historical works im sure are a lot more complicated in reality. But in similarity to street art I'd imagine many religious commissions were seen as 'donations to the spiritual world' in the artists eyes regardless of who paid the bill. To me it would appear as if relocating these pieces should be viewed as just as big of a 'crime'.
|
|
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Lroy on Feb 23, 2017 18:14:17 GMT 1, Wow great debate - since a long time here ! - at the bus stop ! And coming from a stealer of sign roads ( I have nothing against Clet ( that abuses of the " method " and sells in its gallery in the Marais Paris, some roads sign at outrageous prices ) , but one, or two for me is enough and nobody has the talent of a Banksy sign road like the one for the 09/11, a masterpiece ! ! Anyway...
" Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. " said Harveyn
I am not sure about the " enjoy " .
Some people hate that ( not me ) - Graffiti writers per example - Or make a hierarchy in the graffti/street-art, as Eine that condamned Tox at a moment etc..
I am a bit fed up of conventionnal, beautiful and comissionned big murals that make me think to propaganda style in URSS decades ago or some Corean paintings of the Sung family .
I think that most of street-artists ( a lot of French ones per example ) are making street-art to gain notoriety, for their own and to satisfy their nacissism ( as a lot of artists ) , for themselves before all. Others to gain money... and a few, a lot ( ? ) , I am agree, to give food for brain, and/or quotes, slogans to wake up the passerby ! because, almost all its a passion !
Wow great debate - since a long time here ! - at the bus stop ! And coming from a stealer of sign roads ( I have nothing against Clet ( that abuses of the " method " and sells in its gallery in the Marais Paris, some roads sign at outrageous prices ) , but one, or two for me is enough and nobody has the talent of a Banksy sign road like the one for the 09/11, a masterpiece ! ! Anyway...
" Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. " said Harveyn
I am not sure about the " enjoy " .
Some people hate that ( not me ) - Graffiti writers per example - Or make a hierarchy in the graffti/street-art, as Eine that condamned Tox at a moment etc..
I am a bit fed up of conventionnal, beautiful and comissionned big murals that make me think to propaganda style in URSS decades ago or some Corean paintings of the Sung family .
I think that most of street-artists ( a lot of French ones per example ) are making street-art to gain notoriety, for their own and to satisfy their nacissism ( as a lot of artists ) , for themselves before all. Others to gain money... and a few, a lot ( ? ) , I am agree, to give food for brain, and/or quotes, slogans to wake up the passerby ! because, almost all its a passion !
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 19:55:20 GMT 1, A Caravaggio that was in a church for centuries for the "benefit of the people" and then moved to a museum or gallery because the poor church cannot afford security for a painting worth millions I can understand. Even though the Caravaggio and other art was painted for the church as a form of smoke and mirrors advertising religious doctrines and texts and paid for with money donated by often the poor and the mainstream religions have billions in the form of land and money in banks etc.
I guess thats similar in some ways to some of these very wealthy artists who create crowdfunding campaigns to get people to donate money to them.
There will always be thieves and people who sell stuff that fell off the back of a lorry. There is always the grey area stuff as in removing street ar and selling it.
Street art is only illegal if a property owner decides to make a complaint to the police. When it's done on private property. Public property depends on whether a local council sees it as vandalism or as harmless and decorative. It's also a fact of life that certain locations like motorway underpasses etc will always get tagged.
I doubt there is anything Clet can do regarding the signs if he stickered them without permission and I doubt it cost him any money or time to produce the stickers and slap them on the signs. It probably took more time to google images and get ideas in order to come up with stickers. I can see that removing and selling street signs with or without stickers can be a criminal offence in it's own right.
Personally I see no commercial value in any street art removed from the street and people who put a value on it and sell it to very mega rich collectors probably move in circles where reality and value exists in their tiny bubble they live in.
I can see in the future a change in the law that if some dealer removes from the street , some street art and sells it for a big profit, it could be classed as looted art and the dealer made to compensate the artist. So far that type of law does not exist because street art is classed as vandalism even though many property owners do not bother making any type of report of vandalism.
As for morals and unwritten laws. It's part of todays culture that we turn a blind eye to what suits us. I don't see many people who buy their whatever recreational drug of their choice caring about all the misery and violence that is part of the chain of events that they contribute to for their fix of happy ness.
A Caravaggio that was in a church for centuries for the "benefit of the people" and then moved to a museum or gallery because the poor church cannot afford security for a painting worth millions I can understand. Even though the Caravaggio and other art was painted for the church as a form of smoke and mirrors advertising religious doctrines and texts and paid for with money donated by often the poor and the mainstream religions have billions in the form of land and money in banks etc.
I guess thats similar in some ways to some of these very wealthy artists who create crowdfunding campaigns to get people to donate money to them.
There will always be thieves and people who sell stuff that fell off the back of a lorry. There is always the grey area stuff as in removing street ar and selling it.
Street art is only illegal if a property owner decides to make a complaint to the police. When it's done on private property. Public property depends on whether a local council sees it as vandalism or as harmless and decorative. It's also a fact of life that certain locations like motorway underpasses etc will always get tagged.
I doubt there is anything Clet can do regarding the signs if he stickered them without permission and I doubt it cost him any money or time to produce the stickers and slap them on the signs. It probably took more time to google images and get ideas in order to come up with stickers. I can see that removing and selling street signs with or without stickers can be a criminal offence in it's own right.
Personally I see no commercial value in any street art removed from the street and people who put a value on it and sell it to very mega rich collectors probably move in circles where reality and value exists in their tiny bubble they live in.
I can see in the future a change in the law that if some dealer removes from the street , some street art and sells it for a big profit, it could be classed as looted art and the dealer made to compensate the artist. So far that type of law does not exist because street art is classed as vandalism even though many property owners do not bother making any type of report of vandalism.
As for morals and unwritten laws. It's part of todays culture that we turn a blind eye to what suits us. I don't see many people who buy their whatever recreational drug of their choice caring about all the misery and violence that is part of the chain of events that they contribute to for their fix of happy ness.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 20:06:54 GMT 1, Wow great debate - since a long time here ! - at the bus stop ! And coming from a stealer of sign roads ( I have nothing against Clet ( that abuses of the " method " and sells in its gallery in the Marais Paris, some roads sign at outrageous prices ) , but one, or two for me is enough and nobody has the talent of a Banksy sign road like the one for the 09/11, a masterpiece ! ! Anyway... " Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. " said Harveyn I am not sure about the " enjoy " . Some people hate that ( not me ) - Graffiti writers per example - Or make a hierarchy in the graffti/street-art, as Eine that condamned Tox at a moment etc.. I am a bit fed up of conventionnal, beautiful and comissionned big murals that make me think to propaganda style in URSS decades ago or some Corean paintings of the Sung family . I think that most of street-artists ( a lot of French ones per example ) are making street-art to gain notoriety, for their own and to satisfy their nacissism ( as a lot of artists ) , for themselves before all. Others to gain money... and a few, a lot ( ? ) , I am agree, to give food for brain, and/or quotes, slogans to wake up the passerby ! because, almost all its a passion ! There are some great artists making art in the streets and for the right reasons , like Swoon and others.
I think some illustrators have decided to make art on the streets in order to sell their art as prints etc through galleries and promote it.
I think there could be a prima donna ego thing going on with some and some could have slightly sociopathic tendencies too. Altho I would think it's taggers who are the sociopaths. There again artists have often not been totally conformist or considered normal by many.
Monsieur Chat got arrested and jailed in France even though he had been doing his cat for years without problems. Apparently he hit the wrong piece of French railway property or something like that.
www.lemonde.fr/arts/article/2016/09/22/trois-mois-de-prison-ferme-requis-contre-l-artiste-m-chat_5002028_1655012.html
Wow great debate - since a long time here ! - at the bus stop ! And coming from a stealer of sign roads ( I have nothing against Clet ( that abuses of the " method " and sells in its gallery in the Marais Paris, some roads sign at outrageous prices ) , but one, or two for me is enough and nobody has the talent of a Banksy sign road like the one for the 09/11, a masterpiece ! ! Anyway... " Because it was meant to be enjoyed by more than one person for free. " said Harveyn I am not sure about the " enjoy " . Some people hate that ( not me ) - Graffiti writers per example - Or make a hierarchy in the graffti/street-art, as Eine that condamned Tox at a moment etc.. I am a bit fed up of conventionnal, beautiful and comissionned big murals that make me think to propaganda style in URSS decades ago or some Corean paintings of the Sung family . I think that most of street-artists ( a lot of French ones per example ) are making street-art to gain notoriety, for their own and to satisfy their nacissism ( as a lot of artists ) , for themselves before all. Others to gain money... and a few, a lot ( ? ) , I am agree, to give food for brain, and/or quotes, slogans to wake up the passerby ! because, almost all its a passion ! There are some great artists making art in the streets and for the right reasons , like Swoon and others. I think some illustrators have decided to make art on the streets in order to sell their art as prints etc through galleries and promote it. I think there could be a prima donna ego thing going on with some and some could have slightly sociopathic tendencies too. Altho I would think it's taggers who are the sociopaths. There again artists have often not been totally conformist or considered normal by many. Monsieur Chat got arrested and jailed in France even though he had been doing his cat for years without problems. Apparently he hit the wrong piece of French railway property or something like that. www.lemonde.fr/arts/article/2016/09/22/trois-mois-de-prison-ferme-requis-contre-l-artiste-m-chat_5002028_1655012.html
|
|
bustart
Artist
New Member
Posts โข 156
Likes โข 119
September 2015
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by bustart on Feb 23, 2017 20:25:20 GMT 1, lets make one thing clear, putting up a vinyl sticker on a metal sign is not that much of a "vandalism" it can be cleaned with no marks left behind and as long as it don`t damages the surface you only get a fine for illegal advertisement and if you have knowledge or a lawyer you get away with no fine. and stealing a street sign is... stealing and thats a whole other thing than putting up a sticker...
lets make one thing clear, putting up a vinyl sticker on a metal sign is not that much of a "vandalism" it can be cleaned with no marks left behind and as long as it don`t damages the surface you only get a fine for illegal advertisement and if you have knowledge or a lawyer you get away with no fine. and stealing a street sign is... stealing and thats a whole other thing than putting up a sticker...
|
|
agu
New Member
Posts โข 317
Likes โข 332
February 2016
|
CLET ABRAHAM artworks, by agu on Feb 23, 2017 21:29:51 GMT 1,
Kidlut is not one of these people ...surely.
Kidlut is not one of these people ...surely.
|
|