|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by Daniel Silk on Jun 26, 2006 17:14:49 GMT 1, Graffiti - is it ART?
Watch this video and then let us know what you think
Graffiti - is it ART? Watch this video and then let us know what you think
|
|
gm
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 950
๐๐ป 15
February 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by gm on Jun 27, 2006 10:26:52 GMT 1, I lasted about 2 minutes. Those bits where it zooms in and out really fast were making me feel dizzy.
It all depends on your definition of "Art" tho, doesn't it?
I lasted about 2 minutes. Those bits where it zooms in and out really fast were making me feel dizzy.
It all depends on your definition of "Art" tho, doesn't it?
|
|
spence
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 163
๐๐ป 1
January 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by spence on Jun 27, 2006 15:58:40 GMT 1, I agree with what is said in the film. Tagging is a pain in the arse, is a mess and makes places look run down. Normally done by bored teenagers. Not so much of it where i live but my mate lives in london and is plaqued with rubbish daubed over his garage. As soon as he cleans it off some t**t taggs it again. POINTLESS!! Any idiot can scrall a name on a wall.
Graffiti to me is art when pictures are made than can brightenn up an area or used to make a statement etc. Always done by people with a talent of which i'm jealous. I can't even draw a match stick man.
I agree with what is said in the film. Tagging is a pain in the arse, is a mess and makes places look run down. Normally done by bored teenagers. Not so much of it where i live but my mate lives in london and is plaqued with rubbish daubed over his garage. As soon as he cleans it off some t**t taggs it again. POINTLESS!! Any idiot can scrall a name on a wall. Graffiti to me is art when pictures are made than can brightenn up an area or used to make a statement etc. Always done by people with a talent of which i'm jealous. I can't even draw a match stick man.
|
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Jun 30, 2006 17:14:28 GMT 1, Not always art....and certainly not this example. But if not art then irony always goes a long way! Made me chuckle anyway ;D
Not always art....and certainly not this example. But if not art then irony always goes a long way! Made me chuckle anyway ;D
|
|
Run Pig Run
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,437
๐๐ป 9
January 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by Run Pig Run on Jun 30, 2006 19:59:32 GMT 1, that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it?
that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it?
|
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Jun 30, 2006 20:13:44 GMT 1, that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it?
hey hey, did it last Saturday night ;D it's in Stavanger Norway ;D stood there today and watched the police and highway department unscrewing it to take it away ;D
that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it? hey hey, did it last Saturday night ;D it's in Stavanger Norway ;D stood there today and watched the police and highway department unscrewing it to take it away ;D
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by funkrye on Jun 30, 2006 20:30:47 GMT 1, At least we all saw the photo's and enjoyed it.. Good stuff
|
|
LoveRat
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 467
๐๐ป 0
January 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by LoveRat on Jul 1, 2006 10:40:12 GMT 1, that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it? hey hey, did it last Saturday night ;D it's in Stavanger Norway ;D stood there today and watched the police and highway department unscrewing it to take it away ;D
So you're a wanted man now , Numusic ? The police AND the highway dept , how many does it take to unscrew a road sign ? Theres probably a joke in there somewhere.
that men at work roadsign thing is one of the most amazing things ive ever seen...........where is it? hey hey, did it last Saturday night ;D it's in Stavanger Norway ;D stood there today and watched the police and highway department unscrewing it to take it away ;D So you're a wanted man now , Numusic ? The police AND the highway dept , how many does it take to unscrew a road sign ? Theres probably a joke in there somewhere.
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by monochrome on Jul 2, 2006 16:03:38 GMT 1, am i thought you hated 'hearts' and sentimental stuff lol
am i thought you hated 'hearts' and sentimental stuff lol
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Jul 2, 2006 17:20:21 GMT 1, am i thought you hated 'hearts' and sentimental stuff lol
labour of love, heart = hard work ;D,i rest my case !
am i thought you hated 'hearts' and sentimental stuff lol labour of love, heart = hard work ;D,i rest my case !
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Jul 7, 2006 1:13:48 GMT 1,
strange you should say that.. he did that piece on the side of my venue in Stavanger last year ;-)
strange you should say that.. he did that piece on the side of my venue in Stavanger last year ;-)
|
|
digital1
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 4
๐๐ป 0
August 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by digital1 on Aug 7, 2006 19:02:31 GMT 1, ..... if not art then irony always goes a long way!
isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?
That Labour of Love is a fine piece.
..... if not art then irony always goes a long way! isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?That Labour of Love is a fine piece.
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Aug 7, 2006 20:03:29 GMT 1, ..... if not art then irony always goes a long way! isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?Yes Irony is important, I just meant that the piece next to the "CCTV" message I posted was high in irony stakes, but just not "art" (i.e tagger scum!)
..... if not art then irony always goes a long way! isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?Yes Irony is important, I just meant that the piece next to the "CCTV" message I posted was high in irony stakes, but just not "art" (i.e tagger scum!)
|
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Aug 7, 2006 20:19:15 GMT 1, ..... if not art then irony always goes a long way! isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?That Labour of Love is a fine piece.
Cheers ;D ;D
..... if not art then irony always goes a long way! isn't the irony often almost as important as the image?That Labour of Love is a fine piece.Cheers ;D ;D
|
|
upnose
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 2
๐๐ป 0
December 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by upnose on Dec 31, 2006 13:57:34 GMT 1, Graffiti will always be vandlism. Even if its pritty
Graffiti will always be vandlism. Even if its pritty
|
|
thwaites
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 618
๐๐ป 0
October 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by thwaites on Dec 31, 2006 14:09:02 GMT 1, I disagree, the term vandalism connotes a mindless barbaric act, which although is true of some graffiti, is definitely not of others.
I disagree, the term vandalism connotes a mindless barbaric act, which although is true of some graffiti, is definitely not of others.
|
|
ABC
Artist
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,533
๐๐ป 1,923
August 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by ABC on Jan 1, 2007 17:56:29 GMT 1, Tagging is vandalism full stop. but Graffiti takes a while to plan and in my view its art. what is the difference between Paper, canvas or a wall? Nothing they start of blank, throw paint on then you have art. Basic veiw but dont want to go to deep tonight. I used to have these chats at art college with the lecturers they said Vandalism I said art, they said tomado I said tomato. You get the picture
Tagging is vandalism full stop. but Graffiti takes a while to plan and in my view its art. what is the difference between Paper, canvas or a wall? Nothing they start of blank, throw paint on then you have art. Basic veiw but dont want to go to deep tonight. I used to have these chats at art college with the lecturers they said Vandalism I said art, they said tomado I said tomato. You get the picture
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by ร
gent รacardi on Jan 1, 2007 23:22:32 GMT 1, Well as to the question of whether graffiti is vandalism or art, I say it's both. Art is generally defined as "the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance", and since "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", therein lies the arbitrary line between its status as vandalism or art. It's art when it's aesthetically pleasing and desirable, and it's vandalism when it's not so visually pleasing, lacks any meanings/messages whatsoever, and is generally unwanted. That being said, any given piece can be interpreted as vandalism or art according to the viewer's tastes and/or preferences. It's completely subjective. While many of us will probably say that tagging is a nuisance and not art, I'm sure there will be people who will think otherwise. Context is very important too, a Banksy piece in some snooty place like Beverly Hills will probably never be considered as "art" (assuming, for the sake of argument, that nobody in that area knows who he is and couldn't care less). But in a young/hip place such as Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles, it'll definitely be a welcome contribution, and will likely be perceived as art by the people who frequent that area.
Personally, I think that if you're a graffiti writer but don't have the skills/creativity/good ideas, then you don't deserve to use public spaces as your canvas if you're trying to pass off as an artist. A big part of graffiti is its audience; if nobody's ever going to see what you write, then you probably won't write it unless you're plain bored and/or drunk. Public space is a public forum, so if you want to make use of it to express something, you'd better have something good to present. Otherwise, you're just wasting peoples' time and being a public nuisance, and you'll be regarded as a vandal and not an artist. It's like street busking - one could ask if it's art or noise pollution, and the distinction will lie in how good the busker is, and also if he/she is at the right place and the right time to hit his/her target audience. So IMO, street art contributes to a wisely chosen strata of society if it's good (art), and it's a nuisance if it's totally pointless and aesthetically unpleasant (vandalism).
Well as to the question of whether graffiti is vandalism or art, I say it's both. Art is generally defined as "the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance", and since "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", therein lies the arbitrary line between its status as vandalism or art. It's art when it's aesthetically pleasing and desirable, and it's vandalism when it's not so visually pleasing, lacks any meanings/messages whatsoever, and is generally unwanted. That being said, any given piece can be interpreted as vandalism or art according to the viewer's tastes and/or preferences. It's completely subjective. While many of us will probably say that tagging is a nuisance and not art, I'm sure there will be people who will think otherwise. Context is very important too, a Banksy piece in some snooty place like Beverly Hills will probably never be considered as "art" (assuming, for the sake of argument, that nobody in that area knows who he is and couldn't care less). But in a young/hip place such as Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles, it'll definitely be a welcome contribution, and will likely be perceived as art by the people who frequent that area.
Personally, I think that if you're a graffiti writer but don't have the skills/creativity/good ideas, then you don't deserve to use public spaces as your canvas if you're trying to pass off as an artist. A big part of graffiti is its audience; if nobody's ever going to see what you write, then you probably won't write it unless you're plain bored and/or drunk. Public space is a public forum, so if you want to make use of it to express something, you'd better have something good to present. Otherwise, you're just wasting peoples' time and being a public nuisance, and you'll be regarded as a vandal and not an artist. It's like street busking - one could ask if it's art or noise pollution, and the distinction will lie in how good the busker is, and also if he/she is at the right place and the right time to hit his/her target audience. So IMO, street art contributes to a wisely chosen strata of society if it's good (art), and it's a nuisance if it's totally pointless and aesthetically unpleasant (vandalism).
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Jan 1, 2007 23:26:26 GMT 1, Note to AgentB.....2007 is the year of short non babbling posting ;D
Note to AgentB.....2007 is the year of short non babbling posting ;D
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by ร
gent รacardi on Jan 1, 2007 23:38:32 GMT 1, That was a short, non-babbling post.
;D
Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right?
That was a short, non-babbling post. ;D Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right?
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Jan 2, 2007 0:05:55 GMT 1, That was a short, non-babbling post. ;D Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right?
Okay, good point. I'll bugger off and leave you to it then ;D
And it's mostly thanks to you that this forum stays readable!! Top job for 2006 BTW.
That was a short, non-babbling post. ;D Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right? Okay, good point. I'll bugger off and leave you to it then ;D And it's mostly thanks to you that this forum stays readable!! Top job for 2006 BTW.
|
|
|
thwaites
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 618
๐๐ป 0
October 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by thwaites on Jan 2, 2007 0:22:45 GMT 1, That was a short, non-babbling post. ;D Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right? Okay, good point. I'll bugger off and leave you to it then ;D And it's mostly thanks to you that this forum stays readable!! Top job for 2006 BTW.
very true! lets here it for agentb! and howaboutno as well now lovely chaps
That was a short, non-babbling post. ;D Can't have a decent and thoughtful discussion with just a sentence... after all, this forum is more than just "When will Trolleys be released?", right? Okay, good point. I'll bugger off and leave you to it then ;D And it's mostly thanks to you that this forum stays readable!! Top job for 2006 BTW. very true! lets here it for agentb! and howaboutno as well now lovely chaps
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Jan 2, 2007 0:25:58 GMT 1, Well as to the question of whether graffiti is vandalism or art, I say it's both. Art is generally defined as "the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance", and since "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", therein lies the arbitrary line between its status as vandalism or art. It's art when it's aesthetically pleasing and desirable, and it's vandalism when it's not so visually pleasing, lacks any meanings/messages whatsoever, and is generally unwanted. That being said, any given piece can be interpreted as vandalism or art according to the viewer's tastes and/or preferences. It's completely subjective. While many of us will probably say that tagging is a nuisance and not art, I'm sure there will be people who will think otherwise. Context is very important too, a Banksy piece in some snooty place like Beverly Hills will probably never be considered as "art" (assuming, for the sake of argument, that nobody in that area knows who he is and couldn't care less). But in a young/hip place such as Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles, it'll definitely be a welcome contribution, and will likely be perceived as art by the people who frequent that area. Personally, I think that if you're a graffiti writer but don't have the skills/creativity/good ideas, then you don't deserve to use public spaces as your canvas if you're trying to pass off as an artist. A big part of graffiti is its audience; if nobody's ever going to see what you write, then you probably won't write it unless you're plain bored and/or drunk. Public space is a public forum, so if you want to make use of it to express something, you'd better have something good to present. Otherwise, you're just wasting peoples' time and being a public nuisance, and you'll be regarded as a vandal and not an artist. It's like street busking - one could ask if it's art or noise pollution, and the distinction will lie in how good the busker is, and also if he/she is at the right place and the right time to hit his/her target audience. So IMO, street art contributes to a wisely chosen strata of society if it's good (art), and it's a nuisance if it's totally pointless and aesthetically unpleasant (vandalism).
Interesting interpretation, but your definition of 'good' (art) & 'aesthetically unpleasant' is somewhat flawed.. it would leave an awfully large gap in art history. Most of interest generally challenges the 'status quo', throughout the ages new forms of expression have caused outrage and horror, the shock of the new.
Individual tags can be challenging, but taken collectively as a whole, it's quite an amazing movement and one that led directly to graffiti. The sketch to a painting perhaps. I guess there are different types of 'tagging', kids with pens writing on anything and everything without any cultural reference points to graf, and those others who see it as a precursor and legitimate type of graffiti.
Both equally important and intersting from a socio-cultural perspective. But it's not art, much closer to a form of urban caligraphy. Art is what artists do, for want of a better word.
Well as to the question of whether graffiti is vandalism or art, I say it's both. Art is generally defined as "the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance", and since "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", therein lies the arbitrary line between its status as vandalism or art. It's art when it's aesthetically pleasing and desirable, and it's vandalism when it's not so visually pleasing, lacks any meanings/messages whatsoever, and is generally unwanted. That being said, any given piece can be interpreted as vandalism or art according to the viewer's tastes and/or preferences. It's completely subjective. While many of us will probably say that tagging is a nuisance and not art, I'm sure there will be people who will think otherwise. Context is very important too, a Banksy piece in some snooty place like Beverly Hills will probably never be considered as "art" (assuming, for the sake of argument, that nobody in that area knows who he is and couldn't care less). But in a young/hip place such as Melrose Avenue in Los Angeles, it'll definitely be a welcome contribution, and will likely be perceived as art by the people who frequent that area. Personally, I think that if you're a graffiti writer but don't have the skills/creativity/good ideas, then you don't deserve to use public spaces as your canvas if you're trying to pass off as an artist. A big part of graffiti is its audience; if nobody's ever going to see what you write, then you probably won't write it unless you're plain bored and/or drunk. Public space is a public forum, so if you want to make use of it to express something, you'd better have something good to present. Otherwise, you're just wasting peoples' time and being a public nuisance, and you'll be regarded as a vandal and not an artist. It's like street busking - one could ask if it's art or noise pollution, and the distinction will lie in how good the busker is, and also if he/she is at the right place and the right time to hit his/her target audience. So IMO, street art contributes to a wisely chosen strata of society if it's good (art), and it's a nuisance if it's totally pointless and aesthetically unpleasant (vandalism). Interesting interpretation, but your definition of 'good' (art) & 'aesthetically unpleasant' is somewhat flawed.. it would leave an awfully large gap in art history. Most of interest generally challenges the 'status quo', throughout the ages new forms of expression have caused outrage and horror, the shock of the new. Individual tags can be challenging, but taken collectively as a whole, it's quite an amazing movement and one that led directly to graffiti. The sketch to a painting perhaps. I guess there are different types of 'tagging', kids with pens writing on anything and everything without any cultural reference points to graf, and those others who see it as a precursor and legitimate type of graffiti. Both equally important and intersting from a socio-cultural perspective. But it's not art, much closer to a form of urban caligraphy. Art is what artists do, for want of a better word.
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by ร
gent รacardi on Jan 2, 2007 0:34:52 GMT 1, Aw, I'm sure you guys are just exaggerating Thank you for the very kind words, all the same! *bows* ;D Been a real pleasure exchanging posts with you guys as well! And thwaites, remember... the moment it goes into the pooper... you know who to call
;D
Aw, I'm sure you guys are just exaggerating Thank you for the very kind words, all the same! *bows* ;D Been a real pleasure exchanging posts with you guys as well! And thwaites, remember... the moment it goes into the pooper... you know who to call ;D
|
|
gordy
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 320
๐๐ป 4
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by gordy on Jan 2, 2007 0:39:16 GMT 1, Apparently a slide is classed as art these days! ;D ;D
"For Carsten Hรถller, the experience of sliding is best summed up in a phrase by the French writer Roger Caillois as a 'voluptuous panic upon an otherwise lucid mind'. The slides are impressive sculptures in their own right, and you don't have to hurtle down them to appreciate this artwork. What interests Hรถller, however, is both the visual spectacle of watching people sliding and the 'inner spectacle' experienced by the sliders themselves, the state of simultaneous delight and anxiety that you enter as you descend."
If you get the chance get down there it is well worth a slide! ;D ;D
Apparently a slide is classed as art these days! ;D ;D
"For Carsten Hรถller, the experience of sliding is best summed up in a phrase by the French writer Roger Caillois as a 'voluptuous panic upon an otherwise lucid mind'. The slides are impressive sculptures in their own right, and you don't have to hurtle down them to appreciate this artwork. What interests Hรถller, however, is both the visual spectacle of watching people sliding and the 'inner spectacle' experienced by the sliders themselves, the state of simultaneous delight and anxiety that you enter as you descend."
If you get the chance get down there it is well worth a slide! ;D ;D
|
|
thwaites
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 618
๐๐ป 0
October 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by thwaites on Jan 2, 2007 0:41:41 GMT 1, heh! i will definately let you know. so.. have you got a rather large mansion over there in LA? if it does go down the pooper will i get to live a life of luxury?
Im watching a cool programme about damien hirst at the mo (channel 3) and it is showing all his art and he has a huge Napalm canvas, literally the size of a wall. he has a lovely old mansion castle. i want one.
heh! i will definately let you know. so.. have you got a rather large mansion over there in LA? if it does go down the pooper will i get to live a life of luxury? Im watching a cool programme about damien hirst at the mo (channel 3) and it is showing all his art and he has a huge Napalm canvas, literally the size of a wall. he has a lovely old mansion castle. i want one.
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Jan 2, 2007 0:43:38 GMT 1, And thwaites, remember... the moment it goes into the pooper... you know who to call ;D
Tart.
And thwaites, remember... the moment it goes into the pooper... you know who to call ;D Tart.
|
|
HowAboutNo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 756
๐๐ป 11
May 2006
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by HowAboutNo on Jan 2, 2007 0:47:40 GMT 1, Im watching a cool programme about damien hirst at the mo (channel 3) and it is showing all his art and he has a huge Napalm canvas, literally the size of a wall. he has a lovely old mansion castle. i want one.
You mean ITV Thwaites?? Life Of Brian is on here (and no Martin I still didn't watch it) And Eastenders is on BBC3???
Im watching a cool programme about damien hirst at the mo (channel 3) and it is showing all his art and he has a huge Napalm canvas, literally the size of a wall. he has a lovely old mansion castle. i want one. You mean ITV Thwaites?? Life Of Brian is on here (and no Martin I still didn't watch it) And Eastenders is on BBC3???
|
|
|
Graffiti - is it ART?, by numusic on Jan 2, 2007 0:51:17 GMT 1, Apparently a slide is classed as art these days! ;D ;D "For Carsten Hรถller, the experience of sliding is best summed up in a phrase by the French writer Roger Caillois as a 'voluptuous panic upon an otherwise lucid mind'. The slides are impressive sculptures in their own right, and you don't have to hurtle down them to appreciate this artwork. What interests Hรถller, however, is both the visual spectacle of watching people sliding and the 'inner spectacle' experienced by the sliders themselves, the state of simultaneous delight and anxiety that you enter as you descend." If you get the chance get down there it is well worth a slide! ;D ;D
Anyone into Banksy will also like the show on level 2, features some great artists including Peter Kennard
www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/mediaburn/default.shtm
Apparently a slide is classed as art these days! ;D ;D "For Carsten Hรถller, the experience of sliding is best summed up in a phrase by the French writer Roger Caillois as a 'voluptuous panic upon an otherwise lucid mind'. The slides are impressive sculptures in their own right, and you don't have to hurtle down them to appreciate this artwork. What interests Hรถller, however, is both the visual spectacle of watching people sliding and the 'inner spectacle' experienced by the sliders themselves, the state of simultaneous delight and anxiety that you enter as you descend." If you get the chance get down there it is well worth a slide! ;D ;D Anyone into Banksy will also like the show on level 2, features some great artists including Peter Kennard www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/mediaburn/default.shtm
|
|