lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by lg2771 on Jul 5, 2018 18:58:51 GMT 1, Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them.
Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them.
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by alessandro on Jul 5, 2018 19:05:13 GMT 1, Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them.
Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being.
I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂
Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them. Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being. I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂 |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 19:11:18 GMT 1, Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them. Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being. I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂
Not with a face like that
Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them. Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being. I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂 Not with a face like that |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by alessandro on Jul 5, 2018 19:14:23 GMT 1, Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being. I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂 Not with a face like that
Quite incredible it has taken 2 weeks to select 320 people, but hopefully with the time that they have taken they will be able to pick people who actually want them to keep. I wish their communication was a bit more transparent though. With the amount of calls and emails Tanya is getting it is quite incredible how polite she is being. I would be going mad, I’m definitely not suited for a customer facing job 😂 Not with a face like that |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 19:19:02 GMT 1, Not with a face like that
yes, yes of course you are
Not with a face like that yes, yes of course you are |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Jul 5, 2018 19:27:55 GMT 1, Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them.
Yup.. I'd bet on end of next week at this pace. Atleast she's keeping communication going with some Of us
Tanya emailed me and said that Heni is still somehow going through the order forms and processing them. Yup.. I'd bet on end of next week at this pace. Atleast she's keeping communication going with some Of us |
|
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Jul 5, 2018 19:49:22 GMT 1, Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick.
Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick.
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by alessandro on Jul 5, 2018 19:51:15 GMT 1, Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick.
Never gonna give you up.
Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick. Never gonna give you up. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Jul 5, 2018 19:52:54 GMT 1, Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick. Never gonna give you up.
Never gonna let u down
Who's this Tanya that people have been mentioning? I've dealing with Rick. Never gonna give you up. Never gonna let u down |
|
cnrdvln
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,404
👍🏻 1,489
February 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by cnrdvln on Jul 5, 2018 20:01:08 GMT 1, I'm on pause buying anything else until I get the yay or nay in this one... the stress 🤦
I'm on pause buying anything else until I get the yay or nay in this one... the stress 🤦
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:02:37 GMT 1, 40 or more sets are pre-sold
Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public
Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market
40 or more sets are pre-sold
Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public
Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market
|
|
lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by lg2771 on Jul 5, 2018 20:10:44 GMT 1, 40 or more sets are pre-sold Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market
How could you even check if you sold anything on the secondary market?
40 or more sets are pre-sold Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market How could you even check if you sold anything on the secondary market? |
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:16:18 GMT 1, New buyer will change ownship under their name
New buyer will change ownship under their name
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Jul 5, 2018 20:17:56 GMT 1, 40 or more sets are pre-sold Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market How could you even check if you sold anything on the secondary market?
It's not that hard once u have full names addresses etc.. Just a little digging finds most easily. I've done this when selling to new people at retail help. Well, my friend checks for me he's the computer guy. You'd be surprised how easy finding addresses etc is thru back door ebay, even PayPal sometimes.. Find a link, search the ip, find it all. Nothing is "hidden" if someone is smart enough. Saved me from helping a guy that flips tons. I simply told him I changed my mind. He was heated lol. Also a reason I voluntarily give my ebay name, PayPal address, and forum names when applying to buy.
I do wish they'd limit to 1 print each to allow more to enjoy.
40 or more sets are pre-sold Only 25 to 35 sets or 100 to 140 prints will be made to the public Heni are checking if you have pervious sold anything on secondary market How could you even check if you sold anything on the secondary market? It's not that hard once u have full names addresses etc.. Just a little digging finds most easily. I've done this when selling to new people at retail help. Well, my friend checks for me he's the computer guy. You'd be surprised how easy finding addresses etc is thru back door ebay, even PayPal sometimes.. Find a link, search the ip, find it all. Nothing is "hidden" if someone is smart enough. Saved me from helping a guy that flips tons. I simply told him I changed my mind. He was heated lol. Also a reason I voluntarily give my ebay name, PayPal address, and forum names when applying to buy. I do wish they'd limit to 1 print each to allow more to enjoy. |
|
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:19:50 GMT 1, Heni work very similar to pest control
They keep records for all prints sold by them
You can ask anyone on here who knows them well
Heni work very similar to pest control
They keep records for all prints sold by them
You can ask anyone on here who knows them well
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Jul 5, 2018 20:20:19 GMT 1, I've been told by trusted source that there's also a database that artsy, auction houses, etc share of sellers. So all that becomes basically open info to any legit gallery that's curious. They'll share that info easily. And u agree to it in The contractsin fine print
I've been told by trusted source that there's also a database that artsy, auction houses, etc share of sellers. So all that becomes basically open info to any legit gallery that's curious. They'll share that info easily. And u agree to it in The contractsin fine print
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:24:37 GMT 1, Touchwood told that's totally correct
heni has full access to this info
Touchwood told that's totally correct
heni has full access to this info
|
|
RoboJ
Artist
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,202
👍🏻 1,332
July 2015
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by RoboJ on Jul 5, 2018 20:27:58 GMT 1, Well I’m really hoping to get one. They’re beautiful prints indeed but I imagine there are way too many people on the list and as I’ve not bought previously I’m not feeling confident but I’m hopeful
Well I’m really hoping to get one. They’re beautiful prints indeed but I imagine there are way too many people on the list and as I’ve not bought previously I’m not feeling confident but I’m hopeful
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:33:47 GMT 1, When I purchased p8 to p11 on the secondary market
I had to confirm the pervious owner of the prints and heni update there system me as new owner
When I purchased p8 to p11 on the secondary market
I had to confirm the pervious owner of the prints and heni update there system me as new owner
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:46:47 GMT 1, One kind forum member sold me p15 and p16 at almost cost price
His name still registered to my prints and will stay registered under his name
One kind forum member sold me p15 and p16 at almost cost price
His name still registered to my prints and will stay registered under his name
|
|
diarmid
New Member
🗨️ 831
👍🏻 215
October 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by diarmid on Jul 5, 2018 20:54:49 GMT 1, be careful before you buy any Heni editions
be careful before you buy any Heni editions
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 21:01:19 GMT 1, I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year
more should do this, maybe 2 years
Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit
Who is in charge, lets make it law
I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year
more should do this, maybe 2 years
Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit
Who is in charge, lets make it law
|
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Jul 5, 2018 21:08:48 GMT 1, Auction houses should not be passing on buyers info to any galleries or print sellers or even artsy type sites.
There are strict privacy laws or so I thought.
I wouldn't worry about missing out on this hyped up print.
It reminds me of vomit on a pavement. Saturday night, too much beer and a pizza with extras on it.
Auction houses should not be passing on buyers info to any galleries or print sellers or even artsy type sites.
There are strict privacy laws or so I thought.
I wouldn't worry about missing out on this hyped up print.
It reminds me of vomit on a pavement. Saturday night, too much beer and a pizza with extras on it.
|
|
Pawel
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,801
👍🏻 3,274
June 2015
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Pawel on Jul 5, 2018 21:10:34 GMT 1, I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law
I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law For prints like signed “Sale ends” available for £500 2 years is still too short. You win the lottery you get the print and COA. You cannot transfer the ownership for the next 1000 years. That would do the trick. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by alessandro on Jul 5, 2018 21:15:15 GMT 1, Auction houses should not be passing on buyers info to any galleries or print sellers or even artsy type sites. There are strict privacy laws or so I thought. I wouldn't worry about missing out on this hyped up print. It reminds me of vomit on a pavement. Saturday night, too much beer and a pizza with extras on it.
GDPR aside, auction houses like Sotheby’s are extremely secretive with their clients for a reason, that’s why their customers purchase through them.
Also sharing a seller database would be ridiculous since that is one of the main components of a gallery’s value. Sharing a sellers list would give away all of the value of a business. Pretty ridiculous claim.
Auction houses should not be passing on buyers info to any galleries or print sellers or even artsy type sites. There are strict privacy laws or so I thought. I wouldn't worry about missing out on this hyped up print. It reminds me of vomit on a pavement. Saturday night, too much beer and a pizza with extras on it. GDPR aside, auction houses like Sotheby’s are extremely secretive with their clients for a reason, that’s why their customers purchase through them. Also sharing a seller database would be ridiculous since that is one of the main components of a gallery’s value. Sharing a sellers list would give away all of the value of a business. Pretty ridiculous claim. |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Jul 5, 2018 21:29:15 GMT 1, I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law
Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks.
Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business.
I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law The two year wait won't make any difference as people will just sit on the print for two years and then sell at a higher prices as there will be two years to create a demand for the print on the secondary market. Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks. Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 21:36:56 GMT 1, I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law The two year wait won't make any difference as people will just sit on the print for two years and then sell at a higher prices as there will be two years to create a demand for the print on the secondary market. No, You are wrong (maybe). Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks. Seriously? you mean the guys that discovered it doesn't match their sofa, or the wife has got the hump, those guys? Ok, it will also be made law that the gallery has to buy them back at cost (excluding framing costs) and carriage charges and insurance
Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business. None at all, what is your point? Are you saying you dont agree with the 12 month COA thing? You would rather the system as it is?
We need change
Someone take charge and make it happen .
I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law The two year wait won't make any difference as people will just sit on the print for two years and then sell at a higher prices as there will be two years to create a demand for the print on the secondary market. No, You are wrong (maybe). Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks. Seriously? you mean the guys that discovered it doesn't match their sofa, or the wife has got the hump, those guys? Ok, it will also be made law that the gallery has to buy them back at cost (excluding framing costs) and carriage charges and insurance
Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business. None at all, what is your point? Are you saying you dont agree with the 12 month COA thing? You would rather the system as it is?
We need change
Someone take charge and make it happen . xx |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Jul 5, 2018 21:48:33 GMT 1, I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law For prints like signed “Sale ends” available for £500 2 years is still too short. You win the lottery you get the print and COA. You cannot transfer the ownership for the next 1000 years. That would do the trick.
I really like the idea POW started where buyers do not get COA for a year more should do this, maybe 2 years Would make this collecting lark more about the collectors and less about the profit Who is in charge, lets make it law For prints like signed “Sale ends” available for £500 2 years is still too short. You win the lottery you get the print and COA. You cannot transfer the ownership for the next 1000 years. That would do the trick. Two years, a thousand or a million, this didn't stop some people putting the art up on the secondary market almost instantly. |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Jul 5, 2018 21:48:45 GMT 1, The two year wait won't make any difference as people will just sit on the print for two years and then sell at a higher prices as there will be two years to create a demand for the print on the secondary market. No, You are wrong (maybe). Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks. Seriously? you mean the guys that discovered it doesn't match their sofa, or the wife has got the hump, those guys? Ok, it will also be made law that the gallery has to buy them back at cost (excluding framing costs) and carriage charges and insurance
Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business. None at all, what is your point? Are you saying you dont agree with the 12 month COA thing? You would rather the system as it is?
We need change
Someone take charge and make it happen . xx
It's not as if the print took a lot of effort to produce or money. It's a rehash of an earlier prints and sold out at 500 x however many prints were produced.
Plus if POW released this last Banksy print at market price only wealthy people would have bought it and others would be saying look at how much money capitalist pigs POW etc are making now.
So POW and Banksy priced it low and played fair in a lottery type system in order for the little guys to benefit and now they are not letting the little guys benefit because no COA.
People who sell cos it doesn't match their sofa or whatver have the right to sell. They bought it and paid money for it so it's their property.
I'm not a fan of this type of corporate control by galleries and artists who are too far up their own assets.
The two year wait won't make any difference as people will just sit on the print for two years and then sell at a higher prices as there will be two years to create a demand for the print on the secondary market. No, You are wrong (maybe). Meanwhile poor people who need a life saving operation and facing eviction at the same time who could use the money have to wait two years and will probably suffer horribly worse than rich vip list feks. Seriously? you mean the guys that discovered it doesn't match their sofa, or the wife has got the hump, those guys? Ok, it will also be made law that the gallery has to buy them back at cost (excluding framing costs) and carriage charges and insurance
Plus if POW sold the print for five hundred, what business is it of theirs what someone does with it once they have sold it. It's none of their business. None at all, what is your point? Are you saying you dont agree with the 12 month COA thing? You would rather the system as it is?
We need change
Someone take charge and make it happen . xx It's not as if the print took a lot of effort to produce or money. It's a rehash of an earlier prints and sold out at 500 x however many prints were produced. Plus if POW released this last Banksy print at market price only wealthy people would have bought it and others would be saying look at how much money capitalist pigs POW etc are making now. So POW and Banksy priced it low and played fair in a lottery type system in order for the little guys to benefit and now they are not letting the little guys benefit because no COA. People who sell cos it doesn't match their sofa or whatver have the right to sell. They bought it and paid money for it so it's their property. I'm not a fan of this type of corporate control by galleries and artists who are too far up their own assets. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Jul 5, 2018 22:03:18 GMT 1, It's not as if the print took a lot of effort to produce or money. It's a rehash of an earlier prints and sold out at 500 x however many prints were produced. Plus if POW released this last Banksy print at market price only wealthy people would have bought it and others would be saying look at how much money capitalist pigs POW etc are making now. So POW and Banksy priced it low and played fair in a lottery type system in order for the little guys to benefit and now they are not letting the little guys benefit because no COA. People who sell cos it doesn't match their sofa or whatver have the right to sell. They bought it and paid money for it so it's their property. I'm not a fan of this type of corporate control by galleries and artists who are too far up their own assets.
fair points
Thinking about it I don't know what difference it will make on the sale end front if they were flipped on release or when the COA is out in Jan 19
i have forgotton my point to this
what can this mean?
ooh first dates is on :-)
It's not as if the print took a lot of effort to produce or money. It's a rehash of an earlier prints and sold out at 500 x however many prints were produced. Plus if POW released this last Banksy print at market price only wealthy people would have bought it and others would be saying look at how much money capitalist pigs POW etc are making now. So POW and Banksy priced it low and played fair in a lottery type system in order for the little guys to benefit and now they are not letting the little guys benefit because no COA. People who sell cos it doesn't match their sofa or whatver have the right to sell. They bought it and paid money for it so it's their property. I'm not a fan of this type of corporate control by galleries and artists who are too far up their own assets. fair points Thinking about it I don't know what difference it will make on the sale end front if they were flipped on release or when the COA is out in Jan 19 i have forgotton my point to this what can this mean? ooh first dates is on :-) |
|
