|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Eastend Boy 13 on Aug 15, 2018 12:13:08 GMT 1, You do know we've talked about the 'Heni process' many times on this forum right? They undergo a background check on all applicants and then decide whether you are eligible to purchase. Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Part of the marketing psychology too - helps to create a feeling of scarcity/exclusiveness for the product
You do know we've talked about the 'Heni process' many times on this forum right? They undergo a background check on all applicants and then decide whether you are eligible to purchase. Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Part of the marketing psychology too - helps to create a feeling of scarcity/exclusiveness for the product
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Aug 15, 2018 12:32:02 GMT 1, You do know we've talked about the 'Heni process' many times on this forum right? They undergo a background check on all applicants and then decide whether you are eligible to purchase. Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement.
That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate.
Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else?
You do know we've talked about the 'Heni process' many times on this forum right? They undergo a background check on all applicants and then decide whether you are eligible to purchase. Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement. That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate. Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else?
|
|
yobaby
New Member
🗨️ 408
👍🏻 254
November 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by yobaby on Aug 15, 2018 12:59:09 GMT 1, Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise.
Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise.
|
|
sircoxson
New Member
🗨️ 746
👍🏻 866
December 2010
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by sircoxson on Aug 15, 2018 13:41:01 GMT 1, Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise. I partly agree.
a screenprinted edition would have been great.
nevertheless, those h5 look ace on the wall.
Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise. I partly agree. a screenprinted edition would have been great. nevertheless, those h5 look ace on the wall.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Chris JL on Aug 15, 2018 13:47:53 GMT 1, I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print.
I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊
Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice.
I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print.
I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊
Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice.
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Aug 15, 2018 14:07:15 GMT 1, Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise.
These could be screened
Good luck to those in for the hunt. I'd have loved one if these were actual screenprints but I can see how much extra effort and money this would have involved on Hirsts part. Much easier to take a hi-def pic and get it electronically printed. I mean, there is just no way you could create these dots without the use of digital technology. I have no issue with the digital process when you're trying to faithfully recreate the depth and nuance of a Gerhard Richter but this is piss poor from one of the UK finest who is supposedly back at the vanguard. These are little more than a money grabbing exercise. These could be screened
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Aug 15, 2018 14:08:45 GMT 1, I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice.
For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print
I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice. For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Aug 15, 2018 14:11:27 GMT 1, Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement. That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate. Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else?
While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included
I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass
Sorry I think this whole background check thing is complete nonsense. We’re supposed to believe they are cross-referencing every previous sale of any Heni edition through all the auction houses globally before they sell you one. They’re not. Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement. That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate. Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else? While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Aug 15, 2018 14:17:29 GMT 1, Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement. That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate. Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else? While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass And what..?
How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process.
Well they're definitely doing something to avoid selling to flippers. I applied for a H4 two weeks after the announcement and managed to secure one over many who applied at announcement. That's like me filling out the form next week Friday and then given the option to purchase a H5 over all you fools who queued at the Tate. Why would I, a humble singleton with no previous record of buying or selling anything, get preferential treatment over anyone else? While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass And what..? How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Chris JL on Aug 15, 2018 14:20:07 GMT 1, I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice. For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print
“Soul”? I see - I’ve never understood theology I’m afraid 😉
I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice. For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print “Soul”? I see - I’ve never understood theology I’m afraid 😉
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by touchdowntodd on Aug 15, 2018 14:23:14 GMT 1, While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass And what..? How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process.
I'm saying, u may not have been chosen ahead, but rather earlier applicants declined ... I personally don't know anyone whom applied, and did not get a shot. I'm sure there may be some.
I think this thread is really hyping this as though thousands of people applied. We have to remember there's about 250 constantly active accounts on here, probably a third of which are peoples ghost accounts used purely to hype their collection values. This forum is hardly an indicator of the entire world
It's a great image, and I'm happy for no everyone buying. But the diasec method doesn't have as many fans as say a simple print.
Again congrats, but I don't think your situation means the process of fcfs isn't happening (after the usual suspects get vip of course).
While it's great that you scored, a look back on this thread will show that there was a group of original "winners" that were chosen,and decided against buying h4... Myself included I'd suspect this will happen with h5 as well as people are chosen, can't get the image they wanted, or pass And what..? How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process. I'm saying, u may not have been chosen ahead, but rather earlier applicants declined ... I personally don't know anyone whom applied, and did not get a shot. I'm sure there may be some. I think this thread is really hyping this as though thousands of people applied. We have to remember there's about 250 constantly active accounts on here, probably a third of which are peoples ghost accounts used purely to hype their collection values. This forum is hardly an indicator of the entire world It's a great image, and I'm happy for no everyone buying. But the diasec method doesn't have as many fans as say a simple print. Again congrats, but I don't think your situation means the process of fcfs isn't happening (after the usual suspects get vip of course).
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Aug 15, 2018 14:35:37 GMT 1, And what..? How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process. I'm saying, u may not have been chosen ahead, but rather earlier applicants declined ... I personally don't know anyone whom applied, and did not get a shot. I'm sure there may be some. I think this thread is really hyping this as though thousands of people applied. We have to remember there's about 250 constantly active accounts on here, probably a third of which are peoples ghost accounts used purely to hype their collection values. This forum is hardly an indicator of the entire world It's a great image, and I'm happy for no everyone buying. But the diasec method doesn't have as many fans as say a simple print. Again congrats, but I don't think your situation means the process of fcfs isn't happening (after the usual suspects get vip of course). I do see your point, but I do remember a few people wondering why they hadn't received the confirmation email after I'd received mine. There was definitely no-one saying "I got the offer but turned it down" , not for a few days after I received my email at least. A quick look over this thread shows that the user 'Shy' applied and did not receive anything. There's obviously many Hirst applicants out there than are on this thread.
The point I'm trying to make is that the heni process does result in people getting turned away/left down. You may not realise this is the point you're arguing against but if every applicant on this forum who applies gets an edition - that's great! Otherwise, if you're getting radio silence from Heni while everyone else rejoices....well, now you'll know why.
And what..? How does this in any way change my initial statement? I was still chosen ahead of earlier applicants due to the heni process. I'm saying, u may not have been chosen ahead, but rather earlier applicants declined ... I personally don't know anyone whom applied, and did not get a shot. I'm sure there may be some. I think this thread is really hyping this as though thousands of people applied. We have to remember there's about 250 constantly active accounts on here, probably a third of which are peoples ghost accounts used purely to hype their collection values. This forum is hardly an indicator of the entire world It's a great image, and I'm happy for no everyone buying. But the diasec method doesn't have as many fans as say a simple print. Again congrats, but I don't think your situation means the process of fcfs isn't happening (after the usual suspects get vip of course). I do see your point, but I do remember a few people wondering why they hadn't received the confirmation email after I'd received mine. There was definitely no-one saying "I got the offer but turned it down" , not for a few days after I received my email at least. A quick look over this thread shows that the user 'Shy' applied and did not receive anything. There's obviously many Hirst applicants out there than are on this thread. The point I'm trying to make is that the heni process does result in people getting turned away/left down. You may not realise this is the point you're arguing against but if every applicant on this forum who applies gets an edition - that's great! Otherwise, if you're getting radio silence from Heni while everyone else rejoices....well, now you'll know why.
|
|
1000steps
New Member
🗨️ 11
👍🏻 17
February 2015
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by 1000steps on Aug 15, 2018 14:42:28 GMT 1, I'm not convinced by these screen printing arguments. There are beautiful screen prints, and there are awful screen prints, just like with any other medium.
Nobody will argue that digital printing is a more precise form of image capture than screen printing. That precision may be viewed as soulless by screen print evangelists. In all likelihood, however, Hirst and publisher were seeking that digital precision. Screen prints of the H5 images already containing artifacts of creation (paint dribbles, etc.) could very well have resulted in a sloppy mess.
It's easy to say 'such-and-such would have worked beautifully'. The truth is a bit more complex.
I'm not convinced by these screen printing arguments. There are beautiful screen prints, and there are awful screen prints, just like with any other medium.
Nobody will argue that digital printing is a more precise form of image capture than screen printing. That precision may be viewed as soulless by screen print evangelists. In all likelihood, however, Hirst and publisher were seeking that digital precision. Screen prints of the H5 images already containing artifacts of creation (paint dribbles, etc.) could very well have resulted in a sloppy mess.
It's easy to say 'such-and-such would have worked beautifully'. The truth is a bit more complex.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Chris JL on Aug 15, 2018 14:57:21 GMT 1, I'm not convinced by these screen printing arguments. There are beautiful screen prints, and there are awful screen prints, just like with any other medium. Nobody will argue that digital printing is a more precise form of image capture than screen printing. That precision may be viewed as soulless by screen print evangelists. In all likelihood, however, Hirst and publisher were seeking that digital precision. Screen prints of the H5 images already containing artifacts of creation (paint dribbles, etc.) could very well have resulted in a sloppy mess. It's easy to say 'such-and-such would have worked beautifully'. The truth is a bit more complex.
I agree in the sense that the medium is a purely artistic choice.
For example, I do not think that these are mounted with diasec by chance at all - if I wanted to maximise colour punch and contrasts, that’s exactly what I would choose.I would bet that they considered, and probably tried, many media and processes before going for the giclée and diasec combo.
PS but if the soul is eternal, why does the above printing combo has superior longevity? 😉
I'm not convinced by these screen printing arguments. There are beautiful screen prints, and there are awful screen prints, just like with any other medium. Nobody will argue that digital printing is a more precise form of image capture than screen printing. That precision may be viewed as soulless by screen print evangelists. In all likelihood, however, Hirst and publisher were seeking that digital precision. Screen prints of the H5 images already containing artifacts of creation (paint dribbles, etc.) could very well have resulted in a sloppy mess. It's easy to say 'such-and-such would have worked beautifully'. The truth is a bit more complex. I agree in the sense that the medium is a purely artistic choice. For example, I do not think that these are mounted with diasec by chance at all - if I wanted to maximise colour punch and contrasts, that’s exactly what I would choose.I would bet that they considered, and probably tried, many media and processes before going for the giclée and diasec combo. PS but if the soul is eternal, why does the above printing combo has superior longevity? 😉
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 15, 2018 15:24:51 GMT 1, From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person?
From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person?
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 15, 2018 15:28:52 GMT 1,
I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice. For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print
Are there levels of soul in screenprinting as well, hand pulled vs machine pulled? For me, as long as the end result looks great, I don't have a preference.
I wonder how many of the people bashing digital printing have ever worked on making an exhibition quality c-type or inkjet print. I used to think that it is just a low quality cheating shortcut (I grew up working in darkrooms, and refused digital in any form until very recently). I was then trained to work with professional digital printing, and eventually worked on a few exhibition quality digital prints... and totally changed my mind 😊 Maybe, as in other matters, ignorance is the true source of prejudice. For many of us, myself included.. it's not that we don't think the imagery is quality, or that we think it's easy... It's that there's no soul in a glicee.. and so much in a screen print Are there levels of soul in screenprinting as well, hand pulled vs machine pulled? For me, as long as the end result looks great, I don't have a preference.
|
|
bjoern
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,293
👍🏻 569
September 2014
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by bjoern on Aug 15, 2018 20:25:21 GMT 1, From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person? they look even better in person, the bright colours are fantastic.
From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person? they look even better in person, the bright colours are fantastic.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 15, 2018 23:04:28 GMT 1, From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person? they look even better in perhtson, the bright colours are fantastic. Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us.
From what I have seen in the pictures, the quality and detail of the print is fantastic. Perhaps I would feel different if I saw them in person? they look even better in perhtson, the bright colours are fantastic. Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us.
|
|
sircoxson
New Member
🗨️ 746
👍🏻 866
December 2010
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by sircoxson on Aug 15, 2018 23:10:23 GMT 1, they look even better in perhtson, the bright colours are fantastic. Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us.
there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst.
you‘re welcome.
they look even better in perhtson, the bright colours are fantastic. Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us. there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst. you‘re welcome.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 15, 2018 23:24:00 GMT 1, Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us. there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst. you‘re welcome. I wouldn't presume that he isn't aware of Instagram. It's a lot of spot original paintings, skeletons, sharks and Christo photos to Wade through before finding small nuggets of photos taken under poor lightining and strange color filters.
Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us. there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst. you‘re welcome. I wouldn't presume that he isn't aware of Instagram. It's a lot of spot original paintings, skeletons, sharks and Christo photos to Wade through before finding small nuggets of photos taken under poor lightining and strange color filters.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 15, 2018 23:27:26 GMT 1, Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us. there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst. you‘re welcome. I've seen all those. Thanks bud.
Thank you for your input and thank you for sharing the photograph with us. there is an app called instagram. many have posted pictures there. to find the pics you could use the hashtag #damienhirst. you‘re welcome. I've seen all those. Thanks bud.
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Dojo the Dog on Aug 16, 2018 7:27:25 GMT 1, Couldn't make the preview on Friday, will there be a general release or have I missed the chance? Fancy 'Claridges or Camino Real' from the photos I've seen. You can apply directly via the Tate. They send you a form out which in turns gets sent to Heni to vet before they confirm the lucky ones.
Couldn't make the preview on Friday, will there be a general release or have I missed the chance? Fancy 'Claridges or Camino Real' from the photos I've seen. You can apply directly via the Tate. They send you a form out which in turns gets sent to Heni to vet before they confirm the lucky ones.
|
|
|
bjoern
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,293
👍🏻 569
September 2014
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by bjoern on Aug 16, 2018 8:26:45 GMT 1, Does anybody have an idea when HENI informs the selected people?
Does anybody have an idea when HENI informs the selected people?
|
|
blerd
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,350
👍🏻 1,203
November 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by blerd on Aug 16, 2018 9:24:26 GMT 1, Does anybody have an idea when HENI informs the selected people? Tate will let you know.
Does anybody have an idea when HENI informs the selected people? Tate will let you know.
|
|
bjoern
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,293
👍🏻 569
September 2014
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by bjoern on Aug 16, 2018 11:59:16 GMT 1, Hopefully soon
Hopefully soon
|
|
ARN
New Member
🗨️ 320
👍🏻 237
February 2018
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by ARN on Aug 16, 2018 12:21:33 GMT 1, Keeping everything crossed!
Keeping everything crossed!
|
|
shy
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,590
👍🏻 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shy on Aug 16, 2018 13:03:13 GMT 1, well, I was shut out on the last edition so rolling the dice and trying again!
For those people that have seen these in the flesh, please let me know which prints where the nicest?
thank you very much!
well, I was shut out on the last edition so rolling the dice and trying again!
For those people that have seen these in the flesh, please let me know which prints where the nicest?
thank you very much!
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Chris JL on Aug 16, 2018 13:26:53 GMT 1, well, I was shut out on the last edition so rolling the dice and trying again! For those people that have seen these in the flesh, please let me know which prints where the nicest? thank you very much!
That’s very subjective I believe. Nevertheless, personally I went in with the small dots being my favourites, and came out with the medium and large ones being my first choice - with the high contrast/punch/definition of the printing+mounting chosen, they just looked great e.g. after seeing these the LSD silkscreen (or were they lambda prints?) felt dull in comparison.
well, I was shut out on the last edition so rolling the dice and trying again! For those people that have seen these in the flesh, please let me know which prints where the nicest? thank you very much! That’s very subjective I believe. Nevertheless, personally I went in with the small dots being my favourites, and came out with the medium and large ones being my first choice - with the high contrast/punch/definition of the printing+mounting chosen, they just looked great e.g. after seeing these the LSD silkscreen (or were they lambda prints?) felt dull in comparison.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 16, 2018 16:51:31 GMT 1, Did anyone receive confirmation that Tate received their registration form? I called to confirm and they were quite backed up and said they would get back to me.
Did anyone receive confirmation that Tate received their registration form? I called to confirm and they were quite backed up and said they would get back to me.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 16, 2018 17:44:42 GMT 1, I thought people might find this interesting... link
Strange choice by Damien Hirst as the winning caption.
I thought people might find this interesting... link
Strange choice by Damien Hirst as the winning caption.
|
|