d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 11, 2018 23:15:24 GMT 1, Lol. Solid reframe. Discourse has completely broken down going back to 2012 and continuing to today. The country is doing greatest for those in a position that it didnโt matter who became president. The great silent jobless majority still exists. Those being left behind are still being left behind. Itโs too bad really. I know I am well off but I daily interact with many where that isnโt the case. Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country!
The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course.
Lol. Solid reframe. Discourse has completely broken down going back to 2012 and continuing to today. The country is doing greatest for those in a position that it didnโt matter who became president. The great silent jobless majority still exists. Those being left behind are still being left behind. Itโs too bad really. I know I am well off but I daily interact with many where that isnโt the case. Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country! The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by nobokov on Jul 11, 2018 23:18:48 GMT 1, Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country! The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing?
Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country! The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 23:19:35 GMT 1, Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country! The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive.
Unemployment is at an all time low. For every racial group in the country! The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 23:21:31 GMT 1, The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing? It might be the same problem with polling bureaus trying to poll the last election. Some people presumably just can't be reached using the standard statistical methods?
One other reason I could come up with (not backed by any facts, just a thought): more women stay home to take care of their families because more men have jobs that are able to support their families financially?
The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing? It might be the same problem with polling bureaus trying to poll the last election. Some people presumably just can't be reached using the standard statistical methods? One other reason I could come up with (not backed by any facts, just a thought): more women stay home to take care of their families because more men have jobs that are able to support their families financially?
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 11, 2018 23:22:23 GMT 1, The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing?
The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive.
www.google.com/amp/www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/07/employment-vs-unemployment-different-stories-from-the-jobs-numbers/%3famp=1
The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. I frequently hear that the hopeless and dejected aren't included in the stats, but just playing devil's advocate, how would we ever know whether that number is a large or small number and if it's increasing or decreasing? The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive. www.google.com/amp/www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/07/employment-vs-unemployment-different-stories-from-the-jobs-numbers/%3famp=1
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 23:26:58 GMT 1, Thanks, that was an informative read.
Thanks, that was an informative read.
|
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 11, 2018 23:27:38 GMT 1, The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive.
When Obama was president it was quality of jobs and short term work. In addition some skilled labor that were no longer relevant leaving some high and dry. From my understanding but will look more into it later
The same stats that were a lie (actually incomplete cause they mostly donโt include those that stopped looking for jobs) when collected under Obama ( and the same way they have always been collected) with no change in polling or methodology of collection are now fact. < is the one of the problems with this country on itโs current course. What's the general consensus in the USA as to why people would stop looking for a jobs in a thriving economy? Seems a bit counter intuitive. When Obama was president it was quality of jobs and short term work. In addition some skilled labor that were no longer relevant leaving some high and dry. From my understanding but will look more into it later
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by nobokov on Jul 11, 2018 23:30:34 GMT 1, This thread has turned into an interesting discussion.
This thread has turned into an interesting discussion.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:33:24 GMT 1, So how many comfortably off liberals would be willing to move and live in Mexico to prove that they are not racist? Could you please the intent and meaning of that question? Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico.
The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered. The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation.
Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring.
How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ?
Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes.
Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them.
How many of these libtards actually give a fuck about the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate.
Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has.
Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant.
Practice what you preach.
So how many comfortably off liberals would be willing to move and live in Mexico to prove that they are not racist? Could you please the intent and meaning of that question? Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico. The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered. The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation. Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring. How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ? Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes. Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them. How many of these libtards actually give a fuck about the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate. Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has. Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant. Practice what you preach.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:37:07 GMT 1, I actually think Blanksky is trying to distance himself from Moron. At this stage of the game it's his only option. A bit like Trump and Bannon. Question is, which one is the sexual predator filling his face with Big Macs and which one is the wannabe leader of the alt-right media? Above all of which, what are either of these clowns doing on an art forum? Statistics say that sexual predators are often illegal immigrants and unvetted migrants that used to be called "refugees" by CNN etc that have been allowed into europe and created an epidemic of sexual assaults and also migrants who entered UK legally and who have not integrated with UK democracy and cultural values also have an unusually high rate of sexual assaults and crime compared to their percentage of the countries population.
I actually think Blanksky is trying to distance himself from Moron. At this stage of the game it's his only option. A bit like Trump and Bannon. Question is, which one is the sexual predator filling his face with Big Macs and which one is the wannabe leader of the alt-right media? Above all of which, what are either of these clowns doing on an art forum? Statistics say that sexual predators are often illegal immigrants and unvetted migrants that used to be called "refugees" by CNN etc that have been allowed into europe and created an epidemic of sexual assaults and also migrants who entered UK legally and who have not integrated with UK democracy and cultural values also have an unusually high rate of sexual assaults and crime compared to their percentage of the countries population.
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 11, 2018 23:39:44 GMT 1, Could you please the intent and meaning of that question? ย Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico.ย ย ย The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered.ย The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation. ย Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring. ย ย How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ? ย Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes. ย Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them. ย How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate. ย ย Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has. ย Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant. ย Practice what you preach. ย ย
You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this...
" How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive."
Well done
Could you please the intent and meaning of that question? ย Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico.ย ย ย The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered.ย The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation. ย Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring. ย ย How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ? ย Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes. ย Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them. ย How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate. ย ย Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has. ย Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant. ย Practice what you preach. ย ย You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this... " How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive." Well done
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:41:49 GMT 1, Uncle Adolph and cousin Benito think the US is on the right track. You are clueless it appears.
I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros.
Uncle Adolph and cousin Benito think the US is on the right track. You are clueless it appears. I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros.
|
|
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Kevin Anderson on Jul 11, 2018 23:43:32 GMT 1, โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear.
โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:44:02 GMT 1, Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico. The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered. The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation. Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring. How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ? Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes. Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them. How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate. Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has. Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant. Practice what you preach. You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this... " How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive." Well done They don't give a fuck because these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it.
Well I had assumed that people hate Trump because he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from various countries not only Mexicans entering the US via Mexico. The fact is that with unchecked migration into any country there will always be criminals who enter to cause crime and problems in the country they have entered. The honest people who want to work and make a better life are the victims of criminals from their own countries who give illegal migrants a bad reputation. Basically my point is that how many people against Trumps border wall would not make a judgement about the type of people entering ilegally as opposed to purely political point scoring. How many care about the people who try to enter the US illegally that are murdered or raped en route including children. Or how many care that when some adult/s enter the US with a child that the child is actually their son or daughter or a forced drug mule ? Plus saying no borders and supporting no borders means no vetting, allowing anyone to enter a country or community and take over an area of a city. Which means more policing is needed and more social services are needed too. Which means paying more local taxes. Or as in the case of Europe and UK it means police ignore crimes perpetrated by illegal and legal immigrants because local politicians want locals who are from the same community to vote for them. How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive. As opposed to thinking themselves good democrats because they give a Mexican a job cutting their lawn for a cheap rate. Democrats have nothing with which to win votes against Trump so have adopted a global hate Trump campaign despite democrats deporting illegal immigrants and despite democrats politicians behaving far worse than Trump has. Buy a bad expensive photo shopped photo of Trump or give the same amount of money directly to a poor migrant. Practice what you preach. You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this... " How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive." Well done They don't give a fuck because these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it.
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:46:05 GMT 1, โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear. Trump never said "they are all" MS-13 when referring to illegal immigrants.
Illegal immigrants who are often victims of crime by other illegal immigrants do not report the crime to the police.
โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear. Trump never said "they are all" MS-13 when referring to illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants who are often victims of crime by other illegal immigrants do not report the crime to the police.
|
|
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Kevin Anderson on Jul 11, 2018 23:46:18 GMT 1, Uncle Adolph and cousin Benito think the US is on the right track. ย You are clueless it appears. ย ย I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2.ย I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. ย ย
You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless?
Uncle Adolph and cousin Benito think the US is on the right track. ย You are clueless it appears. ย ย I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2.ย I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. ย ย You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 23:46:55 GMT 1, โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear. Can you please quote me a source where Trump has said this?
โStatisticsโ also say that illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens. Trumpโs rhetoric that they are all MS-13 members, serial rapists or animals are a scare tactic, pure and simple. You have to keep the populace in fear. Can you please quote me a source where Trump has said this?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 11, 2018 23:47:31 GMT 1, You are clueless it appears. I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? Could you elaborate on how Trump is a fascist?
You are clueless it appears. I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? Could you elaborate on how Trump is a fascist?
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 11, 2018 23:52:23 GMT 1, You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this... " How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive." Well done ย They don't give a f**kbecause these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it.
Hahaha
I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it?
You're arguing extremes and rhetoric.... My favorite is this... " How many of these libtards actually give a f**kabout the poor migrant family in their neighbourhood or poor people struggling to survive." Well done ย They don't give a f**kbecause these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it. Hahaha I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it?
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Trump has called MS13 gangmembers animals. The MS-13 motto is kill, rape and control. I'd say he was spot on when he said that. So what should these links actually tell me?
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 11, 2018 23:59:24 GMT 1, You are clueless it appears. I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? thanks for posting an example of fascist tactics.
Trump has not jailed anyone who has insulted him, unlike Castro, and other Marxists thru history who had people jailed, sent to the gulag etc tortured and murdered for insulting them and speaking against them.
You are clueless it appears. I am proud to say that my father was there when Mussolini was strung up in WW2. I abhor Nazis, Fascists and Communists and Merkel and Soros. You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? thanks for posting an example of fascist tactics. Trump has not jailed anyone who has insulted him, unlike Castro, and other Marxists thru history who had people jailed, sent to the gulag etc tortured and murdered for insulting them and speaking against them.
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 12, 2018 0:01:18 GMT 1, They don't give a f**kbecause these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it. Hahaha I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it? The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks.
They don't give a f**kbecause these no borders social security scrounging cave dwellers know the tax payers mainly low waged tax payers end up paying for it. Hahaha I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it? The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks.
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 12, 2018 0:01:43 GMT 1, You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? thanks for posting an example of fascist tactics. ย Trump has not jailed anyone who has insulted him, unlike Castro, and other Marxists thru history who had people jailed, sent to the gulag etc tortured and murdered for insulting them and speaking against them.
I'm not calling him fascist but are there any other traits that would be considered fascist or are these the only ones?
You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Whoโs clueless? thanks for posting an example of fascist tactics. ย Trump has not jailed anyone who has insulted him, unlike Castro, and other Marxists thru history who had people jailed, sent to the gulag etc tortured and murdered for insulting them and speaking against them. I'm not calling him fascist but are there any other traits that would be considered fascist or are these the only ones?
|
|
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Kevin Anderson on Jul 12, 2018 0:02:29 GMT 1, His generalizations are dangerous as well as stupid.
His generalizations are dangerous as well as stupid.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 12, 2018 0:05:20 GMT 1, His generalizations are dangerous as well as stupid. So no facts, just virtue signaling buzzwords. Got it.
His generalizations are dangerous as well as stupid. So no facts, just virtue signaling buzzwords. Got it.
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 12, 2018 0:08:00 GMT 1, Hahaha I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it? The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks.
You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15%
Hahaha I thought the wealthy pay te majority of the taxes? Which is it? The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks. You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15%
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 12, 2018 0:11:09 GMT 1, The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks. You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15% Also the bottom gets all the social benefits so their effective tax % is close to zero.
The working class and low waged pay the majority of a countries tax. The wealthy get tax breaks and perks. You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15% Also the bottom gets all the social benefits so their effective tax % is close to zero.
|
|
d.r. perseus
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,570
๐๐ป 1,749
December 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by d.r. perseus on Jul 12, 2018 0:12:00 GMT 1, You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15% Also the bottom gets all the social benefits so their effective tax % is close to zero.
If that's the case why do conservatives yell about poor getting so much in social benefits?
You are poorly educated on the topic. Top one percent pays over 40% of federal. The bottom 70-80% pay 15% Also the bottom gets all the social benefits so their effective tax % is close to zero. If that's the case why do conservatives yell about poor getting so much in social benefits?
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by nobokov on Jul 12, 2018 0:12:05 GMT 1, I actually think Blanksky is trying to distance himself from Moron. At this stage of the game it's his only option. A bit like Trump and Bannon. Question is, which one is the sexual predator filling his face with Big Macs and which one is the wannabe leader of the alt-right media? Above all of which, what are either of these clowns doing on an art forum? Statistics say that sexual predators are often illegal immigrants and unvetted migrants that used to be called "refugees" by CNN etc that have been allowed into europe and created an epidemic of sexual assaults and also migrants who entered UK legally and who have not integrated with UK democracy and cultural values also have an unusually high rate of sexual assaults and crime compared to their percentage of the countries population. The reason why I asked is because your question came off as a bit racist. I can't speak to whether the statistics you're quoting are accurate or not. I would think that the opposition to the wall is not necessarily the question of security, as in, who would not be interested in security? The opposition might be due to the possibility that maybe a wall would not be cost-effective for security or an effective deterrent for the criminal element crossing the border or that a wall would block families who are just crossing for a chance at a better life. Who doesn't want a chance at a better life and if they're a risking their lives to cross the border, it speaks to the dire circumstances from where they originate. I think the opposition is due to the inhumane manner in which people are being treated by either side who might be using basic fears and wants for their own political gain. Perhaps if the government concentrated on economic equality and expanding opportunities for everyone, instead of dividing, perhaps those driven to crimes would not be driven in that direction.
I actually think Blanksky is trying to distance himself from Moron. At this stage of the game it's his only option. A bit like Trump and Bannon. Question is, which one is the sexual predator filling his face with Big Macs and which one is the wannabe leader of the alt-right media? Above all of which, what are either of these clowns doing on an art forum? Statistics say that sexual predators are often illegal immigrants and unvetted migrants that used to be called "refugees" by CNN etc that have been allowed into europe and created an epidemic of sexual assaults and also migrants who entered UK legally and who have not integrated with UK democracy and cultural values also have an unusually high rate of sexual assaults and crime compared to their percentage of the countries population. The reason why I asked is because your question came off as a bit racist. I can't speak to whether the statistics you're quoting are accurate or not. I would think that the opposition to the wall is not necessarily the question of security, as in, who would not be interested in security? The opposition might be due to the possibility that maybe a wall would not be cost-effective for security or an effective deterrent for the criminal element crossing the border or that a wall would block families who are just crossing for a chance at a better life. Who doesn't want a chance at a better life and if they're a risking their lives to cross the border, it speaks to the dire circumstances from where they originate. I think the opposition is due to the inhumane manner in which people are being treated by either side who might be using basic fears and wants for their own political gain. Perhaps if the government concentrated on economic equality and expanding opportunities for everyone, instead of dividing, perhaps those driven to crimes would not be driven in that direction.
|
|