thomasmer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,107
๐๐ป 565
July 2014
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by thomasmer on Jul 21, 2018 5:10:51 GMT 1, I always forget how Daily Mail the Urban art forum is.
I always forget how Daily Mail the Urban art forum is.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,946
๐๐ป 2,740
November 2010
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Hairbland on Jul 21, 2018 5:41:25 GMT 1, Trump puts comedians who make fun of him on the โNo Fly List.โ Wait what in the actual fuck. Kathy Griffin didn't 'make fun' of Trump. She proudly posed with a Trump like decapitated head. Please point me to the 'fun' in that horrific scene. She should be extremely happy the right has defended freedom of speech up until a point where you can do this and not be in jail for the rest of your life. Unless you are in the NFL.
Trump puts comedians who make fun of him on the โNo Fly List.โ Wait what in the actual fuck. Kathy Griffin didn't 'make fun' of Trump. She proudly posed with a Trump like decapitated head. Please point me to the 'fun' in that horrific scene. She should be extremely happy the right has defended freedom of speech up until a point where you can do this and not be in jail for the rest of your life. Unless you are in the NFL.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 21:16:18 GMT 1, I'd be a very happy camper would I have been an American with Trump as president. Country has never been better. It's sad the left has radicalized so much. The man could singlehandedly cure cancer only for the left to blame him he didn't cure aids in the process. You don't have a fvcking clue what you're talking about, Dutchie. Trump's a cancer and you're a clueless tourist. Are you saying you hate foreigners?
I'd be a very happy camper would I have been an American with Trump as president. Country has never been better. It's sad the left has radicalized so much. The man could singlehandedly cure cancer only for the left to blame him he didn't cure aids in the process. You don't have a fvcking clue what you're talking about, Dutchie. Trump's a cancer and you're a clueless tourist. Are you saying you hate foreigners?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 21:17:00 GMT 1, If you are moderately right, far right, centre, or moderately left, you'd see the country is doing great. It's only the far left (which sadly have taken over media and education and scream the loudest) would claim the country is doing bad. Seriously, you are fvcking clueless. How the fvck would know how things are on this side of the pond? You live in Holland. Tourist with an clueless opinion. Nothing more. You actually sound like how a comedian would portray a typical bigoted Trump voter.
If you are moderately right, far right, centre, or moderately left, you'd see the country is doing great. It's only the far left (which sadly have taken over media and education and scream the loudest) would claim the country is doing bad. Seriously, you are fvcking clueless. How the fvck would know how things are on this side of the pond? You live in Holland. Tourist with an clueless opinion. Nothing more. You actually sound like how a comedian would portray a typical bigoted Trump voter.
|
|
nex
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,573
๐๐ป 1,819
February 2009
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by nex on Jul 21, 2018 21:44:25 GMT 1, โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ
Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while
โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ
Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while
|
|
kalm
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,005
๐๐ป 355
November 2010
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by kalm on Jul 21, 2018 22:27:40 GMT 1, Conservatives only care about themselves.
Conservatives only care about themselves.
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 23:45:28 GMT 1, โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while You should look beyond the short term effects, think about it a little, and post again.
โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while You should look beyond the short term effects, think about it a little, and post again.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 17:22:46 GMT 1, โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while and theres me thinking "white privelidge" is the most idiotic thing posted on this forum.
โKeeping people poor by drowning them in benefitsโ Thatโs literally the most idiotic thing Iโve read here in a while and theres me thinking "white privelidge" is the most idiotic thing posted on this forum.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 17:33:40 GMT 1, Worth watching for anyone with an attention span of more than two minutes.
Worth watching for anyone with an attention span of more than two minutes.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 17:38:26 GMT 1, A work of genius from Sasha Baron Cohen.
It's comedy but in some ways it could be reality and it's frightening.
A work of genius from Sasha Baron Cohen.
It's comedy but in some ways it could be reality and it's frightening.
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 21:09:25 GMT 1, Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though.
"WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"
Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though. "WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 21:13:34 GMT 1, It's good to see that this image of Trump appeals to you.
Katsu makes some interesting artworks www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-posters-katsu-art/
I'm not sure about the timing though as the poster seems to be saying Trump should be beaten up.
Isn't that all a bit Lenin 1917 regarding democracy?
It's good to see that this image of Trump appeals to you. Katsu makes some interesting artworks www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-posters-katsu-art/ I'm not sure about the timing though as the poster seems to be saying Trump should be beaten up. Isn't that all a bit Lenin 1917 regarding democracy?
|
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by qest on Jul 23, 2018 21:16:54 GMT 1, Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though. "WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump," Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism."
Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though. "WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism."
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 21:21:40 GMT 1, Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though. "WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism." For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course.
Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though. "WASHINGTON โ President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism." For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course.
|
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by qest on Jul 23, 2018 21:29:49 GMT 1, Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism." For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course. Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia.
Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud.
Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism." For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course. Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia. Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 21:56:13 GMT 1, For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course. Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia. Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud. How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore?
For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course. Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia. Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud. How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore?
|
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by qest on Jul 23, 2018 22:04:07 GMT 1, Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia. Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud. How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore? It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors.
It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations).
Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist.
Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia. Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights. That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech. Textbook fascism, you must be so proud. How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore? It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 22:21:57 GMT 1, How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore? It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist. But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me.
How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore? It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist. But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me.
|
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by qest on Jul 23, 2018 22:24:49 GMT 1, It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist. But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me. Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel. There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech. I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that. If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her.
It affects their ability to work in the private sector. Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income. It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist. But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me. Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel. There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech. I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that. If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 22:36:14 GMT 1, But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me. Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel. There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech. I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that. If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her. I don't think it's that black or white. What if they are actively using their presumably top secret clearance to undermine the current establishment?
But, yes, if the current president is doing this purely out of spite, then I of course agree with you.
But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me. Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel. There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech. I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that. If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her. I don't think it's that black or white. What if they are actively using their presumably top secret clearance to undermine the current establishment? But, yes, if the current president is doing this purely out of spite, then I of course agree with you.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 22:36:35 GMT 1, Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election?
Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee?
Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election?
Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee?
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 22:41:56 GMT 1, Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election? Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee? It kinda depends on which direction they are going with their politics.
If they go all out marxist/socialist, I presume it's going to be Bernie. But I doubt that given how well the economy is doing and how much of that is granted to Trump.
If they go all out intersectional it's going to be a black woman (Oprah? lol).
Who else?
Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election? Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee? It kinda depends on which direction they are going with their politics. If they go all out marxist/socialist, I presume it's going to be Bernie. But I doubt that given how well the economy is doing and how much of that is granted to Trump. If they go all out intersectional it's going to be a black woman (Oprah? lol). Who else?
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 22:52:09 GMT 1, 2020 Presidential candidates.
www.politics1.com/p2020.htm
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by moron on Jul 23, 2018 22:57:21 GMT 1, I guess for democrats, free speech only works one way.
" Clintons turn IRS into โgestapoโ
Few federal agencies are more feared and loathed by Americans than the Internal Revenue Service โ especially when corrupt presidents abuse the power of the IRS to harass and exact revenge on political enemies. As WND has reported, during Bill Clintonโs terms in office, IRS audits were conducted against individuals and groups who caused problems for the administration. Several prominent conservative groups found themselves facing IRS audits following their criticism of the president and his policies. Among the conservative groups targeted for audits were the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Review, American Spectator (which was burglarized three times), the National Center for Public Policy Research, the American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, David Horowitzโs Center for the Study of Popular Culture and the Western Journalism Center.
Individuals singled out for audits during the administration included Clinton paramours Gennifer Flowers and Liz Ward Gracen, sexual assault accusers Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, fired White House Travel Office Director Billy Dale and attorney Kent Masterson Brown. Fox Newsโ Bill OโReilly, an outspoken critic of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, said he was audited three times during the Clinton presidency.
A 1996 survey by the Washington Times could not identify a single liberal public policy organization that had been audited during the entire Clinton administration."
www.wnd.com/2016/07/above-the-law-hillarys-huge-scandal-list-explodes-to-25/
I guess for democrats, free speech only works one way. " Clintons turn IRS into โgestapoโ
Few federal agencies are more feared and loathed by Americans than the Internal Revenue Service โ especially when corrupt presidents abuse the power of the IRS to harass and exact revenge on political enemies. As WND has reported, during Bill Clintonโs terms in office, IRS audits were conducted against individuals and groups who caused problems for the administration. Several prominent conservative groups found themselves facing IRS audits following their criticism of the president and his policies. Among the conservative groups targeted for audits were the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Review, American Spectator (which was burglarized three times), the National Center for Public Policy Research, the American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, David Horowitzโs Center for the Study of Popular Culture and the Western Journalism Center.
Individuals singled out for audits during the administration included Clinton paramours Gennifer Flowers and Liz Ward Gracen, sexual assault accusers Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, fired White House Travel Office Director Billy Dale and attorney Kent Masterson Brown. Fox Newsโ Bill OโReilly, an outspoken critic of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, said he was audited three times during the Clinton presidency.
A 1996 survey by the Washington Times could not identify a single liberal public policy organization that had been audited during the entire Clinton administration."www.wnd.com/2016/07/above-the-law-hillarys-huge-scandal-list-explodes-to-25/
|
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by qest on Jul 23, 2018 23:26:01 GMT 1, Irrelevant and garbage article by a garbage publication citing another garbage publication. In other words, par for course.
Irrelevant and garbage article by a garbage publication citing another garbage publication. In other words, par for course.
|
|
|
kevinalba94
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 7
๐๐ป 0
November 2017
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by kevinalba94 on Nov 14, 2019 12:18:52 GMT 1, Iโm interested
Iโm interested
|
|
floubi
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,509
๐๐ป 795
June 2011
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by floubi on Dec 10, 2019 10:55:49 GMT 1, I may be on the wrong thread...
KATSU Launches First Semi-Autonomous Smart Painting Drone
Widely recognized as a pioneer of drone painting, KATSU merges public art and technology to progress the development of drone technology in art and activism. After years of research and development, KATSU and Tsuru Robotics have developed the first for-sale smart painting drone, dubbed the โKATSURU BETA.โ
The semi-autonomous spray painting drone is controlled manually and uses highly-advanced sensors and software to detect and cling to walls. The KATSURU BETA tracks walls hundreds of feet high, has 10 minutes of flight per battery and uses standard spray paint cans to creates works of enormous scale. โIt will be upgradable in late 2020 to full autonomous painting with a vision kit,โ KATSU explains, referring to the drone as โan art object and a fully functioning tool.โ The limited edition collectible will arrive hand-signed by the artist himself.
katsuru.ai/
Very interesting IMO, but I can't pull the trigger as I don't know how to use a "regular drone"
I may be on the wrong thread... KATSU Launches First Semi-Autonomous Smart Painting Drone Widely recognized as a pioneer of drone painting, KATSU merges public art and technology to progress the development of drone technology in art and activism. After years of research and development, KATSU and Tsuru Robotics have developed the first for-sale smart painting drone, dubbed the โKATSURU BETA.โ The semi-autonomous spray painting drone is controlled manually and uses highly-advanced sensors and software to detect and cling to walls. The KATSURU BETA tracks walls hundreds of feet high, has 10 minutes of flight per battery and uses standard spray paint cans to creates works of enormous scale. โIt will be upgradable in late 2020 to full autonomous painting with a vision kit,โ KATSU explains, referring to the drone as โan art object and a fully functioning tool.โ The limited edition collectible will arrive hand-signed by the artist himself. katsuru.ai/Very interesting IMO, but I can't pull the trigger as I don't know how to use a "regular drone"
|
|
liddlejc
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 278
๐๐ป 117
October 2007
|
Katsu ๐บ๐ธ BTM Graffiti Crew โข Art For Sale, by liddlejc on Dec 4, 2021 15:36:09 GMT 1, Hya I have this print for sale that I got from beyond the streets LA I'm really not sure on price so excepting offers thanks
Hya I have this print for sale that I got from beyond the streets LA I'm really not sure on price so excepting offers thanks
|
|