|
|
Echo in the Night, by Tommy Tucker on Oct 5, 2018 13:53:33 GMT 1,
Medium:Archival Inkjet with 2 Colour Screenprint and Varnish Overlay on Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308gsm Paper
Edges: Cut
Year: 2018
Edition: 50
Size: 54.00cm (w) x 78.00cm (h)
www.jealousgallery.com/prints/echo
295 GBP
Medium:Archival Inkjet with 2 Colour Screenprint and Varnish Overlay on Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308gsm Paper Edges: Cut Year: 2018 Edition: 50 Size: 54.00cm (w) x 78.00cm (h) www.jealousgallery.com/prints/echo295 GBP |
|
|
|
Echo in the Night, by andyroo0312 on Oct 5, 2018 13:58:09 GMT 1, Medium:Archival Inkjet with 2 Colour Screenprint and Varnish Overlay on Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308gsm Paper Edges: Cut Year: 2018 Edition: 50 Size: 54.00cm (w) x 78.00cm (h) www.jealousgallery.com/prints/echo295 GBP
Medium:Archival Inkjet with 2 Colour Screenprint and Varnish Overlay on Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308gsm Paper Edges: Cut Year: 2018 Edition: 50 Size: 54.00cm (w) x 78.00cm (h) www.jealousgallery.com/prints/echo295 GBP I like this Miss Bugs. I want one but have not really got the cash. A little surprised they are still up for sale on the website.. |
|
loother
New Member
🗨️ 471
👍🏻 602
October 2014
|
Echo in the Night, by loother on Oct 5, 2018 14:31:14 GMT 1, I love Miss Bugs, but this isn't one of their best in my opinion. Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. I'm still very much looking forward to the show.
I love Miss Bugs, but this isn't one of their best in my opinion. Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. I'm still very much looking forward to the show.
|
|
Segment
New Member
🗨️ 456
👍🏻 386
September 2014
|
Echo in the Night, by Segment on Oct 5, 2018 14:41:08 GMT 1, Sore this at Moniker yesterday and its nice but in my opinion not as nice as some of there previous screened prints, an easy pass for me.
Sore this at Moniker yesterday and its nice but in my opinion not as nice as some of there previous screened prints, an easy pass for me.
|
|
soupy
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,108
👍🏻 2,611
April 2014
|
Echo in the Night, by soupy on Oct 5, 2018 15:05:18 GMT 1, Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive.
(2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work
(3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort.
Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. (1) previous print releases (once we dreamt, who ate the last hope) with the pop art character collages had some form of inkjet. they weren't 100% screened. (2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work (3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort. |
|
|
|
Echo in the Night, by andyroo0312 on Oct 5, 2018 15:15:18 GMT 1, I love Miss Bugs, but this isn't one of their best in my opinion. Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. I'm still very much looking forward to the show.  Newbie mistake I know but on a high note, I have not received any complaints from the 280 souls that dined this evening. 
I love Miss Bugs, but this isn't one of their best in my opinion. Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. I'm still very much looking forward to the show. I agree it is not her best work but it is still worthy of a wall just not in my house. I am a purist myself but only relating to inkjet prints which are not allowed at or in my premises. I didn't even notice that it was an inkjet when I quickly scanned the info, I guess I just assumed that it was screened. Lessoned learnt for me, "never assume" also never read important things in a rushed manner. I was still at work doing a function for 280 covers with the food being of Indian theme so somewhere between getting out the Chicken Jalfrezi and the Matar Paneer while keeping 1 eye on the Palak Dal Chana, I missed the word Inkjet. Newbie mistake I know but on a high note, I have not received any complaints from the 280 souls that dined this evening. |
|
|
|
kalm
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,005
👍🏻 356
November 2010
|
Echo in the Night, by kalm on Oct 5, 2018 15:38:52 GMT 1, +1
It’s ink jet and screen printed...easy purchase to own a miss bugs!
P.s. plus the image of the girl is HOT...my type of lady
+1
It’s ink jet and screen printed...easy purchase to own a miss bugs!
P.s. plus the image of the girl is HOT...my type of lady
|
|
loother
New Member
🗨️ 471
👍🏻 602
October 2014
|
Echo in the Night, by loother on Oct 5, 2018 16:50:48 GMT 1, Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. (1) previous print releases (once we dreamt, who ate the last hope) with the pop art character collages had some form of inkjet. they weren't 100% screened. (2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work (3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort.
Maybe some purists are also put off by the fact it's an inkjet print where previous releases have been screened, often with bonus hand-finishing, without being wildly more expensive. (1) previous print releases (once we dreamt, who ate the last hope) with the pop art character collages had some form of inkjet. they weren't 100% screened. (2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work (3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort. (1) I did wonder if that was the case, because of the number of colours and the complexity of the images, though none of them boasted about it - when it was released Once we Dreamt was described as "silkscreen print, aerosol stencil, hand painted 24ct gold leaf". However they did it, it's on my wall and I like it. |
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Echo in the Night, by Ottomatik on Oct 23, 2018 13:15:44 GMT 1, (1) previous print releases (once we dreamt, who ate the last hope) with the pop art character collages had some form of inkjet. they weren't 100% screened. (2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work (3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort. (1) I did wonder if that was the case, because of the number of colours and the complexity of the images, though none of them boasted about it - when it was released Once we Dreamt was described as "silkscreen print, aerosol stencil, hand painted 24ct gold leaf". However they did it, it's on my wall and I like it.
I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet.
(1) previous print releases (once we dreamt, who ate the last hope) with the pop art character collages had some form of inkjet. they weren't 100% screened. (2) agree that some had gold leaf and/or aerosol stencil work (3) i think it is priced accordingly. the previously mentioned prints were larger, pricier, and had some "hand finished" work of some sort. (1) I did wonder if that was the case, because of the number of colours and the complexity of the images, though none of them boasted about it - when it was released Once we Dreamt was described as "silkscreen print, aerosol stencil, hand painted 24ct gold leaf". However they did it, it's on my wall and I like it. I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. |
|
|
|
nawf
New Member
🗨️ 91
👍🏻 69
November 2015
|
Echo in the Night, by nawf on Oct 25, 2018 10:05:45 GMT 1, (1) I did wonder if that was the case, because of the number of colours and the complexity of the images, though none of them boasted about it - when it was released Once we Dreamt was described as "silkscreen print, aerosol stencil, hand painted 24ct gold leaf". However they did it, it's on my wall and I like it. I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that.
(1) I did wonder if that was the case, because of the number of colours and the complexity of the images, though none of them boasted about it - when it was released Once we Dreamt was described as "silkscreen print, aerosol stencil, hand painted 24ct gold leaf". However they did it, it's on my wall and I like it. I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that. |
|
|
|
Echo in the Night, by South Bound on Oct 25, 2018 11:59:49 GMT 1, I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that.
interested as to why it would be impossible? I’ve seen many, more complicated works that were created via screenprinting. What makes this one so unique?
I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that. interested as to why it would be impossible? I’ve seen many, more complicated works that were created via screenprinting. What makes this one so unique? |
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Echo in the Night, by Ottomatik on Oct 25, 2018 13:41:21 GMT 1, I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that.
I disagree.
The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf.
No inkjet.
I’m sure that OWD, WATLH have no inkjet. The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that. I disagree. The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf. No inkjet. |
|
nawf
New Member
🗨️ 91
👍🏻 69
November 2015
|
Echo in the Night, by nawf on Oct 25, 2018 15:21:21 GMT 1, The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that. I disagree. The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf. No inkjet. Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
The entire hair area of both of these prints is 100% inkjet- It would be close to impossible to screen print that. I disagree. The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf. No inkjet. Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
|
|
|
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Echo in the Night, by Ottomatik on Oct 25, 2018 21:46:37 GMT 1, I disagree. The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf. No inkjet. Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
Nope.
’The majority of their prints(...) are giclees...’ That is an incorrect statement. I may be wrong, but I think the only other inkjets were the Monsters of Spin and Driving Miss Crazy.
I do not own Monsters, but I believe that the background spin Á la Hirst was Giclee with screens and stuff on top. As for Driving Miss Crazy, the car background was inkjet with diamond dust on top:
But back to the topic....
Why would they add Inkjet to a print that has inkjet and not the....
You know what? Nevermind.
I’ll ask Miss myself.
To be continued...
I disagree. The description states Silkscreen, Stencil, gold leaf. No inkjet. Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
Nope. ’The majority of their prints(...) are giclees...’ That is an incorrect statement. I may be wrong, but I think the only other inkjets were the Monsters of Spin and Driving Miss Crazy. I do not own Monsters, but I believe that the background spin Á la Hirst was Giclee with screens and stuff on top. As for Driving Miss Crazy, the car background was inkjet with diamond dust on top: But back to the topic.... Why would they add Inkjet to a print that has inkjet and not the.... You know what? Nevermind. I’ll ask Miss myself. To be continued... |
|
|
|
Echo in the Night, by Henry Gale Was Here on Nov 9, 2018 16:50:45 GMT 1, Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
Nope. ’The majority of their prints(...) are giclees...’ That is an incorrect statement. I may be wrong, but I think the only other inkjets were the Monsters of Spin and Driving Miss Crazy. I do not own Monsters, but I believe that the background spin Á la Hirst was Giclee with screens and stuff on top. As for Driving Miss Crazy, the car background was inkjet with diamond dust on top: But back to the topic.... Why would they add Inkjet to a print that has inkjet and not the.... You know what? Nevermind. I’ll ask Miss myself. To be continued...
I'm pretty sure all the cartoon characters in their recent pieces are ink jet. They're not CMYK screen printed, and if they were spot color screen printed, there would be a LOT more screen printed layers than they mention. Still look amazing though!
Yeah they don't state it, but the majority of their prints (including the ones you listed) are giclees which are screen-printed on top.
Nope. ’The majority of their prints(...) are giclees...’ That is an incorrect statement. I may be wrong, but I think the only other inkjets were the Monsters of Spin and Driving Miss Crazy. I do not own Monsters, but I believe that the background spin Á la Hirst was Giclee with screens and stuff on top. As for Driving Miss Crazy, the car background was inkjet with diamond dust on top: But back to the topic.... Why would they add Inkjet to a print that has inkjet and not the.... You know what? Nevermind. I’ll ask Miss myself. To be continued...
I'm pretty sure all the cartoon characters in their recent pieces are ink jet. They're not CMYK screen printed, and if they were spot color screen printed, there would be a LOT more screen printed layers than they mention. Still look amazing though!
|
|
Newbie mistake I know but on a high note, I have not received any complaints from the 280 souls that dined this evening. 
