hnkpnk
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,344
👍🏻 1,423
July 2011
|
New BANKSY stall, by hnkpnk on Nov 6, 2018 22:38:37 GMT 1, BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above.  
BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above. How on earth did you make a nine hundred something kb jpg into a 755 MB TIFF file and especially why? |
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
New BANKSY stall, by FЯ on Nov 6, 2018 22:41:48 GMT 1, BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above. How on earth did you make a nine hundred something jpg into a 755 MB TIFF file and especially why?
because size matters - don't let your gf or bf tell you otherwise.
They have bad art taste if they say they like a 1MB
BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above. How on earth did you make a nine hundred something jpg into a 755 MB TIFF file and especially why? because size matters - don't let your gf or bf tell you otherwise. They have bad art taste if they say they like a 1MB |
|
k2
New Member
🗨️ 528
👍🏻 972
November 2016
|
New BANKSY stall, by k2 on Nov 6, 2018 22:42:05 GMT 1, I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off.
Nice work. I’ve got a load of VHS tapes at home - any chance you could pop over and ‘fix them’ into Blu-rays?
I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. Nice work. I’ve got a load of VHS tapes at home - any chance you could pop over and ‘fix them’ into Blu-rays? |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 6, 2018 22:44:47 GMT 1, I'm glad we have moved the debate on from occupied territories to dpi and pixels. Hang up your hat Banksy, your work here is done 🙄 I thought it was mainly an art forum not a political one?
Banksy IS political. As large part of good art (of any form).
I'm glad we have moved the debate on from occupied territories to dpi and pixels. Hang up your hat Banksy, your work here is done 🙄 I thought it was mainly an art forum not a political one? Banksy IS political. As large part of good art (of any form). |
|
|
|
Look at how pixelated and feathered the text is.. |
|
slevin
New Member
🗨️ 602
👍🏻 699
December 2015
|
New BANKSY stall, by slevin on Nov 6, 2018 22:45:54 GMT 1, Hi mate,( I ‘ve been already to f**koff ) but your links does not show all the poster, only the top .,. I m not complete It is intentional, you can have a huge square banksy on the wall without the text. That image is 83x83 cm and wont pixelate
Hi mate,( I ‘ve been already to f**koff ) but your links does not show all the poster, only the top .,. I m not complete It is intentional, you can have a huge square banksy on the wall without the text. That image is 83x83 cm and wont pixelate At 72dpi it will pixellate and won't look good at 83cm. It would need to be printed at roughly 20x20cm to look decent. |
|
|
|
rockbeer
New Member
🗨️ 364
👍🏻 445
May 2006
|
New BANKSY stall, by rockbeer on Nov 6, 2018 22:51:10 GMT 1, Oh good grief.
Just to clarify, for anyone who’s interested, though I doubt anyone is:
Resolution is measured in dots per inch = DPI = PPI = pixels per inch. It’s just maths - the number of ‘physical’ pixels / dots contained in the image (each dot being a discrete unit of colour information) divided by the perceived ‘size’ of the printed or displayed image.
A digital image has a finite and fixed number of pixels - this value is established when the image is created and is not a variable. Resolution is a variable - it can be adjusted depending on the display device or desired scale of the printed image, but realistically only within the limits imposed by the actual pixel count. Resolution can be increased or reduced at will by squeezing the pixels closer together or spacing them apart, but this doesn’t change the actual number of pixels - the amount of colour information - contained in the image.
Resolution and pixel ‘size’ therefore depend entirely on the output device. A screen has (generally) bigger pixels than a printer - and the resolution of an image can easily be adusted so it looks as good as possible on either of these or any other given device. Which is not to say it can be made to look good, only as good as possible, since whether it can be reproduced successfully on a given device depends ultimately on the overall pixel dimensions.
Any enlargement of the image involves either making each pixel bigger (by adjusting the DPI - which tends to make it look increasingly pixellated the further you go), or increasing the total number of pixels in the image, which can only be done by interpolation i.e. software guessing what colour each new pixel should be, based on the colour of the surrounding pixels. Similarly, a real reduction in image size involves software choosing pixels to discard.
Either way, quality is reduced. To a point, minor enlargements and reductions are basically undetectable, but anyone who says a 2480 px x 3507 px image can be printed at A0 scale with no significant pixellation or degradation in quality is delusional or, more likely, having you on. It might look good, or it might be fine for your purposes, or you might happen to like it, but it definitely won’t look the way the original image was intended to look.
Oh good grief.
Just to clarify, for anyone who’s interested, though I doubt anyone is:
Resolution is measured in dots per inch = DPI = PPI = pixels per inch. It’s just maths - the number of ‘physical’ pixels / dots contained in the image (each dot being a discrete unit of colour information) divided by the perceived ‘size’ of the printed or displayed image.
A digital image has a finite and fixed number of pixels - this value is established when the image is created and is not a variable. Resolution is a variable - it can be adjusted depending on the display device or desired scale of the printed image, but realistically only within the limits imposed by the actual pixel count. Resolution can be increased or reduced at will by squeezing the pixels closer together or spacing them apart, but this doesn’t change the actual number of pixels - the amount of colour information - contained in the image.
Resolution and pixel ‘size’ therefore depend entirely on the output device. A screen has (generally) bigger pixels than a printer - and the resolution of an image can easily be adusted so it looks as good as possible on either of these or any other given device. Which is not to say it can be made to look good, only as good as possible, since whether it can be reproduced successfully on a given device depends ultimately on the overall pixel dimensions.
Any enlargement of the image involves either making each pixel bigger (by adjusting the DPI - which tends to make it look increasingly pixellated the further you go), or increasing the total number of pixels in the image, which can only be done by interpolation i.e. software guessing what colour each new pixel should be, based on the colour of the surrounding pixels. Similarly, a real reduction in image size involves software choosing pixels to discard.
Either way, quality is reduced. To a point, minor enlargements and reductions are basically undetectable, but anyone who says a 2480 px x 3507 px image can be printed at A0 scale with no significant pixellation or degradation in quality is delusional or, more likely, having you on. It might look good, or it might be fine for your purposes, or you might happen to like it, but it definitely won’t look the way the original image was intended to look.
|
|
slevin
New Member
🗨️ 602
👍🏻 699
December 2015
|
New BANKSY stall, by slevin on Nov 6, 2018 22:55:01 GMT 1, Oh good grief. Just to clarify, for anyone who’s interested, though I doubt anyone is: Resolution is measured in dots per inch = DPI = PPI = pixels per inch. It’s just maths - the number of ‘physical’ pixels / dots contained in the image (each dot being a discrete unit of colour information) divided by the perceived ‘size’ of the printed or displayed image. A digital image has a finite and fixed number of pixels - this value is established when the image is created and is not a variable. Resolution is a variable - it can be adjusted depending on the display device or desired scale of the printed image, but realistically only within the limits imposed by the actual pixel count. Resolution can be increased or reduced at will by squeezing the pixels closer together or spacing them apart, but this doesn’t change the actual number of pixels - the amount of colour information - contained in the image. Resolution and pixel ‘size’ therefore depend entirely on the output device. A screen has (generally) bigger pixels than a printer - and the resolution of an image can easily be adusted so it looks as good as possible on either of these or any other given device. Which is not to say it can be made to look good, only as good as possible, since whether it can be reproduced successfully on a given device depends ultimately on the overall pixel dimensions. Any enlargement of the image involves either making each pixel bigger (by adjusting the DPI - which tends to make it look increasingly pixellated the further you go), or increasing the total number of pixels in the image, which can only be done by interpolation i.e. software guessing what colour each new pixel should be, based on the colour of the surrounding pixels. Similarly, a real reduction in image size involves software choosing pixels to discard. Either way, quality is reduced. To a point, minor enlargements and reductions are basically undetectable, but anyone who says a 2480 px x 3507 px image can be printed at A0 scale with no significant pixellation or degradation in quality is delusional or, more likely, having you on. It might look good, or it might be fine for your purposes, or you might happen to like it, but it definitely won’t look the way the original image was intended to look.
The downloadable poster from the Banksy site is an A4 print (21x29.7cm) at the proper print resolution (300dpi). Go any larger and you will see a loss in quality.
Oh good grief. Just to clarify, for anyone who’s interested, though I doubt anyone is: Resolution is measured in dots per inch = DPI = PPI = pixels per inch. It’s just maths - the number of ‘physical’ pixels / dots contained in the image (each dot being a discrete unit of colour information) divided by the perceived ‘size’ of the printed or displayed image. A digital image has a finite and fixed number of pixels - this value is established when the image is created and is not a variable. Resolution is a variable - it can be adjusted depending on the display device or desired scale of the printed image, but realistically only within the limits imposed by the actual pixel count. Resolution can be increased or reduced at will by squeezing the pixels closer together or spacing them apart, but this doesn’t change the actual number of pixels - the amount of colour information - contained in the image. Resolution and pixel ‘size’ therefore depend entirely on the output device. A screen has (generally) bigger pixels than a printer - and the resolution of an image can easily be adusted so it looks as good as possible on either of these or any other given device. Which is not to say it can be made to look good, only as good as possible, since whether it can be reproduced successfully on a given device depends ultimately on the overall pixel dimensions. Any enlargement of the image involves either making each pixel bigger (by adjusting the DPI - which tends to make it look increasingly pixellated the further you go), or increasing the total number of pixels in the image, which can only be done by interpolation i.e. software guessing what colour each new pixel should be, based on the colour of the surrounding pixels. Similarly, a real reduction in image size involves software choosing pixels to discard. Either way, quality is reduced. To a point, minor enlargements and reductions are basically undetectable, but anyone who says a 2480 px x 3507 px image can be printed at A0 scale with no significant pixellation or degradation in quality is delusional or, more likely, having you on. It might look good, or it might be fine for your purposes, or you might happen to like it, but it definitely won’t look the way the original image was intended to look. TL;DR The downloadable poster from the Banksy site is an A4 print (21x29.7cm) at the proper print resolution (300dpi). Go any larger and you will see a loss in quality. |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 6, 2018 22:55:18 GMT 1, BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above.
🤦♂️ it’s a Banksy, not an Invader.
BANKSY IMAGE WITHOUT THE TEXT
-
UPDATED - 300DPI NOT PIXELATED AND WILL LOOK AMAZING 83 X 83CM. I even made it CMYK for arguments sake and tweaked the pdf values for a better quality. YOU Clearly do not understand how this works as it would be exactly the same. You did not download and check the file now did you HAVE A NICE DAY - INSTEAD OF NIT PICKING YOU COULD HAVE DONE THIS FOR PEOPLE.-I fixed this image for everyone. now you can all f**k off. For one week only you can download this image which is 84cm x 84cm high res to print out at somewhere that does posters and frame. Trust me, it will look nice. HI RES VERSION HERE: ----- TIF: (755MB) we.tl/t-0DnuZ4Q56oPDF: (495MB) we.tl/t-mRJbJqgFz4----- ENJOY This is the preview: (do not use this image to print) Use link above. 🤦♂️ it’s a Banksy, not an Invader. |
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by Rouen Cathedral on Nov 6, 2018 22:56:40 GMT 1, I had my bots download the first dowbload from the babksy site. It's signed!
Sorry all I've already sikd 100+ copies for 10k each. Snooze you lose bots bots bots!
I had my bots download the first dowbload from the babksy site. It's signed!
Sorry all I've already sikd 100+ copies for 10k each. Snooze you lose bots bots bots!
|
|
Argiebaji
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,015
👍🏻 1,183
June 2008
|
New BANKSY stall, by Argiebaji on Nov 6, 2018 22:57:50 GMT 1, Is it just me ... ?
Even though there is a download available ..
..I'd still want one from the WTM event !
Is it just me ... ?
Even though there is a download available ..
..I'd still want one from the WTM event !
|
|
slevin
New Member
🗨️ 602
👍🏻 699
December 2015
|
New BANKSY stall, by slevin on Nov 6, 2018 22:59:11 GMT 1, Can anybody with a poster from the event confirm the size please?
Can anybody with a poster from the event confirm the size please?
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Look at how pixelated and feathered the text is.. Crappy print indeed. Yet another that does not understand dpi... |
|
tno
New Member
🗨️ 54
👍🏻 143
April 2018
|
New BANKSY stall, by tno on Nov 6, 2018 23:04:40 GMT 1,  guys sorry but as seen too much here about resolution... Here you have it correct, just ready for local printer office. Tell them to print it to minimum 250g paper... .)
And here just for fun
guys sorry but as seen too much here about resolution... Here you have it correct, just ready for local printer office. Tell them to print it to minimum 250g paper... .)
And here just for fun
|
|
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 6, 2018 23:10:47 GMT 1, Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable).
PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve.
Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable). PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve. |
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by letterpressed on Nov 6, 2018 23:17:51 GMT 1, Can you take a shot of them both side by side?
Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable). PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve.
Can you take a shot of them both side by side? Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable). PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve. |
|
rockbeer
New Member
🗨️ 364
👍🏻 445
May 2006
|
New BANKSY stall, by rockbeer on Nov 6, 2018 23:23:04 GMT 1, TL;DR The downloadable poster from the Banksy site is an A4 print (21x29.7cm) at the proper print resolution (300dpi). Go any larger and you will see a loss in quality.
Yes, I started out saying that about 10 pages back.
Some people take a lot of convincing.
Should be okay up to about A3 - bigger than that, it’s going to get sketchy.
TL;DR The downloadable poster from the Banksy site is an A4 print (21x29.7cm) at the proper print resolution (300dpi). Go any larger and you will see a loss in quality. Yes, I started out saying that about 10 pages back. Some people take a lot of convincing. Should be okay up to about A3 - bigger than that, it’s going to get sketchy. |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 6, 2018 23:27:24 GMT 1, Can you take a shot of them both side by side? Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable). PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve.
Don’t have it at hand at the moment, but a few millimetres difference between the prints. And already the (crappy phone) image above has much more white at the bottom than at the top.
Can you take a shot of them both side by side? Btw, I’ve notice an odd thing about the print: the image is not at the centre of the page ie the one below has more space at the top than at the bottom. Furthermore, different images are off center in a different way (I’ve got mine in the morning, my partner got one in the evening, and comparing the two the difference is quite noticeable). PS sorry for the reflection - I’ve already popped it into a sleeve. Don’t have it at hand at the moment, but a few millimetres difference between the prints. And already the (crappy phone) image above has much more white at the bottom than at the top. |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 6, 2018 23:35:56 GMT 1,
In this image too the print is not centered on the page
In this image too the print is not centered on the page |
|
|
|
Pysgod
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,677
👍🏻 1,347
December 2016
|
New BANKSY stall, by Pysgod on Nov 6, 2018 23:52:09 GMT 1, In this image too the print is not centered on the page
In this image too the print is not centered on the page Who gives a fuck you odd little herb |
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by Not 4 The Thril on Nov 6, 2018 23:54:36 GMT 1, how long before people will start printing these out themselves and selling them on ebay for $400???
how long before people will start printing these out themselves and selling them on ebay for $400???
|
|
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
New BANKSY stall, by rebate on Nov 6, 2018 23:57:24 GMT 1, how long before people will start printing these out themselves and selling them on ebay for $400???
how long before people will start printing these out themselves and selling them on ebay for $400??? -3 hours or so. |
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by Lroy on Nov 7, 2018 0:06:25 GMT 1, Can you take a shot of them both side by side? Don’t have it at hand at the moment, but a few millimetres difference between the prints. And already the (crappy phone) image above has much more white at the bottom than at the top.
It means one thing : these posters has been done and printed quickly - maybe not at he same time - from the same link that Banksy generously put on its website.
Now, how people having the real one ( or the flippers ) will could show and prove the « authenticity » of their poster ?
To put a pic of the rubber band 😂 😂 😂 in the pic 2 !!! Ahahah !!
Can you take a shot of them both side by side? Don’t have it at hand at the moment, but a few millimetres difference between the prints. And already the (crappy phone) image above has much more white at the bottom than at the top. It means one thing : these posters has been done and printed quickly - maybe not at he same time - from the same link that Banksy generously put on its website. Now, how people having the real one ( or the flippers ) will could show and prove the « authenticity » of their poster ? To put a pic of the rubber band 😂 😂 😂 in the pic 2 !!! Ahahah !! |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 7, 2018 0:20:00 GMT 1, In this image too the print is not centered on the page Who gives a f**kyou odd little herb
Buzz off 👋
In this image too the print is not centered on the page Who gives a f**kyou odd little herb Buzz off 👋 |
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by letterpressed on Nov 7, 2018 0:22:51 GMT 1, I think it’s probably a design choice to have the bottom border a bit bigger than the top, It’s not unusual 👍🏻
In this image too the print is not centered on the page
I think it’s probably a design choice to have the bottom border a bit bigger than the top, It’s not unusual 👍🏻 In this image too the print is not centered on the page |
|
iamzero
Full Member
🗨️ 9,190
👍🏻 8,545
May 2011
|
New BANKSY stall, by iamzero on Nov 7, 2018 0:25:39 GMT 1, Well I think it looks odd... I’ll give you £20 for it so you don’t have to look at it.
Well I think it looks odd... I’ll give you £20 for it so you don’t have to look at it.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
New BANKSY stall, by Chris JL on Nov 7, 2018 0:45:32 GMT 1, I think it’s probably a design choice to have the bottom border a bit bigger than the top, It’s not unusual 👍🏻 In this image too the print is not centered on the page
Indeed. But one print has 2mm less than the other on top and, on the same print, I just realised that one side has 3mm more white than the other... (the total space is 1cm on one side and 0.7cm on the other).
I think Lroy is right: these were printed (or at least cut) quite in a hurry (and since the beginning, since my print was picked up early in the morning).
Or maybe it’s just designed to send your framer crazy 😊
I think it’s probably a design choice to have the bottom border a bit bigger than the top, It’s not unusual 👍🏻 In this image too the print is not centered on the page Indeed. But one print has 2mm less than the other on top and, on the same print, I just realised that one side has 3mm more white than the other... (the total space is 1cm on one side and 0.7cm on the other). I think Lroy is right: these were printed (or at least cut) quite in a hurry (and since the beginning, since my print was picked up early in the morning). Or maybe it’s just designed to send your framer crazy 😊 |
|
Winter
Junior Member
🗨️ 7,155
👍🏻 4,461
March 2007
|
New BANKSY stall, by Winter on Nov 7, 2018 0:50:02 GMT 1, Lots on the bay which is no massive surprise - I’m sure it will double tomorrow
Lots on the bay which is no massive surprise - I’m sure it will double tomorrow
|
|
|
|
New BANKSY stall, by Rouen Cathedral on Nov 7, 2018 0:53:03 GMT 1, I'll ask again cause no one wanted to answer.
Why did banksy feel the need to advertise free stuff?
I'll ask again cause no one wanted to answer.
Why did banksy feel the need to advertise free stuff?
|
|
guys sorry but as seen too much here about resolution... Here you have it correct, just ready for local printer office. Tell them to print it to minimum 250g paper... .) 
