|
|
kwatis
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,002
👍🏻 699
April 2007
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by kwatis on Dec 6, 2018 2:07:27 GMT 1, Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger.
Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger.
|
|
kwatis
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,002
👍🏻 699
April 2007
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by kwatis on Dec 6, 2018 2:07:53 GMT 1,
Thanks for sharing!
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 2:20:49 GMT 1, Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger.
i share the same sentiment! A 24x24 would be a killer screenprint.
Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger. i share the same sentiment! A 24x24 would be a killer screenprint. |
|
kwatis
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,002
👍🏻 699
April 2007
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by kwatis on Dec 6, 2018 2:26:11 GMT 1, Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger. i share the same sentiment! A 24x24 would be a killer screenprint.
Or bigger! And I know that the larger the piece, the more expensive it is to frame, but some things (Marks work included) is better larger.
Love the images, hate that they're giclees. No reason that they need to be when they'd make lovely 3 or 4 color screen prints. And so small; 12 x 12". Wish it was large, maybe 24 x 24" or larger. i share the same sentiment! A 24x24 would be a killer screenprint. Or bigger! And I know that the larger the piece, the more expensive it is to frame, but some things (Marks work included) is better larger. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 2:33:20 GMT 1, Or bigger! And I know that the larger the piece, the more expensive it is to frame, but some things (Marks work included) is better larger. Def is, his originals are the sizes we are talking about , he made a goombah 18x24. I dont like glicess but i own a few from artists that work only in that medium even though they could do screenprinting..but hey the "common" artist pocket is not that deep and glicees are more economically viable. The only screenprinted wrk i can think of, of his, are the pearl jam and primus art prints, where he used popeye and dr.seus cat in the hat.
Or bigger! And I know that the larger the piece, the more expensive it is to frame, but some things (Marks work included) is better larger. Def is, his originals are the sizes we are talking about , he made a goombah 18x24. I dont like glicess but i own a few from artists that work only in that medium even though they could do screenprinting..but hey the "common" artist pocket is not that deep and glicees are more economically viable. The only screenprinted wrk i can think of, of his, are the pearl jam and primus art prints, where he used popeye and dr.seus cat in the hat. |
|
|
|
kwatis
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,002
👍🏻 699
April 2007
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by kwatis on Dec 6, 2018 2:41:12 GMT 1, It might surprise some people (collectors and artists) to know that giclees can be more expensive than screenprints.
It might surprise some people (collectors and artists) to know that giclees can be more expensive than screenprints.
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by Deleted on Dec 6, 2018 4:16:01 GMT 1,
the red one and blck ones are niice too
the red one and blck ones are niice too |
|
kwatis
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,002
👍🏻 699
April 2007
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by kwatis on Dec 6, 2018 19:08:29 GMT 1, Agreed with both comments. It's surprises me that Marks work isn't more sought after. The pricing of his originals are decent and usually sell fast when he has a show. The prints and toys tho surprisingly don't sell as well. That Tweety is amazing (ESPECIALLY the red and black/gold variant) and for the price is a steal. Only thing I own from him is a commissioned painting (three letters of my choice; it was a promo he did on social media) and the collaborative 4.5ft skeleton ornament he did with Kaws.
Agreed with both comments. It's surprises me that Marks work isn't more sought after. The pricing of his originals are decent and usually sell fast when he has a show. The prints and toys tho surprisingly don't sell as well. That Tweety is amazing (ESPECIALLY the red and black/gold variant) and for the price is a steal. Only thing I own from him is a commissioned painting (three letters of my choice; it was a promo he did on social media) and the collaborative 4.5ft skeleton ornament he did with Kaws.
|
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by acaipride on Sept 8, 2020 1:46:33 GMT 1,
He is def in my collection
He is def in my collection |
|
flatcolor
New Member
🗨️ 204
👍🏻 392
April 2020
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by flatcolor on Sept 8, 2020 1:58:24 GMT 1, Every time I see this thread, all I can think of is Mike Dean and what kind of art he'd make. 🤷♂️
Every time I see this thread, all I can think of is Mike Dean and what kind of art he'd make. 🤷♂️ |
|
sharky
New Member
🗨️ 913
👍🏻 319
January 2012
|
MARK DEAN VECA , by sharky on Sept 8, 2020 10:05:33 GMT 1, Definitively overlooked
Definitively overlooked
|
|
|
|
|
|
