irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Mercedes-Benz sue 4 artists over instagram posts, by Inknart on Apr 3, 2019 20:49:08 GMT 1, Didn't Revok win or settle with H and M?
Didn't Revok win or settle with H and M?
|
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Mercedes-Benz sue 4 artists over instagram posts, by irl1 on Apr 3, 2019 20:52:24 GMT 1, Didn't Revok win or settle with H and M? Yes he won the case. I posted a link up a while ago about the result. If i find it i will post it again
Didn't Revok win or settle with H and M? Yes he won the case. I posted a link up a while ago about the result. If i find it i will post it again
|
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Mercedes-Benz sue 4 artists over instagram posts, by Deleted on Sept 10, 2019 8:36:23 GMT 1, I don't know if i agree or not with the artist, I think it wrong of Mercedes not to say who did the artwork in their post, wouldn't do any harm for them?
I don't know how the artist can say Mercedes acted illegally by using it?
It's all a bit precious of the artist isn't it?
If say mercedes decided to take the pics around parliament square, would they have to pay whoever owns the buildings in the photos money?
or has the point of this flown over my head?
I don't know if i agree or not with the artist, I think it wrong of Mercedes not to say who did the artwork in their post, wouldn't do any harm for them?
I don't know how the artist can say Mercedes acted illegally by using it?
It's all a bit precious of the artist isn't it?
If say mercedes decided to take the pics around parliament square, would they have to pay whoever owns the buildings in the photos money?
or has the point of this flown over my head?
|
|
printminx
New Member
🗨️ 101
👍🏻 160
February 2018
|
Mercedes-Benz sue 4 artists over instagram posts, by printminx on Sept 10, 2019 10:57:16 GMT 1, It looks to me that Mercedes deliberately used the art work for promotion of their cars and are therefore in the wrong. Artists work must be protected otherwise any piece of art work could be used to promote anything. There has to be limits and boundaries, imagine you are the proud owner of a house and are really proud of the work and energy you have put into making it look good but then a decorating company comes along and uses photos of your newly decorated home in a campaign as an example of how not to do it. How would you feel, violated, I should think and that's how artists feel when these huge companies basically take the piss.
It looks to me that Mercedes deliberately used the art work for promotion of their cars and are therefore in the wrong. Artists work must be protected otherwise any piece of art work could be used to promote anything. There has to be limits and boundaries, imagine you are the proud owner of a house and are really proud of the work and energy you have put into making it look good but then a decorating company comes along and uses photos of your newly decorated home in a campaign as an example of how not to do it. How would you feel, violated, I should think and that's how artists feel when these huge companies basically take the piss.
|
|