bossk7
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 8
๐๐ป 2
September 2018
|
Dran LTF B+W, by bossk7 on Jul 1, 2019 6:43:13 GMT 1, Hi,
Is it an edition of 50 or 100? The Black and White one. Just checking for a potential purchase.
Thanks.
Hi,
Is it an edition of 50 or 100? The Black and White one. Just checking for a potential purchase.
Thanks.
|
|
bossk7
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 8
๐๐ป 2
September 2018
|
Dran LTF B+W, by bossk7 on Jul 1, 2019 6:48:28 GMT 1, Hi, Is it an edition of 50 or 100? The Black and White one. Just checking for a potential purchase. Thanks.
Thereโs one on eBay but itโs 34/50 so canโt see how itโs possible.
Hi, Is it an edition of 50 or 100? The Black and White one. Just checking for a potential purchase. Thanks. Thereโs one on eBay but itโs 34/50 so canโt see how itโs possible. |
|
rjf76
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,494
๐๐ป 2,662
January 2015
|
Dran LTF B+W, by rjf76 on Jul 1, 2019 8:00:55 GMT 1, I think this came up a while back too....the B&W is definitely an edition of 100. This is definitely a fake...
- POW stamp too thick and blending together
- Loss of detail on black print. No textures on โfloorโ as seen on original. Too clean.
- Black ink looks too glossy (like inkjet)
- Paper looks wrong. Too textured.
Avoid. If itโs too cheap then too good to be true...
I think this came up a while back too....the B&W is definitely an edition of 100. This is definitely a fake...
- POW stamp too thick and blending together
- Loss of detail on black print. No textures on โfloorโ as seen on original. Too clean.
- Black ink looks too glossy (like inkjet)
- Paper looks wrong. Too textured.
Avoid. If itโs too cheap then too good to be true...
|
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 1, 2019 8:01:23 GMT 1, The one /50 is a FAKE
The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100.
The one /50 is a FAKE
The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100.
|
|
rjf76
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,494
๐๐ป 2,662
January 2015
|
Dran LTF B+W, by rjf76 on Jul 1, 2019 8:06:03 GMT 1, The one /50 is a FAKE The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100.
It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ!
The one /50 is a FAKE The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100. It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ! |
|
juni0209
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 788
๐๐ป 558
February 2018
|
Dran LTF B+W, by juni0209 on Jul 1, 2019 8:18:03 GMT 1, I think this came up a while back too....the B&W is definitely an edition of 100. This is definitely a fake... - POW stamp too thick and blending together - Loss of detail on black print. No textures on โfloorโ as seen on original. Too clean. - Black ink looks too glossy (like inkjet) - Paper looks wrong. Too textured. Avoid. If itโs too cheap then too good to be true...
It did. It was on catawiki but got taken of because its fake
I think this came up a while back too....the B&W is definitely an edition of 100. This is definitely a fake... - POW stamp too thick and blending together - Loss of detail on black print. No textures on โfloorโ as seen on original. Too clean. - Black ink looks too glossy (like inkjet) - Paper looks wrong. Too textured. Avoid. If itโs too cheap then too good to be true... It did. It was on catawiki but got taken of because its fake |
|
|
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 1, 2019 8:35:34 GMT 1, The one /50 is a FAKE The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100. It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ!
With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised.
The one /50 is a FAKE The Black and white was only available as an unsigned print in an edition of 100. It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ! With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised. |
|
rjf76
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,494
๐๐ป 2,662
January 2015
|
Dran LTF B+W, by rjf76 on Jul 1, 2019 8:38:58 GMT 1, It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ! With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised.
Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป
It was signed...but this signature looks too small and โpreciseโ! With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised. Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป |
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 1, 2019 8:54:01 GMT 1, With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised. Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป
With respect, I'm 100 % sure the Black and White version was unsigned editon of 100 for ยฃ70. There may be signed copies out there but they are not official or authorised. Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป To be fair, while trying to check to see if I was going mad, I looked online and a few sites including Prescription Art Artcollectorz say it was signed, it wasn't. |
|
rjf76
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,494
๐๐ป 2,662
January 2015
|
Dran LTF B+W, by rjf76 on Jul 1, 2019 8:56:05 GMT 1, Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป To be fair, while trying to check to see if I was going mad, I looked online and a few sites including Prescription Art Artcollectorz say it was signed, it wasn't.ย
Yes info is all over the place! Although not signed, original does have the machine gun/crayon blind stamp doesnโt it?!
Apologies mate! Yes, getting confused ๐คช๐๐ป To be fair, while trying to check to see if I was going mad, I looked online and a few sites including Prescription Art Artcollectorz say it was signed, it wasn't.ย Yes info is all over the place! Although not signed, original does have the machine gun/crayon blind stamp doesnโt it?! |
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 1, 2019 9:06:01 GMT 1, To be fair, while trying to check to see if I was going mad, I looked online and a few sites including Prescription Art Artcollectorz say it was signed, it wasn't.ย Yes info is all over the place! Although not signed, original does have the machine gun/crayon blind stamp doesnโt it?!
Yes.
To be fair, while trying to check to see if I was going mad, I looked online and a few sites including Prescription Art Artcollectorz say it was signed, it wasn't.ย Yes info is all over the place! Although not signed, original does have the machine gun/crayon blind stamp doesnโt it?! Yes. |
|
pidge
New Member
FourCorners
๐จ๏ธ 914
๐๐ป 836
May 2011
|
Dran LTF B+W, by pidge on Jul 2, 2019 22:45:58 GMT 1, I have a genuine unsigned, stamped B&W LTF if anyone is looking? Original owner, mint condition and London based. Please DM to discuss further if interested.
I have a genuine unsigned, stamped B&W LTF if anyone is looking? Original owner, mint condition and London based. Please DM to discuss further if interested.
|
|
sookmedeek
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 1
๐๐ป 0
July 2019
|
Dran LTF B+W, by sookmedeek on Jul 7, 2019 15:55:04 GMT 1, So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host
So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host |
|
|
|
Dran LTF B+W, by Jalouse Rosemont on Jul 7, 2019 16:10:51 GMT 1, So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host
So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host...Fake as my wife's boobies!..... |
|
|
|
irl1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,274
๐๐ป 9,381
December 2017
|
Dran LTF B+W, by irl1 on Jul 7, 2019 17:02:01 GMT 1, So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host...Fake as my wife's boobies!..... 
So I'm confused,
When you go to the POW website and click on the archive image of LTF it says it was a signed edition of 50, Ive only ever heard of it as an unsigned edition of 100 though. In looking at the embossed POW emblem on the listed print it definitely doesn't look right all the lettering is clunky and not very crisp, also in comparisons with my other POW prints the edition numbering is different: on the LTF its side by side with the '/' and on all my POW prints it is one above the other with a '_'. I contacted the ebay seller and he sent me a bunch of stuff that it was purchased through the following:
What does everyone think?
pic host...Fake as my wife's boobies!..... What edition size are they |
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 7, 2019 17:09:38 GMT 1, ...Fake as my wife's boobies!..... What edition size are theyย
100 unsigned
...Fake as my wife's boobies!..... What edition size are theyย 100 unsigned |
|
PS
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 828
๐๐ป 755
April 2016
|
Dran LTF B+W, by PS on Jul 7, 2019 17:09:56 GMT 1, What edition size are theyย 100 unsigned
None signed
What edition size are theyย 100 unsigned None signed |
|
