Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 14:50:11 GMT 1, I don't think these are as good as people are trying to make them out to be. For a start, they are a small size. They are not going to look very impressive when you frame and hang them on your wall. Secondly, they are unsigned. They're basically a poster. Yes, they are a nice image and yes, they are limited edition. But they are still basically just a poster. I would prefer to save my money and buy a proper signed Nara print.
You sound like you are trying to convince yourself more than us ๐๐
I don't think these are as good as people are trying to make them out to be. For a start, they are a small size. They are not going to look very impressive when you frame and hang them on your wall. Secondly, they are unsigned. They're basically a poster. Yes, they are a nice image and yes, they are limited edition. But they are still basically just a poster. I would prefer to save my money and buy a proper signed Nara print. You sound like you are trying to convince yourself more than us ๐๐ |
|
Georgie Poppit
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,558
๐๐ป 1,674
February 2021
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Georgie Poppit on Oct 24, 2021 15:07:02 GMT 1, Iโd rather have an original drawing than an expensive signed edition
Iโd rather have an original drawing than an expensive signed edition
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 24, 2021 16:53:55 GMT 1, Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!"
These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique."
The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is.
With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out.
"It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?"
Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!"
These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique."
The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is.
With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out.
"It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?"
Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
|
|
astbury
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 461
๐๐ป 251
August 2013
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by astbury on Oct 24, 2021 17:02:48 GMT 1, From the Artspace description...
Miss Spring is available as an edition of 100 prints, produced in Tokyo under the direction of the artist.
No trip to Texas required ๐
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
From the Artspace description... Miss Spring is available as an edition of 100 prints, produced in Tokyo under the direction of the artist. No trip to Texas required ๐ Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 24, 2021 17:12:44 GMT 1, From the Artspace description... Miss Spring is available as an edition of 100 prints, produced in Tokyo under the direction of the artist. No trip to Texas required ๐ Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
๐
From the Artspace description... Miss Spring is available as an edition of 100 prints, produced in Tokyo under the direction of the artist. No trip to Texas required ๐ Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. ๐ |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 17:37:43 GMT 1, Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
Another salty little cry baby.. ๐
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. Another salty little cry baby.. ๐ |
|
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 24, 2021 17:49:20 GMT 1, Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. Another salty little cry baby.. ๐
Where does salty cry baby belong on this pyramid?
So are you hanging yours or how will you title your listing "un-signed?" It's okay to admit that they're shitty. It's not your fault.
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. Another salty little cry baby.. ๐ Where does salty cry baby belong on this pyramid? So are you hanging yours or how will you title your listing "un-signed?" It's okay to admit that they're shitty. It's not your fault. |
|
eureka
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 30
๐๐ป 13
January 2021
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by eureka on Oct 24, 2021 18:02:09 GMT 1, Obviously this print has different value to different people, and that's is nice and welcome.
However, what's amazing in this thread is the hype some users are creating based on "I know a friend who bought at XX, I have cousin who is willing to pay YYY, etc".
I could say I have a cousin who is willing to pay 200k, but that is not a provable evidence, it just tries to create hype. Indeed this is not different at all from what happens daily in the NFT space.
Definitely part of the fun of art collecting/investing.
Obviously this print has different value to different people, and that's is nice and welcome.
However, what's amazing in this thread is the hype some users are creating based on "I know a friend who bought at XX, I have cousin who is willing to pay YYY, etc".
I could say I have a cousin who is willing to pay 200k, but that is not a provable evidence, it just tries to create hype. Indeed this is not different at all from what happens daily in the NFT space.
Definitely part of the fun of art collecting/investing.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 24, 2021 18:25:12 GMT 1, Obviously this print has different value to different people, and that's is nice and welcome. However, what's amazing in this thread is the hype some users are creating based on "I know a friend who bought at XX, I have cousin who is willing to pay YYY, etc". I could say I have a cousin who is willing to pay 200k, but that is not a provable evidence, it just tries to create hype. Indeed this is not different at all from what happens daily in the NFT space. Definitely part of the fun of art collecting/investing. I think there's only different value, because those who value it higher are uninformed. There's so much money being thrown around by the clueless these days. Everyone's trying to create value out of nothing and trying to entice the uninformed to bite. The art market is a gross place filled with deception and jealousy. I wonder if the bubble will ever burst.
Obviously this print has different value to different people, and that's is nice and welcome. However, what's amazing in this thread is the hype some users are creating based on "I know a friend who bought at XX, I have cousin who is willing to pay YYY, etc". I could say I have a cousin who is willing to pay 200k, but that is not a provable evidence, it just tries to create hype. Indeed this is not different at all from what happens daily in the NFT space. Definitely part of the fun of art collecting/investing. I think there's only different value, because those who value it higher are uninformed. There's so much money being thrown around by the clueless these days. Everyone's trying to create value out of nothing and trying to entice the uninformed to bite. The art market is a gross place filled with deception and jealousy. I wonder if the bubble will ever burst.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 24, 2021 19:32:33 GMT 1, Thinking that any comments on the UAA forum have an impact on the global Nara market Absolute top tier lolz Lads we are just here debating our views , ainโt nobody listening No one's talking about the real Nara art market though, which would be about his originals.
We're talking about printouts here for donations and flips. UAA is all about the printouts and UAA does move the market for copies. If you had a buyer's list, you'd have to think the majority are UAA viewers and members.
Thinking that any comments on the UAA forum have an impact on the global Nara market Absolute top tier lolz Lads we are just here debating our views , ainโt nobody listening No one's talking about the real Nara art market though, which would be about his originals.
We're talking about printouts here for donations and flips. UAA is all about the printouts and UAA does move the market for copies. If you had a buyer's list, you'd have to think the majority are UAA viewers and members. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 19:38:33 GMT 1, Thinking that any comments on the UAA forum have an impact on the global Nara market Absolute top tier lolz Lads we are just here debating our views , ainโt nobody listening No one's talking about the real Nara art market though, which would be about his originals.
We're talking about printouts here for donations and flips. UAA is all about the printouts and UAA does move the market for copies. If you had a buyer's list, you'd have to think the majority are UAA viewers and members.
Then get a buyers list from top tier auction houses that these will be selling at for x times more than cost price in a year. Will be very different.
Thinking that any comments on the UAA forum have an impact on the global Nara market Absolute top tier lolz Lads we are just here debating our views , ainโt nobody listening No one's talking about the real Nara art market though, which would be about his originals.
We're talking about printouts here for donations and flips. UAA is all about the printouts and UAA does move the market for copies. If you had a buyer's list, you'd have to think the majority are UAA viewers and members. Then get a buyers list from top tier auction houses that these will be selling at for x times more than cost price in a year. Will be very different. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 24, 2021 19:45:32 GMT 1, Another salty little cry baby.. ๐ Another flipper trying to protect his interests. ย
Flippidy doodle flippidy yay! My my my what a wonderful day
Another salty little cry baby.. ๐ Another flipper trying to protect his interests. ย Flippidy doodle flippidy yay! My my my what a wonderful day |
|
qest
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 619
๐๐ป 713
March 2018
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by qest on Oct 25, 2021 0:28:31 GMT 1, Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses.
I always appreciate your iconoclastic takes, even where I may not agree. We should all think more critically about our purchases and the value we place on these silly things, and at least for me, your comments spur welcome reflection.
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. I always appreciate your iconoclastic takes, even where I may not agree. We should all think more critically about our purchases and the value we place on these silly things, and at least for me, your comments spur welcome reflection. |
|
Francis
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,571
๐๐ป 137
September 2007
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Francis on Oct 25, 2021 1:20:25 GMT 1, This is the release of the year - no doubt about tit.
This is the release of the year - no doubt about tit.
|
|
|
|
ianarts
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 166
๐๐ป 55
March 2021
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by ianarts on Oct 25, 2021 2:25:05 GMT 1, gutted to have missed this
gutted to have missed this
|
|
Jimini Cricket
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,886
๐๐ป 1,267
December 2017
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Jimini Cricket on Oct 25, 2021 2:34:58 GMT 1, Some food for thought..
Just say the MSRP was priced to market $8000, similar to the PACE Robin F Williams situation and her $12500 prints.
Would you feel as bad for missing out? Would you still want these?
Reading between the lines here, you guys just want that sweet, sweet easy flip money. D'uh.
Some food for thought..
Just say the MSRP was priced to market $8000, similar to the PACE Robin F Williams situation and her $12500 prints.
Would you feel as bad for missing out? Would you still want these?
Reading between the lines here, you guys just want that sweet, sweet easy flip money. D'uh.
|
|
rosac
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,894
๐๐ป 1,538
July 2015
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by rosac on Oct 25, 2021 10:17:32 GMT 1, That looks very nice indeed!
That looks very nice indeed!
|
|
|
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Art for Love 1 on Oct 25, 2021 10:37:41 GMT 1, it a beauty!
it a beauty!
|
|
john1539
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 772
๐๐ป 124
May 2009
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by john1539 on Oct 25, 2021 12:30:20 GMT 1, Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD
Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD
|
|
u%hdjfka c
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,005
๐๐ป 1,132
January 2021
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by u%hdjfka c on Oct 25, 2021 12:36:07 GMT 1, Thanks to the person who asked as I forgot to look The QR opens up a high def digital COA thatโs downloaded from a unique URL for the specific edition number Nice touch
I think the appliquรฉd cotton sleeve it came in is nicer than the print
Thanks to the person who asked as I forgot to look The QR opens up a high def digital COA thatโs downloaded from a unique URL for the specific edition number Nice touch I think the appliquรฉd cotton sleeve it came in is nicer than the print |
|
|
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Art for Love 1 on Oct 25, 2021 13:17:40 GMT 1, Bargain!
Bargain!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 25, 2021 13:20:15 GMT 1, Thanks to the person who asked as I forgot to look The QR opens up a high def digital COA thatโs downloaded from a unique URL for the specific edition number Nice touch I think the appliquรฉd cotton sleeve it came in is nicer than the print
Well this is your lucky day Fred! I have said sleeve available for the bargain price of ยฃ5000 ๐คฏ
Thanks to the person who asked as I forgot to look The QR opens up a high def digital COA thatโs downloaded from a unique URL for the specific edition number Nice touch I think the appliquรฉd cotton sleeve it came in is nicer than the print Well this is your lucky day Fred! I have said sleeve available for the bargain price of ยฃ5000 ๐คฏ |
|
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by nobokov on Oct 25, 2021 16:28:34 GMT 1, Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. I always appreciate your iconoclastic takes, even where I may not agree. We should all think more critically about our purchases and the value we place on these silly things, and at least for me, your comments spur welcome reflection. What a very nice thing to say, I really appreciate the kind words.
Overseen by the artist...Can you imagine him flying to Texas to observe the copy room shaking his head at the insufficient level of contrast. After 280 complaints from Nara, the copyboy leaps into a lengthy tirade, "Why don't you fucking press the Print button yourself, you depressed art fuck!" These are pretty much just expensive posters that they slap a "limited edition" label to get the lower castes to buy so that they feel like they're participating in higher caste activities. Prints in general, are for suckers. Unsigned inkjet prints are for the bigger fools. The luster's dulled on regular prints so print houses these days need artists to doodle a few dots on the print to make them "unique." The first rule of Print Club is to pretend that its artwork. It's not. Maybe unless the artist creates the print themselves without any assistance. Even then, artist created prints are mostly pretty shitty. Just look at Jasper John's prints. I've bought too many prints over the years to realize what an utter waste of money it was and is. With this thread all about the fomo and slobbering over potential resale prices. It's the same for NFTs. And as with NFTs, buyers have to convince other buyers of their value so they can unload before it's too late. So this thread like all others will be full of glowing praise from those who bought. And they'll do it using multiple accounts. Just look at the other Nara poster threads and see how that turned out. "It's artist approved" "It's a real authorized limited edition!" "It's his most iconic image." "Did you see how much his unsigned posters and dish sold for at auction?" Congrats to those who bought it and were able to find the next chump. For those who bought it on the secondary, you know the saying, a fool and their money. Luckily there's a sucker born every day otherwise this entire art pyramid collapses. I always appreciate your iconoclastic takes, even where I may not agree. We should all think more critically about our purchases and the value we place on these silly things, and at least for me, your comments spur welcome reflection. What a very nice thing to say, I really appreciate the kind words.
|
|
|
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Art for Love 1 on Oct 25, 2021 17:03:08 GMT 1, Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD
Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD Sold already! |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Deleted on Oct 25, 2021 18:03:51 GMT 1, Nice looking print Small envelope included with a logo embossed card detailing the edition number plus a QR code and the full production detailsย   
Absolutely stunning. Thatโs an amazing recognisable image - from an amazing artist
Nice looking print Small envelope included with a logo embossed card detailing the edition number plus a QR code and the full production detailsย Absolutely stunning. Thatโs an amazing recognisable image - from an amazing artist |
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,600
๐๐ป 6,562
October 2019
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Terry Fuckwitt on Oct 25, 2021 18:04:03 GMT 1, Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD Sold already!
Not sold, it was removed
Hi, the first Miss Spring are already on ebay... with asking price around 10,000 USD Sold already! Not sold, it was removed |
|
Fuzzyduck121
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,305
๐๐ป 1,223
December 2011
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Fuzzyduck121 on Oct 25, 2021 18:09:58 GMT 1,
Because he got higher offers
Donโt shoot the messenger
Because he got higher offers Donโt shoot the messenger |
|
eureka
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 30
๐๐ป 13
January 2021
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by eureka on Oct 25, 2021 18:14:53 GMT 1, I heard he got offered 100k, but decided to hold
I heard he got offered 100k, but decided to hold
|
|
Terry Fuckwitt
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,600
๐๐ป 6,562
October 2019
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Terry Fuckwitt on Oct 25, 2021 18:16:07 GMT 1, Because he got higher offers Donโt shoot the messenger
I don't know and I don't care, I was just correcting misinformation that it was sold.
Why would someone offer higher than what the Buy it now price was? That's just a bit daft.
Because he got higher offers Donโt shoot the messenger I don't know and I don't care, I was just correcting misinformation that it was sold. Why would someone offer higher than what the Buy it now price was? That's just a bit daft. |
|
Francis
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,571
๐๐ป 137
September 2007
|
Yoshitomo Nara ๐ฏ๐ต New Print Release โข Contemporary Art , by Francis on Oct 25, 2021 18:31:02 GMT 1, Because he got higher offers Donโt shoot the messenger I don't know and I don't care, I was just correcting misinformation that it was sold. Why would someone offer higher than what the Buy it now price was? That's just a bit daft.
Because he got higher offers Donโt shoot the messenger I don't know and I don't care, I was just correcting misinformation that it was sold. Why would someone offer higher than what the Buy it now price was? That's just a bit daft. From others outside of eBay, like forums and Craigslist. |
|
