Thanks. I'm getting old. 78 and counting

You're all gone mad on here. What planet is that Jonny fella living on 

It's a good image, but for me, it lacks the technical ability and humour of say Gonefellow's Playboy which is what we really should be gauging pencil drawings against.

😂😂😂

Thingy did above

moon land was fake and film in same studio as titanic movie

I was going to say, I actually read it initially as being another planet.  I entered the lotto and would most likely purchase the print if I won.  Don't own any Pejac but like the image and could see myself enjoying it on the wall. 

EDIT: Just read the write up on the site which (thanks for the spoon feeding) makes it clear. 

Kubrick did it. Just watch The Shining. It'll all make sense. 🤣

government in greece is bad.  EU is bad for people.  many are in hard times.  I want grexit. 

That’s a little ungrateful seeing as the Eurozone has bailed Greece out to the tune of €310 billion

Finally, some art to talk about.

I like the concept of using the moon landing as an example of humans achieving amazing things, I mean, it's the fcking moon! Apes have no fcking business being up there. Dinosaurs were around for hundreds of millions of years, and didn't even build so much as a shopping centre. We fcking rock. Admittedly, they didn't artificially fck about with their environment on the scale that we have, but hey, we might burn out sooner than they did, but we'll burn brighter.

From the write-up, it appears Pejac is playing with the subject matter, refusing to lead us down any obvious path (like it's a mocked-up Sunday Sport front cover proclaiming ANCHOR FOUND ON MOON!!), instead suggesting we can come up with our own interpretations. I fcking refuse however to think of the image as "a sharp warning about the mankind's dystopian future (or past)" - no. It cannot be a sharp warning about mankind's past. Fck that right off.

"Whether reading it as a hypothesis that humans once lived on the Moon" - While I appreciate that we can all bring our own narrative to every piece of art, and there are no incorrect interpretations of art, this can also get in the fcking bin.

"or seeing a distant future space explorer re-discovering once (a/the?) Blue planet" - If they're inferring that the presence of the anchor means the barren planet once had a large body of water on it, it's unlikely to be the moon, and is more likely to be the Earth or a similar planet.

Overall, I love the piece. And while many may rightly interpret the image as an interpretation of mankind's ability to achieve the impossible, to overcome nature and escape the boundaries of our seemingly inescapable cage, I prefer to view it slightly differently. The astronaut is a symbol of what mankind is capable of, when we have the political and collective will to triumph and succeed, however I view the image as if the astronaut's suit is now housing the long-dead corpse of a once triumphant and high-achieving human being. They may have even been responsible for placing the anchor there? That's the kind of seemingly impossible crap that humans seem to love. Maybe they had an art grant? 

I think it's all about technology. The anchor, once invented by mankind to act as a stabilising influence against the tide, now sits useless and decaying. Whatever it once held safely in place, has long since been lost. The astronaut, instead of thriving in a hostile environment, is actually trapped and vulnerable. A prisoner of its own technology. Unable to live without it. 

correct. but I am sure they have much better food than where you are from, my friend. 

plus, maybe older temples and nicer islands.

Oh there will definitely be a $pecial €dition!

... 25 lucky 'winners' then