cosmic
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,449
๐๐ป 932
January 2006
|
which artist ?, by cosmic on Sept 10, 2020 0:11:23 GMT 1, which artist is this please ?
which artist is this please ? |
|
met
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,796
๐๐ป 6,762
June 2009
|
|
|
cosmic
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,449
๐๐ป 932
January 2006
|
which artist ?, by cosmic on Sept 10, 2020 0:41:27 GMT 1, that's great thanks for this , so many people believe this to be a Banksy for reasons unknown to me
that's great thanks for this , so many people believe this to be a Banksy for reasons unknown to me
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The Met = who's who in UA |
|
met
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,796
๐๐ป 6,762
June 2009
|
which artist ?, by met on Sept 10, 2020 1:32:32 GMT 1, that's great thanks for this , so many people believe this to be a Banksy for reasons unknown to me
From the date of Maynard's posts, the artwork is at least eight years old.
In the earliest reference I discovered, his comment was "Hitchcock gets the Banksy treatment.":
www.facebook.com/maynard.art.design/photos/a.127311047419376/127311054086042
But far less is usually required for a stencil-based image to be called a "Banksy".
And once you have somebody asserting a falsehood online, plenty of others blindly parrot the same. The assumption is then, "Well, I read/heard it from multiple sources, so it must be accurate; they can't all be wrong."
Hence the profusion of non-Banksy "Banksy" tattoos, conspiracy theories, and the spread of misinformation generally.
Bullshit Said With Confidence Becomes The Truth*
that's great thanks for this , so many people believe this to be a Banksy for reasons unknown to me From the date of Maynard's posts, the artwork is at least eight years old. In the earliest reference I discovered, his comment was "Hitchcock gets the Banksy treatment.": www.facebook.com/maynard.art.design/photos/a.127311047419376/127311054086042But far less is usually required for a stencil-based image to be called a "Banksy". And once you have somebody asserting a falsehood online, plenty of others blindly parrot the same. The assumption is then, "Well, I read/heard it from multiple sources, so it must be accurate; they can't all be wrong." Hence the profusion of non-Ban ksy "Banksy" tattoos, conspiracy theories, and the spread of misinformation generally. Bullshit Said With Confidence Becomes The Truth* |
|
saint
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,887
๐๐ป 1,881
September 2010
|
which artist ?, by saint on Sept 10, 2020 6:55:51 GMT 1, Speaking of banksy tattoos, Iโm sure years ago there was a thread on here showing some of the worst examples and misappropriations people had done to themselves, canโt find it now. I did find a thread with a link to this group tho.
Some classics
www.flickr.com/groups/banksytattoos/pool/
Speaking of banksy tattoos, Iโm sure years ago there was a thread on here showing some of the worst examples and misappropriations people had done to themselves, canโt find it now. I did find a thread with a link to this group tho. Some classics www.flickr.com/groups/banksytattoos/pool/ |
|
saint
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,887
๐๐ป 1,881
September 2010
|
which artist ?, by saint on Sept 10, 2020 6:57:03 GMT 1, Iโm a particular fan of dolks paintbrush girl getting in there.
Iโm a particular fan of dolks paintbrush girl getting in there.
|
|
iainm
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 1
๐๐ป 8
September 2020
|
which artist ?, by iainm on Sept 16, 2020 23:29:07 GMT 1, I an categorically stare that is not a Banksy and was created by Iain Maynard, because I am Iain Maynard. I created the piece in the style of Banksy, but never attributed it to him.
I used to sell it via Redbubble, but had to take it off the site after I had the Hitchcock estate saying I needed licence if I wanted to sell it. From what I can tell, before this happened it was clearly saved and shared to other sites and before you know it, it was being attributed to Banksy. What is somewhat annoying is seeing how many people have sold copies of it over the years. Profiting from my work.
What is worth noting isthat the image was never made in the real world. It is a completely digital piece of art.
I an categorically stare that is not a Banksy and was created by Iain Maynard, because I am Iain Maynard. I created the piece in the style of Banksy, but never attributed it to him.
I used to sell it via Redbubble, but had to take it off the site after I had the Hitchcock estate saying I needed licence if I wanted to sell it. From what I can tell, before this happened it was clearly saved and shared to other sites and before you know it, it was being attributed to Banksy. What is somewhat annoying is seeing how many people have sold copies of it over the years. Profiting from my work.
What is worth noting isthat the image was never made in the real world. It is a completely digital piece of art.
|
|
