|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by stillborncrisps on Jun 22, 2021 10:51:09 GMT 1, He's trying to avoid using copyright laws so he doesn't reveal himself, but brands who have no single creator manage to copyright their work? How does that work and why can't Banksy do that? Eg a design or pattern on a Diesel t-shirt would be copyrighted (not just the trademarked D logo) but it could have been created by any number of designers? One person doesn't hold the copyright?
He's trying to avoid using copyright laws so he doesn't reveal himself, but brands who have no single creator manage to copyright their work? How does that work and why can't Banksy do that? Eg a design or pattern on a Diesel t-shirt would be copyrighted (not just the trademarked D logo) but it could have been created by any number of designers? One person doesn't hold the copyright?
|
|
toshspice
New Member
🗨️ 676
👍🏻 878
January 2006
|
|
|
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by irl1 on Jun 27, 2021 10:25:11 GMT 1, The street artist Banksy has successfully trademarked two of his most famous artworks in Australia, in an attempt to stop them being copied and sold.
The secretive artist applied for the trademarks via a law firm based in Perth, and although the tactic ultimately failed in Europe, the Australian applications were successful and will be registered next week.
The street artist Banksy has successfully trademarked two of his most famous artworks in Australia, in an attempt to stop them being copied and sold.
The secretive artist applied for the trademarks via a law firm based in Perth, and although the tactic ultimately failed in Europe, the Australian applications were successful and will be registered next week.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Daniel Silk on Jun 28, 2021 3:01:11 GMT 1, But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks?
He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them?
But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks?
He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them?
|
|
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by irl1 on Jun 28, 2021 7:59:00 GMT 1, But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them? How many millions are made each year on Banksy fake art.
More to the point, how many people are fooled with Banksy fake art
But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them? How many millions are made each year on Banksy fake art. More to the point, how many people are fooled with Banksy fake art
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Daniel Silk on Jun 28, 2021 11:38:49 GMT 1, Do you think making the images trademark will stop fakes? I really can’t see it making any difference. The only way to stop fakes is to produce official stuff in unlimited runs and at near cost price.
Do you think making the images trademark will stop fakes? I really can’t see it making any difference. The only way to stop fakes is to produce official stuff in unlimited runs and at near cost price.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Daniel Silk on Jun 28, 2021 11:44:37 GMT 1, Surely Banksy would love a situation with millions of teenagers all over the World having genuine Banksy Posters blu tacked on their bedroom walls, and the messages behind the images making a difference. Rather than the current situation of half his art being in portfolio folders or on the walls of the rich. I dunno.
Surely Banksy would love a situation with millions of teenagers all over the World having genuine Banksy Posters blu tacked on their bedroom walls, and the messages behind the images making a difference. Rather than the current situation of half his art being in portfolio folders or on the walls of the rich. I dunno.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by sandinista on Jun 28, 2021 12:04:03 GMT 1, hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission.
p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review.
hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission.
p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Charlesworth on Jun 28, 2021 12:13:50 GMT 1, I guess if he owns the trademark then he can sell it?
I guess if he owns the trademark then he can sell it?
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,185
👍🏻 3,710
May 2014
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by mojo on Jun 28, 2021 14:35:07 GMT 1, hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission. p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review. You only have to change an image by a certain % in UK copyright law to make it your own.
I'm sure when the Kate/Marilyn mash up was released it was the day it legally came out of copyright protection, I could have missunderstood that but I think that was the entire point of it?
I imagine Banksy has very competent legal representation and pest control could very well be furloughed owing to the pandemic and therefore legally unable to work?
*At the same time as the Kate release I went to Snappy Snaps to photocopy the postcard to make a birthday card for a mate and the bloke working there made an enormous fuss and refused to let me use the photocopier because it was a Banksy image...I had to go to Pronto Print
hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission. p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review. You only have to change an image by a certain % in UK copyright law to make it your own. I'm sure when the Kate/Marilyn mash up was released it was the day it legally came out of copyright protection, I could have missunderstood that but I think that was the entire point of it? I imagine Banksy has very competent legal representation and pest control could very well be furloughed owing to the pandemic and therefore legally unable to work? *At the same time as the Kate release I went to Snappy Snaps to photocopy the postcard to make a birthday card for a mate and the bloke working there made an enormous fuss and refused to let me use the photocopier because it was a Banksy image...I had to go to Pronto Print
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Daniel Silk on Jun 28, 2021 15:51:22 GMT 1, So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it.
So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it.
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,185
👍🏻 3,710
May 2014
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by mojo on Jun 28, 2021 16:18:13 GMT 1, So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. Perhaps Banksy's motivation is more aligned to actually protecting people from spending small fortunes and being ripped off by scammers rather than a desire to 'spend the rest of his life taking people to court.' I've posted a trailer to this movie a couple of times as to me it's kind of similar to the Banksy situation. I recommend you watch it. Don't be fooled by the title!
So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. Perhaps Banksy's motivation is more aligned to actually protecting people from spending small fortunes and being ripped off by scammers rather than a desire to 'spend the rest of his life taking people to court.' I've posted a trailer to this movie a couple of times as to me it's kind of similar to the Banksy situation. I recommend you watch it. Don't be fooled by the title!
|
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Inknart on Jun 28, 2021 17:04:41 GMT 1, What happens to all the medicom tat currently being sold with the successful trademarks?
What happens to all the medicom tat currently being sold with the successful trademarks?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Deleted on Jun 28, 2021 17:16:10 GMT 1, So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it.
I don't get it really either, never used to do anything about it
I do get why he might get a bit pissed if businesses are trying to 'own' his artwork by registering trademarks and copyright and then licensing and charging out these images to other businesses, might this be a possibility why he is doing it?
So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. I don't get it really either, never used to do anything about it I do get why he might get a bit pissed if businesses are trying to 'own' his artwork by registering trademarks and copyright and then licensing and charging out these images to other businesses, might this be a possibility why he is doing it?
|
|
thrash822
New Member
🗨️ 270
👍🏻 399
September 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by thrash822 on Jun 28, 2021 17:59:56 GMT 1, I think with all things Banksy does, his actions here are meant to be questioned and met with Speculation, and then in time, he will reveal his intentions. I don't believe this was a rash action that wasn't thought through or done in different taste than his approach and stance as an artist.. In short time I think we will hear from Banksy side, until then I guess like any Banksy topic the speculation is the fun
I think with all things Banksy does, his actions here are meant to be questioned and met with Speculation, and then in time, he will reveal his intentions. I don't believe this was a rash action that wasn't thought through or done in different taste than his approach and stance as an artist.. In short time I think we will hear from Banksy side, until then I guess like any Banksy topic the speculation is the fun
|
|
Rubberneck
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 1,433
October 2018
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Rubberneck on Jun 28, 2021 18:07:24 GMT 1, I’m sure after losing a few times he needs to chalk up a victory to stop legal businesses who have large scale reliance on his creativity to operate, like brandalism and full colour black. Whilst a decision in Australia it should have a knock on for other territories.
I’m sure after losing a few times he needs to chalk up a victory to stop legal businesses who have large scale reliance on his creativity to operate, like brandalism and full colour black. Whilst a decision in Australia it should have a knock on for other territories.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Deleted on Jun 28, 2021 18:11:23 GMT 1, What happens to all the medicom tat currently being sold with the successful trademarks?
We'll still buy it all
What happens to all the medicom tat currently being sold with the successful trademarks? We'll still buy it all
|
|
Whitefish
Artist
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,251
👍🏻 2,455
February 2015
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Whitefish on Jun 28, 2021 18:22:16 GMT 1, Culture Sculpture
Culture Sculpture
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by sandinista on Jun 30, 2021 10:26:25 GMT 1, understanding copyright and trademark is a dark art and differs country to country. Just look a the word 'parody' and what you can get away with in US but not UK. I saw someone post on instagram that it was their flower thrower photo that banksy used without permission but i cant find it. makes me laugh that Banksy is taking claims to that image. What next he claims all rats and sues blek?
understanding copyright and trademark is a dark art and differs country to country. Just look a the word 'parody' and what you can get away with in US but not UK. I saw someone post on instagram that it was their flower thrower photo that banksy used without permission but i cant find it. makes me laugh that Banksy is taking claims to that image. What next he claims all rats and sues blek?
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Coach on Jun 30, 2021 10:45:42 GMT 1, understanding copyright and trademark is a dark art and differs country to country. Just look a the word 'parody' and what you can get away with in US but not UK. I saw someone post on instagram that it was their flower thrower photo that banksy used without permission but i cant find it. makes me laugh that Banksy is taking claims to that image. What next he claims all rats and sues blek?
There’s nothing wrong with an artist using a source photograph as inspiration for an artwork. To my mind flower thrower is undoubtedly Banksy’s image.
understanding copyright and trademark is a dark art and differs country to country. Just look a the word 'parody' and what you can get away with in US but not UK. I saw someone post on instagram that it was their flower thrower photo that banksy used without permission but i cant find it. makes me laugh that Banksy is taking claims to that image. What next he claims all rats and sues blek? There’s nothing wrong with an artist using a source photograph as inspiration for an artwork. To my mind flower thrower is undoubtedly Banksy’s image.
|
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Coach on Jun 30, 2021 10:48:02 GMT 1, But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them?
One should be perfectly entitled to protect one’s IP rights, even if one isn’t using that IP at any given moment. The logic implied by your post would suggest that I should be able to use your car, if you aren’t using it at the time.
But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them? One should be perfectly entitled to protect one’s IP rights, even if one isn’t using that IP at any given moment. The logic implied by your post would suggest that I should be able to use your car, if you aren’t using it at the time.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by stillborncrisps on Jun 30, 2021 10:50:47 GMT 1, So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. I don't get it really either, never used to do anything about it I do get why he might get a bit pissed if businesses are trying to 'own' his artwork by registering trademarks and copyright and then licensing and charging out these images to other businesses, might this be a possibility why he is doing it? I think this is it. Day to day he's fine, and small time bootleggers he's not arsed about.
But what artist would want a situation like with Full Colour Black where they gain control of the rights and have the power to prevent HIM from using/producing his own work? I think this is what he's trying to stop.
So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. I don't get it really either, never used to do anything about it I do get why he might get a bit pissed if businesses are trying to 'own' his artwork by registering trademarks and copyright and then licensing and charging out these images to other businesses, might this be a possibility why he is doing it? I think this is it. Day to day he's fine, and small time bootleggers he's not arsed about.
But what artist would want a situation like with Full Colour Black where they gain control of the rights and have the power to prevent HIM from using/producing his own work? I think this is what he's trying to stop.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Deleted on Jun 30, 2021 11:46:33 GMT 1, At this point i think it's more about legacy. who knows what the plans are for these images in the future. I imagine/hope some will be left with charitys/good NGOs and lobbying groups ect.
At this point i think it's more about legacy. who knows what the plans are for these images in the future. I imagine/hope some will be left with charitys/good NGOs and lobbying groups ect.
|
|
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by Coach on Jun 30, 2021 12:41:54 GMT 1, At this point i think it's more about legacy. who knows what the plans are for these images in the future. I imagine/hope some will be left with charitys/good NGOs and lobbying groups ect.
That wouldn’t surprise me at all, considering his track record.
At this point i think it's more about legacy. who knows what the plans are for these images in the future. I imagine/hope some will be left with charitys/good NGOs and lobbying groups ect. That wouldn’t surprise me at all, considering his track record.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by moron on Jul 3, 2021 17:22:13 GMT 1, But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them? How many millions are made each year on Banksy fake art. More to the point, how many people are fooled with Banksy fake art Disney is a huge global enterprise and trademarks and copyrights everything using global trademarking policy.
Disney pursues infringement using it's legal team.
At the same time just look at the millions of fake items with stolen Disney art on them for sale.
But what’s the purpose of registering them as trademarks? He doesn’t use use the images himself and he doesn’t want others to use them? How many millions are made each year on Banksy fake art. More to the point, how many people are fooled with Banksy fake art Disney is a huge global enterprise and trademarks and copyrights everything using global trademarking policy. Disney pursues infringement using it's legal team. At the same time just look at the millions of fake items with stolen Disney art on them for sale.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by moron on Jul 3, 2021 17:31:18 GMT 1, hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission. p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review. You only have to change an image by a certain % in UK copyright law to make it your own. I'm sure when the Kate/Marilyn mash up was released it was the day it legally came out of copyright protection, I could have missunderstood that but I think that was the entire point of it? I imagine Banksy has very competent legal representation and pest control could very well be furloughed owing to the pandemic and therefore legally unable to work? *At the same time as the Kate release I went to Snappy Snaps to photocopy the postcard to make a birthday card for a mate and the bloke working there made an enormous fuss and refused to let me use the photocopier because it was a Banksy image...I had to go to Pronto Print apparently to change an image by a small percentage still requires written permission from the copyright owner under UK law.
copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/copyright_myths
hypocrite when he's using other peoples photos to create his images. supposedly without permission. p.s is it pest control dealing with all this legal activities? explains why they are incapable of acknowledging coa requests or sending them out within a year. must be so difficult. Are they on trip advisor as i would like to leave a review. You only have to change an image by a certain % in UK copyright law to make it your own. I'm sure when the Kate/Marilyn mash up was released it was the day it legally came out of copyright protection, I could have missunderstood that but I think that was the entire point of it? I imagine Banksy has very competent legal representation and pest control could very well be furloughed owing to the pandemic and therefore legally unable to work? *At the same time as the Kate release I went to Snappy Snaps to photocopy the postcard to make a birthday card for a mate and the bloke working there made an enormous fuss and refused to let me use the photocopier because it was a Banksy image...I had to go to Pronto Print apparently to change an image by a small percentage still requires written permission from the copyright owner under UK law. copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/copyright_myths
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by moron on Jul 3, 2021 17:32:36 GMT 1, So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. Perhaps Banksy's motivation is more aligned to actually protecting people from spending small fortunes and being ripped off by scammers rather than a desire to 'spend the rest of his life taking people to court.' I've posted a trailer to this movie a couple of times as to me it's kind of similar to the Banksy situation. I recommend you watch it. Don't be fooled by the title! Never trust an art dealer.
So Banksy wants to spend the rest of his life taking people to court for making T-shirts, Postcards and Mugs with his images on? Sorry, I just don’t get it. Perhaps Banksy's motivation is more aligned to actually protecting people from spending small fortunes and being ripped off by scammers rather than a desire to 'spend the rest of his life taking people to court.' I've posted a trailer to this movie a couple of times as to me it's kind of similar to the Banksy situation. I recommend you watch it. Don't be fooled by the title! Never trust an art dealer.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Copyright© & Trademark™, by moron on Jul 3, 2021 17:45:47 GMT 1, He's trying to avoid using copyright laws so he doesn't reveal himself, but brands who have no single creator manage to copyright their work? How does that work and why can't Banksy do that? Eg a design or pattern on a Diesel t-shirt would be copyrighted (not just the trademarked D logo) but it could have been created by any number of designers? One person doesn't hold the copyright? Apparently Pest Control hold exclusive rights in Banksy artworks.
From UK Companies House records ""person with significant control" is "Picturesonwalls Ltd"
""PICTURESONWALLS LIMITED"" "person with significant control" is "Mr Mark Howard Stephens"
Pest Control is Banksy as opposed to Banksy is Pest Control.
To send DMCA takedown notices regarding copyright infringement, image theft has to be done by the rights holder.
Maybe they are avoiding taking people to court for copyright infringment as it would confirm or show that Banksy is nothing more than a construct.
A house of cards.
Trade marking Banksy art as logos appears to be a badly thought out way of protecting these images by turning them into logos instead of individual art works.
He's trying to avoid using copyright laws so he doesn't reveal himself, but brands who have no single creator manage to copyright their work? How does that work and why can't Banksy do that? Eg a design or pattern on a Diesel t-shirt would be copyrighted (not just the trademarked D logo) but it could have been created by any number of designers? One person doesn't hold the copyright? Apparently Pest Control hold exclusive rights in Banksy artworks. From UK Companies House records ""person with significant control" is "Picturesonwalls Ltd" ""PICTURESONWALLS LIMITED"" "person with significant control" is "Mr Mark Howard Stephens" Pest Control is Banksy as opposed to Banksy is Pest Control. To send DMCA takedown notices regarding copyright infringement, image theft has to be done by the rights holder. Maybe they are avoiding taking people to court for copyright infringment as it would confirm or show that Banksy is nothing more than a construct. A house of cards. Trade marking Banksy art as logos appears to be a badly thought out way of protecting these images by turning them into logos instead of individual art works.
|
|