|
|
Rsyok
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,375
👍🏻 507
January 2008
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Rsyok on Jun 9, 2022 12:26:15 GMT 1, Nice size, no queue or tiered pricing. So I now have to write some more words to post any thing.
Nice size, no queue or tiered pricing. So I now have to write some more words to post any thing.
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Crunchy Carrot on Jun 9, 2022 12:33:26 GMT 1, Nice size, no queue or tiered pricing. So I now have to write some more words to post any thing.
Nice size, no queue or tiered pricing. So I now have to write some more words to post any thing. The 20 words minimum thing is very annoying. But yeah I like the skeleton print. Looks very cool and I can hang it without getting shouted at for having fuck off on my wall |
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Daniel Silk on Jun 9, 2022 12:44:28 GMT 1, I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭
Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐
I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭
Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Love Is In The Air on Jun 9, 2022 13:15:13 GMT 1, I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐
All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; )
As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections...
I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐 I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections... |
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Daniel Silk on Jun 9, 2022 13:31:38 GMT 1, I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐 I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections...
As you say, we all are entitled to our own personal opinions. It's an Art forum, and we will never always agree, and that's as it should be.
I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐 I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections... If you like them, that's great 👏 Well done! As you say, we all are entitled to our own personal opinions. It's an Art forum, and we will never always agree, and that's as it should be. |
|
|
|
G$
New Member
🗨️ 82
👍🏻 80
March 2022
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by G$ on Jun 9, 2022 14:28:42 GMT 1, I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐 I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections...
If you want more profit, then behave more business-like.
Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents.
Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights.
If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself.
-Greg
I can only post my honest opinion 🖐️ Truly awful 🤭 Just can't get my head around how someone would feel proud or inspired by having those on their wall at home. Sorry 🤐 I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections... Shrigley's work may be a novelty, and it's value may not hold up well over time, but that will be for current and future consumers to decide. No reason to crap on it, write it off, and risk unnecessarily alienating users of your own site. If you want more profit, then behave more business-like. Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents. Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights. If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself. -Greg |
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by pocketrocket on Jun 9, 2022 14:43:46 GMT 1, Personally a big fan of the skeleton- so much so that I purchased one. Poor taste I guess, I guess, I guess. Guessing
Personally a big fan of the skeleton- so much so that I purchased one. Poor taste I guess, I guess, I guess. Guessing
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Jules Leotard on Jun 10, 2022 2:49:57 GMT 1, I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections... Shrigley's work may be a novelty, and it's value may not hold up well over time, but that will be for current and future consumers to decide. No reason to crap on it, write it off, and risk unnecessarily alienating users of your own site. If you want more profit, then behave more business-like. Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents. Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights. If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself. -Greg Greg,
Do you have other usernames or did you really register recently and post this? I find it refreshing that Daniel gives an honest opinion and isn't "shilling" - there's plenty of that going on. Are you really asserting that he isn't entitled to an opinion? He posted a conscious-stream-of-thought and was honest. I would guess plenty of people who are less savvy than you stumble on this website and take some guidance from it. It would be nice if it remained fair and balanced, but that doesn't seem to work for people like you who have a vested interest in pillaging the naive. This is the best and most egalitarian contemporary art forum on the net. That's probably why you found it and are here, but Daniel should change it because you said so.
David Shrigley's sole contribution to "art" is to push the boundary bar lower on what is considered "art". The whimsy of banal quotes with monochrome stick figures on your wall...
I find this a weirdly negative post from the founder of the forum. Surely if you don't like these it is better to not say anything at all? All art is really subjective.....IMHO Shrigley made these linos when thinking about themes such as What is beauty? and how important is physical appearance to describe who we are? I like the skull one myself, but appreciate they won't be for everyone. It would be "truly awful" if we all liked the same thing ; ) As an aside I am not sure I am "proud" of having any of my prints on my walls, I put stuff up that I like or that makes me smile or feel happy. I would be interested to know why other people put their art on their walls, what emotions drive their buying decisions and what they feel about their collections... Shrigley's work may be a novelty, and it's value may not hold up well over time, but that will be for current and future consumers to decide. No reason to crap on it, write it off, and risk unnecessarily alienating users of your own site. If you want more profit, then behave more business-like. Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents. Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights. If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself. -Greg Greg,
Do you have other usernames or did you really register recently and post this? I find it refreshing that Daniel gives an honest opinion and isn't "shilling" - there's plenty of that going on. Are you really asserting that he isn't entitled to an opinion? He posted a conscious-stream-of-thought and was honest. I would guess plenty of people who are less savvy than you stumble on this website and take some guidance from it. It would be nice if it remained fair and balanced, but that doesn't seem to work for people like you who have a vested interest in pillaging the naive. This is the best and most egalitarian contemporary art forum on the net. That's probably why you found it and are here, but Daniel should change it because you said so.
David Shrigley's sole contribution to "art" is to push the boundary bar lower on what is considered "art". The whimsy of banal quotes with monochrome stick figures on your wall...
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Inknart on Jun 10, 2022 5:39:05 GMT 1, Whats a linencut?
I actually like the skeleton one, and i'm not a huge shrigley fan as i find most of his stuff more novelty.
Why are some of his prints selling for 4k+ and this website has prints sitting around for years at 1k?
If someone wouldn't mind explaining his market/differences in these pieces i'd appreciate it.
Whats a linencut?
I actually like the skeleton one, and i'm not a huge shrigley fan as i find most of his stuff more novelty.
Why are some of his prints selling for 4k+ and this website has prints sitting around for years at 1k?
If someone wouldn't mind explaining his market/differences in these pieces i'd appreciate it.
|
|
G$
New Member
🗨️ 82
👍🏻 80
March 2022
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by G$ on Jun 10, 2022 19:33:27 GMT 1, Shrigley's work may be a novelty, and it's value may not hold up well over time, but that will be for current and future consumers to decide. No reason to crap on it, write it off, and risk unnecessarily alienating users of your own site. If you want more profit, then behave more business-like. Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents. Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights. If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself. -Greg Greg,
Do you have other usernames or did you really register recently and post this? I find it refreshing that Daniel gives an honest opinion and isn't "shilling" - there's plenty of that going on. Are you really asserting that he isn't entitled to an opinion? He posted a conscious-stream-of-thought and was honest. I would guess plenty of people who are less savvy than you stumble on this website and take some guidance from it. It would be nice if it remained fair and balanced, but that doesn't seem to work for people like you who have a vested interest in pillaging the naive. This is the best and most egalitarian contemporary art forum on the net. That's probably why you found it and are here, but Daniel should change it because you said so.
David Shrigley's sole contribution to "art" is to push the boundary bar lower on what is considered "art". The whimsy of banal quotes with monochrome stick figures on your wall...
I'm only now seeing your reply. My apologies for the delay.
Let me first answer some of your queries.
Yes, I am indeed a new member.
No, I do not have any other usernames.
Daniel mentioned publicly in another thread, that may or may not have been deleted, that he was seeking to generate additional revenue from the site, and I only offered my opion of how to increase revenue in a more audience friendly way.
Would my having voiced an opinion make any difference to you if I told you that I made a donation to the forum prior to asking Daniel to change the forum back to how it was?
Please let me know at what point I am allowed to both have, and offer, an opinion. Is it based on post count alone? Do I have to have been a member for 15 months, too?
I should also thank you for the education on the location of the boundary bar of art. I get confused by all the Sunday-morning-comic-strip looking art these days with what is real art and what is banal.
Cheers.
Shrigley's work may be a novelty, and it's value may not hold up well over time, but that will be for current and future consumers to decide. No reason to crap on it, write it off, and risk unnecessarily alienating users of your own site. If you want more profit, then behave more business-like. Don't be petty and spiteful, like the American politicians who all openly despise their constituents. Monetize the site by charging us an annual fee for visually appealing, ad-free access, coupled with buy/sell goods rights. If you care about maximizing profit, then seek the advice of/mimic someone successful. Also treat your audience, which is largely comprised of successful fellow business people, with respect, and as equals, instead of like your subjects. If you want more money from this business, then focus on the money, bury some of your ego, and keep some opinions to yourself. -Greg Greg,
Do you have other usernames or did you really register recently and post this? I find it refreshing that Daniel gives an honest opinion and isn't "shilling" - there's plenty of that going on. Are you really asserting that he isn't entitled to an opinion? He posted a conscious-stream-of-thought and was honest. I would guess plenty of people who are less savvy than you stumble on this website and take some guidance from it. It would be nice if it remained fair and balanced, but that doesn't seem to work for people like you who have a vested interest in pillaging the naive. This is the best and most egalitarian contemporary art forum on the net. That's probably why you found it and are here, but Daniel should change it because you said so.
David Shrigley's sole contribution to "art" is to push the boundary bar lower on what is considered "art". The whimsy of banal quotes with monochrome stick figures on your wall...
Hello julesleotard! I'm only now seeing your reply. My apologies for the delay. Let me first answer some of your queries. Yes, I am indeed a new member. No, I do not have any other usernames. Daniel mentioned publicly in another thread, that may or may not have been deleted, that he was seeking to generate additional revenue from the site, and I only offered my opion of how to increase revenue in a more audience friendly way. Would my having voiced an opinion make any difference to you if I told you that I made a donation to the forum prior to asking Daniel to change the forum back to how it was? Please let me know at what point I am allowed to both have, and offer, an opinion. Is it based on post count alone? Do I have to have been a member for 15 months, too? I should also thank you for the education on the location of the boundary bar of art. I get confused by all the Sunday-morning-comic-strip looking art these days with what is real art and what is banal. Cheers. |
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Jules Leotard on Jun 11, 2022 4:09:22 GMT 1, Hello julesleotard! I'm only now seeing your reply. My apologies for the delay. Let me first answer some of your queries. Yes, I am indeed a new member. No, I do not have any other usernames. Daniel mentioned publicly in another thread, that may or may not have been deleted, that he was seeking to generate additional revenue from the site, and I only offered my opion of how to increase revenue in a more audience friendly way. Would my having voiced an opinion make any difference to you if I told you that I made a donation to the forum prior to asking Daniel to change the forum back to how it was? Please let me know at what point I am allowed to both have, and offer, an opinion. Is it based on post count alone? Do I have to have been a member for 15 months, too? I should also thank you for the education on the location of the boundary bar of art. I get confused by all the Sunday-morning-comic-strip looking art these days with what is real art and what is banal. Cheers. The only opinion you presented was your opinion of Daniel's opinion. I don't see how sidelining Daniel is more audience-friendly nor do I think 20 posts into joining a forum you should be telling the guy who has kept it up and running for 16 years how it's done, BUT I also haven't frequented your forum(s), but I am sure they are stellar.
Hello julesleotard! I'm only now seeing your reply. My apologies for the delay. Let me first answer some of your queries. Yes, I am indeed a new member. No, I do not have any other usernames. Daniel mentioned publicly in another thread, that may or may not have been deleted, that he was seeking to generate additional revenue from the site, and I only offered my opion of how to increase revenue in a more audience friendly way. Would my having voiced an opinion make any difference to you if I told you that I made a donation to the forum prior to asking Daniel to change the forum back to how it was? Please let me know at what point I am allowed to both have, and offer, an opinion. Is it based on post count alone? Do I have to have been a member for 15 months, too? I should also thank you for the education on the location of the boundary bar of art. I get confused by all the Sunday-morning-comic-strip looking art these days with what is real art and what is banal. Cheers. The only opinion you presented was your opinion of Daniel's opinion. I don't see how sidelining Daniel is more audience-friendly nor do I think 20 posts into joining a forum you should be telling the guy who has kept it up and running for 16 years how it's done, BUT I also haven't frequented your forum(s), but I am sure they are stellar.
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Ravnur 2020 on Jun 11, 2022 6:39:16 GMT 1, Well argued negative or positive opinion together with art info and insight is what the forum is about for me at least 😊
More of that please and less sales adverts!
Well argued negative or positive opinion together with art info and insight is what the forum is about for me at least 😊
More of that please and less sales adverts!
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Buttercup NYC on Aug 30, 2022 20:02:51 GMT 1, Anyone going for the Moth to the Flame linocut that's going to be released tomorrow? I love this one and might purchase.
Someone asked about linocuts vs. screenprints, and the difference in value on the secondary market. Can anyone comment on that? I'm just curious... there are still a few linos on the site available.
www.schaefergrafik.dk/artist/p/david-shrigley-hand-made-linocut-887z8-er29h-bhet2-cjztb
|
|
|
|
|
|
New David Shrigley linocuts, by Gentle Mental on Aug 31, 2022 12:47:54 GMT 1, Nice one. Works well in black and white.
More reasonably priced than most shrigs.
Such is the way of his market. Now or never. Fomo and all that.
Nice one. Works well in black and white.
More reasonably priced than most shrigs.
Such is the way of his market. Now or never. Fomo and all that.
|
|
