|
Banksy in Detroit, by TheCatalyst on May 23, 2010 0:43:06 GMT 1, Go mouse go!
Go mouse go!
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by TheCatalyst on May 23, 2010 0:44:28 GMT 1, ...and thanks for posting all the new shots Fragile. They're great.
...and thanks for posting all the new shots Fragile. They're great.
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by erikjorgenen303 on May 30, 2010 2:24:58 GMT 1, did anyone see this one?
did anyone see this one?
|
|
otomi
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,805
👍🏻 169
July 2007
|
Banksy in Detroit, by otomi on May 30, 2010 5:56:32 GMT 1, what exactly is in the cage - love the self portrait
what exactly is in the cage - love the self portrait
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by TheCatalyst on May 30, 2010 6:34:09 GMT 1, Looks like a small tweeting bird.
Looks like a small tweeting bird.
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by geoffreyrickly on May 30, 2010 6:42:16 GMT 1, Another example of Banksy at his best. Not just making the location/environment an integral part of the piece, but as someone mentioned on another forum yesterday with regards to the "Take That!" tree piece, and the "You concrete me" piece, he just sees art where other people don't. This is what makes him a genius imo.
yeah- you nailed it. This is one of those pieces that reminds you why you love BANKSY. There is a real sensitivity and empathy in the work. Detroit has had it harder than usual lately and to change the tone of this rat "character" from witty to desperate is brilliant in this setting.
Another example of Banksy at his best. Not just making the location/environment an integral part of the piece, but as someone mentioned on another forum yesterday with regards to the "Take That!" tree piece, and the "You concrete me" piece, he just sees art where other people don't. This is what makes him a genius imo. yeah- you nailed it. This is one of those pieces that reminds you why you love BANKSY. There is a real sensitivity and empathy in the work. Detroit has had it harder than usual lately and to change the tone of this rat "character" from witty to desperate is brilliant in this setting.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Deleted on May 30, 2010 8:29:17 GMT 1, Looks like a small tweeting bird.
That's great.
I'm assuming it's a canary / budgie. Miners used to take them down the mines as early warning of gas leaks. The birds would expire and stop singing (I guess the other way around) before the miners realised there was any danger.
A fantastic idea. Who else would have thought of that as a piece of graf?
Looks like a small tweeting bird. That's great. I'm assuming it's a canary / budgie. Miners used to take them down the mines as early warning of gas leaks. The birds would expire and stop singing (I guess the other way around) before the miners realised there was any danger. A fantastic idea. Who else would have thought of that as a piece of graf?
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Daniel Silk on Jun 8, 2010 11:26:25 GMT 1, Full story here - insidetherockposterframe.blogspot.com/2010/06/banksy-unfinished-piece-in-detroit.html
"On May 21 around 10:30 pm Sue Jones was awakened by her dog and a lot of noise on her roof. She got up to go find out what the hell was going on and found 10-20 people on roof. She thought they were partying and told them to get down. She had no idea who they were or what the hell they were doing other than pissing her off and driving her pit bull crazy. They never asked if they could be up there and had gained access from another building. So finally after the third time telling them to leave they did. This is after she saw them getting pizzas delivered by a local restaurant even. One bad thing that happened is they put a hole in her roof, its an old flat roof and not really good for walking on. Today though she found out what was going on up on her roof a couple of weeks ago and who was there, BANKSY. She is still a little mad since they did not ask her to get up there and if they had she would not have had a problem with it. As you can see from the picture it looks like the I Remember When All This Was Trees Piece. But I'm sure there will be a different message once its finished. The rumor is Banksy will be back this week to finish it. Just dont mess up her roof any more Banksy, ok."
Full story here - insidetherockposterframe.blogspot.com/2010/06/banksy-unfinished-piece-in-detroit.html"On May 21 around 10:30 pm Sue Jones was awakened by her dog and a lot of noise on her roof. She got up to go find out what the hell was going on and found 10-20 people on roof. She thought they were partying and told them to get down. She had no idea who they were or what the hell they were doing other than pissing her off and driving her pit bull crazy. They never asked if they could be up there and had gained access from another building. So finally after the third time telling them to leave they did. This is after she saw them getting pizzas delivered by a local restaurant even. One bad thing that happened is they put a hole in her roof, its an old flat roof and not really good for walking on. Today though she found out what was going on up on her roof a couple of weeks ago and who was there, BANKSY. She is still a little mad since they did not ask her to get up there and if they had she would not have had a problem with it. As you can see from the picture it looks like the I Remember When All This Was Trees Piece. But I'm sure there will be a different message once its finished. The rumor is Banksy will be back this week to finish it. Just dont mess up her roof any more Banksy, ok."
|
|
rowan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,253
👍🏻 198
August 2008
|
Banksy in Detroit, by rowan on Jun 8, 2010 13:01:12 GMT 1, 10-20 people?... So much for being undercover Interesting read, thanks Silky!
10-20 people?... So much for being undercover Interesting read, thanks Silky!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Mason Storm on Jun 9, 2010 21:19:00 GMT 1, What!! there are 10 to 20 Banksy's??Bugger me I am gonna be busy at the easle!
What!! there are 10 to 20 Banksy's??Bugger me I am gonna be busy at the easle!
|
|
fuzzed
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,446
👍🏻 344
April 2008
|
Banksy in Detroit, by fuzzed on Jun 12, 2010 18:36:25 GMT 1, Interesting read and photo! Not sure what to make of it. You'd have thought that if you were putting a piece up you wouldn't want 10-20 others hanging around with you!
Interesting read and photo! Not sure what to make of it. You'd have thought that if you were putting a piece up you wouldn't want 10-20 others hanging around with you!
|
|
Fragile
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,739
👍🏻 74
August 2006
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Fragile on Jun 12, 2010 18:57:51 GMT 1, It's not by Banksy
It's not by Banksy
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Daniel Silk on Jun 13, 2010 10:54:15 GMT 1, www.freep.com/article/20100611/ENT05/100611085/1115/Another-graffiti-mural-by-Banksy-found-at-Packard
"Another graffiti mural by Banksy found at Packard Bearing trademarks of the internationally known British graffiti artist called Banksy, a 6-foot mural of a yellow bird inside a cage has been found amid the destruction of a courtyard in the derelict Packard Plant in Detroit. A photograph of the piece, evocative of a canary in a coal mine, has been posted on the artist’s Web site, banksy.co.uk, typically the way Banksy authenticates his work."
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Daniel Silk on Jun 19, 2010 12:32:51 GMT 1, www.freep.com/article/20100618/ENT05/6180307/1322/2nd-Banksy-work-leaves-Packard
"For the second time in a month, a mural at the derelict Packard Plant created by the internationally known British graffiti artist and provocateur called Banksy has been excavated from its original site. Except this time, it was removed by agents working for a partner of the building's owner. The 6-foot painting of a yellow canary was carved out of the wall at the Detroit plant and carted away Thursday. The crew who carried out the removal left the message "The canary has flown its coup" in red letters next to the hole. Pete Adamo, 57, of Clarkston, a speculator and developer affiliated with the building's owner, Romel Casab, said he had the mural moved. Adamo also hired a security detail of four men to guard the work 24 hours a day since Saturday, when a story about the Banksy ran in the Free Press, prompting a swarm of curiosity seekers and, according to Adamo, vandals who wanted to sneak into the plant and destroy it. "I hired the guards to protect it, before it was defaced," said Adamo, who said he was worried about liability if someone got hurt. Citing other Banksy works that have sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars, Adamo said his intention is to donate the work to a respected gallery or museum to receive a tax deduction. However, authenticating and appraising graffiti art is a hornet's nest, leaving its value unclear. Last month, artists from 555 Nonprofit Gallery and Studios controversially removed another Banksy mural from the Packard and displayed it in their Detroit space. Adamo and his partners have discussed ownership rights with the gallery."
www.freep.com/article/20100618/ENT05/6180307/1322/2nd-Banksy-work-leaves-Packard"For the second time in a month, a mural at the derelict Packard Plant created by the internationally known British graffiti artist and provocateur called Banksy has been excavated from its original site. Except this time, it was removed by agents working for a partner of the building's owner. The 6-foot painting of a yellow canary was carved out of the wall at the Detroit plant and carted away Thursday. The crew who carried out the removal left the message "The canary has flown its coup" in red letters next to the hole. Pete Adamo, 57, of Clarkston, a speculator and developer affiliated with the building's owner, Romel Casab, said he had the mural moved. Adamo also hired a security detail of four men to guard the work 24 hours a day since Saturday, when a story about the Banksy ran in the Free Press, prompting a swarm of curiosity seekers and, according to Adamo, vandals who wanted to sneak into the plant and destroy it. "I hired the guards to protect it, before it was defaced," said Adamo, who said he was worried about liability if someone got hurt. Citing other Banksy works that have sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars, Adamo said his intention is to donate the work to a respected gallery or museum to receive a tax deduction. However, authenticating and appraising graffiti art is a hornet's nest, leaving its value unclear. Last month, artists from 555 Nonprofit Gallery and Studios controversially removed another Banksy mural from the Packard and displayed it in their Detroit space. Adamo and his partners have discussed ownership rights with the gallery."
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by stillborncrisps on Jun 19, 2010 16:21:31 GMT 1, However, authenticating and appraising graffiti art is a hornet's nest, leaving its value unclear. I think the bigger question here is why that hornet apostrophe is in the wrong place, or whether it's actually even needed at all.
However, authenticating and appraising graffiti art is a hornet's nest, leaving its value unclear. I think the bigger question here is why that hornet apostrophe is in the wrong place, or whether it's actually even needed at all.
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by bigbry74 on Jun 29, 2010 14:50:04 GMT 1, In case anyone was planning on seeing the rat on the chain link fence...don't waste your time. I went down to see it on Friday (June 25th) and to my displeasure was greeted with the Banksy painting painted over. I knew I should have gone down there sooner!
In case anyone was planning on seeing the rat on the chain link fence...don't waste your time. I went down to see it on Friday (June 25th) and to my displeasure was greeted with the Banksy painting painted over. I knew I should have gone down there sooner!
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Daniel Silk on Jul 8, 2010 10:46:00 GMT 1, www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2010/jul/07/bc-mi-banksy-detroit/?entertainment&national-entertainment
Gallery sued over removal of Detroit Banksy mural
"A company that claims ownership of the Packard plant in Detroit has sued a gallery over the removal of an 8-foot, 1,500-pound section of cinderblock wall featuring stenciled artwork and a message by elusive British graffiti artist Banksy. The Detroit News reports that Bioresource Inc. says in the lawsuit Tuesday in Wayne County Circuit Court that the mural taken by 555 galleries and studio could be worth $100,000 or more. The company wants the mural returned. Messages seeking comment were left Wednesday at the gallery. Gallery workers and volunteers converged on the abandoned car plant in mid-May and removed the mural. It features a figure of a child holding a bucket of red paint and brush alongside the message: "I remember when all this was trees.""
www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2010/jul/07/bc-mi-banksy-detroit/?entertainment&national-entertainmentGallery sued over removal of Detroit Banksy mural"A company that claims ownership of the Packard plant in Detroit has sued a gallery over the removal of an 8-foot, 1,500-pound section of cinderblock wall featuring stenciled artwork and a message by elusive British graffiti artist Banksy. The Detroit News reports that Bioresource Inc. says in the lawsuit Tuesday in Wayne County Circuit Court that the mural taken by 555 galleries and studio could be worth $100,000 or more. The company wants the mural returned. Messages seeking comment were left Wednesday at the gallery. Gallery workers and volunteers converged on the abandoned car plant in mid-May and removed the mural. It features a figure of a child holding a bucket of red paint and brush alongside the message: "I remember when all this was trees.""
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by starbug71 on Jul 10, 2010 3:53:34 GMT 1, hey all new to the site , but a long time Detroit....
this is crap....the true owners of the plant didnt give a gods danm rats ass about what was going on it their buildings for over 20 years....anyone who has been in there has seen the condition of the place...now all of a sudden , they want the art back..
it took them suing the gallery for Detroit to even FIND OUT who the REAl owners are...they have been trying to get the "owners" to help pay to knock the place down, but no one knew who it was truely till now....
Banksy...if I was you...disown the hooded boy and the birdcage ...your other 4 were destroyed by greed and stupidity and this one is being fought over...( the other moved already by the "owners" of the plant to protect it ( if you believe that, I have a very nice bridge for sale for the dirt cheap price of 10,000).
its a sad thing to suggest, but this may be the only way....
hey all new to the site , but a long time Detroit....
this is crap....the true owners of the plant didnt give a gods danm rats ass about what was going on it their buildings for over 20 years....anyone who has been in there has seen the condition of the place...now all of a sudden , they want the art back..
it took them suing the gallery for Detroit to even FIND OUT who the REAl owners are...they have been trying to get the "owners" to help pay to knock the place down, but no one knew who it was truely till now....
Banksy...if I was you...disown the hooded boy and the birdcage ...your other 4 were destroyed by greed and stupidity and this one is being fought over...( the other moved already by the "owners" of the plant to protect it ( if you believe that, I have a very nice bridge for sale for the dirt cheap price of 10,000).
its a sad thing to suggest, but this may be the only way....
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by walshy on Jul 10, 2010 9:42:38 GMT 1, hey all new to the site , but a long time Detroit.... this is crap....the true owners of the plant didnt give a gods danm rats ass about what was going on it their buildings for over 20 years....anyone who has been in there has seen the condition of the place...now all of a sudden , they want the art back.. it took them suing the gallery for Detroit to even FIND OUT who the REAl owners are...they have been trying to get the "owners" to help pay to knock the place down, but no one knew who it was truely till now.... Banksy...if I was you...disown the hooded boy and the birdcage ...your other 4 were destroyed by greed and stupidity and this one is being fought over...( the other moved already by the "owners" of the plant to protect it ( if you believe that, I have a very nice bridge for sale for the dirt cheap price of 10,000). its a sad thing to suggest, but this may be the only way....
all of that info is in the post before you
hey all new to the site , but a long time Detroit.... this is crap....the true owners of the plant didnt give a gods danm rats ass about what was going on it their buildings for over 20 years....anyone who has been in there has seen the condition of the place...now all of a sudden , they want the art back.. it took them suing the gallery for Detroit to even FIND OUT who the REAl owners are...they have been trying to get the "owners" to help pay to knock the place down, but no one knew who it was truely till now.... Banksy...if I was you...disown the hooded boy and the birdcage ...your other 4 were destroyed by greed and stupidity and this one is being fought over...( the other moved already by the "owners" of the plant to protect it ( if you believe that, I have a very nice bridge for sale for the dirt cheap price of 10,000). its a sad thing to suggest, but this may be the only way.... all of that info is in the post before you
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by starbug71 on Jul 10, 2010 11:17:58 GMT 1, sigh ...i know...lol
i posted and started looking...and its like great, already posted..
sigh ...i know...lol
i posted and started looking...and its like great, already posted..
|
|
|
|
Banksy in Detroit, by rosstierney on Jul 16, 2010 0:22:30 GMT 1,
i received an e-mail today saying the owner of bldg has sold up and moved on to a similar venture. i wonder if he's donated it to himself...
i received an e-mail today saying the owner of bldg has sold up and moved on to a similar venture. i wonder if he's donated it to himself...
|
|
Wearology
Junior Member
Staff at FatFreeArt
🗨️ 3,596
👍🏻 4,512
April 2008
|
Banksy in Detroit, by Wearology on Jul 19, 2010 13:46:25 GMT 1, Renowned street artist Banksy tags Detroit, ignites controversy by Jeremy Korzeniewski (RSS feed) on Jul 15th 2010 at 11:29AM
Banksy's graffiti before it was removed from the Packard plant – Click above for high-res image gallery
It's just a little graffiti, and yet its existence has caused a firestorm of legal wrangling as to who actually owns the work and the building that once housed it. Seems rather odd, until you take a closer look at who is responsible, where it was created and why it exists in the first place.
The Location
Of all the derelict buildings filling the city of Detroit, one of the most famous is the former Packard automobile plant. As much as the city of Detroit would like to do something about the the 3,500,000-square-foot facility, nobody seems quite sure who owns the dilapidated building... nor is there any consensus on who should foot the bill for the massive clean-up project.
Recently, though, the old Packard plant became just a little bit more valuable, leading to a skirmish between an assortment of interested parties. The how and why that led to the recently revived interest is a story unto itself.
But first, some history. When the Packard automobile plant was first constructed over 35 acres on East Grand Boulevard in Detroit, it was the city's first industrial building made from reinforced concrete. When the plant opened its doors way back in 1903, it was widely considered to be the most advanced automobile manufacturing facility in the world. By the 1930s, the site had reached its zenith of 74 buildings spread across 80 acres in northern Detroit.
Every day, thousands of workers swarmed the plant, building some of the most desirable cars in the world for four decades. During World War II, the facility was converted to assemble engines for the war and was thus extremely important to America's success. Sadly, it would only be a few more years before the plant was shut down in 1956 after being sold to Studebaker, which ceased to exist shortly thereafter.
Over the next 50 years, the once grand Packard automobile plant was left to rot. The City of Detroit attempted to turn the area into a massive industrial park but failed. Today, the site is dangerously unstable and home to huge numbers of scrapped cars, boats and other unwanted detritus.
The Artist
Naturally, the abandoned Packard plant is a haven for vandalism. Nearly every surface that can be reached is covered in graffiti, some of it rather interesting. And valuable. British-born and highly-secretive street artist Banksy recently descended on the decrepit Packard plant, leaving his mark behind in the form of an image of a young boy holding a can of red paint. Beside the boy are the words "I remember when all this was trees."
It's a simple message, but it's also a somewhat profound statement when viewed from the ravaged surroundings in which it exists. Or rather, in which it once existed. Shortly after the art appeared, it was literally cut out of the building and transferred to a new site by a group known as the 555 Nonprofit Studio and Gallery. However, some parties want it put back from where it came, while others believe they are entitled to damages related to its relocation.
Why? It seems that Banksy's handiwork has a rather high value attached to it. In fact, Angelina Jolie is said to have paid half a million dollars for a few pieces of the UK artist's previous paintings, and this latest piece is said to be valued at over $100,000. But in this instance, there are questions as to who, if anyone, owns Banksy's work.
The Players
Says Luis Croquer, director of the Museum of Contemporary Art Detroit, "This may be unprecedented, because in most other cities, you wouldn't be able to take a wall home... What does it mean to move a wall? And beyond legality, who does the wall really belong to, and now does the art belong to the gallery? To everybody? To nobody? We're operating in this space where there's this lawlessness that opens up possibilities that would be much harder to encounter in other cities."
Not surprisingly, the City of Detroit is keenly interested in how the legal proceedings turn out, as it has been attempting to find the true owner of the site for quite some time. The best anyone can figure, the plant is currently owned by a company called Biosource, Inc, and the only person on that company's books is Dominic Cristini. Cristini is currently serving a prison term in California on drug charges, leaving the local government to try to decide how best to go about cleaning up the site.
Of course, now that there's some value to the property and a lawsuit, other potential players have worked their way into the picture. Interestingly, the name on the legal documents is Romel Casab, not Cristini. And Detroit now has another person to question regarding the site and its potential cleanup.
As it currently stands, 555 has placed the graffiti in a protective enclosure and has it safely displayed at its gallery on West Vernor Highway in the shadow of I-75.
The Remaining Questions
Was 555 right to take Banksy's artwork? That depends on whom you ask and your point of view. Some say that the graffiti should have been left where it was created, since that's where the artist was inspired to create it in the first place and since that's where its message may be the most powerful.
Others, such as volunteer executive director and co-founder of 555 Carl W. Goines, believe it must be preserved at all costs. "It's about preservation for us, said Goines. "We're watching this beautiful city crumble around us and we can't do anything to stop it. So with this fine-art piece – and it's not just everyday graffiti that you might whiz by – here was our opportunity to do something. It would have been destroyed if we didn't make the effort."
Regardless of who's version of the facts you choose to believe, there's obviously value to the artwork, and that stands in stark contrast to the surroundings that inspired its creation. It seems odd that a lone bit of graffiti was the shot that started a war amongst a cast of characters that includes the long dormant and silent owners of a rundown building and a seemingly well-intentioned crew of fervent art collectors, and perhaps that is what makes Banksy's works so intriguing.
Renowned street artist Banksy tags Detroit, ignites controversy by Jeremy Korzeniewski (RSS feed) on Jul 15th 2010 at 11:29AM
Banksy's graffiti before it was removed from the Packard plant – Click above for high-res image gallery
It's just a little graffiti, and yet its existence has caused a firestorm of legal wrangling as to who actually owns the work and the building that once housed it. Seems rather odd, until you take a closer look at who is responsible, where it was created and why it exists in the first place.
The Location
Of all the derelict buildings filling the city of Detroit, one of the most famous is the former Packard automobile plant. As much as the city of Detroit would like to do something about the the 3,500,000-square-foot facility, nobody seems quite sure who owns the dilapidated building... nor is there any consensus on who should foot the bill for the massive clean-up project.
Recently, though, the old Packard plant became just a little bit more valuable, leading to a skirmish between an assortment of interested parties. The how and why that led to the recently revived interest is a story unto itself.
But first, some history. When the Packard automobile plant was first constructed over 35 acres on East Grand Boulevard in Detroit, it was the city's first industrial building made from reinforced concrete. When the plant opened its doors way back in 1903, it was widely considered to be the most advanced automobile manufacturing facility in the world. By the 1930s, the site had reached its zenith of 74 buildings spread across 80 acres in northern Detroit.
Every day, thousands of workers swarmed the plant, building some of the most desirable cars in the world for four decades. During World War II, the facility was converted to assemble engines for the war and was thus extremely important to America's success. Sadly, it would only be a few more years before the plant was shut down in 1956 after being sold to Studebaker, which ceased to exist shortly thereafter.
Over the next 50 years, the once grand Packard automobile plant was left to rot. The City of Detroit attempted to turn the area into a massive industrial park but failed. Today, the site is dangerously unstable and home to huge numbers of scrapped cars, boats and other unwanted detritus.
The Artist
Naturally, the abandoned Packard plant is a haven for vandalism. Nearly every surface that can be reached is covered in graffiti, some of it rather interesting. And valuable. British-born and highly-secretive street artist Banksy recently descended on the decrepit Packard plant, leaving his mark behind in the form of an image of a young boy holding a can of red paint. Beside the boy are the words "I remember when all this was trees."
It's a simple message, but it's also a somewhat profound statement when viewed from the ravaged surroundings in which it exists. Or rather, in which it once existed. Shortly after the art appeared, it was literally cut out of the building and transferred to a new site by a group known as the 555 Nonprofit Studio and Gallery. However, some parties want it put back from where it came, while others believe they are entitled to damages related to its relocation.
Why? It seems that Banksy's handiwork has a rather high value attached to it. In fact, Angelina Jolie is said to have paid half a million dollars for a few pieces of the UK artist's previous paintings, and this latest piece is said to be valued at over $100,000. But in this instance, there are questions as to who, if anyone, owns Banksy's work.
The Players
Says Luis Croquer, director of the Museum of Contemporary Art Detroit, "This may be unprecedented, because in most other cities, you wouldn't be able to take a wall home... What does it mean to move a wall? And beyond legality, who does the wall really belong to, and now does the art belong to the gallery? To everybody? To nobody? We're operating in this space where there's this lawlessness that opens up possibilities that would be much harder to encounter in other cities."
Not surprisingly, the City of Detroit is keenly interested in how the legal proceedings turn out, as it has been attempting to find the true owner of the site for quite some time. The best anyone can figure, the plant is currently owned by a company called Biosource, Inc, and the only person on that company's books is Dominic Cristini. Cristini is currently serving a prison term in California on drug charges, leaving the local government to try to decide how best to go about cleaning up the site.
Of course, now that there's some value to the property and a lawsuit, other potential players have worked their way into the picture. Interestingly, the name on the legal documents is Romel Casab, not Cristini. And Detroit now has another person to question regarding the site and its potential cleanup.
As it currently stands, 555 has placed the graffiti in a protective enclosure and has it safely displayed at its gallery on West Vernor Highway in the shadow of I-75.
The Remaining Questions
Was 555 right to take Banksy's artwork? That depends on whom you ask and your point of view. Some say that the graffiti should have been left where it was created, since that's where the artist was inspired to create it in the first place and since that's where its message may be the most powerful.
Others, such as volunteer executive director and co-founder of 555 Carl W. Goines, believe it must be preserved at all costs. "It's about preservation for us, said Goines. "We're watching this beautiful city crumble around us and we can't do anything to stop it. So with this fine-art piece – and it's not just everyday graffiti that you might whiz by – here was our opportunity to do something. It would have been destroyed if we didn't make the effort."
Regardless of who's version of the facts you choose to believe, there's obviously value to the artwork, and that stands in stark contrast to the surroundings that inspired its creation. It seems odd that a lone bit of graffiti was the shot that started a war amongst a cast of characters that includes the long dormant and silent owners of a rundown building and a seemingly well-intentioned crew of fervent art collectors, and perhaps that is what makes Banksy's works so intriguing.
|
|
|