lifeonwalls
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,407
๐๐ป 173
September 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by lifeonwalls on Mar 30, 2011 20:48:12 GMT 1, Opens April 7th.
ffdg.net/index.php?/exhibitions/josh-keyes/
Josh just posted this image on his site....something certainly looks familiar there. 
|
|
skem
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 116
๐๐ป 0
October 2009
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by skem on Mar 30, 2011 21:42:20 GMT 1, Now I want that as a print!
Now I want that as a print!
|
|
Bram
Artist
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,820
๐๐ป 296
November 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by Bram on Mar 30, 2011 21:48:21 GMT 1, No prints from this show, is the word on the street
No prints from this show, is the word on the street
|
|
Wenters
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 815
๐๐ป 862
May 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by Wenters on Mar 30, 2011 22:28:10 GMT 1, The gallery told me 2 weeks ago that there would be prints (plural!)
Hopefully somebody will have some more info?
The gallery told me 2 weeks ago that there would be prints (plural!)
Hopefully somebody will have some more info?
|
|
sal
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,009
๐๐ป 2,326
January 2011
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by sal on Mar 30, 2011 22:46:57 GMT 1, here is a nice closeup of this beauty:
Josh said theres gonna be only four paintings and about 4-6 graphite drawings @ this show.. with TinyShowcase print being released just week ago, I doubt there are gonna be prints this time 
I do hope Im totally wrong about that..
here is a nice closeup of this beauty: Josh said theres gonna be only four paintings and about 4-6 graphite drawings @ this show.. with TinyShowcase print being released just week ago, I doubt there are gonna be prints this time I do hope Im totally wrong about that.. |
|
connecta1
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,117
๐๐ป 320
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by connecta1 on Mar 30, 2011 22:48:53 GMT 1, ...that is amazing
...that is amazing
|
|
|
|
jackcuzzy
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 730
๐๐ป 101
August 2009
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by jackcuzzy on Mar 30, 2011 22:50:14 GMT 1, How much do his prints retail for usually?
How much do his prints retail for usually?
|
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by Jeezuz Jones Snr on Mar 30, 2011 22:52:23 GMT 1, brilliant piece!!
brilliant piece!!
|
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by Guest on Mar 30, 2011 23:06:53 GMT 1, How much do his prints retail for usually?
Around $250 depending on the size of the print and edition.
How much do his prints retail for usually? Around $250 depending on the size of the print and edition. |
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by rottenredrooster on Mar 30, 2011 23:09:04 GMT 1, Would love to see a print from Josh. Great great artist.
Would love to see a print from Josh. Great great artist.
|
|
etched
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,302
๐๐ป 72
February 2008
|
|
|
sal
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,009
๐๐ป 2,326
January 2011
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by sal on Mar 31, 2011 1:39:06 GMT 1, turns out I was wrong:
"To address the print edition question, I do with to release an edition from this show. FFDG and I will be working on a strategy and it will most likely be towards the closing date of this show. "
good times!
turns out I was wrong: "To address the print edition question, I do with to release an edition from this show. FFDG and I will be working on a strategy and it will most likely be towards the closing date of this show. "good times! |
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by pinballwizard on Mar 31, 2011 2:29:41 GMT 1, Stunning! Glad i got on the list last may for this show! Fingers crossed!!
Stunning! Glad i got on the list last may for this show! Fingers crossed!!
|
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by heathunter881 on Mar 31, 2011 3:01:49 GMT 1, i've been waiting for this show for ages! hopefully the gallery will allocate a % of the prints for local buyers. can't wait to get a josh keyes print in person without having to f5
i've been waiting for this show for ages! hopefully the gallery will allocate a % of the prints for local buyers. can't wait to get a josh keyes print in person without having to f5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by pinballwizard on Mar 31, 2011 3:46:12 GMT 1, Good luck hh
Good luck hh
|
|
saint
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,887
๐๐ป 1,881
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by saint on Mar 31, 2011 9:35:32 GMT 1, Quality looking piece that.
Quality looking piece that.
|
|
tc
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 55
๐๐ป 27
August 2009
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by tc on Mar 31, 2011 9:49:26 GMT 1, that is super nice..
that is super nice..
|
|
Scraffer
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,240
๐๐ป 90
June 2008
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by Scraffer on Mar 31, 2011 10:54:38 GMT 1, I wonder if that is the Banksy collab coming through...
He said in my interview with him:
"it would be cool to work on a painting with Banksy, I could paint something and he could vandalize it."
Full int here: scraffer.com/blog/?p=854
I wonder if that is the Banksy collab coming through... He said in my interview with him: "it would be cool to work on a painting with Banksy, I could paint something and he could vandalize it." Full int here: scraffer.com/blog/?p=854 |
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,319
๐๐ป 2
October 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by robinbanks on Mar 31, 2011 12:14:48 GMT 1, I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me.
I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body.
It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean?
I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me. I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body. It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean? |
|
connecta1
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,117
๐๐ป 320
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by connecta1 on Mar 31, 2011 12:24:56 GMT 1, ...'naff'?
Not a word that springs to mind when I look at his work... dunno what you mean about not looking 'right' either... one of the most appealing things to me is that it's clear he's done his homework and they are about as anatomically correct as it's possible to be.
The tiger for example, cover any two heads up and the posture is absolutely spot on for each... no idea what you're on about tbh.
...'naff'?
Not a word that springs to mind when I look at his work... dunno what you mean about not looking 'right' either... one of the most appealing things to me is that it's clear he's done his homework and they are about as anatomically correct as it's possible to be.
The tiger for example, cover any two heads up and the posture is absolutely spot on for each... no idea what you're on about tbh.
|
|
lojack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 231
๐๐ป 0
February 2011
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by lojack on Mar 31, 2011 12:31:43 GMT 1, I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me. I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body. It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean?
Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you
BTW is naff a british expression?
I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me. I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body. It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean? Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you BTW is naff a british expression? |
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,319
๐๐ป 2
October 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by robinbanks on Mar 31, 2011 12:34:22 GMT 1, cover any two heads up and the posture is absolutely spot on for each... no idea what you're on about tbh.
That's kind of my point.
They are just three separate poses combined together with not a lot of thought for what's going on underneath.
It looks as though if the one bending down were to lift its head up it would crush the middle one's windpipe.
cover any two heads up and the posture is absolutely spot on for each... no idea what you're on about tbh. That's kind of my point. They are just three separate poses combined together with not a lot of thought for what's going on underneath. It looks as though if the one bending down were to lift its head up it would crush the middle one's windpipe. |
|
|
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,319
๐๐ป 2
October 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by robinbanks on Mar 31, 2011 12:37:41 GMT 1, I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me. I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body. It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean? Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you BTW is naff a british expression?
There you go. Thank you.
You can see on the illustrations of Cerberus that the shoulders are much broader and the front legs much wider apart.
Whereas the piece above is just a normal tiger body with 3 different tiger heads painted on the end.
I like JK's stuff generally, but I sometimes find some of it a bit naff if I'm being honest, and I'm afraid this falls into that category for me. I think it might have worked a bit better if he'd thought about the anatomy a bit more - rather than just sticking three head studies on the end of a regular tiger body. It just doesn't look right to me (obviously it's a tiger with three heads so its not meant to look "right") if you know what I mean? Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you BTW is naff a british expression? There you go. Thank you. You can see on the illustrations of Cerberus that the shoulders are much broader and the front legs much wider apart. Whereas the piece above is just a normal tiger body with 3 different tiger heads painted on the end. |
|
saint
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,887
๐๐ป 1,881
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by saint on Mar 31, 2011 12:41:58 GMT 1, Each to their own, i dont agree and personally think it looks very well done. Bit hard to be critical of an imaginary animal painting which is in itself a rework of an imaginary animal imo, but there ya go.
Each to their own, i dont agree and personally think it looks very well done. Bit hard to be critical of an imaginary animal painting which is in itself a rework of an imaginary animal imo, but there ya go.
|
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,319
๐๐ป 2
October 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by robinbanks on Mar 31, 2011 12:45:12 GMT 1, Bit hard to be critical of an imaginary animal painting which is in itself a rework of an imaginary animal imo, but there ya go.
No, I agree. Just my take on it.
Bit hard to be critical of an imaginary animal painting which is in itself a rework of an imaginary animal imo, but there ya go. No, I agree. Just my take on it. |
|
connecta1
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,117
๐๐ป 320
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by connecta1 on Mar 31, 2011 12:46:05 GMT 1, ...yeah, anatomy of a fictional beast is always going to be a tricky one to debate 
Looks great to me though...
...yeah, anatomy of a fictional beast is always going to be a tricky one to debate Looks great to me though... |
|
volvic
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,781
๐๐ป 317
December 2008
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by volvic on Mar 31, 2011 12:58:35 GMT 1, i sent my name for that list in august 2009.... not holding out any hope though 
i sent my name for that list in august 2009.... not holding out any hope though |
|
lojack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 231
๐๐ป 0
February 2011
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by lojack on Mar 31, 2011 13:14:31 GMT 1, Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you BTW is naff a british expression? There you go. Thank you. You can see on the illustrations of Cerberus that the shoulders are much broader and the front legs much wider apart. Whereas the piece above is just a normal tiger body with 3 different tiger heads painted on the end.
I think one of the tigers heads (the bone sniffer) blocks the broadness of the front. I'm a big animal guy and almost went into biology/zoology and I can tell you the front of the bod is much broader then your average tiger.
I'm guessing Josh didn't want to make the tiger look like it was on steroids so he slimmed it down a bit and although I'm no expert on mythical creatures I could definitely see this as being an actual accurate mutation
Google cerberus and let me know what you think after... might clear things up for you BTW is naff a british expression? There you go. Thank you. You can see on the illustrations of Cerberus that the shoulders are much broader and the front legs much wider apart. Whereas the piece above is just a normal tiger body with 3 different tiger heads painted on the end. I think one of the tigers heads (the bone sniffer) blocks the broadness of the front. I'm a big animal guy and almost went into biology/zoology and I can tell you the front of the bod is much broader then your average tiger. I'm guessing Josh didn't want to make the tiger look like it was on steroids so he slimmed it down a bit and although I'm no expert on mythical creatures I could definitely see this as being an actual accurate mutation |
|
saint
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,887
๐๐ป 1,881
September 2010
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by saint on Mar 31, 2011 13:30:59 GMT 1, I did do zoology at uni and also happen to be an expert on the biology of mythological creatures, and so can assure you its definitely the same broadness as the last cerberus/tiger cross breed i dissected in the lab. Luckily it was only an infant, but don't worry as it had died of natural courses.... well it had been attacked by a phoenix and a griffin anyways, i wouldnt have got near it cos normally they'd have eaten the carcass but a hippocamp scared them off.
I did do zoology at uni and also happen to be an expert on the biology of mythological creatures, and so can assure you its definitely the same broadness as the last cerberus/tiger cross breed i dissected in the lab. Luckily it was only an infant, but don't worry as it had died of natural courses.... well it had been attacked by a phoenix and a griffin anyways, i wouldnt have got near it cos normally they'd have eaten the carcass but a hippocamp scared them off.
|
|
robinbanks
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,319
๐๐ป 2
October 2007
|
Josh Keyes - Fecal Face Gallery, by robinbanks on Mar 31, 2011 14:20:10 GMT 1, Haha. Ok, I think I may have upset a few fanboys now with my comments. I apologise. 
Haha. Ok, I think I may have upset a few fanboys now with my comments. I apologise. |
|
