7eny
New Member
🗨️ 107
👍🏻 0
November 2006
|
No-bomb.com, by 7eny on Feb 23, 2007 19:49:12 GMT 1, Not sure if this is the right place for this but has anyone else seen this?
www.nme.com/news/blur/26639
|
|
rolyateel
New Member
🗨️ 600
👍🏻 9
October 2006
|
No-bomb.com, by rolyateel on Feb 23, 2007 20:16:35 GMT 1, mmmm...a demonstration tomorrow
never been on one before...quite tempted to get a train to laaandan for that
mmmm...a demonstration tomorrow
never been on one before...quite tempted to get a train to laaandan for that
|
|
|
|
No-bomb.com, by Run Pig Run on Feb 23, 2007 20:17:15 GMT 1, cheers for that. looks like there's gonna be a lot of fuss kicked up in the next few weeks.
wish i could tomorrow, but I only found out about it yesterday when i bought the NME.
cheers for that. looks like there's gonna be a lot of fuss kicked up in the next few weeks.
wish i could tomorrow, but I only found out about it yesterday when i bought the NME.
|
|
7eny
New Member
🗨️ 107
👍🏻 0
November 2006
|
No-bomb.com, by 7eny on Feb 23, 2007 21:07:16 GMT 1, I wish I'd know about this earlier but it also makes me wonder if this is going to influence some of Hewlett and Kennards future works?
I wish I'd know about this earlier but it also makes me wonder if this is going to influence some of Hewlett and Kennards future works?
|
|
|
|
No-bomb.com, by menace2sobriety on Feb 24, 2007 1:40:13 GMT 1, Sounds like it should be good
There we are crushing other nations for their capability to manufacture so called "weapons of mass destruction" and our own government is spending billions of pounds doing exactly the same thing?
Sounds like it should be good There we are crushing other nations for their capability to manufacture so called "weapons of mass destruction" and our own government is spending billions of pounds doing exactly the same thing? |
|
|
|
No-bomb.com, by Ågent ßacardi on Feb 24, 2007 1:47:24 GMT 1, Sounds like it should be good There we are crushing other nations for their capability to manufacture so called "weapons of mass destruction" and our own government is spending billions of pounds doing exactly the same thing?
I've always wondered about that. It's okay for the "good" guys to have weapons, but not for the "bad" guys, of course... but isn't everything subjective, i.e., "good" vs "bad"? It's like the argument about the right to own weapons in the US... proponents claim that they should be able to have guns to protect themselves. But if gun possession was outlawed, nobody would own guns, then what would there be to protect each other from? Same line of reasoning: If the "good guy" countries continue to flex their missile muscles, the "bad guys" will always have a reason to feel threatened, and weapon development will never cease.
But what's the use, they're never gonna listen to us "common folk" anyway... since y'know, they know what's the best for all of us and stuff. 
Sounds like it should be good There we are crushing other nations for their capability to manufacture so called "weapons of mass destruction" and our own government is spending billions of pounds doing exactly the same thing? I've always wondered about that. It's okay for the "good" guys to have weapons, but not for the "bad" guys, of course... but isn't everything subjective, i.e., "good" vs "bad"? It's like the argument about the right to own weapons in the US... proponents claim that they should be able to have guns to protect themselves. But if gun possession was outlawed, nobody would own guns, then what would there be to protect each other from? Same line of reasoning: If the "good guy" countries continue to flex their missile muscles, the "bad guys" will always have a reason to feel threatened, and weapon development will never cease. But what's the use, they're never gonna listen to us "common folk" anyway... since y'know, they know what's the best for all of us and stuff. |
|
