|
|
|
|
Micallef Original, by manchestermike on Feb 9, 2007 10:34:01 GMT 1, The EXACT same one
The EXACT same one
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micallef Original, by mcnuts on Feb 9, 2007 10:55:37 GMT 1,
hell, thats cheap if the pricing of LAZ's new prints are anything to go by. But, its not cheap for me. Cheap for me would be to drop the Zeros on the end 
hell, thats cheap if the pricing of LAZ's new prints are anything to go by. But, its not cheap for me. Cheap for me would be to drop the Zeros on the end |
|
atomcore
New Member
🗨️ 61
👍🏻 0
October 2006
|
Micallef Original, by atomcore on Feb 9, 2007 11:37:55 GMT 1, I seem to remember it going once before that as well.
I seem to remember it going once before that as well.
|
|
pastiepie
New Member
🗨️ 446
👍🏻 0
October 2006
|
Micallef Original, by pastiepie on Feb 12, 2007 1:58:26 GMT 1, So to the Micallef fans. How does this compare to the canvas that sold for 24k at Sotheby's? I'm pretty sure the next expensive canvas was around the 16k mark so theoretically the 17k asking price on this would only be met if this was indeed one of his best works to date.
So to the Micallef fans. How does this compare to the canvas that sold for 24k at Sotheby's? I'm pretty sure the next expensive canvas was around the 16k mark so theoretically the 17k asking price on this would only be met if this was indeed one of his best works to date.
|
|
