nex
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,573
ππ» 1,819
February 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nex on Sept 16, 2009 15:07:09 GMT 1, I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all...
thankyou for explaining how the value of art works - never understood what the squiggle and the numbering at the bottom of my prints was all about!
I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all... thankyou for explaining how the value of art works - never understood what the squiggle and the numbering at the bottom of my prints was all about! |
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 16, 2009 15:27:59 GMT 1, LOL Nex you're welcome. It did not seem that obvious for everybody ;-)
LOL Nex you're welcome. It did not seem that obvious for everybody ;-)
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bazzj04 on Sept 16, 2009 15:33:43 GMT 1, I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all...
Still cant see it ever amounting to anything great , he's works below standard as it is, Photoshops skills are pretty week to , im no pro but im also not trying to sell things like this.So yes i can moan and bich a bit. Up to you a but personally think its possibly the biggest waste of 50 you could have spent , I understand your thinking (kinda) trying to get something for future investment , fine , but this will not happen with this. Its just something in the news paper thats all , wait till this dies down nothing will be heard again , Also surely all these art collecters who have been buying work that they only see as investments ( not sure there are many) but wouldnt these all have sold out buy now and everything he has done ?. There is allot of serious collectors out there SERIOUS , if they have not snapped up these then why do you think that just because of press coverage these will possibly be worth investing in?. im guessing you are also hoping that his style and work improves though too, which maybe it will hopefully for your investment anyways , But you still wasted 50 quid on that , because of hype. Should get some Jazz socks man instead , thats an investment .
So for me to sell some crap i can print out at work , i firstly need to commit some type of stupid crime, and make rubbish posters , hmmmm , thinking going large scale though and trying to steal the angel of the north anyone got a large shed i can store something in please?
Bored now of this ,
I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all... Still cant see it ever amounting to anything great , he's works below standard as it is, Photoshops skills are pretty week to , im no pro but im also not trying to sell things like this.So yes i can moan and bich a bit. Up to you a but personally think its possibly the biggest waste of 50 you could have spent , I understand your thinking (kinda) trying to get something for future investment , fine , but this will not happen with this. Its just something in the news paper thats all , wait till this dies down nothing will be heard again , Also surely all these art collecters who have been buying work that they only see as investments ( not sure there are many) but wouldnt these all have sold out buy now and everything he has done ?. There is allot of serious collectors out there SERIOUS , if they have not snapped up these then why do you think that just because of press coverage these will possibly be worth investing in?. im guessing you are also hoping that his style and work improves though too, which maybe it will hopefully for your investment anyways , But you still wasted 50 quid on that , because of hype. Should get some Jazz socks man instead , thats an investment . So for me to sell some crap i can print out at work , i firstly need to commit some type of stupid crime, and make rubbish posters , hmmmm , thinking going large scale though and trying to steal the angel of the north anyone got a large shed i can store something in please? Bored now of this , |
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 16, 2009 16:59:02 GMT 1, uh
Yeah I get your point, maybe I wasted my GBP, dunno. Time will tell soon or later. Well it's not much more expensive than a few lottery tickets imho. I'm a daytrader too and I'm used to take some gamble trades for the fun of it. The important thing when investing is to keep control of the risk/reward ratio. not sure the guy who bought Hirst art at 20+ million dollars made a better investment than I did :-) I don't know if there are some Art specialists around but I'd be curious to have their POV.
PS : being not an englishman, your post was quite a pain to read :-)
uh
Yeah I get your point, maybe I wasted my GBP, dunno. Time will tell soon or later. Well it's not much more expensive than a few lottery tickets imho. I'm a daytrader too and I'm used to take some gamble trades for the fun of it. The important thing when investing is to keep control of the risk/reward ratio. not sure the guy who bought Hirst art at 20+ million dollars made a better investment than I did :-) I don't know if there are some Art specialists around but I'd be curious to have their POV.
PS : being not an englishman, your post was quite a pain to read :-)
|
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 16, 2009 17:00:06 GMT 1, PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ?
PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ?
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bazzj04 on Sept 16, 2009 17:03:16 GMT 1, uh Yeah I get your point, maybe I wasted my GBP, dunno. Time will tell soon or later. Well it's not much more expensive than a few lottery tickets imho. I'm a daytrader too and I'm used to take some gamble trades for the fun of it. The important thing when investing is to keep control of the risk/reward ratio. not sure the guy who bought Hirst art at 20+ million dollars made a better investment than I did :-) I don't know if there are some Art specialists around but I'd be curious to have their POV. PS : being not an englishman, your post was quite a pain to read :-)
Fair point man fair point , hopefful you can keep the print safe for twenty years and make a killing all the best.
Bloody hell i bet you had a hard time reading it, most of my posts are hard enough to read being English , you done well. I type like a retard most of the time,
All best
uh Yeah I get your point, maybe I wasted my GBP, dunno. Time will tell soon or later. Well it's not much more expensive than a few lottery tickets imho. I'm a daytrader too and I'm used to take some gamble trades for the fun of it. The important thing when investing is to keep control of the risk/reward ratio. not sure the guy who bought Hirst art at 20+ million dollars made a better investment than I did :-) I don't know if there are some Art specialists around but I'd be curious to have their POV. PS : being not an englishman, your post was quite a pain to read :-) Fair point man fair point , hopefful you can keep the print safe for twenty years and make a killing all the best. Bloody hell i bet you had a hard time reading it, most of my posts are hard enough to read being English , you done well. I type like a retard most of the time, All best |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bazzj04 on Sept 16, 2009 17:05:50 GMT 1, PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ?
Well this is a rather important issue and future art, its been covered in a few post on here, in this thread, Have a look there but really the man to speak to would be Wizbong , hes idea there I have to admit as much as it pains me too.
PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ? Well this is a rather important issue and future art, its been covered in a few post on here, in this thread, Have a look there but really the man to speak to would be Wizbong , hes idea there I have to admit as much as it pains me too. |
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 5,833
ππ» 1,091
March 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by curiousgeorge on Sept 16, 2009 17:15:14 GMT 1, Jazz socks
www.vivafiesta.com.au/prodJazzSocks.htm
I'm out, they don't carry any over a size 8
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 16, 2009 17:15:51 GMT 1, PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ?
Socks that play Jazz as you walk along, similarly there is the Geography shirt which you helps find places a la Sat Nav and the already not in production Cookery Cardigan which comes with recipes pinned onto it (can be updated). The original of course was the Perfumed bubblewrap which has a squirt of your favourite cologne inside the bubbles ready to pop at will, this i believe was put into production by the now departed Brad Pit.
PS : Jazz socks ? What's that ? Socks that play Jazz as you walk along, similarly there is the Geography shirt which you helps find places a la Sat Nav and the already not in production Cookery Cardigan which comes with recipes pinned onto it (can be updated). The original of course was the Perfumed bubblewrap which has a squirt of your favourite cologne inside the bubbles ready to pop at will, this i believe was put into production by the now departed Brad Pit. |
|
nacional
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,734
ππ» 227
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nacional on Sept 16, 2009 17:23:06 GMT 1, I think I must be one of the few people who actually quite like some of Cartrain's work. And he is a decent chap as he sent me a collage for free. It's nice to look at, quite funny and it definitely on a par with some of the crap that more established artists churn out (nozzle??? Pigtails??? Donuts!!!...)
I think I must be one of the few people who actually quite like some of Cartrain's work. And he is a decent chap as he sent me a collage for free. It's nice to look at, quite funny and it definitely on a par with some of the crap that more established artists churn out (nozzle??? Pigtails??? Donuts!!!...)
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 16, 2009 17:25:21 GMT 1, I have a collage also Nacional.
I have a collage also Nacional.
|
|
nacional
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,734
ππ» 227
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nacional on Sept 16, 2009 17:26:41 GMT 1, Good to hear I'm not alone...they are quite fun don't you think Wizbong?
Good to hear I'm not alone...they are quite fun don't you think Wizbong? |
|
nacional
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,734
ππ» 227
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nacional on Sept 16, 2009 17:27:15 GMT 1, Have I started an "I am Sparticus..." moment!!!
Have I started an "I am Sparticus..." moment!!!
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by thegreatarchitect on Sept 16, 2009 17:28:01 GMT 1, I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all... Still cant see it ever amounting to anything great , he's works below standard as it is, Photoshops skills are pretty week to , im no pro but im also not trying to sell things like this.So yes i can moan and bich a bit. Up to you a but personally think its possibly the biggest waste of 50 you could have spent , I understand your thinking (kinda) trying to get something for future investment , fine , but this will not happen with this. Its just something in the news paper thats all , wait till this dies down nothing will be heard again , Also surely all these art collecters who have been buying work that they only see as investments ( not sure there are many) but wouldnt these all have sold out buy now and everything he has done ?. There is allot of serious collectors out there SERIOUS , if they have not snapped up these then why do you think that just because of press coverage these will possibly be worth investing in?. im guessing you are also hoping that his style and work improves though too, which maybe it will hopefully for your investment anyways , But you still wasted 50 quid on that , because of hype. Should get some Jazz socks man instead , thats an investment . So for me to sell some crap i can print out at work , i firstly need to commit some type of stupid crime, and make rubbish posters , hmmmm , thinking going large scale though and trying to steal the angel of the north anyone got a large shed i can store something in please? Bored now of this ,
Would have agreed with you on this issue Bazz ( under normal circumstances) but what you have failed to understand is that this is not your normal average everyday stupid crime, This act in my opinion betrays the standard spontaneity so often employed in common theft and in this case Cartrains corporal spontaneity has objectified and elevated the pencils into a stylistic mechanism and the art work that is associated with this act must merit some value, surely.
I "toadally" agree with Bingo here. Like I said I bought a Ransom print as well and just like him I bought a concept, a physical trace of the Cartrain / Hirst Feud. Of course it could be printed by oneself but what gives it potential value is the fact it is the signed and numbered limited edition. Nobody cares about a copy of it. The potential value is given by the pencil signature (COA). I did not buy the print to hang it in my house. If you don't understand this you have missed something about what gives Art some monetary value. And you may have very good (even better) concepts but if none gets some sort of publicity, they are worthless. Sad, but true. When Warhol sold his first Campbell soups screenprints, you could easily copy them as well. But those which are worth a few thousands dollars now are not the cheap posters you can find at WArhol museum, it's the genuine signed ones of course. Do you think Art investors/collectors buy art for the Art depicted ? Nah. Most of them buy a name/signature. I'm pretty sure most of them really care about the aesthetical value (if any) of the art. Some Klein's paintings are a simple blue. They are worth millions. He had the concept of his own color IKB. That as simple as that. Basquiat was selling postcards for a buck or two in the street. I wonder how much is valued one of these today... I bet that in a few years, IF Cartrain becomes a recognized artist, the most valuable pieces of art will be The first skull collage he made which was confiscated by Hirst AND the Ransom print. And if I have to wait 20 years to sell my Cartrain Ransom cheap s**tty print at Christie's, I will. It was only a 50pounds bet after all... Still cant see it ever amounting to anything great , he's works below standard as it is, Photoshops skills are pretty week to , im no pro but im also not trying to sell things like this.So yes i can moan and bich a bit. Up to you a but personally think its possibly the biggest waste of 50 you could have spent , I understand your thinking (kinda) trying to get something for future investment , fine , but this will not happen with this. Its just something in the news paper thats all , wait till this dies down nothing will be heard again , Also surely all these art collecters who have been buying work that they only see as investments ( not sure there are many) but wouldnt these all have sold out buy now and everything he has done ?. There is allot of serious collectors out there SERIOUS , if they have not snapped up these then why do you think that just because of press coverage these will possibly be worth investing in?. im guessing you are also hoping that his style and work improves though too, which maybe it will hopefully for your investment anyways , But you still wasted 50 quid on that , because of hype. Should get some Jazz socks man instead , thats an investment . So for me to sell some crap i can print out at work , i firstly need to commit some type of stupid crime, and make rubbish posters , hmmmm , thinking going large scale though and trying to steal the angel of the north anyone got a large shed i can store something in please? Bored now of this , Would have agreed with you on this issue Bazz ( under normal circumstances) but what you have failed to understand is that this is not your normal average everyday stupid crime, This act in my opinion betrays the standard spontaneity so often employed in common theft and in this case Cartrains corporal spontaneity has objectified and elevated the pencils into a stylistic mechanism and the art work that is associated with this act must merit some value, surely. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 16, 2009 17:28:43 GMT 1, I like mine, visitors certainly notice it!, fun yes, makes a nice change from serious stuff.
I like mine, visitors certainly notice it!, fun yes, makes a nice change from serious stuff.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by thegreatarchitect on Sept 16, 2009 17:32:53 GMT 1, Have I started an "I am Sparticus..." moment!!!
Iam Sparticus I have thre collages Plus 2 canvases
Have I started an "I am Sparticus..." moment!!! Iam Sparticus I have thre collages Plus 2 canvases |
|
nacional
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,734
ππ» 227
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nacional on Sept 16, 2009 17:35:42 GMT 1, No, I am Sparticus, I have a collage and a canvas...gulp......
No, I am Sparticus, I have a collage and a canvas...gulp......
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 16, 2009 17:38:58 GMT 1, Dont think i have seen a cartrain canvas?.
Dont think i have seen a cartrain canvas?.
|
|
nacional
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,734
ππ» 227
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by nacional on Sept 16, 2009 17:56:31 GMT 1, One of the stencils on sale on 100 artworks....
One of the stencils on sale on 100 artworks....
|
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 16, 2009 19:31:31 GMT 1, Uh... The thread must have turned to world famed British humour which is quite obscure for French people most of time... LOL Really did not get it about the jazz socks.
About the Perfumed bubblewrap I would have rather some fart imprisoned in it, varying according the food you ate (French Cassoulet or cabbage soup for instance)... Funnier. But it might be French humour :-)
Uh... The thread must have turned to world famed British humour which is quite obscure for French people most of time... LOL Really did not get it about the jazz socks. About the Perfumed bubblewrap I would have rather some fart imprisoned in it, varying according the food you ate (French Cassoulet or cabbage soup for instance)... Funnier. But it might be French humour :-) |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wizzy on Sept 16, 2009 19:46:04 GMT 1, You are correct, it must be French humour. (its already been done that one, its called Troublewrap).
You are correct, it must be French humour. (its already been done that one, its called Troublewrap).
|
|
Cedric Mnich
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,158
ππ» 98
June 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Cedric Mnich on Sept 16, 2009 19:56:31 GMT 1, Too bad. My farts smell quite good. IMHO. My wife certainly does not agree :-))))
Too bad. My farts smell quite good. IMHO. My wife certainly does not agree :-))))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by monkeyballs on Sept 18, 2009 20:29:20 GMT 1, From Not Banksy to not cartrain, they're original alright
From Not Banksy to not cartrain, they're original alright
|
|
Sacked...
Full Member
π¨οΈ 7,978
ππ» 1,338
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Sacked... on Sept 18, 2009 22:22:58 GMT 1, The socks could play a tune as you walk which gets faster as you walk faster until you are positively dancing in the street whereas the Film Noir underpants would enable the wearer to watch his favourite classic via an open fly whilst on the train / driving or wherever. Now im liking your thinking there, im thinking different styles of trainers or shoes , to reflect different types of music, Im thinking a few eexamples prehaps. Bazz ,you are funny.perhaps you are still addled from Reading ? classic brogues = Classical? Old Skool Reebok classics = 90's Garage? Hi Tops= Hip Hop? suggestions welcolm As for the Noir underpants genious , with a simple un-zip or button of a fly get a little watch of your favorite film, For some reason though i keep thinking its going to be very large dirty looking men sitting on trains watching these, with a Mc D's in hand and a very large coke. i said coke...
The socks could play a tune as you walk which gets faster as you walk faster until you are positively dancing in the street whereas the Film Noir underpants would enable the wearer to watch his favourite classic via an open fly whilst on the train / driving or wherever. Now im liking your thinking there, im thinking different styles of trainers or shoes , to reflect different types of music, Im thinking a few eexamples prehaps. Bazz ,you are funny.perhaps you are still addled from Reading ? classic brogues = Classical? Old Skool Reebok classics = 90's Garage? Hi Tops= Hip Hop? suggestions welcolm As for the Noir underpants genious , with a simple un-zip or button of a fly get a little watch of your favorite film, For some reason though i keep thinking its going to be very large dirty looking men sitting on trains watching these, with a Mc D's in hand and a very large coke. i said coke... |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bazzj04 on Sept 24, 2009 15:40:51 GMT 1, www.redragtoabull.com/acatalog/copy_of_REAL_DRAWINGS_BY_ARTISTS.html
have a look here , it continues.,
some sketches with the stolen pencils apparently , also apparently done by some top artisits , Emin, Banksy and amazingly Basquait
bit of fun though
|
|
G-Man
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 3,529
ππ» 33
November 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by G-Man on Sept 24, 2009 15:48:39 GMT 1, I like some of those Billy Childish ones
I like some of those Billy Childish ones
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bazzj04 on Sept 24, 2009 16:05:51 GMT 1, I do too actually, they are all selling though , even the Banksy Soup can gone , bargain for 30 signed too ha
I do too actually, they are all selling though , even the Banksy Soup can gone , bargain for 30 signed too ha
|
|
Karl Read
Artist
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 3,569
ππ» 637
April 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Karl Read on Sept 24, 2009 16:07:12 GMT 1, Are they a joke?
Are they a joke?
|
|
|
|
