|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
help with this please.., by Deleted on May 22, 2012 2:44:24 GMT 1, That's definitely not an image I'd be buying without understanding what's behind it
That's definitely not an image I'd be buying without understanding what's behind it
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 22, 2012 5:24:12 GMT 1, whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip.
whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip.
|
|
yeah
New Member
🗨️ 212
👍🏻 3
April 2007
|
help with this please.., by yeah on May 22, 2012 10:17:32 GMT 1, whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip.
it was a fair statement that deserved more than a silly flippant answer.
I guess you've never been called a wog then?
or a yid, a gypo, a mong, a cripple, a bender, a paki or a chink?
or been scarred by racism, negativity or homophobia?
whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip. it was a fair statement that deserved more than a silly flippant answer. I guess you've never been called a wog then? or a yid, a gypo, a mong, a cripple, a bender, a paki or a chink? or been scarred by racism, negativity or homophobia? |
|
Damien
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,324
👍🏻 284
July 2008
|
help with this please.., by Damien on May 22, 2012 11:24:16 GMT 1, looks like the golliwog from robertsons marmalade adverts, when they were allowed to use it back in the 70's i think. I'd never hang it personally
looks like the golliwog from robertsons marmalade adverts, when they were allowed to use it back in the 70's i think. I'd never hang it personally
|
|
Damien
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,324
👍🏻 284
July 2008
|
help with this please.., by Damien on May 22, 2012 11:30:20 GMT 1, the name is to do with a rhyme that i can't find at moment
'Wednesday's Golly of full of woe Thursday's Golly has far to go' don't remember what the rest of the days were
no idea who made this though
the name is to do with a rhyme that i can't find at moment
'Wednesday's Golly of full of woe Thursday's Golly has far to go' don't remember what the rest of the days were
no idea who made this though
|
|
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by fingerz on May 22, 2012 11:38:40 GMT 1, the rhyme thing is the same as the 'child' 1 but they replaced 'child' with 'golly' or i could be wrong
the rhyme thing is the same as the 'child' 1 but they replaced 'child' with 'golly' or i could be wrong
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by fingerz on May 22, 2012 11:39:25 GMT 1, Monday's Golly is Fair of Face
Tuesday's Golly is Full of Grace
Wednesday's Golly is Full of Woe
Thursday's Golly has Far to Go
Friday's Golly is Loving and Giving
Saturday's Golly Works Hard for a Living
But the Golly that's Born on the Sabbath Day is Fair and Wise and Good and Gay
Monday's Golly is Fair of Face
Tuesday's Golly is Full of Grace
Wednesday's Golly is Full of Woe
Thursday's Golly has Far to Go
Friday's Golly is Loving and Giving
Saturday's Golly Works Hard for a Living
But the Golly that's Born on the Sabbath Day is Fair and Wise and Good and Gay
|
|
AoT Framing
Art Gallery
New Member
🗨️ 570
👍🏻 292
April 2006
|
help with this please.., by AoT Framing on May 22, 2012 11:41:43 GMT 1, the name is to do with a rhyme that i can't find at moment 'Wednesday's Golly of full of woe Thursday's Golly has far to go' don't remember what the rest of the days were no idea who made this though
Monday's golly is full of face, Tuesday's golly is full of grace, friday's golly is loving
the name is to do with a rhyme that i can't find at moment 'Wednesday's Golly of full of woe Thursday's Golly has far to go' don't remember what the rest of the days were no idea who made this though Monday's golly is full of face, Tuesday's golly is full of grace, friday's golly is loving |
|
Damien
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,324
👍🏻 284
July 2008
|
help with this please.., by Damien on May 22, 2012 11:46:59 GMT 1, yeah sounds right to me fingerz
yeah sounds right to me fingerz
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 22, 2012 17:33:10 GMT 1, Thanks, but I was more interested in the artist. As for the racial slant how dare anyone assume they know me or anything about me based on an artists picture. What a sad and pathetic world where people try to score brownie points by producing the race or pc card at any opportunity .
Luckily, Iam a grown up.
Thanks, but I was more interested in the artist. As for the racial slant how dare anyone assume they know me or anything about me based on an artists picture. What a sad and pathetic world where people try to score brownie points by producing the race or pc card at any opportunity .
Luckily, Iam a grown up.
|
|
Damien
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,324
👍🏻 284
July 2008
|
help with this please.., by Damien on May 22, 2012 18:26:40 GMT 1, its an ugly print anyway
its an ugly print anyway
|
|
johnnyh
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,492
👍🏻 2,102
March 2011
|
help with this please.., by johnnyh on May 22, 2012 18:42:46 GMT 1, Artful you seem upset but no one claimed to know You nor did anyone produce a race card. You produced what is regarded as a racist picture. So perhaps you possibly should have looked into it before putting up here.
A ghul was an Egyptian worker and the true meaning of wogs is worker on government service.
The term WOG as you know has pretty racist connotations . Just as a swastika has fascist connotations?
Now no one on here as far as I can see has called you a racist they have just commented on the racist connotations of the picture.
That is what is being questioned and is possibly something you should consider as that in general is how this image is viewed.
As you are asking and do not know its history or the why it was produced that may well also have been the intention of the producer.
Hence people's comments
Artful you seem upset but no one claimed to know You nor did anyone produce a race card. You produced what is regarded as a racist picture. So perhaps you possibly should have looked into it before putting up here.
A ghul was an Egyptian worker and the true meaning of wogs is worker on government service.
The term WOG as you know has pretty racist connotations . Just as a swastika has fascist connotations?
Now no one on here as far as I can see has called you a racist they have just commented on the racist connotations of the picture.
That is what is being questioned and is possibly something you should consider as that in general is how this image is viewed.
As you are asking and do not know its history or the why it was produced that may well also have been the intention of the producer.
Hence people's comments
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
help with this please.., by Deleted on May 22, 2012 18:48:27 GMT 1, Artful you seem upset but no one claimed to know nor did anyone produce a race card. You produced what is regarded as a racist picture. So perhaps you possibly should have looked into it before putting up here. A ghul was an Egyptian worker and the true meaning of wogs is worker on government service. The term WOG as you know has pretty racist connotations. Just as a swastika has fascist connotations? Now no one on here as far as I can see has called you a racist they have just commented on the racist connotations of the picture. That is what is being questioned and is possibly something you should consider as that in general is how this image is viewed. As you are asking and do not know its history or the why it was produced that may well also have been the intention of the producer. Hence people's comments
Perfect response, couldn't be bettered.
Artful you seem upset but no one claimed to know nor did anyone produce a race card. You produced what is regarded as a racist picture. So perhaps you possibly should have looked into it before putting up here. A ghul was an Egyptian worker and the true meaning of wogs is worker on government service. The term WOG as you know has pretty racist connotations. Just as a swastika has fascist connotations? Now no one on here as far as I can see has called you a racist they have just commented on the racist connotations of the picture. That is what is being questioned and is possibly something you should consider as that in general is how this image is viewed. As you are asking and do not know its history or the why it was produced that may well also have been the intention of the producer. Hence people's comments Perfect response, couldn't be bettered. |
|
|
|
Damien
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,324
👍🏻 284
July 2008
|
help with this please.., by Damien on May 22, 2012 22:30:41 GMT 1, PLUS 1 -well put jonny
PLUS 1 -well put jonny
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by Jeezuz Jones Snr on May 22, 2012 23:57:30 GMT 1, I am originally from UK but been living in Sydney 8 years. Aren't GW's banned in most countries?? not here in Australia!!.. Also the term WOG is also commonly used and my local chemist sells GW's and there are loads in the front window with other bears/clothing etc..!! About 3 times a year we stay at our favourite beach 2 hr drive from where we live, stopped off in a place called Milton for lunch and there was a street market and I swear there were at least 5 stalls all with knitted GW's being sold by Grannies?? strange....
I am originally from UK but been living in Sydney 8 years. Aren't GW's banned in most countries?? not here in Australia!!.. Also the term WOG is also commonly used and my local chemist sells GW's and there are loads in the front window with other bears/clothing etc..!! About 3 times a year we stay at our favourite beach 2 hr drive from where we live, stopped off in a place called Milton for lunch and there was a street market and I swear there were at least 5 stalls all with knitted GW's being sold by Grannies?? strange....
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 31, 2012 16:48:27 GMT 1, thanks for the info to those that gave it. yes johnny i did bite on the comments made by YEAH mainly because he/she made an assumption of me and my character based on a picture id purchased..ive never viewed a golly as a racial image nor did anyone else until it was made so. i have my own mind and refuse to be told how and why to think and feel by the powers that be and modern press/media..we (alledgedly) live in a free society but it seems to me we are becoming more extreme than the extremists we war with...i wonder how long it will be before something like a gorilla by mighty mo is deemed to have racial slants or something else..
very tiring trying to be politically correct in this free society we live in where everyone it seems is either a racist or is to scared to say they like something incase they get labelled as one
thanks for the info to those that gave it. yes johnny i did bite on the comments made by YEAH mainly because he/she made an assumption of me and my character based on a picture id purchased..ive never viewed a golly as a racial image nor did anyone else until it was made so. i have my own mind and refuse to be told how and why to think and feel by the powers that be and modern press/media..we (alledgedly) live in a free society but it seems to me we are becoming more extreme than the extremists we war with...i wonder how long it will be before something like a gorilla by mighty mo is deemed to have racial slants or something else..
very tiring trying to be politically correct in this free society we live in where everyone it seems is either a racist or is to scared to say they like something incase they get labelled as one
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 31, 2012 16:49:30 GMT 1, thanks for the info to those that gave it. yes johnny i did bite on the comments made by YEAH mainly because he/she made an assumption of me and my character based on a picture id purchased..ive never viewed a golly as a racial image nor did anyone else until it was made so. i have my own mind and refuse to be told how and why to think and feel by the powers that be and modern press/media..we (alledgedly) live in a free society but it seems to me we are becoming more extreme than the extremists we war with...i wonder how long it will be before something like a gorilla by mighty mo is deemed to have racial slants or something else..
very tiring trying to be politically correct in this free society we live in where everyone it seems is either a racist or is to scared to say they like something incase they get labelled as one
thanks for the info to those that gave it. yes johnny i did bite on the comments made by YEAH mainly because he/she made an assumption of me and my character based on a picture id purchased..ive never viewed a golly as a racial image nor did anyone else until it was made so. i have my own mind and refuse to be told how and why to think and feel by the powers that be and modern press/media..we (alledgedly) live in a free society but it seems to me we are becoming more extreme than the extremists we war with...i wonder how long it will be before something like a gorilla by mighty mo is deemed to have racial slants or something else..
very tiring trying to be politically correct in this free society we live in where everyone it seems is either a racist or is to scared to say they like something incase they get labelled as one
|
|
yeah
New Member
🗨️ 212
👍🏻 3
April 2007
|
help with this please.., by yeah on May 31, 2012 19:53:22 GMT 1, instead of viewing me as a scapegoat why don't you look at your own comments, and the comments of many other people on the forum.
it's easy to get defensive. why not actually sit down and think about it. that is tougher.
-43 tells a story.
I didn't cast any aspersions or made any assumption; you just saw a few questions and immediately started defending yourself.
And you are continuing.
instead of viewing me as a scapegoat why don't you look at your own comments, and the comments of many other people on the forum.
it's easy to get defensive. why not actually sit down and think about it. that is tougher.
-43 tells a story.
I didn't cast any aspersions or made any assumption; you just saw a few questions and immediately started defending yourself.
And you are continuing.
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
🗨️ 9,190
👍🏻 8,545
May 2011
|
help with this please.., by iamzero on May 31, 2012 20:06:18 GMT 1, Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist?
I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian.
-43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this?
Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes?
Anyone have any problem with that?
I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.?
Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist?
I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian.
-43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this?
Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes?
Anyone have any problem with that?
I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.?
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by Coach on May 31, 2012 20:16:11 GMT 1, I have no axe to grind, and I don't think anyone on this thread has illustrated themselves to be racist, but I do think the image of a golly (formally known as gollywog) does now have racist connotations. I think that a lot of people do find the image of a golly to be offensive, though accept that original poster had no such views.
I don't think it's political correctness gone mad. All just my own personal opinion, of course.
I have no axe to grind, and I don't think anyone on this thread has illustrated themselves to be racist, but I do think the image of a golly (formally known as gollywog) does now have racist connotations. I think that a lot of people do find the image of a golly to be offensive, though accept that original poster had no such views.
I don't think it's political correctness gone mad. All just my own personal opinion, of course.
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by rottenredrooster on May 31, 2012 20:31:48 GMT 1, Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist? I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian. -43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this? Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes? Anyone have any problem with that? I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.?
We know Reid's intentions behind his art which has Swastikas just like Jake and Dino's Chapmans Hitler paintings. To take the piss.
Unfortunately, images like this were deliberately used to dehumanise non-whites and to put forward white supremacy. Whilst, those who own them very well may not be 'racist', I think the issue is that it reenforces the general idea take to laugh at those whom were once presumed to be 'uncivilised'.
That being said, until you know the intentions of the artist behind the work it can't really be commented on.
Remember the beach ball fiasco on here not so long ago...
Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist? I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian. -43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this? Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes? Anyone have any problem with that? I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.? We know Reid's intentions behind his art which has Swastikas just like Jake and Dino's Chapmans Hitler paintings. To take the piss. Unfortunately, images like this were deliberately used to dehumanise non-whites and to put forward white supremacy. Whilst, those who own them very well may not be 'racist', I think the issue is that it reenforces the general idea take to laugh at those whom were once presumed to be 'uncivilised'. That being said, until you know the intentions of the artist behind the work it can't really be commented on. Remember the beach ball fiasco on here not so long ago... |
|
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by Coach on May 31, 2012 20:39:51 GMT 1, Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist? I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian. -43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this? Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes? Anyone have any problem with that? I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.? We know Reid's intentions behind his art which has Swastikas just like Jake and Dino's Chapmans Hitler paintings. To take the piss. Unfortunately, images like this were deliberately used to dehumanise non-whites and to put forward white supremacy. Whilst, those who own them very well may not be 'racist', I think the issue is that it reenforces the general idea take to laugh at those whom were once presumed to be 'uncivilised'. That being said, until you know the intentions of the artist behind the work it can't really be commented on. Remember the beach ball fiasco on here not so long ago...
Intelligent post. +1
Although I can see why this provokes such a race card response I only view this as an image from the jam pots in my Nans pantry and happy memories from the Noddy and Big Ears books and my girlfriend has a stuffed toy from her childhood. Does that imply that we are racist? I for one hope not. It certainly wouldn't sit well with the part of my family that is Asian. -43 tells a story... that this forum member happens to disagree with some forum members that like backstabbing and c0ck rubbing. I disagreed with some thread about flipping and and got negged and upset a thread slagging off the monarchy and also got negged. Not such a big deal. I expect a few more pointless minus marks for this? Not jumping to defend anyone as I see all points of view with this but just pointing some things out. And while I'm doing just that I'm wondering how people feel about the Jamie Reid Queen with Swastikas for eyes? Anyone have any problem with that? I don't like that image but if I did would that qualify me for free membership the the Hitler Youth or get me invited to Nick Griffins BBQ.? We know Reid's intentions behind his art which has Swastikas just like Jake and Dino's Chapmans Hitler paintings. To take the piss. Unfortunately, images like this were deliberately used to dehumanise non-whites and to put forward white supremacy. Whilst, those who own them very well may not be 'racist', I think the issue is that it reenforces the general idea take to laugh at those whom were once presumed to be 'uncivilised'. That being said, until you know the intentions of the artist behind the work it can't really be commented on. Remember the beach ball fiasco on here not so long ago... Intelligent post. +1 |
|
iamzero
Full Member
🗨️ 9,190
👍🏻 8,545
May 2011
|
help with this please.., by iamzero on May 31, 2012 20:51:31 GMT 1, Thankjs for the +1, it balances the -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it doesn't show who done it but I can guess... Moron.
Thankjs for the +1, it balances the -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it doesn't show who done it but I can guess... Moron.
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by rottenredrooster on May 31, 2012 20:55:10 GMT 1, Thankjs for the +1, it blances to -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it does show who done it but I can guess... Moron.
Wouldn't it be fantastic if all the minuses/pluses by users were published...
Thankjs for the +1, it blances to -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it does show who done it but I can guess... Moron. Wouldn't it be fantastic if all the minuses/pluses by users were published... |
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 31, 2012 21:24:22 GMT 1, whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip. it was a fair statement that deserved more than a silly flippant answer. I guess you've never been called a wog then? or a yid, a gypo, a mong, a cripple, a bender, a paki or a chink? or been scarred by racism, negativity or homophobia?  as for viewing you as a scapegoat?/ good grief..you are the only one who has made an assumption (as indicated) of my character, the other comments have been reasoned and whilst i may not agree with them, i respect them.
as for the minus 43 thing? i did think that was a bad thing until i saw a couple of other members with over 200 minus, so guess thats just a playground name calling kind of deal that no one really gives a monkeys about anyway.. i think i did give you a minus by the way 
whats behind it, is the wall its hung on and my daughters school dress...get a grip. it was a fair statement that deserved more than a silly flippant answer. I guess you've never been called a wog then? or a yid, a gypo, a mong, a cripple, a bender, a paki or a chink? or been scarred by racism, negativity or homophobia? thats an assumption... as for viewing you as a scapegoat?/ good grief..you are the only one who has made an assumption (as indicated) of my character, the other comments have been reasoned and whilst i may not agree with them, i respect them. as for the minus 43 thing? i did think that was a bad thing until i saw a couple of other members with over 200 minus, so guess thats just a playground name calling kind of deal that no one really gives a monkeys about anyway.. i think i did give you a minus by the way |
|
|
|
help with this please.., by boatyyy on May 31, 2012 21:27:43 GMT 1, ok, one of my useless comments...
those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them...
i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways...
ok, one of my useless comments...
those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them...
i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways...
|
|
|
|
help with this please.., by artfuldodgers on May 31, 2012 21:34:18 GMT 1, ok, one of my useless comments... those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them... i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways...
ok, one of my useless comments... those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them... i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways... absolutely.. not surprised by public views at all, thats why i put it on a public forum, i am however disappointed that 1 member decided to make a personal judgement on me and my character based on an enquiry, a picture and some words on a computer screen.. |
|
iamzero
Full Member
🗨️ 9,190
👍🏻 8,545
May 2011
|
help with this please.., by iamzero on May 31, 2012 22:07:07 GMT 1, Thankjs for the +1, it blances to -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it does show who done it but I can guess... Moron. Wouldn't it be fantastic if all the minuses/pluses by users were published...
I think we should see, I think they'd be less of it going on.
Thankjs for the +1, it blances to -1 some dick has done just now. Shame it does show who done it but I can guess... Moron. Wouldn't it be fantastic if all the minuses/pluses by users were published... I think we should see, I think they'd be less of it going on. |
|
|
|
help with this please.., by boatyyy on May 31, 2012 22:09:10 GMT 1, ok, one of my useless comments... those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them... i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways... absolutely.. not surprised by public views at all, thats why i put it on a public forum, i am however disappointed that 1 member decided to make a personal judgement on me and my character based on an enquiry, a picture and some words on a computer screen..
the problem is racism does still exist... and sometimes we're fiighting the wrong war trying to solve some of those old issues... love that banksy image with the smiley face and 'wrong war' words... saw those on here not that long ago (made me smile...)... (don't have any by the way...) peace and love...
ok, one of my useless comments... those images are a part of history - sure no one cares, but it's not something i would choose to put on my walls - not very interesting... but, may surprise that alot of african-americans that i know have these images/statues and are avid collectors of them... i came out quite aggressively when that obama beach ball thing came out, primarily because didn't like the language attached to it, think it was something like "...chance to kick the head of the world around...'... something like that... thought it violent and provoking and the directness to obama was concerning (and btw don't care for some of those politics)... anyways, still don't believe in censorship and if those images are your thing, is what it is... but if you're gonna put in a public domain - don't be too surprised at public views, is all... anyways... absolutely.. not surprised by public views at all, thats why i put it on a public forum, i am however disappointed that 1 member decided to make a personal judgement on me and my character based on an enquiry, a picture and some words on a computer screen.. the problem is racism does still exist... and sometimes we're fiighting the wrong war trying to solve some of those old issues... love that banksy image with the smiley face and 'wrong war' words... saw those on here not that long ago (made me smile...)... (don't have any by the way...) peace and love... |
|
as for viewing you as a scapegoat?/ good grief..you are the only one who has made an assumption (as indicated) of my character, the other comments have been reasoned and whilst i may not agree with them, i respect them.
